Functional Programming in Java 8 (Part 2): Optionals
Use Optionals when there is a clear need to represent ‘no result’ or where null is likely to cause errors. Otherwise, stick to nulls.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
After we’ve made our first big steps into functional programming in the last post, we will talk about Optionals in today’s part.
Why do we need Optionals?
Hand on heart, you also think that null is annoying, don’t you? For every argument which can be null, you have to check whether it is null or not.
These lines suck! This is a boilerplate that bloats up your code and can be easily forgotten. So how can we fix that?
In Java 8, java.util.Optional<T> was introduced to handle objects which might not exist better. It is a container object that can hold another object. The Generic T is the type of the object you want to contain.
The Optional class doesn’t have any public constructor. To create an optional, you have to use
Optional.ofNullable(object). You use the first one if the object is never, ever null. The second one is used for nullable objects.
How do optionals work?
Options have two states. They either hold an object or they hold null. If they hold an object, optionals are called present, if they hold null, they are called empty. If they are not empty, you can get the object in the optional by using
Optional.get(). But be careful, because a get() on an empty optional will cause a
NoSuchElementException. You can check if a optional is present by calling the method
Example: Playing with Optionals
Common problems when using Optionals
1. Working with Optional and null
This is just the wrong use of an Optional! If you get an Optional (In the example you get one from the DB), you don’t have to look whether the object is null or not! If there’s no string in the DB, it will return
null! If you got an empty Optional from the DB, there would also be a
NoSuchElementException in this example.
2. Using isPresent() and get()
2.1. Doing something when the value is present
As I already said, you should always be 100% sure if an Optional is present before you use
Optional.get(). You wouldn’t get a
NoSuchElementException anymore in the updated function. But you shouldn’t check a optional with the
isPresent() + get() combo! Because if you do it like that, you could have used null in the first place. You would replace
first != null and you have the same result. But how can we replace this annoying if-block with the help of Optionals?
Optional.ifPresent() method is our new best friend to replace the if. It takes a Function, so a Lambda or method reference, and applies it only when the value is present. If you don’t remember how to use method references or Lambdas, you should read the last part of this series again.
2.2. Returning a Modified Version of the Value
In this method, we want to double the value of an optional, if it is present. Otherwise, we return zero. The given example works, but it isn’t the functional way of solving this problem. To make this a lot nicer, we have two function that are coming to help us. The first one’s
Optional.map(Function<T, R> mapper) and the second one’s
map takes a function, applies it on the value and returns the result of the function, wrapped in an Optional again. If the Optional is empty, it will return an empty Optional again.
orElse returns the value of the Optional it is called on. If there is no value, it returns the value you gave
orElse(object) as a parameter. With that in mind, we can make this function a one liner.
When Should you use Nullable Objects and when Optionals
You can find a lot of books, talks and discussions about the question: Should you use null or Optional in some particular case. And both have their right to be used. In the linked talk, you will find a nice rule which you can apply in most of the cases. Use Optionals when “there is a clear need to represent ‘no result’ or where null is likely to cause errors.”.
So you shouldn’t use Optionals like this:
Because a null check is much easier to read.
You should use Optionals just as a return value from a function. It’s not a good idea to create new ones to make a cool method chain like in the example above. Most of the times, null is enough.
That’s it for today! We have played with the Optional class. It’s a container class for other classes which is either present or not present(empty). We have removed some common code smell that comes with Optionals and used functions as objects again. We also discussed when you should use null and when Optionals.
In the next part, we will use Streams as a new way to handle a Collection of Objects, like Iterables and Collections.
Thanks for reading and have a nice day,
Published at DZone with permission of Niklas Wuensche, DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.