DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Newsletter
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Node and Capacity Spillover: What Happens When Kubernetes Runs Out of Room
  • One Query, Four GPUs: Tracing a Distributed Training Stall Across Nodes
  • Implementing Budget Policies and Budget Limits on Databricks
  • Can You Run a MariaDB Cluster on a $150 Kubernetes Lab? I Gave It a Shot

Trending

  • AI Coding Agent Guardrails: Finding Gaps in Tool Permissions
  • When One Docker Swarm Replica Became Unreachable Over an Overlay Network: A Production Case With Traefik
  • Claude Code Superpowers: The 5-Tool Stack That Ends Limits and Context Amnesia
  • Idempotency Under Concurrency: Why Your Application Check Isn't the Last Line of Defense

Draft This article hasn't been published, so readers can't see it.

In moderation This article is waiting for review, so readers can't see it yet.

Deleted This article has been deleted, so readers can't see it.

  1. DZone
  2. Software Design and Architecture
  3. Cloud Architecture
  4. EasyNetQ Cluster Support

EasyNetQ Cluster Support

By 
Mike Hadlow
·
Oct. 14, 12 · Interview
Post on X (opens in a new tab) Share on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
7.0K Views

Join the DZone community Save articles, join the discussion, and download Refcards and Trend Reports with a free account.

Join for free Already a member? Log in

EasyNetQ, my super simple .NET API for RabbitMQ, now (from version 0.7.2.34) supports RabbitMQ clusters without any need to deploy a load balancer.

Simply list the nodes of the cluster in the connection string ...

var bus = RabbitHutch.CreateBus("host=ubuntu:5672,ubuntu:5673");

In this example I have set up a cluster on a single machine, 'ubuntu', with node 1 on port 5672 and node 2 on port 5673. When the CreateBus statement executes, EasyNetQ will attempt to connect to the first host listed (ubuntu:5672). If it fails to connect it will attempt to connect to the second host listed (ubuntu:5673). If neither node is available it will sit in a re-try loop attempting to connect to both servers every five seconds. It logs all this activity to the registered IEasyNetQLogger. You might see something like this if the first node was unavailable:

DEBUG: Trying to connect
ERROR: Failed to connect to Broker: 'ubuntu', Port: 5672 VHost: '/'. ExceptionMessage: 'None of the specified endpoints were reachable'
DEBUG: OnConnected event fired
INFO: Connected to RabbitMQ. Broker: 'ubuntu', Port: 5674, VHost: '/'

If the node that EasyNetQ is connected to fails, EasyNetQ will attempt to connect to the next listed node. Once connected, it will re-declare all the exchanges and queues and re-start all the consumers. Here's an example log record showing one node failing then EasyNetQ connecting to the other node and recreating the subscribers:

INFO: Disconnected from RabbitMQ Broker
DEBUG: Trying to connect
DEBUG: OnConnected event fired
DEBUG: Re-creating subscribers
INFO: Connected to RabbitMQ. Broker: 'ubuntu', Port: 5674, VHost: '/'

You get automatic fail-over out of the box. That’s pretty cool.

If you have multiple services using EasyNetQ to connect to a RabbitMQ cluster, they will all initially connect to the first listed node in their respective connection strings. For this reason the EasyNetQ cluster support is not really suitable for load balancing high throughput systems. I would recommend that you use a dedicated hardware or software load balancer instead, if that’s what you want.

cluster

Published at DZone with permission of Mike Hadlow. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Node and Capacity Spillover: What Happens When Kubernetes Runs Out of Room
  • One Query, Four GPUs: Tracing a Distributed Training Stall Across Nodes
  • Implementing Budget Policies and Budget Limits on Databricks
  • Can You Run a MariaDB Cluster on a $150 Kubernetes Lab? I Gave It a Shot

Partner Resources

×

Comments

Loading comments

The comments didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

Likes

Loading

The next likes didn't load. Please try again.

The likes didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

See who liked this

Log in or join DZone for free to see who liked this article.

Log in Join for free
  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook