DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Please enter at least three characters to search
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Zones

Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

Last call! Secure your stack and shape the future! Help dev teams across the globe navigate their software supply chain security challenges.

Modernize your data layer. Learn how to design cloud-native database architectures to meet the evolving demands of AI and GenAI workloads.

Releasing software shouldn't be stressful or risky. Learn how to leverage progressive delivery techniques to ensure safer deployments.

Avoid machine learning mistakes and boost model performance! Discover key ML patterns, anti-patterns, data strategies, and more.

Related

  • The Art of Postmortem
  • The Art of Prompt Engineering in Incident Response
  • Leveraging AIOps for Observability Workflows: How to Improve the Scalability and Intelligence of Observability
  • Decoding DORA: EU's Unified Approach to ICT Risk Governance

Trending

  • Immutable Secrets Management: A Zero-Trust Approach to Sensitive Data in Containers
  • Beyond ChatGPT, AI Reasoning 2.0: Engineering AI Models With Human-Like Reasoning
  • How to Practice TDD With Kotlin
  • DGS GraphQL and Spring Boot
  1. DZone
  2. Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
  3. Maintenance
  4. Incident Management vs. Incident Response — What's the Difference?

Incident Management vs. Incident Response — What's the Difference?

What are the differences between incident management and incident response? The answer varies widely depending on whom you ask.

By 
Quentin Rousseau user avatar
Quentin Rousseau
·
Jun. 21, 21 · Analysis
Likes (2)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
12.7K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Is there a difference between incident response and incident management? Virtually every SRE will tell you there is.

However, the exact nature of the differences depends on whom you ask. There are several takes out there on the meanings of incident management and incident response. If you’re an SRE, understanding the surprising amount of variation surrounding definitions of each term can be helpful for thinking about how different types of organizations approach incident response and incident management.

So, let’s walk through some competing perspectives on the similarities and differences between incident management and incident response, and what SREs can learn from the varying viewpoints.

Technical Processes vs Business Processes

Probably the most widespread viewpoint on the differences between incident response and incident management boils down to the idea that the former focuses on the technical processes necessary to resolve an incident, whereas the latter deals with managing the broader impact of an incident on the business.

That’s the interpretation evident from the U.K. National Cyber Security Centre’s definition, for example, which tells us:

  • Incident Management (IM) sits within and across any response process, ensuring all stages are handled. IM deals with any communications, media handling, escalations and any reporting issues, pulling the whole response together, coherently and holistically….
  • Incident Response (IR): This includes triage, in-depth analysis, technical recovery actions and more.

Adrien de Beaupré of the SANS Institute offers a similar definition (although he uses the term “incident handling” in place of “incident management”):

  • Incident Response is all of the technical components required in order to analyze and contain an incident. Incident Handling is the logistics, communications, coordination, and planning functions needed in order to resolve an incident in a calm and efficient manner.

If you subscribe to this viewpoint, you probably think of incident response as the primary responsibility of SREs, whereas incident management requires the collaboration of a broader set of stakeholders -- the legal department, PR teams, compliance officers and so on -- who help steer the business as a whole through an incident.

Incident Management as a Technical Process

Interestingly, some folks adopt an interpretation of incident management that is almost the opposite of the definition described above.

For instance, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency says that incident management “includes detecting and responding to computer security incidents as well as protecting critical data, assets, and systems to prevent incidents from happening.” Those are all essentially technical processes.

Although the agency goes on to state that incident management requires participation by a “wide range of participants across the enterprise,” rather than just technical teams, the core definition nonetheless focuses on the technical aspects of incident management more than the business aspects.

Referring to the ITIL (but not actually quoting it), BMC offers a take on incident management that similarly focuses on managing technical issues: “Incident management is the practice of minimizing the negative impact of incidents by restoring normal service operation as quickly as possible.” This definition doesn’t mention managing broader business impacts, just restoring service.

Within organizations like these, then, SREs may be expected to play a more central role in incident management, given that their definitions focus on technical processes first and foremost.

Incident Management and Incident Response as Interchangeable Terms

Sometimes, you find organizations that use the terms incident management and incident response more or less interchangeably.

The incident management and response guidance offered by EDUCAUSE, a nonprofit that promotes IT in the higher education industry, is a good example of this type of usage. The article doesn’t attempt to distinguish incident management from incident response in any formal way, and it seems to alternate between both terms more or less randomly.

It even implies that the terms are directly interchangeable, writing that “information security incident management” are “sometimes also called information security incident response programs.”

If we had to bet, we’d wager that most SREs would be uncomfortable with this more-or-less interchangeable use of the two terms. But the fact is that some organizations don’t distinguish between the phrases, whether SREs like it or not.

What SREs Need to Know About Incident Management vs Incident Response

From examples like those cited above, it’s clear that there are multiple ways to define incident management and incident response. Some of them are ambiguous about the differences. Some definitions even directly contradict each other.

As an SRE, you could adopt one interpretation or another and go on a crusade to convince the world that your perspective is the right one. But realistically speaking, you’re probably not going to achieve universal consensus about the meaning of the two terms. Just as there will likely always be differences of opinion about whether Linux-based operating systems should be called just “Linux” or “GNU/Linux,” there will always exist varying viewpoints on the meaning of incident management and incident response.

Rather than trying to impose a certain perspective, SREs should adopt a flexible mindset. Their take on the definitions of incident management and incident response should reflect whichever viewpoint their organizational culture adopts. And they should do their best to support the practices that go along with incident response and management, no matter how they are labeled or categorized.

Incident management

Published at DZone with permission of Quentin Rousseau. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • The Art of Postmortem
  • The Art of Prompt Engineering in Incident Response
  • Leveraging AIOps for Observability Workflows: How to Improve the Scalability and Intelligence of Observability
  • Decoding DORA: EU's Unified Approach to ICT Risk Governance

Partner Resources

×

Comments
Oops! Something Went Wrong

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 100
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • support@dzone.com

Let's be friends:

Likes
There are no likes...yet! 👀
Be the first to like this post!
It looks like you're not logged in.
Sign in to see who liked this post!