DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Newsletter
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • The SDLC After AI
  • You Don’t Need To Be a Manager To Lead: Why Leadership Matters for Software Engineers
  • Stop Using the ATM-Didn’t-Kill-Jobs Story to Reassure Developers About AI
  • The 7 Pillars of Meeting Design: Transforming Expensive Conversations into Decision Assets

Trending

  • When a Coding Agent Fixes the Test Instead of the Bug
  • Searching Kafka Without an Index: Lessons From Building Message Search for Kafdrop
  • Rebuilding Elasticsearch Under Load: Unsafe Watermarks and a Sampling Blind Spot
  • One Database, Two Models: Building AI-Friendly Java Applications With MySQL JSON Duality Views

Draft This article hasn't been published, so readers can't see it.

In moderation This article is waiting for review, so readers can't see it yet.

Deleted This article has been deleted, so readers can't see it.

Input, Output, and Outcome

A discussion of the importance of the relationship between Input, Output, and Outcome.

By 
Khoa Doan Tien
·
Aug. 06, 19 · Analysis
Post on X (opens in a new tab) Share on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
7.7K Views

Join the DZone community Save articles, join the discussion, and download Refcards and Trend Reports with a free account.

Join for free Already a member? Log in

Many years ago, I questioned myself about what makes a software product successful and what makes it fail. In project management, I observed that even when we deliver the project within budget, scope, and time, it still may not succeed when launching into the market.

I researched and observed what is essential to make a product successful, and I found that: one of the things that impact the success of the product is a weak connection between Input, Output, and Outcome. People are quick to focus too much on Output but less likely to focus on Outcome. Developers also fail to connect the three ideas.

Definition of "Input," "Output," and "Outcome."

Input: Anything needed for a project or product. In this context, will be money, time, resources, people, efforts, plans, and documents.

Output: In terms of the project or product: features, products, or a service that can be used by users.

Outcome: Feedback from the user when using the product or the features.


Input Output and Outcome

If we investigate deeper, when we invest Money, Resources, and Technology to a project, it is "Input”. Then the result of that investment is a product, or features meet with the initial requirement, on-time, and on the budget is "Output". In the next step, we deliver the product and features to market for the end-users to use. In this phase, the feedbacks and feeling of the users about the product or service is "Outcome".

The Broken Line Between Input, Output, and Outcome.

Many people thought that the product would be a success if it had more features than the competitor. It is not entirely wrong, but the success of the product also relies on other elements. Such as: whether the users are happy with the features of the product, or if it makes them disappointed and they switch to the competitor, despite the lack of features. In this case, you will lose the users and waste all the efforts to build the product.

Software development is a complex environment, by “Technology”, "People" and "Market". Therefore, focus on increasing the number of features, or trying to gold plate the idea, looking for perfection, but not link it with the market is a danger. It can lead you to build an outdated product or a thing users never need.

For that reason, let’s build the line to connect your product with the users and get feedback about the product as soon as possible and frequently. It will help you collect the data and sight to continues to improve product values. Instead of spending all money, effort, and long duration to develop, then bring it to the market, it just likes a big gamble, where you play "All in" but the percent of win is low.


Input Output and Outcome with Scrum

Conclusion

"Input", "Output" or "Outcome" are the same level of importance. If you forget one or do not have a connect the three, it will impact the success of your product. Therefore, build the circle to deliver value to the user fast and frequently and learn from your users. That is the core of Scrum. Every Sprint (with time-box is one month), we have a Done Increment is ready to send to the users. From that, we will receive feedback to improve our product in the next Sprint. Scrum creates a strong connection between "Input", "Output", and "Outcome".

Software development

Published at DZone with permission of Khoa Doan Tien. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • The SDLC After AI
  • You Don’t Need To Be a Manager To Lead: Why Leadership Matters for Software Engineers
  • Stop Using the ATM-Didn’t-Kill-Jobs Story to Reassure Developers About AI
  • The 7 Pillars of Meeting Design: Transforming Expensive Conversations into Decision Assets

Partner Resources

×

Comments

Loading comments

The comments didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

Likes

Loading

The next likes didn't load. Please try again.

The likes didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

See who liked this

Log in or join DZone for free to see who liked this article.

Log in Join for free
  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook