Choosing Between eMTC and NB-IoT
Choosing Between eMTC and NB-IoT
Mobile IoT standards NB-IoT and eMTC are suitable for various types of applications. Check out this post to learn more about choosing between eMTC and NB-IoT.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Digi-Key Electronics’ Internet of Things (IoT) Resource Center Inspires the Future: Read More
For a long time, the two mobile IoT standards eMTC (enhanced machine-type communication) and NB-IoT (narrowband Internet of Things) competed against one another, leading to an endless debate amongst the industry. This article analyzes the two network standards, identifying their differences on the technical level and their complementary applications. Consequently, we will be introducing the industry consensus regarding the evolution of mobile IoT technology (including NB-IoT and eMTC) as expressed by Rel. 15 of the 76th plenary meeting of the 3GPP.
Advantages of eMTC
As one of the most common network standards for narrowband mobile IoT, eMTC offers four major capabilities compared to non-mobile IoT systems using LPWA: wide coverage, big network, low power consumption, and low costs. Here, we will briefly discuss each of these features:
Low Power Consumption and Extended Terminal Battery Life
Currently, 2G terminals only have a standby time of about 20 days. In some typical LPWA applications, such as meter reading services, 2G modules obviously cannot meet the needs of terminals located in hard-to-access locations, such as deep wells and chimneys, because it is impossible to replace the batteries. In contrast, the eMTC standard consumes only 1 percent of the power used by a 2G modem, extending the terminal standby time to up to 10 years.
IoT terminals must connect to a massive number of users to meet the needs of "big network" applications. Currently, networks without an IoT application design do not support simultaneous access by a large volume of terminals, while eMTC can accommodate over 10,000 terminals in each zone.
Sufficient Network Coverage in Typical Scenarios
Outdoor 4G base stations cannot provide full coverage, as there are blind spots in deep wells, underground parking garages, and other such locations. Concerning coverage, eMTC is 15 dB more powerful than LTE (and can penetrate multiple walls) and 11 dB more powerful than GPRS. This means its signal can reach two to three floors below ground.
Costs Expected to Decrease
Currently, smart home applications generally use Wi-Fi for communication. Although WiFi modules do not cost much themselves (already less than 10 RMB), IoT devices that support Wi-Fi usually also require wireless routers or wireless access points to connect to the Internet or communicate within a LAN. 2G communication modules generally cost more than 20 RMB, while 4G communication modules cost more than 150 RMB. In contrast, the cost of eMTC terminals is expected to continue to decrease due to cross-subsidization throughout the industry chain.
Dedicated Band Transmission for Low Interference
Compared to mobile IoT technology, eMTC uses a licensed frequency for transmission to reduce interference and provide better security. This ensures reliable transmission.
Competition Between eMTC and NB-IoT
Both the eMTC and NB-IoT mobile IoT network standards have often competed and created confusion over their application scope. In fact, both standards have distinct technical advantages and can work together, so there is no better choice. As a result, the competition is decided by who can reduce their module chip costs faster, who has a higher degree of commercialization, and whose network construction is better.
This issue finally got resolved in June 2017, when the 76th plenary meeting of the 3GPP issued Rel. 15 representing a consensus on the future evolution of mobile IoT technology (including NB-IoT and eMTC). It stated that future systems with a bandwidth under 1.4 MHz would not use eMTC terminals and future systems with a bandwidth over 200 KHz would not use NB-IoT terminals.
This 3GPP resolution promotes the orderly development of M-IoT by clearly delineating the application scopes of eMTC and NB-IoT. Thus, the two standards are no longer in competition but form a hybrid network with differentiated and complementary cooperation. Now, let's compare the two standards over their technical and application aspects.
Technical Features of eMTC and NB-IoT
When comparing peak speeds, NB-IoT only supports data speeds under 200 Kbit/s, while eMTC can reach 1 Mbit/s. Regarding portability, because NB-IoT does not support automatic zone switching, terminals that use this standard are not portable. eMTC provides much better portability.
In terms of voice functionality, NB-IoT does not support voice transmission, while eMTC does. When it comes to terminal costs, NB-IoT's unified module and chip standard has reduced prices to around 5 USD, while eMTC prices are higher and falling more slowly.
Comparing zone capacities, we have seen that eMTC has not advanced in this direction, so it cannot satisfy the needs of high connection volume scenarios. In contrast, NB-IoT offers a coverage radius 30 percent larger than eMTC. eMTC's coverage is about 9 dB below NB-IoT.
Using Both Standards to Create a Hybrid Network
Looking at the technical features of the two standards, we can see that NB-IoT offers advantages in terms coverage, power consumption, costs, and connection volume. Organizations can generally use this standard in static scenarios where lower costs, greater coverage, and longer battery life are major requirements.
Currently, eMTC is inferior to NB-IoT, in terms of coverage and module costs, but it is superior in terms of peak speed, portability, and voice capabilities. This standard is better suited for scenarios that involve voice calls, high bandwidth speed, and portable terminals. In actual use cases, the two standards can work together in a complementary manner.
As the predictive data shows, due to NB-IoT's low cost and wide coverage, the ratio of NB-IoT to eMTC connections is 8:2. However, eMTC networks support a wider range of applications that are more directly related to users, so eMTC network environments have higher ARPU values.
In the Mobile Internet of Things Industry Solutions White Paper published by China Mobile, we can see that the advent of hybrid NB-IoT/eMTC networks will increase the range of supported applications.
NB-IoT technology is effective in static scenarios, such as smart meter reading, smart switches, and smart manhole covers. However, hybrid NB-IoT/eMTC networks are suited to more interactive and collaborative IoT applications, such as full-process product management, smart parking, shared bicycles, financial leasing, cashbox monitoring, intelligent greenhouses, animal tracking, forestry data collection, remote health, smart streetlights, and smart homes. We can conclude that the synchronized promotion of NB-IoT and eMTC can meet the comprehensive IoT needs and application scenarios.
The Road Ahead
We have seen that the relationship between NB-IoT and eMTC is not an either/or choice. Rather, because NB-IoT and eMTC are suitable for different applications, operators will continue to use the two standards together, creating a larger industry chain and constantly driving increased consumption. This will provide vendors with a greater range of applications without technical restrictions and improve the experience of customers. By encouraging users to demand more, this will lay a foundation for the integrated development of 5G and various industries. This is the future path of integrated NB-IoT and eMTC development.
Published at DZone with permission of Leona Zhang . See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.