DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Please enter at least three characters to search
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Zones

Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

Last call! Secure your stack and shape the future! Help dev teams across the globe navigate their software supply chain security challenges.

Modernize your data layer. Learn how to design cloud-native database architectures to meet the evolving demands of AI and GenAI workloads.

Releasing software shouldn't be stressful or risky. Learn how to leverage progressive delivery techniques to ensure safer deployments.

Avoid machine learning mistakes and boost model performance! Discover key ML patterns, anti-patterns, data strategies, and more.

Related

  • ETL and How it Changed Over Time
  • Kafka: Powerhouse Messaging
  • Superior Stream Processing: Apache Flink's Impact on Data Lakehouse Architecture
  • A Deep Dive Into the Differences Between Kafka and Pulsar

Trending

  • AI's Dilemma: When to Retrain and When to Unlearn?
  • Unlocking Data with Language: Real-World Applications of Text-to-SQL Interfaces
  • How the Go Runtime Preempts Goroutines for Efficient Concurrency
  • Blue Skies Ahead: An AI Case Study on LLM Use for a Graph Theory Related Application
  1. DZone
  2. Data Engineering
  3. Big Data
  4. Comparing NATS and Kafka: Understanding the Differences

Comparing NATS and Kafka: Understanding the Differences

In this article, we will explore the differences between NATS and Kafka in terms of category ranking features, limitations, use cases, and capabilities.

By 
Sveta Gimpelson user avatar
Sveta Gimpelson
·
Jul. 09, 23 · Analysis
Likes (1)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
5.6K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Messaging systems are game-changers in modern software development, enabling communication between different components of a system. They also help tackle the challenge of processing a high volume of data efficiently while ensuring reliable service delivery, real-time data processing, and secure data transfer between systems.

As messaging systems for modern applications continue to evolve, NATS and Kafka have emerged as part of the most popular options in the market today. Both NATS and Kafka are open-source and have gained a lot of traction due to their reliability, efficiency, and scalability. However, there are several differences between the two, and deciding upon the appropriate messaging system can considerably impact your application. In this article, we will explore the differences between NATS and Kafka in terms of category ranking features, limitations, use cases, and capabilities.

Overview of NATS

NATS is an open-source, message bus technology that powers modern distributed systems. Accordingly, it is responsible for addressing, discovering, and exchanging messages that drive the common patterns in distributed systems, asking and answering questions, aka services/microservices, and making and processing statements, or stream processing.

Its publish-subscribe messaging model called subject-based system. In NATS, messages are sent to subjects, which are hierarchical string values, and subscribers listen to these subjects to receive messages. NATS is known for its high throughput and low latency and supports various message types such as JSON, XML, and plain text.

NATS has a built-in distributed persistence system called JetStream. Specifically, this system enables new functionalities and higher qualities of service on top of the base ‘Core NATS’ functionalities and qualities of service. JetStream is built-in to nats-server; therefore, you only need 1 (or 3 or 5 if you want fault-tolerance against 1 or 2 simultaneous NATS server failures) of your NATS server(s) to be JetStream-enabled for it to be available to all the client applications.

Overview of Kafka

Kafka is an open-source distributed event streaming platform. Kafka is designed to offer high throughput, fault tolerance, and horizontal scalability, with the ability to handle a high volume of data. Kafka has become popular among big data and distributed systems.

Kafka was originally developed at LinkedIn. In 2011, it became an open-source Apache project, and by 2012, it had become a first-class Apache project. Kafka is written in Scala and Java, and it is designed to handle real-time data feeds with high throughput and low latency.

Kafka uses a publish-subscribe messaging model called a topic-based system. Topics are partitions that Kafka maintains in a distributed fashion, and producers send messages to these topics. Consumers subscribe to topics to receive messages. Kafka is known for its high throughput, data retention, and ability to store large amounts of data.

Comparing NATS and Kafka

NATS and Kafka have differences in their architecture, messaging patterns, and scalability. With its subject-based messaging, NATS is simpler than Kafka, which has a topic-based messaging system. NATS is more suitable for microservices while Kafka is more suitable for big data applications, where it can process large amounts of data in real-time.

Kafka’s distributed architecture allows it to achieve high concurrency and fault tolerance, while NATS is designed as a single-instance process, limiting its scalability. Kafka also supports multiple message types such as Avro, Protocol Buffers, and Thrift.

NATS is designed for scenarios where high performance and low latency are crucial, is easy to operate, with the option to deploy it over Kubernetes, monitor it using Grafana, encrypt traffic, and many other features.

Tabular Comparison Between NATS and Apache Kafka

 

NATS Apache Kafka
Message Consumption Model Publish-Subscribe. NATS supports pull-based and push-based architecture. Publish-Subscribe. Kafka uses a pull-based architecture where consumers pull messages from the server.
Delivery guarantee NATS supports at most once delivery guarantee.  Exactly-once delivery guarantee.
Scalability NATS can be horizontally scaled in or out by adding or removing servers. Kafka was designed to scale horizontally by adding brokers to a cluster or scale in by removing brokers.
Message Ordering NATS implements source ordered delivery per publisher. There are no guarantees of message delivery order amongst multiple publishers. Kafka guarantees message ordering within a partition.
Use cases
  • Services (microservices, service mesh)
  • Event/Data streaming (observability, analytics, ML/AI)
  • IOT and Edge
  • Telemetry/ Sensor data/ Command and control
  • Augmenting or replacing legacy messaging systems
  • Messaging
  • Website activity tracking
  • Metrics
  • Log aggregation
  • Stream processing
  • Event sourcing
  • Commit log
Consumer Groups Available as Queue Groups Available as Consumer Groups
Persistence Persistence achieved using JetStream. Built-in persistence via log storage
License Apache 2.0 Apache 2.0
Languages Supported Official clients are available in Go, Rust, JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, C#, C, Ruby and Elixir, in addition to 30+ community-contributed clients. Clients are available in Java and Scala, Go, Python, C/C++, and many other programming languages as well as REST APIs
Security
  • Supported encryption with TLS.
  • Supported authentication with:
    • Token Authentication
    • Username/Password credentials
    • TLS Certificate
    • NKeys
    • Decentralized JWT Authentication/Authorization
  • Authorizations of authenticated users.
  • Authentication of connections to brokers using either SSL or SASL.
  • Authentication of connections from brokers to ZooKeeper
  • Encryption of data transferred between brokers and clients, between brokers, or between brokers and tools using SSL.
  • Authorization of read / write operations by clients.
  • Supported integration with external authorization services.

Use Cases for NATS

  • NATS is best suited for real-time communications between microservices, cloud-native applications, and IoT devices. It is a lightweight messaging system designed to handle real-time events and messages.
  • NATS JetStream is a highly advanced message streaming system that distributes messages across a network using the publish/subscribe messaging pattern just like NATS. JetStream is the next generation of NATS, serving as the latest iteration of message streaming technology from NATS, supplanting the older NATS, which sunset in June 2023.
  • JetStream provides message streaming support that is seamlessly integrated into the NATS server, ensuring efficient and hassle-free operation. With JetStream, you get a slew of outstanding features, such as a file or memory-based persistence, the ability to read messages from a specific time or message sequence, and both durable and ephemeral message consumer support.

Use Cases for Kafka

  • Kafka is commonly utilized for collecting operational monitoring data. This includes collecting statistics from distributed applications to generate centralized operational data feeds.
  • Kafka is suitable for applications that require high data throughputs, like big data processing and analysis. Kafka uses a distributed processing model, which makes it well-suited for high-level analytics and real-time analytics.
  • Frameworks like Storm and Spark Streaming can read data from a topic within Kafka, process it, and store the processed data in a new topic where it can be accessed by users and applications.
  • Kafka can be leveraged to gather logs from various services across an organization and disseminate them in a standardized format to several consumers.
  • Kafka finds usefulness in many organizations and industries. These include financial industries for payment processing, healthcare organizations, telematics for real-time tracking and monitoring of cars, trucks, fleets, and shipments, and many more.
Big data Data processing Stream processing kafka

Published at DZone with permission of Sveta Gimpelson. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • ETL and How it Changed Over Time
  • Kafka: Powerhouse Messaging
  • Superior Stream Processing: Apache Flink's Impact on Data Lakehouse Architecture
  • A Deep Dive Into the Differences Between Kafka and Pulsar

Partner Resources

×

Comments
Oops! Something Went Wrong

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 100
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • support@dzone.com

Let's be friends:

Likes
There are no likes...yet! 👀
Be the first to like this post!
It looks like you're not logged in.
Sign in to see who liked this post!