DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Please enter at least three characters to search
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Zones

Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

Last call! Secure your stack and shape the future! Help dev teams across the globe navigate their software supply chain security challenges.

Modernize your data layer. Learn how to design cloud-native database architectures to meet the evolving demands of AI and GenAI workloads.

Releasing software shouldn't be stressful or risky. Learn how to leverage progressive delivery techniques to ensure safer deployments.

Avoid machine learning mistakes and boost model performance! Discover key ML patterns, anti-patterns, data strategies, and more.

Related

  • Navigating Software Leadership in a Dynamic Era
  • Exploring Leading Software Development Methodologies
  • Custom Software vs. Readymade Software
  • The Evolution of Software Development: From Waterfall to Agile to DevOps and Beyond

Trending

  • Java's Quiet Revolution: Thriving in the Serverless Kubernetes Era
  • Enhancing Avro With Semantic Metadata Using Logical Types
  • Understanding Java Signals
  • Evolution of Cloud Services for MCP/A2A Protocols in AI Agents
  1. DZone
  2. Culture and Methodologies
  3. Agile
  4. Adoption of Hybrid Agile in Fixed-Bid Projects

Adoption of Hybrid Agile in Fixed-Bid Projects

Is the Waterfall or Agile method more effective? How about both? Learn more about the benefits and breakdown of using hybrid Agile in fixed-bid projects.

By 
Ravi Kiran Mallidi user avatar
Ravi Kiran Mallidi
DZone Core CORE ·
Jul. 13, 20 · Analysis
Likes (3)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
3.6K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

IT Organizations are using mainly two development models nowadays called Agile and Waterfall. They are commonly used Software Development Life Cycles (SDLC) for both of the models. The primary transformation between Agile and Waterfall is that the Waterfall model executes the development life cycle sequence,  whereas Agile executes iterative cycles. Both of the models are their advantages and disadvantages. As per the TrustRadius survey in 2019, 81% of Organizations are using Agile, and 19% are using Waterfall. 

Nowadays, Organizations are willing to execute projects in an Agile manner in a fixed bid contract. An alternative to fixed bid contracts is time and material pricing model. A fixed bid contract project implementing in Agile is challenging for IT Service Providers to manage. The primary job of Service Provider is to execute the project with the timeframe and budget given by the Organization with high Quality. One of the core principles of Agile is Adaptability- able to change design, architecture, requirement, and deliverables at any point in the project life cycle. Change in requirement and architecture is not well suited for Fixed Bid Contracts. All feel that all Fixed Bid contacts run in the Waterfall approach instead of running in the Agile model. 

But IT Service Providers can think about the Hybrid Agile approach for attempting Agile implementations in Fixed Bid projects. 

The below table describes when to go with Fixed Bid and Time and Material pricing models.

Fixed Bid Pricing Model

Time and Material Pricing Model

Standard Requirements

Dynamic Requirements

Very Clear Requirement of the Project

Unclear Project Scope

Determined Deadlines. Scope not to change

Adaptability is one of the requirements

Limited Budget and Service Provider to manage the project

Willing to manage the project by Organization

 

The time and materials pricing model work for organizations where the requirements are flexible (adaptability). At the same time, the fixed bid pricing model works best for with apparent requirements and features upfront.

The agile development model practiced over a decade for many Organizations / Service Vendors. IT Organizations experienced significant advantages over the traditional waterfall model by using Agile. In due course, the core agile development to Hybrid Agile development which is a modified waterfall model for Fixed Bid projects especially. Hybrid agile is used mostly in various IT Service Industries instead of core agile methodology. 

Hybrid Agile Model

Agile methodology is an iterative process with iterative cycles called Sprints. The agile process allows project teams to increased development speed, lowers cost, and quick resolutions of defects. The Hybrid Agile framework is a mixture of the Waterfall and Agile Methodology combined to follow sequential flow for Requirements and Design and then iterative cycles for the Development process. Hence, a hybrid agile is the best of both software development models which aids in business values with the precision of the waterfall model and speed of the agile model combined. Below diagram shows how the Hybrid Agile looks like:

development and unit testing iterative process graphic

  • Requirement Analysis, Architecture, and Design can be done with Waterfall and Development and Unite Testing in Sprints. System Integration, UAT in short sprints using Agile Scrum.
  • Communication channels, and a collaborative software tool to support information exchange, data consistency, and traceability across the lifecycle
  • Involve Product Owners in all the communication early.
  • Compliance outlooks and focus on the design phase.
  • Changes in requirements can be adopted with the mutual concern of the Organization and the Service Provider. 
  • All the new requirements after Design signoff will be moved to the Change Management process.

Hybrid Agile suites for below scenarios

  • Project team already using the waterfall model and trying to adopt an agile model
  • Organizations need to meet regulatory and compliance requirements (which require governance and documentation of the project).
  • Projects deals with legacy applications with an inflexible release cycle.
  • Multi-vendor model where independent agile teams cannot run all the stages
  • More suitable for fixed bid projects implementations.

Below are the considerations to choose which methodology to use in the projects:

Factor

Waterfall

Agile 

Hybrid Agile

Customer Availability

Requires only at milestones

Throughout the project life cycle as Product Owner role

Requires sign off after completing the requirement and design phase.

Features Changes

Scope / Features defined well in advance

Adaptability in requirement any time

The feature can change within the time-bound. The scope changes with a mutual understanding of Product Owner and Project Manager

Team Selection

Owned by the Service Provider Management team

An organization can choose the team

An organization can choose the leading persons in the team

Funding and Budgets

Well for Fixed contracts

Well for Time and Material contracts

Well for both of the contracts

 

A hybrid agile approach for managing projects can offer advantages with highly effective for Service Providers for Fixed Bid Projects. Implementing and planning should be adequately requiring preparation. It is essential to gain knowledge of hybrid agile methodologies and hybrid agile project management. The Project Manager should be known how to adopt the change in Hybrid Agile; otherwise, the total project is in overtime and budget to the Service Provider. The Service Provider Manager has to discuss the requirements one by one with the Product Owner and fix the requirement in the requirement and design stage. After completing / signoff the requirements and design, the Service Provider team starts the development in Sprints and provides the product to the Organization. The Organization can make minimal changes in introspect meetings wherever required. If the change is significant, not able to fit into the timeline, both the parties can sit together and mutually understand the requirement and fit the requirement with removing the non-priory requirement. 

agile Requirement scrum Service provider Waterfall model waterfall Software development Design

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Navigating Software Leadership in a Dynamic Era
  • Exploring Leading Software Development Methodologies
  • Custom Software vs. Readymade Software
  • The Evolution of Software Development: From Waterfall to Agile to DevOps and Beyond

Partner Resources

×

Comments
Oops! Something Went Wrong

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 100
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • support@dzone.com

Let's be friends:

Likes
There are no likes...yet! 👀
Be the first to like this post!
It looks like you're not logged in.
Sign in to see who liked this post!