DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Jackson vs Gson: Edge Cases in JSON Parsing for Java Apps
  • JSON Handling With GSON in Java With OOP Essence
  • The Configure() Method in Jackson in JSON
  • Let's Unblock: Read Json Using GSON in Scala

Trending

  • Querying Without a Query Language
  • Liquibase: Database Change Management and Automated Deployments
  • The Prompt Isn't Hiding Inside the Image
  • Why Pass/Fail CI Pipelines Are Insufficient for Enterprise Release Decisions
  1. DZone
  2. Coding
  3. Languages
  4. Comparing the JSON APIs Gson and Jackson

Comparing the JSON APIs Gson and Jackson

Compare JSON APIs Gson and Jackson based on performance for JSON conversion wrappers and creation of lists in both APIs.

By 
Ganesh Pol user avatar
Ganesh Pol
·
Aug. 03, 15 · Analysis
Likes (6)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
18.7K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

In this post we will compare two famous JSON specific API i.e. Gson and Jackson from a performance point of view:json_1

Code

Wrapper

This class is used for conversion to JSON

public class MeasurementRecord {

private String measurementId;

private long duration;

private long time;

private MeasurementType type=MeasurementType.METHOD_CALL;

/**
 * 
 * @param measurementId
 * @param duration
 * @param time
 * @param type
 */
public MeasurementRecord(String measurementId, long duration, long time,
MeasurementType type) {
super();
this.measurementId = measurementId;
this.duration = duration;
this.time = time;
this.type = type;
}
//getters and setters
}


public enum MeasurementType {

WEB_REQUEST,SQL,EXCEPTION,METHOD_CALL

}

Code for Creating List

private static List<String> getList(int iteration){
List l=new ArrayList();
for(int i=0;i<iteration;i++){
l.add(new MeasurementRecord("/test.html", 10, System.currentTimeMillis(), MeasurementType.WEB_REQUEST));
}
return l;
}

Jackson API

private static long jacksonTest(int iteration)throws Exception{
ObjectMapper mapper=new ObjectMapper();
List<String> l=getList(iteration);
long T1=System.nanoTime();
String json=mapper.writeValueAsString(l);
long T2=System.nanoTime();
return (T2-T1);
}

Gson API

private static long gsonTest(int iteration){
Gson gson = new GsonBuilder().create();
List l=getList(iteration);
long T1=System.nanoTime();
String json=gson.toJson(l);
long T2=System.nanoTime();
return (T2-T1);
}

Results

resultsgraph

Conclusion

For converting small- or medium-sized lists, Gson provides a better response compared to Jackson. For large lists, Jackson provides a better response than Gson. Based on this results one can conclude that for converting small or medium size list to JSON one can use Gson for better performance.

JSON Gson Jackson (API)

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Jackson vs Gson: Edge Cases in JSON Parsing for Java Apps
  • JSON Handling With GSON in Java With OOP Essence
  • The Configure() Method in Jackson in JSON
  • Let's Unblock: Read Json Using GSON in Scala

Partner Resources

×

Comments

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook