DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports Events Over 2 million developers have joined DZone. Join Today! Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile Manage Email Subscriptions Moderation Admin Console How to Post to DZone Article Submission Guidelines
View Profile
Sign Out
Refcards
Trend Reports
Events
Zones
Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
  1. DZone
  2. Software Design and Architecture
  3. Security
  4. Using RASP to Make Bug Bounty Programs More Efficient

Using RASP to Make Bug Bounty Programs More Efficient

By using RASP, you can save users, and your code, from exploitable mistakes that slip through bug bounty programs due to human error.

Mike Milner user avatar by
Mike Milner
·
Feb. 22, 17 · Opinion
Like (2)
Save
Tweet
Share
2.32K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Bug bounty programs have gained popularity throughout the tech industry, cropping up at tech giants such as Facebook, Google, and more recently Apple. The programs effectively crowdsource manual penetration testing (pen testing), allowing users to try to break into an application to expose its vulnerabilities (bugs), in exchange for a monetary reward (bounty). This assists in making organizations aware of vulnerabilities to patch before they can be exploited to their own and their users’ detriment. It is understandable why such programs have gained in popularity. Companies that produce software need to be made aware of vulnerabilities, and rather than divert their own resources from projects, they can offer the opportunity to the whitehat community at large. It might even, depending on the scale of the operation, be cost effective, as they only have to pay if a vulnerability is successfully located and exploited.Make Bug Bounty Programs more Productive with RASP .jpg

Despite popularity, it is important to note that there are also risks associated with bug bounty programs. Most malicious hackers are incentivized to find exploitable vulnerabilities or user data to sell on the dark web. Should a vulnerability be found by a less-ethical hacker, this knowledge could be sold to a higher, ill-intentioned bidder. Additionally, while bug bounty programs help to identify vulnerabilities, they still must be located and patched, meaning they are hardly a cure-all security solution. There's a huge amount of effort just reviewing submissions to weed out the low-quality noise, find the ones that might be real, figure out which team might be responsible, then farm them out to be investigated. To patch vulnerabilities requires the time of developers, which removes them from working on creating new software or features, which is especially difficult in the fast-paced DevOps environment. Patches take time, the SANS Institute 2016 State of Application Security report found that 26% of survey respondents said that vulnerabilities are remediated in 1-7 days of being found, while another 26% said that vulnerabilities are remediated within 8-30 days of being found. This means that for between seven days and a month, the known vulnerability can still be exploited.

While bug bounty programs can be effective, organizations are best served by combining these programs with additional application security measures. Specifically, RASP solutions increase the efficacy and efficiency of bug bounty programs. This is because this AppSec solution runs inside of the application, gaining a privileged perspective of how the application works at runtime, unlike pen-testers or web application firewalls. If a vulnerability is found, exploited, and reported by a hacker participating in the bug bounty program, RASP solutions can determine the exact line of code in which the vulnerability exists, and highlight if an actual vulnerability was detected, capture the payload, identify lines of code, which app, and more. This allows developers to locate and patch the vulnerability faster. RASP will also protect that code from being exploited by malicious actors, in real-time, until the patch is disseminated. Moreover, bug bounty testers will likely check for simple vulnerabilities using Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) or SQL Injections but may miss more advanced vulnerabilities like second-order injections, or injections in the framework and library code. RASP solutions offer real-time protection from unknown vulnerabilities, ensuring that applications are protected even if bug bounty participants miss an exploitable vulnerability.

Bug bounty programs are a good start to developing application defenses. However, they cannot be the only security precaution taken after the software is released, as they leave too much to chance. To ensure your bug bounty program makes securing code as effective and efficient as possible, utilize a RASP solution as well. Learn more about RASP in the Real-Time Web Application Security whitepaper.

Vulnerability Application security Web application

Published at DZone with permission of Mike Milner, DZone MVB. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Popular on DZone

  • A Guide To Successful DevOps in Web3
  • The Future of Cloud Engineering Evolves
  • Type Variance in Java and Kotlin
  • Top Five Tools for AI-based Test Automation

Comments

Partner Resources

X

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Send feedback
  • Careers
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 600 Park Offices Drive
  • Suite 300
  • Durham, NC 27709
  • support@dzone.com
  • +1 (919) 678-0300

Let's be friends: