Reset, Checkout, and Revert
Reset, Checkout, and Revert
When it comes to commit-level operations, reset, checkout, and revert are similar, but different. It's important to know when to use which to get the biggest benefit.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
git checkout, and
git revert commands are some of the most useful tools in your Git toolbox. They all let you undo some kind of change in your repository, and the first two commands can be used to manipulate either commits or individual files.
Because they’re so similar, it’s very easy to mix up which command should be used in any given development scenario. In this article, we’ll compare the most common configurations of
git checkout, and
git revert. Hopefully, you’ll walk away with the confidence to navigate your repository using any of these commands.
It helps to think about each command in terms of their effect on the three main components of a Git repository: the working directory, the staged snapshot, and the commit history. Keep these components in mind as you read through this article.
The parameters that you pass to
git reset and
git checkout determine their scope. When you don’t include a file path as a parameter, they operate on whole commits. That’s what we’ll be exploring in this section. Note that
git revert has no file-level counterpart.
On the commit-level, resetting is a way to move the tip of a branch to a different commit. This can be used to remove commits from the current branch. For example, the following command moves the
hotfix branch backwards by two commits.
git checkout hotfix git reset HEAD~2
The two commits that were on the end of
hotfix are now dangling commits, which means they will be deleted the next time Git performs a garbage collection. In other words, you’re saying that you want to throw away these commits. This can be visualized as the following:
This usage of
git reset is a simple way to undo changes that haven’t been shared with anyone else. It’s your go-to command when you’ve started working on a feature and find yourself thinking, “Oh crap, what am I doing? I should just start over.”
In addition to moving the current branch, you can also get
git reset to alter the staged snapshot and/or the working directory by passing it one of the following flags:
--soft– The staged snapshot and working directory are not altered in any way.
--mixed– The staged snapshot is updated to match the specified commit, but the working directory is not affected. This is the default option.
--hard– The staged snapshot and the working directory are both updated to match the specified commit.
It’s easier to think of these modes as defining the scope of a
git reset operation:
These flags are often used with
HEAD as the parameter. For instance,
git reset --mixed HEAD has the affect of unstaging all changes, but leaves them in the working directory. On the other hand, if you want to completely throw away all your uncommitted changes, you would use
git reset --hard HEAD. These are two of the most common uses of
Be careful when passing a commit other than
git reset, since this re-writes the current branch’s history. As discussed in The Golden Rule of Rebasing, this a big problem when working on a public branch.
By now, you should be very familiar with the commit-level version of
git checkout. When passed a branch name, it lets you switch between branches.
git checkout hotfix
Internally, all the above command does is move
HEAD to a different branch and update the working directory to match. Since this has the potential to overwrite local changes, Git forces you to commit or stash any changes in the working directory that will be lost during the checkout operation. Unlike
git checkout doesn’t move any branches around.
You can also check out arbitrary commits by passing in the commit reference instead of a branch. This does the exact same thing as checking out a branch: it moves the
HEAD reference to the specified commit. For example, the following command will check out out the grandparent of the current commit:
git checkout HEAD~2
This is useful for quickly inspecting an old version of your project. However, since there is no branch reference to the current
HEAD, this puts you in a
detached HEAD state. This can be dangerous if you start adding new commits because there will be no way to get back to them after you switch to another branch. For this reason, you should always create a new branch before adding commits to a detached
Reverting undoes a commit by creating a new commit. This is a safe way to undo changes, as it has no chance of re-writing the commit history. For example, the following command will figure out the changes contained in the second-to-last commit, create a new commit undoing those changes, and tack the new commit onto the existing project.
git checkout hotfix git revert HEAD~2
This can be visualized as the following:
Contrast this with
git reset, which does alter the existing commit history. For this reason,
git revert should be used to undo changes on a public branch, and
git reset should be reserved for undoing changes on a private branch.
You can also think of
git revert as a tool for undoing committed changes, while
git reset HEAD is for undoing uncommitted changes.
git revert has the potential to overwrite files in the working directory, so it will ask you to commit or stash changes that would be lost during the revert operation.
git reset and
git checkout commands also accept an optional file path as a parameter. This dramatically alters their behavior. Instead of operating on entire snapshots, this forces them to limit their operations to a single file.
When invoked with a file path,
git reset updates the staged snapshot to match the version from the specified commit. For example, this command will fetch the version of
foo.py in the 2nd-to-last commit and stage it for the next commit:
git reset HEAD~2 foo.py
As with the commit-level version of
git reset, this is more commonly used with
HEAD rather than an arbitrary commit. Running
git reset HEAD foo.py will unstage
foo.py. The changes it contains will still be present in the working directory.
--hard flags do not have any effect on the file-level version of
git reset, as the staged snapshot is always updated, and the working directory is never updated.
Checking out a file is similar to using
git reset with a file path, except it updates the working directory instead of the stage. Unlike the commit-level version of this command, this does not move the
HEAD reference, which means that you won’t switch branches.
For example, the following command makes
foo.py in the working directory match the one from the 2nd-to-last commit:
git checkout HEAD~2 foo.py
Just like the commit-level invocation of
git checkout, this can be used to inspect old versions of a project—but the scope is limited to the specified file.
If you stage and commit the checked-out file, this has the effect of “reverting” to the old version of that file. Note that this removes all of the subsequent changes to the file, whereas the
git revert command undoes only the changes introduced by the specified commit.
git reset, this is commonly used with
HEAD as the commit reference. For instance,
git checkout HEAD foo.py has the effect of discarding unstaged changes to
foo.py. This is similar behavior to
git reset HEAD --hard, but it operates only on the specified file.
You should now have all the tools you could ever need to undo changes in a Git repository. The
git checkout, and
git revert commands can be confusing, but when you think about their effects on the working directory, staged snapshot, and commit history, it should be easier to discern which command fits the development task at hand.
The table below sums up the most common use cases for all of these commands. Be sure to keep this reference handy, as you’ll undoubtedly need to use at least some them during your Git career.
|Command||Scope||Common use cases|
Discard commits in a private branch or throw away uncommited changes
Unstage a file
Switch between branches or inspect old snapshots
Discard changes in the working directory
Undo commits in a public branch
Published at DZone with permission of Claire Maynard , DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.