Single-Tenant vs Multi-Tenant: SaaS Architecture
Single-Tenant vs Multi-Tenant: SaaS Architecture
The main difference between them is that these software applications can serve either one or more customers at the same time.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Today we’ll break down the differences between single and multi-tenant architectures. The main difference between them is that these software applications can serve either one or more customers at the same time. A single tenancy architecture is mostly used throughout the SaaS (software-as-a-service) cloud services or delivery models. On the other hand, a multi-tenancy, though it is also an architecture of a single software application, serves multiple customers at a time.
By knowing the differences, people will understand how each architecture works and which model is the best solution for their needs, also I record a video were I explained 3 ways to architect your SaaS application. It’s essential to learn more about single-tenant vs multi-tenant so people understand the importance these two architectures have.
What Is a Single Tenant?
The single-tenant architecture uses a software application and a database for each tenant (client). What this means is that clients can’t share the database or application between them, because all of them have their instances of database and applications.
Single-tenant architecture has a specific design, making it unique since it allows only one instance per every SaaS server. Moreover, it will enable people to build every piece of software purposefully for each client. When the software is installed locally, clients can change the UI (User Interface) at their own will after the installation is complete. That way, they can customize the software to fit their needs within a specific environment. However, they won’t have access to the underlying code.
It’s important to note that the single-tenant architecture is adaptable to Cloud computing as well. Usually, when someone uses a third-party cloud, or even a private cloud service, in most cases it’s the single tenancy system.
Single-tenant vs multi-tenant comparison is straightforward. When we understand the basics of single-tenant architecture, it’s much easier to explain how multi-tenant architecture works. A multi-tenancy is an architecture in which every instance of software application is serving more than one tenant (client). The multi-client architecture means that all clients will share the same database and application information, unlike in the single-tenant architecture where every tenant has its database and application.
The multi-tenancy architecture is a fantastic solution for every business that wants to have more comfortable startup experience and a lower hardware requirement. The multi-tenant architecture has become the standard within the enterprise SaaS environments. However, the multi-tenancy has other traits that we’ll mention in this article. People must realize that multi-tenant architecture allows its users to make significant customizable changes within the software.
Other vital things that everyone must know about these two architecture models are that single-tenancy is much more expensive than its counterpart. Additionally, multi-tenant architecture has very efficient resource usage and potentially has much larger computing capacities. It’s also worth mentioning that multi-tenant architecture’s maintenance costs are much cheaper.
Single Tenant vs Multi-Tenant: Benefits of Using Both Architectures
Security and reliability: By implementing a single-tenant architecture, the client’s data will ultimately be isolated from all other customers. This means that no one can access another’s sensitive data. Data security is the essential benefit that this architecture provides. Therefore, a single-tenant architecture is considered more reliable. Here is a quick video about the importance of having a highly reliable environment on the Cloud. Without interference with other people’s activities, the single-tenant architecture allows clients to continue using their software even if another client is experiencing downtime during some cumbersome integrations.
Overall costs: A multi-tenant structure provides various exchanges, like the exchange of databases, services, applications, and resources, while it costs less than a single-tenant architecture. Scaling within the multi-tenant architecture is also crucial since it has fewer implications, thanks to the possibility that the new users have. New users can access the same software as all the original buyers can. This means that customers don’t have to pay costly fees to keep the software updated. The maintenance costs within the multi-tenant architecture are associated with a SaaS subscription. This means that they won’t be charged per case, as they are with a single-tenant architecture.
Larger Computing Capacities and Self-Hosting Environment Migrations: When it comes to single-tenant vs multi-tenant benefits, the multi-tenant has some advantages. Multi-tenant architecture gives organizations the possibility of staying within the same infrastructure and data center. Therefore, clients won’t have to think about adding more computer or server capacity. In case clients wish to go from a SaaS environment to another, self-hosted environment, they can do it easily with a single-tenant SaaS structure. It’s easy simply because all the information is already stored in one space that allows secure transfers and export of data into a new environment.
Single Tenant vs Multi-Tenant: What Are the Limitations?
Although single-tenant architecture is an excellent choice because of the security and reliability it provides, a single-tenant structure is more expensive. Moreover, it’s not as easy to implement as the multi-tenant architecture, because it requires much more resources and time for maintenance and customization. If you are just diving into SaaS, I may recommend reviewing a general introduction to SaaS principles and best practices. Many other costs of ownership make the single-tenant option less appealing to clients, but multi-tenancy has its limitations as well.
The multi-tenant structure is much more vulnerable from a security standpoint since it leaves behind a significant number of access points that are suitable for cyberattacks. Moreover, multi-tenant structures don’t offer as many options for customization as single-tenant structures do. This means that the multi-tenant architecture users will have less control when it comes to environmental quality.
