DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Newsletter
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Building Multi-Rail Payment Failover to Stop Latency Spikes and Double Debits
  • GET, POST, PUT, DELETE: Choosing HTTP Verbs in a Real .NET Core Web API, Not Just by the Textbook
  • Delegated Transport, Forked Authorization: Where Chat and AI-Agent Integrations Actually Break
  • A Non-Expiring AKS Deployment Token Could Read Secrets Across Three Namespaces

Trending

  • When RabbitMQ Accepts a Message but Does Not Route It to a Queue
  • Why We Chose Iceberg Over Delta After Evaluating Both at Scale
  • MySQL Instant DDL: Metadata Locks, Waiting Writers, and Query Pileups
  • Two AI Agents, One Database: Solving Concurrent Updates With Optimistic Locking

Draft This article hasn't been published, so readers can't see it.

In moderation This article is waiting for review, so readers can't see it yet.

Deleted This article has been deleted, so readers can't see it.

  1. DZone
  2. Data Engineering
  3. Databases
  4. Wrapping Begin/End Asynchronous API into C#5 Tasks

Wrapping Begin/End Asynchronous API into C#5 Tasks

By 
Toni Petrina
·
Jun. 21, 12 · Interview
Post on X (opens in a new tab) Share on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
10.9K Views

Join the DZone community Save articles, join the discussion, and download Refcards and Trend Reports with a free account.

Join for free Already a member? Log in

Microsoft offered programmers several different ways of dealing with the asynchronous programming since .NET 1.0. The first model was Asynchronous programming model or APM for short. The pattern is implemented with two methods named BeginOperation and EndOperation. .NET 4 introduced new pattern – Task Asynchronous Pattern and with the introduction of .NET 4.5, Microsoft added language support for language integrated asynchronous coding style. You can check the MSDN for more samples and information. I will assume that you are familiar with it and have written code using it.

You can wrap existing APM pattern into TPL pattern using the Task.Factory.FromAsync methods. For example:
public static Task<IEnumerable<T>> ExecuteAsync<T>(this DataServiceQuery<T> query, object state)
{
    return Task.Factory.FromAsync<IEnumerable<T>>(query.BeginExecute, query.EndExecute, state);
}

It is easy to wrap most of the asynchronous functions this way, but some cannot be since the wrapper functions assume that the last two parameters to the BeginOperation are AsyncCallback and object, and there are some versions of asynchronous operations that have different specifications.

Examples:

1. Extra parameters after the object state parameter:
IAsyncResult DataServiceContext.BeginExecuteBatch(
                        AsyncCallback callback,
                        object state,
                        params DataServiceRequest[] queries);
2. Missing the expected object state parameter and different return type:
ICancelableAsyncResult BeginQuery(AsyncCallback callBack);
WorkItemCollection EndQuery(ICancelableAsyncResult car);

Short solution for the first example

The short and elegant way for wrapping the first example is to provide the following wrapper:

public static Task<DataServiceResponse> ExecuteBatchAsync(this DataServiceContext context,
                                                            object state,
                                                            params DataServiceRequest[] queries)
{
    if (context == null)
        throw new ArgumentNullException("context");
    return Task.Factory.FromAsync<DataServiceResponse>(
                            context.BeginExecuteBatch(null, state, queries),
                            context.EndExecuteBatch);
}

We simply call the Begin method ourselves and then wrap it using an another overload for FromAsync function.

The longer way

However, we can fully wrap it ourselves by simulating what the FromAsync wrapper does. The complete code is listed below.

public static Task<DataServiceResponse> ExecuteBatchAsync(this DataServiceContext context, object state, params DataServiceRequest[] queries)
{
    // this will be our sentry that will know when our async operation is completed
    var tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<DataServiceResponse>();
 
    try
    {
        context.BeginExecuteBatch((iar) =>
        {
            try
            {
                var result = context.EndExecuteBatch(iar as ICancelableAsyncResult);
                tcs.TrySetResult(result);
            }
            catch (OperationCanceledException ex)
            {
                // if the inner operation was canceled, this task is cancelled too
                tcs.TrySetCanceled();
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                // general exception has been set
                bool flag = tcs.TrySetException(ex);
                if (flag && ex as ThreadAbortException != null)
                {
                    tcs.Task.m_contingentProperties.m_exceptionsHolder.MarkAsHandled(false);
                }
            }
        }, state, queries);
    }
    catch
    {
        tcs.TrySetResult(default(DataServiceResponse));
        // propagate exceptions to the outside
        throw;
    }
 
    return tcs.Task;
}

Besides educational benefits, writing the full wrapper code allows us to add cancellation, logging and diagnostic information. Once we understand how to wrap APM pattern, We can now tackle the second problem easily.

Handling the BeginQuery/EndQuery

We will first create our own wrapper function in the spirit of the above code with the notable difference that we use the ICancelableAsyncResult interface instead of the IAsyncResult.

public static class TaskEx<TResult>
{
    public static Task<TResult> FromAsync(Func<AsyncCallback, IAsyncResult> beginMethod, Func<ICancelableAsyncResult, TResult> endMethod)
    {
        if (beginMethod == null)
            throw new ArgumentNullException("beginMethod");
        if (endMethod == null)
            throw new ArgumentNullException("endMethod");
 
        var tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<TResult>();
 
        try
        {
            beginMethod((iar) =>
            {
                try
                {
                    var result = endMethod(iar as ICancelableAsyncResult);
                    tcs.TrySetResult(result);
                }
                catch (OperationCanceledException ex)
                {
                    tcs.TrySetCanceled();
                }
                catch (Exception ex)
                {
                    bool flag = tcs.TrySetException(ex);
                    if (flag && ex as ThreadAbortException != null)
                    {
                        tcs.Task.m_contingentProperties.m_exceptionsHolder.MarkAsHandled(false);
                    }
                }
            });
        }
        catch
        {
            tcs.TrySetResult(default(TResult));
            throw;
        }
 
        return tcs.Task;
    }
}

The code is pretty self-explanatory and we can go ahead with the wrapping. There are four different operations that are exposed both in synchronous and asynchronous version: Query, LinkQuery, CountOnlyQuery and RegularQuery.

The extension methods are short since we have already created our generic wrapper above:

public static Task<WorkItemCollection> RunQueryAsync(this Query query)
{
    return TaskEx<WorkItemCollection>.FromAsync(query.BeginQuery, query.EndQuery);
}
 
public static Task<WorkItemLinkInfo[]> RunLinkQueryAsync(this Query query)
{
    return TaskEx<WorkItemLinkInfo[]>.FromAsync(query.BeginLinkQuery, query.EndLinkQuery);
}
 
public static Task<int> RunCountOnlyQueryAsync(this Query query)
{
    return TaskEx<int>.FromAsync(query.BeginCountOnlyQuery, query.EndCountOnlyQuery);
}
 
public static Task<int[]> RunRegularQueryAsync(this Query query)
{
    return TaskEx<int[]>.FromAsync(query.BeginRegularQuery, query.EndRegularQuery);
}

That is it for today, you can write your own handy extensions easily for APM functions out there.

API

Published at DZone with permission of Toni Petrina. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Building Multi-Rail Payment Failover to Stop Latency Spikes and Double Debits
  • GET, POST, PUT, DELETE: Choosing HTTP Verbs in a Real .NET Core Web API, Not Just by the Textbook
  • Delegated Transport, Forked Authorization: Where Chat and AI-Agent Integrations Actually Break
  • A Non-Expiring AKS Deployment Token Could Read Secrets Across Three Namespaces

Partner Resources

×

Comments

Loading comments

The comments didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

Likes

Loading

The next likes didn't load. Please try again.

The likes didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

See who liked this

Log in or join DZone for free to see who liked this article.

Log in Join for free
  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook