Curious about the future of data-driven systems? Join our Data Engineering roundtable and learn how to build scalable data platforms.
Data Engineering: The industry has come a long way from organizing unstructured data to adopting today's modern data pipelines. See how.
Passionate technologist empowered by core technical knowledge (hands-on) with 20+ years of IT industry experience from conceptualization to realization of large/medium scale IT delivery programs My core competency is technical mindset/passion & experimentation with disruptive technologies. My breadth of experience covers enterprise architecture (inc. EA framework, reference architecture, trade-off analysis), multi-tier technology know-how, multi-channel user experience (UX) & enterprise-level governance model (e.g. quality model, best practices establishment) in globally distributed environment. Founder: vedcraft.com
Stats
| Reputation: | 718 |
| Pageviews: | 290.7K |
| Articles: | 5 |
| Comments: | 35 |
Comments
Oct 19, 2021 · Ankur Kumar
Thanks for your support.
Mar 20, 2015 · mitchp
Mar 20, 2015 · mitchp
Mar 20, 2015 · mitchp
Mar 20, 2015 · mitchp
Mar 20, 2015 · Mr B Loid
Mar 20, 2015 · Mr B Loid
Mar 20, 2015 · Mr B Loid
Mar 20, 2015 · Mr B Loid
May 26, 2014 · Mr B Loid
Thanks for your comments. We chose AXIS2 after due diligence within internal architect's community.
May 26, 2014 · Mr B Loid
Thanks for your comments. We chose AXIS2 after due diligence within internal architect's community.
May 26, 2014 · mitchp
Thanks for your comments. We chose AXIS2 after due diligence within internal architect's community.
May 26, 2014 · mitchp
Thanks for your comments. We chose AXIS2 after due diligence within internal architect's community.
May 16, 2013 · Mr B Loid
Thanks for your insightful inputs. We are already using Service Virtualization software to mock Web Services.
May 16, 2013 · mitchp
Thanks for your insightful inputs. We are already using Service Virtualization software to mock Web Services.
May 16, 2013 · mitchp
Thanks for your insightful inputs. We are already using Service Virtualization software to mock Web Services.
May 16, 2013 · mitchp
Thanks for your insightful inputs. We are already using Service Virtualization software to mock Web Services.
May 16, 2013 · Mr B Loid
Thanks for your insightful inputs. We are already using Service Virtualization software to mock Web Services.
May 16, 2013 · Mr B Loid
Thanks for your insightful inputs. We are already using Service Virtualization software to mock Web Services.
May 09, 2013 · mitchp
Thanks for highlighting JAX-RS support.
May 09, 2013 · Mr B Loid
Thanks for highlighting JAX-RS support.
May 09, 2013 · Mr B Loid
Thanks for highlighting JAX-RS support.
May 09, 2013 · Mr B Loid
Thanks for highlighting JAX-RS support.
May 09, 2013 · mitchp
Thanks for highlighting JAX-RS support.
May 09, 2013 · mitchp
Thanks for highlighting JAX-RS support.
May 09, 2013 · Mr B Loid
Agree with nature of Spring WS regards to its ease of integration & development. That's why it has been scored well in specific area. Also, note that Scorecard can be customized as per need (for example, if you give more importance to Governance & Vendor Alignment, then weight of it can be increased and scorecard will change)
May 09, 2013 · Mr B Loid
Agree with nature of Spring WS regards to its ease of integration & development. That's why it has been scored well in specific area. Also, note that Scorecard can be customized as per need (for example, if you give more importance to Governance & Vendor Alignment, then weight of it can be increased and scorecard will change)
May 09, 2013 · mitchp
Agree with nature of Spring WS regards to its ease of integration & development. That's why it has been scored well in specific area. Also, note that Scorecard can be customized as per need (for example, if you give more importance to Governance & Vendor Alignment, then weight of it can be increased and scorecard will change)
May 09, 2013 · mitchp
Agree with nature of Spring WS regards to its ease of integration & development. That's why it has been scored well in specific area. Also, note that Scorecard can be customized as per need (for example, if you give more importance to Governance & Vendor Alignment, then weight of it can be increased and scorecard will change)
Jul 14, 2010 · Mr B Loid
I concur with you all!!
EA is a generic enterprise-level practice driven by individual on the top of the hierarchy (reporting to CTO or CIO) whereas architects (software/technical/application) are individuals limited to specific areas.
EA is also largely responsible to establish processes/guidelines/framework around which IT division will evolve in the right direction.
Jul 14, 2010 · Mr B Loid
I concur with you all!!
EA is a generic enterprise-level practice driven by individual on the top of the hierarchy (reporting to CTO or CIO) whereas architects (software/technical/application) are individuals limited to specific areas.
EA is also largely responsible to establish processes/guidelines/framework around which IT division will evolve in the right direction.
Jul 14, 2010 · Mr B Loid
I concur with you all!!
EA is a generic enterprise-level practice driven by individual on the top of the hierarchy (reporting to CTO or CIO) whereas architects (software/technical/application) are individuals limited to specific areas.
EA is also largely responsible to establish processes/guidelines/framework around which IT division will evolve in the right direction.
Jul 14, 2010 · Mr B Loid
I concur with you all!!
EA is a generic enterprise-level practice driven by individual on the top of the hierarchy (reporting to CTO or CIO) whereas architects (software/technical/application) are individuals limited to specific areas.
EA is also largely responsible to establish processes/guidelines/framework around which IT division will evolve in the right direction.
Jul 14, 2010 · Mr B Loid
I concur with you all!!
EA is a generic enterprise-level practice driven by individual on the top of the hierarchy (reporting to CTO or CIO) whereas architects (software/technical/application) are individuals limited to specific areas.
EA is also largely responsible to establish processes/guidelines/framework around which IT division will evolve in the right direction.
Jul 14, 2010 · Mr B Loid
I concur with you all!!
EA is a generic enterprise-level practice driven by individual on the top of the hierarchy (reporting to CTO or CIO) whereas architects (software/technical/application) are individuals limited to specific areas.
EA is also largely responsible to establish processes/guidelines/framework around which IT division will evolve in the right direction.