Single-tenant vs multi-tenant architectures: both have their upsides and downsides. Another essential limitation of a single-tenant structure is that it requires more maintenance than a multi-tenant structure. Single-tenant architecture needs to be updated and upgraded by the client, while the multi-tenant architecture uses the universal upgrades launched for all the users at once.
Single Tenant Architecture
People often aren’t sure which architecture to choose, but single-tenant vs multi-tenant architectures are pretty straightforward. When it comes to single-tenant architecture, this structure allows users to use a piece of software as a single instance per each client on the SaaS server.
We’ll try to explain how the single-tenant structure system works by providing you with the real estate example, which should be easy enough to understand.
If you think of a server environment as an ecosystem, it’ll be much easier to explain how the single-tenant architecture works. Imagine that every client has its very own office building. All these buildings are located on the same street. The street represents the same server from which all the SaaS clients operate. Every client runs its operations from within their buildings. The buildings are lined-up next to each other on the street.
We’ll use the same descriptive method of the above real estate example for multi-tenant architecture. Multi-tenant architecture can be described as the environment in which clients are offices, but, in this case, all of the offices (clients) are located within the same building. Every client works from its own space within a large SaaS software product, making it much more comfortable and more accessible in some cases.
The single-tenant vs multi-tenant architectures have their similarities, but they have their differences as well. Multi-tenant SaaS architecture is based on the B2B ecosystem in which two or even more parties can collaborate on the same activity at the same time while the single-tenant architecture does not provide this capability to its clients.
Startup businesses today use multi-tenant architecture since it allows them various benefits. However, if a company wants to transition from a finely-managed business environment to a self-hosted environment, the multi-tenancy is not the answer for them.
Why Would You Choose Multi-Tenant Architecture for a SaaS Application?
It’s well-known that the clouds are storing, managing, and governing our data, and all of it depends mostly on its architecture (foundation). Therefore, choosing the right foundation is of the utmost importance. And therefore, to define where to use a Multi-Tenant architecture. Nowadays, developers and businesses tend to choose the most efficient and cost-effective architecture when it comes to developing SaaS applications.
The fight between the single-tenant vs multi-tenant architecture rages on since both of these architectures have their advantages and disadvantages. However, we’ll discuss more why multi-tenant SaaS architecture is the right choice when designing a multi-tenant SaaS application.
The multi-tenant approach models are divided into:
Logical Data Separation is a model that allows all tenants the possibility to utilize only one database. All of their data is securely separated within the same database by implementing unique identifiers for every client. The codebase is responsible for retrieving and storing the data via this unique identifier.
Physical Data Separation is another model that will successfully separate the data by utilizing different databases for different clients (tenants). Doing so helps people scale the application following the client’s growth and will also scale the application according to the clients’ needs.
In the modern age, multi-tenancy is a part of numerous SaaS applications like Zendesk, Boho, Office 365, Slack, and many other on-demand apps. It’s a known fact that cloud providers offer multitenancy. The multi-tenant approach or technique is the shared utilization of various computing resources. Bear in mind that this model is not the same as virtualization, which is a similar concept.
The multitenancy environment gives clients the possibility to use the same application within the same operating environment (Slack) on the same hardware and within the same storage. On the other hand, virtualization is different. With virtualization, all applications run on different virtual machines within their own operating systems.
The most common multi-tenant application structures go down to the three structure models listed below:
Virtualization-based SaaS (containers) is probably the most complex setup of them all because it has a lot of interaction between the databases, apps, and containers.
Multi-Tenant SaaS is a bit less complicated model. However, the multiple schemas/databases, as well as the restrictions, are all done at the database level. The operating SaaS applications can often provide more close-up interaction with the database.
URL-based SaaS is the most straightforward model to implement because it uses a single database and domain. This means that you have a specified URL like subdomain0.maindomain.com or subdomain1.maindomain.com, etc. It’s worth mentioning that security and data management are all handled at the app level. You should know that some SaaS can operate this way, like the ones that put the Web app interface between the database and the user.
When we talk about the single-tenant vs multi-tenant architectures, many things will come to mind. First of all, both tenant architectures have their pros and cons. Security-wise, single-tenant architecture is a better option. On the other hand, cost-efficiency in the cloud is the main trait of multi-tenant architecture. The multi-tenant structure is an excellent choice for businesses that want to work simultaneously through the same operating environment.
Multi-tenancy doesn’t require a lot of maintenance, which is an excellent perk. Multitenancy architecture will upgrade automatically as soon as the upgrade patch is universally distributed to its clients, unlike the single-tenancy architecture. Multi-tenancy architecture provides many more perks, and it’s much easier to handle, and that’s why many businesses opt-in for this architectural type. However, looking into single-tenancy architecture is good, so people can know what it offers as well.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.