DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Newsletter
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Shallow and Deep Copies in JavaScript: What’s the Difference?
  • PWA on iOS, Part 3: Chrome on iPhone Is WebKit Too. How One Engine Sets the Rules for PWAs on iOS
  • PWA on iOS, Part 2: HTTPS, Manifest and Service Worker
  • PWA on iOS, Part 1: PWAs on the iPhone Are Older Than They Look

Trending

  • Java 8 Optional - Avoid Null and NullPointerException Altogether - and Keep It Pretty
  • Building a Real Pipeline With senro: Monorepos, Caching, and Triggers
  • Why Your Test Automation Is Always Behind the Code And the Architecture That Fixes It
  • Introducing senro: A Pipeline Engine You Program in Go

Draft This article hasn't been published, so readers can't see it.

In moderation This article is waiting for review, so readers can't see it yet.

Deleted This article has been deleted, so readers can't see it.

  1. DZone
  2. Coding
  3. Java
  4. (Deep) Cloning Objects in JavaScript

(Deep) Cloning Objects in JavaScript

Cloning objects in JavaScript (and in other languages) is a tricky task. Let's see different options and check the performance.

By 
Sergio Carracedo
·
Dec. 09, 22 · Tutorial
Post on X (opens in a new tab) Share on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
6.0K Views

Join the DZone community Save articles, join the discussion, and download Refcards and Trend Reports with a free account.

Join for free Already a member? Log in

Even when you pass an object to a function or method, you are passing this object by reference, not the value.

If you pass (or copy) an object by reference and then change any property, the ‘source’ object’s property also changes.

In any example, I’ll use the object below

JavaScript
 
const sourceObject = {
  l1_1: {
    l2_1: 123,
    l2_2: [1, 2, 3, 4],
    l2_3: {
      l3_1: 'l3_3',
      l3_3: () => 'l3_3'
    }
  },
  l1_2: 'My original object'
} 


‘Standard’ Cloning

We’ll use a ‘standard’ cloning by assigning the source value to another constant.

JavaScript
 
const copiedObject = sourceObject

console.log('sourceObject', sourceObject.l1_2)
// My original object --> ✔️

clonedObject.l1_2 = 'My cloned object'

console.log('clonedObject', clonedObject.l1_2)
// My original object --> ✔️

console.log('sourceObject', sourceObject.l1_2)
// My original object --> ❌


As I said before, when I change the property l1_2 on the cloned object, the value also changes on the source object.

Using this strategy, you are not copying the object at all.

Using Spread Operator

This time I’ll use the spread operator, which 'returns' every element in the object individually.

JavaScript
 
console.log('sourceObject l1_2', sourceObject.l1_2)
// My original object --> ✔️
console.log('sourceObject l1_1.l2_1', sourceObject.l1_1.l2_1)
// 123 --> ✔️

const clonedObject = { ...sourceObject }
clonedObject.l1_2 = 'My cloned object'

console.log('clonedObject', clonedObject.l1_2)
// My cloned object --> ✔️
console.log('sourceObject', sourceObject.l1_2)
// My original object  --> ✔️

clonedObject.l1_1.l2_1 = '321'

console.log('clonedObject l1_1.l2_1', clonedObject.l1_1.l2_1)
// 321 --> ✔️
console.log('sourceObject l1_1.l2_1', sourceObject.l1_1.l2_1)
// 321 --> ❌️ // Should keep returning 123 if the clone was complete


Lodash to the Rescue

Lodash is a modular utility library that adds many functionalities, and one of them is cloneDeep, which does exactly what we need to clone (deep) an object through nested properties, keeping all value types, even functions.

JavaScript
 
import { cloneDeep } from 'lodash'

const clonedObject = cloneDeep(sourceObject)

console.log('clonedObject l1_1.l2_3.l3_3', clonedObject.l1_1.l2_3.l3_3)
// function l3_3() {} --> ✔️
console.log('sourceObject l1_1.l2_3.l3_3', sourceObject.l1_1.l2_3.l3_3)
// function l3_3() {} --> ✔️


Performance

We’ll copy the source object 10.000 times using each method to compare the time elapsed. Compare memory usage is no sense because Object.assign and Spread Operator method is not copying nested property by value.

The results in my browser are the following:

* Object.assign clone elapsed time: 4ms
* Spread operator clone elapsed time: 22ms
* JSON clone elapsed time: 47ms
* Lodash clone elapsed time: 92ms

As you can see, if you only need to do a shallow clone Object.assign is the faster solution over the spread operator, and if you only need to clone values in nested properties (not functions or symbols), JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()) could be a faster solution. But if you want to make sure that all values are copied, you must use Lodash or a similar solution.

Cloning JavaScript Java performance

Published at DZone with permission of Sergio Carracedo. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Shallow and Deep Copies in JavaScript: What’s the Difference?
  • PWA on iOS, Part 3: Chrome on iPhone Is WebKit Too. How One Engine Sets the Rules for PWAs on iOS
  • PWA on iOS, Part 2: HTTPS, Manifest and Service Worker
  • PWA on iOS, Part 1: PWAs on the iPhone Are Older Than They Look

Partner Resources

×

Comments

Loading comments

The comments didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

Likes

Loading

The next likes didn't load. Please try again.

The likes didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

See who liked this

Log in or join DZone for free to see who liked this article.

Log in Join for free
  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook