Yongjun Jiao

There is no so-called asynchronous execution support in JDBC mainly because most of the time you want to wait for the result of your DML or DDL, or because there is too much complexity involved between the back-end database and the front end JDBC driver. Some database vendors do provide such support in their native drives. For example Oracle supports non-blocking calls in its native OCI driver. Unfortunately it is based on polling instead of callback or interrupt. Neither Hibernate or Spring supports this feature. But sometimes you do need such a feature. For example some business logic is still implemented using legacy Oracle PL/SQL stored procedures and they run pretty long. The front-end UI doesn't want to wait for its finish and it just needs to check the running result later in a database logging table into which the store procedure will write the execution status. In other cases your front-end application really cares about low latency and doesn't care too much about how individual DML is executed. So you just fire a DML into the database and forget the running status. Nothing can stop you from making asynchronous DB calls using multi-threading in your application. (Actually even Oracle recommends to use multi-thread instead of polling OCI for efficiency). However you must think about how to handle transaction and connection (or Hibernate Session) in threads. Before continuing, let's assume we are only handling local transaction instead of JTA. 1. JDBC It is straightforward. You just create another thread (DB thread hereafter) from the calling thread to make the actual JDBC call. If such a call is frequent, you call use ThreadPoolExecutor to reduce thread's creation and destroy overhead. 2. Hibernate You usually use session context policy "thread" for Hibernate to automatically handle your session and transaction. With this policy, you get one session and transaction per thread. When you commit the transaction, Hibernate automatically closes the session. Again you need to create a DB thread for the actual stored procedure call. Some developer may be wondering whether the new DB thread inherits its parent calling thread's session and transaction. This is an important question. First of all, you usually don't want to share the same transaction between the calling thread and its spawned DB thread because you want to return immediately from the calling thread and if both threads share the same session and transaction, the calling thread can't commit the transaction and long running transaction should be avoided. Secondly Hibernate's "thread" policy doesn't support such inheritance because if you look at Hibernate's corresponding ThreadLocalSessionContext, it is using ThreadLocal class instead of InheritableThreadLocal. Here is a sample code in the DB thread: // Non-managed environment and "thread" policy is in place // gets a session first Session sess = factory.getCurrentSession(); Transaction tx = null; try { tx = sess.beginTransaction(); // call the long running DB stored procedure //Hibernate automatically closes the session tx.commit(); } catch (RuntimeException e) { if (tx != null) tx.rollback(); throw e; } 3.Spring's Declarative Transaction Let's suppose your stored procedure call is included in method: @Transactional(readOnly=false) public void callDBStoredProcedure(); The calling thread has the following method to call the above method asynchronously using Spring's TaskExecutor: @Transactional(readOnly=false) public void asynchCallDBStoredProcedure() { //creates a DB thread pool this.taskExecutor.execute(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { //call callDBStoredProcedure() } }); } You usually configure Spring's HibernateTransactionManager and the default proxy mode (aspectj is another mode) for declarative transactions. This class binds a transaction and a Hibernate session to each thread and doesn't Inheritance either just like Hibernate's "thread" policy. Where you put the above method callDBStoredProcedure() makes a huge difference. If you put the method in the same class as the calling thread, the declared transaction for callDBStoredProcedure() doesn't take place because in the proxy mode only external or remote method calls coming in through the AOP proxy (an object created by the AOP framework in order to implement the transaction aspect. This object supports your calling thread's class by composing an instance of your calling thread class) will be intercepted. This meas that "self-invocation", i.e. a method within the target object (the composed instance of your calling thread class in the AOP proxy) calling some other method of the target object, won't lead to an actual transaction at runtime even if the invoked method is marked with @Transactional! So you must put callDBStoredProcedure() in a different class as a Spring's bean so that the DB thread in method asynchCallDBStoredProcedure() can load that bean's AOP proxy and call callDBStoredProcedure() through that proxy. About The Author Yongjun Jiao is a technical manager with SunGard Consulting Services. He has been a professional software developer for the past 10 years. His expertise covers Java SE, Java EE, Oracle, application tuning and high performance and low latency computing.