DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Newsletter
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Stop Writing Database Migration Scripts: Declarative Schema Sync for Java
  • Searching Kafka Without an Index: Lessons From Building Message Search for Kafdrop
  • ScyllaDB in Enterprise Java: High-Performance NoSQL With Eclipse JNoSQL
  • Member Spotlight: Shai Almong

Trending

  • Part 3: End-to-End Tracing and Observability Across Goose, agentgateway, and Quarkus
  • AI Agents and Frontier Models: Insights From The Neuron
  • Building a Real Pipeline With senro: Monorepos, Caching, and Triggers
  • Kill the Worker, Keep the Research: Build a Recoverable LangGraph Agent on Temporal

Draft This article hasn't been published, so readers can't see it.

In moderation This article is waiting for review, so readers can't see it yet.

Deleted This article has been deleted, so readers can't see it.

  1. DZone
  2. Coding
  3. Java
  4. Java 8: Lambda Expressions vs Auto Closeable

Java 8: Lambda Expressions vs Auto Closeable

By 
Mark Needham
·
Mar. 03, 14 · Interview
Post on X (opens in a new tab) Share on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
8.5K Views

Join the DZone community Save articles, join the discussion, and download Refcards and Trend Reports with a free account.

Join for free Already a member? Log in

If you used earlier versions of Neo4j via its Java API with Java 6 you probably have code similar to the following to ensure write operations happen within a transaction:

public class StylesOfTx
{
    public static void main( String[] args ) throws IOException
    {
        String path = "/tmp/tx-style-test";
        FileUtils.deleteRecursively(new File(path));
 
        GraphDatabaseService db = new GraphDatabaseFactory().newEmbeddedDatabase( path );
 
        Transaction tx = db.beginTx();
        try 
        {
            db.createNode();
            tx.success();
        } 
        finally 
        {
            tx.close();
        }
    }
}

In Neo4j 2.0 Transaction started extending AutoCloseable which meant that you could use ‘try with resources’ and the ‘close’ method would be automatically called when the block finished:

public class StylesOfTx
{
    public static void main( String[] args ) throws IOException
    {
        String path = "/tmp/tx-style-test";
        FileUtils.deleteRecursively(new File(path));
 
        GraphDatabaseService db = new GraphDatabaseFactory().newEmbeddedDatabase( path );
 
        try ( Transaction tx = db.beginTx() )
        {
            Node node = db.createNode();
            tx.success();
        }
    }
}

This works quite well although it’s still possible to have transactions hanging around in an application when people don’t use this syntax – the old style is still permissible.

In Venkat Subramaniam’s Java 8 book he suggests an alternative approach where we use a lambda based approach:

public class StylesOfTx
{
    public static void main( String[] args ) throws IOException
    {
        String path = "/tmp/tx-style-test";
        FileUtils.deleteRecursively(new File(path));
 
        GraphDatabaseService db = new GraphDatabaseFactory().newEmbeddedDatabase( path );
 
        Db.withinTransaction(db, neo4jDb -> {
            Node node = neo4jDb.createNode();
        });
    }
 
    static class Db {
        public static void withinTransaction(GraphDatabaseService db, Consumer<GraphDatabaseService> fn) {
            try ( Transaction tx = db.beginTx() )
            {
                fn.accept(db);
                tx.success();
            }
        }
    }
}

The ‘withinTransaction’ function would actually go on GraphDatabaseService or similar rather than being on that Db class but it was easier to put it on there for this example.

A disadvantage of this style is that you don’t have explicit control over the transaction for handling the failure case – it’s assumed that if ‘tx.success()’ isn’t called then the transaction failed and it’s rolled back. I’m not sure what % of use cases actually need such fine grained control though.

Brian Hurt refers to this as the ‘hole in the middle pattern‘ and I imagine we’ll start seeing more code of this ilk once Java 8 is released and becomes more widely used.

Java (programming language)

Published at DZone with permission of Mark Needham. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Stop Writing Database Migration Scripts: Declarative Schema Sync for Java
  • Searching Kafka Without an Index: Lessons From Building Message Search for Kafdrop
  • ScyllaDB in Enterprise Java: High-Performance NoSQL With Eclipse JNoSQL
  • Member Spotlight: Shai Almong

Partner Resources

×

Comments

Loading comments

The comments didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

Likes

Loading

The next likes didn't load. Please try again.

The likes didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

See who liked this

Log in or join DZone for free to see who liked this article.

Log in Join for free
  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook