DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Newsletter
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Building Multi-Rail Payment Failover to Stop Latency Spikes and Double Debits
  • GET, POST, PUT, DELETE: Choosing HTTP Verbs in a Real .NET Core Web API, Not Just by the Textbook
  • Delegated Transport, Forked Authorization: Where Chat and AI-Agent Integrations Actually Break
  • A Non-Expiring AKS Deployment Token Could Read Secrets Across Three Namespaces

Trending

  • Beyond the Wall of Charts: How Advanced Observability Displaced the Telemetry Dashboard
  • Building a Windows App for a Resilient SSH SOCKS Proxy and Selective Browser Routing
  • Testing Java and Spring Applications With Kotlin: Low-Risk to Adoption
  • Guess the Speed: Building a Family Internet Speed Guessing Game

Draft This article hasn't been published, so readers can't see it.

In moderation This article is waiting for review, so readers can't see it yet.

Deleted This article has been deleted, so readers can't see it.

  1. DZone
  2. Data Engineering
  3. Databases
  4. An OpenAPI Vendor Extension for Defining Your API Audience

An OpenAPI Vendor Extension for Defining Your API Audience

A look at what one organization has done to establish an OpenAPI vendor extension so that the definition is machine readable and available via their OpenAPI.

By 
Kin Lane
·
Mar. 19, 18 · Analysis
Post on X (opens in a new tab) Share on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
5.8K Views

Join the DZone community Save articles, join the discussion, and download Refcards and Trend Reports with a free account.

Join for free Already a member? Log in

The clothing marketplace Zalando has an interesting approach to classifying their APIs based upon who is consuming them. It isn’t just about APIs being published publicly, or privately, they actually have standardized their definition, and have established an OpenAPI vendor extension, so that the definition is machine readable and available via their OpenAPI.

According to the Zalando API design guide, “each API must be classified with respect to the intended target audience supposed to consume the API, to facilitate differentiated standards on APIs for discoverability, changeability, quality of design and documentation, as well as permission granting. We differentiate the following API audience groups with clear organizational and legal boundaries.”

  • component-internal - The API consumers with this audience are restricted to applications of the same functional component (internal link). All services of a functional component are owned by specific dedicated owner and engineering team. Typical examples are APIs being used by internal helper and worker services or that support service operation.
  • business-unit-internal - The API consumers with this audience are restricted to applications of a specific product portfolio owned by the same business unit.
  • company-internal - The API consumers with this audience are restricted to applications owned by the business units of the same the company (e.g. Zalando company with Zalando SE, Zalando Payments SE & Co. KG. etc.)
  • external-partner - The API consumers with this audience are restricted to applications of business partners of the company owning the API and the company itself.
  • external-public - APIs with this audience can be accessed by anyone with Internet access.

Note: a smaller audience group is intentionally included in the wider group and thus does not need to be declared additionally. The API audience is provided as API meta information in the info-block of the Open API specification and must conform to the following specification:

#/info/x-audience:
  type: string
  x-extensible-enum:
    - component-internal
    - business-unit-internal
    - company-internal
    - external-partner
    - external-public
  description: |
    Intended target audience of the API. Relevant for standards around
    quality of design and documentation, reviews, discoverability,
    changeability, and permission granting

Note: Exactly one audience per API specification is allowed. For this reason, a smaller audience group is intentionally included in the wider group and thus does not need to be declared additionally. If parts of your API have a different target audience, we recommend splitting API specifications among the target audience — even if this creates redundancies (rationale).

Here is an example of the OpenAPI vendor extension in action, as part of the info block:

swagger: '2.0'
info:
  x-audience: company-internal
  title: Parcel Helper Service API
  description: API for <...>
  version: 1.2.4

Providing a pretty interesting way of establishing the scope and reach of each API in a way that makes each API owner think deeply about who they are/should be targeting with the service. Done in a way that makes the audience focus machine readable, and available as part of it’s OpenAPI definition which can be then used across discovery, documentation, and through API governance and security.

I like the multiple views of who the audience could be, going beyond just public and private APIs. I like that it is an OpenAPI vendor extension. I like that they even have a schema crafted for the vendor extension – another interesting concept I’d like to see more of. Overall, making for a pretty compelling approach to define the reach of our APIs, and quantifying the audience we are looking to reach with each API we publish.

API

Published at DZone with permission of Kin Lane. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Building Multi-Rail Payment Failover to Stop Latency Spikes and Double Debits
  • GET, POST, PUT, DELETE: Choosing HTTP Verbs in a Real .NET Core Web API, Not Just by the Textbook
  • Delegated Transport, Forked Authorization: Where Chat and AI-Agent Integrations Actually Break
  • A Non-Expiring AKS Deployment Token Could Read Secrets Across Three Namespaces

Partner Resources

×

Comments

Loading comments

The comments didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

Likes

Loading

The next likes didn't load. Please try again.

The likes didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

See who liked this

Log in or join DZone for free to see who liked this article.

Log in Join for free
  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook