Tuning NGINX: Part I
Tuning NGINX: Part I
In today’s article, we’ll be taking an out-of-the-box instance of NGINX and tuning it to get more out of an already high-performance web server.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
xMatters delivers integration-driven collaboration that relays data between systems, while engaging the right people to proactively resolve issues. Read the Monitoring in a Connected Enterprise whitepaper and learn about 3 tools for resolving incidents quickly.
While NGINX is much younger than other web servers, it has quickly become a popular choice. Part of its success is based on it being the web server of choice for those looking for a lightweight and performant web server.
In today’s article, we’ll be taking an out-of-the-box instance of NGINX and tuning it to get more out of an already high-performance web server. While not a complete tuning guide, this article should provide readers with a solid understanding of tuning fundamentals and a few common NGINX tuning parameters.
Before we get into tuning however, let’s first install NGINX.
For this article, we will be running NGINX on an Ubuntu Linux-based server, so we can perform the installation with the
root@nginx-test:~# apt-get install nginx
This step will install a generic installation of NGINX, which already has some tuning parameters set out of the box. The default installation of NGINX, however, doesn’t offer much in the way of content to serve. In order to give ourselves a realistic web application to tune, let’s go ahead and deploy a sample site from GitHub.
root@nginx-test:~# git clone https://github.com/BlackrockDigital/startbootstrap-clean-blog.git /var/www/html Cloning into '/var/www/html'... remote: Counting objects: 308, done. remote: Total 308 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 308 Receiving objects: 100% (308/308), 1.98 MiB | 0 bytes/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (119/119), done. Checking connectivity... done.
When performance tuning, it’s important to understand the type of application that’s being tuned. In the case of NGINX, it’s important to know if you’re tuning for static content or dynamic content served by a downstream application. The difference between these two types of content can alter what tuning parameters to change, as well as the values for those parameters.
In this article, we’ll be tuning NGINX to serve static HTML content. While most of the parameters will apply to NGINX in general, not all of them will. It’s best to use this article as a guide for your own tuning and testing.
Now that our basic instance is installed and a sample site deployed, let’s see how well an out-of-the-box installation of NGINX performs.
Establishing a Baseline
One of the first steps in performance tuning anything is to establish a unit of measurement. For this article, we will be using the HTTP load testing tool ApacheBench, otherwise known as
ab to generate test traffic to our NGINX system.
This load-testing tool is very simple and useful for web applications. ApacheBench provides quite a few options for different types of load-testing scenarios; however for this article, we’ll keep our testing pretty simple.
We will be executing the
ab command with the
-c (concurrency level) and
-n (number of requests) parameters set.
$ ab -c 40 -n 50000 http://126.96.36.199/
When we execute
ab, we’ll be setting the concurrency level (
ab will maintain at least
40 concurrent HTTP sessions to our target NGINX instance. We will also be setting a limit on the number of requests to make with the
-n parameter. Essentially these two options together will cause
ab to open
40 concurrent HTTP sessions and send as many requests as possible until it reaches
Let’s go ahead and execute a test run to establish a baseline and identify which metric we will use for our testing today.
# ab -c 40 -n 50000 http://188.8.131.52/ This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1528965 $> Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ Benchmarking 184.108.40.206 (be patient) Completed 5000 requests Completed 10000 requests Completed 15000 requests Completed 20000 requests Completed 25000 requests Completed 30000 requests Completed 35000 requests Completed 40000 requests Completed 45000 requests Completed 50000 requests Finished 50000 requests Server Software: nginx/1.10.0 Server Hostname: 220.127.116.11 Server Port: 80 Document Path: / Document Length: 8089 bytes Concurrency Level: 40 Time taken for tests: 16.904 seconds Complete requests: 50000 Failed requests: 0 Total transferred: 420250000 bytes HTML transferred: 404450000 bytes Requests per second: 2957.93 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 13.523 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 0.338 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 24278.70 [Kbytes/sec] received
In the above output, there are several interesting metrics. Today we will be focusing on the
Requests per second metric. This metric shows the average number of requests our NGINX instance can serve in a second. As we adjust parameters, we should see this metric go up or down.
Requests per second: 2957.93 [#/sec] (mean)
From the above, we can see that the mean requests per second was
2957.93. This might seem like a lot, but we will increase this number by quite a bit as we continue.
When performance tuning, it’s important to remember to make small incremental changes and compare the results with the baseline. For this article,
2957.93 requests per second is our baseline measurement. For a parameter to be successful, it must result in an increase in requests per second.
With our baseline metrics set, let’s go ahead and start tuning NGINX.
One of the most basic tuning parameters in NGINX is the number of worker threads available. By default, the value of this parameter is
auto, which tells NGINX to create one worker thread for each CPU available to the system.
For most systems, one worker process per CPU is an even balance of performance and reduced overhead. With this article, however, we are trying to get the most out of NGINX serving static content which should be pretty low CPU overhead. Let’s go ahead and see how many requests per second we can get by increasing this value.
For our first test, let’s go ahead and start two worker processes for each CPU on the system.
In order to figure out how many worker processes we need, we first need to know how many CPUs are available to this system. While there are many ways to do this, in this example we will use the
lshw command to show hardware information.
root@nginx-test:~# lshw -short -class cpu H/W path Device Class Description ============================================ /0/401 processor Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz /0/402 processor Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GH
From the output above, it appears our system is a
2 CPU system. This means for our first test, we will need to set NGINX to start a total of
4 worker processes.
We can do this by editing the
worker_processes parameter within the
/etc/nginx/nginx.conf file. This is the default NGINX configuration file and the location for all of the parameters we will be adjusting today.
The above shows that this parameter is set to the default value of
auto. Let’s go ahead and change this to a value of
After setting the new value and saving the
/etc/nginx/nginx.conf file, we will need to restart NGINX in order for the configuration change to take effect.
root@nginx-test:~# service nginx restart root@nginx-test:~# ps -elf | grep nginx 1 S root 23465 1 0 80 0 - 31264 sigsus 20:16 ? 00:00:00 nginx: master process /usr/sbin/nginx -g daemon on; master_process on; 5 S www-data 23466 23465 0 80 0 - 31354 ep_pol 20:16 ? 00:00:00 nginx: worker process 5 S www-data 23467 23465 0 80 0 - 31354 ep_pol 20:16 ? 00:00:00 nginx: worker process 5 S www-data 23468 23465 0 80 0 - 31354 ep_pol 20:16 ? 00:00:00 nginx: worker process 5 S www-data 23469 23465 0 80 0 - 31354 ep_pol 20:16 ? 00:00:00 nginx: worker process 0 S root 23471 23289 0 80 0 - 3628 pipe_w 20:16 pts/0 00:00:00 grep --color=auto nginx root@nginx-test:~#
We can see from the above that there are now
4 running processes with the name of
nginx: worker process. This indicates that our change was successful.
Checking the Effect
With our additional workers started, let’s run
ab again to see if there has been any change in throughput.
# ab -c 40 -n 50000 http://18.104.22.168/ | grep "per second" Requests per second: 3051.40 [#/sec] (mean)
It seems that our change has had very little effect: our original
Requests per second was
2957.93, and our new value is
3051.40. The difference here is roughly
100 more requests per second. While this is an improvement, this is not the level of improvement we were looking for.
Let’s go ahead and change the
worker_processes value to
8, four times the number of CPU’s available. In order for this change to take effect, we will once again need to restart the NGINX service.
root@nginx-test:~# service nginx restart
With the service restarted, we can go ahead and rerun our
# ab -c 40 -n 50000 http://22.214.171.124/ | grep "per second" Requests per second: 5204.32 [#/sec] (mean)
It seems that
8 worker threads have a much more significant effect than
4. Compared to our baseline metrics, we can see that with
8 worker threads we are able to process roughly
2250 more requests per second.
Overall this seems like a significant improvement from our baseline. The question is how much more improvement would we see if we increased the number of worker threads further?
Remember, it’s best to make small incremental changes and measure performance increases each step of the way. For this parameter, I would simply increase its value in multiples of two and rerun a test each time. I would repeat this process until the requests per second value no longer increases. For this article, however, we will go ahead and move on to the next parameter, leaving the
worker_processes value set to
Ready for Part II? Check it out tomorrow at this link!
Published at DZone with permission of Ben Cane , DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.