DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Zones

Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

Generative AI has transformed nearly every industry. How can you leverage GenAI to improve your productivity and efficiency?

SBOMs are essential to circumventing software supply chain attacks, and they provide visibility into various software components.

Related

  • Docker and Kubernetes Transforming Modern Deployment
  • Deploying Python and Java Applications to Kubernetes With Korifi
  • Don’t Let Kubernetes Developers Suffer From Solved Problems
  • Building an AI Nutrition Coach With OpenAI, Gradio, and gTTS

Trending

  • MCP Client Agent: Architecture and Implementation
  • Migrating Traditional Workloads From Classic Compute to Serverless Compute on Databricks
  • How We Broke the Monolith (and Kept Our Sanity): Lessons From Moving to Microservices
  • Decoding the Secret Language of LLM Tokenizers
  1. DZone
  2. Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
  3. DevOps and CI/CD
  4. Automating Kubernetes RBAC Sync With LDAP Entitlements Using Python

Automating Kubernetes RBAC Sync With LDAP Entitlements Using Python

Learn how I automated a Python script to sync LDAP entitlements with Kubernetes RoleBindings. Runs via CronJob to keep namespace access secure and up to date.

By 
Rajeev Chevuri user avatar
Rajeev Chevuri
·
Jun. 04, 25 · Tutorial
Likes (3)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
1.5K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

In enterprise Kubernetes environments, particularly those supporting data science and analytics teams, managing namespace access becomes increasingly complex as user roles and responsibilities evolve. Teams often rely on centralized identity platforms like LDAP or Active Directory, where group entitlements define access rights. However, Kubernetes lacks native integration with LDAP, which forces teams to maintain RoleBindings manually — a tedious, error-prone, and unscalable process.

This exact challenge emerged in our organization, where dozens of data scientists and engineers needed timely, accurate access to shared Kubernetes namespaces. We were stuck managing access through a manual process involving support tickets, group membership checks, and handcrafted YAML RoleBindings. It was slow, insecure, and operationally painful.

To address this, I designed and implemented a Python-based automation system that synchronizes LDAP group entitlements with Kubernetes RoleBindings. It runs on a schedule via Kubernetes CronJobs, tracks recent LDAP changes, and ensures the cluster reflects the latest access policies. In this article, you’ll learn how this solution works, how to implement it, and the key lessons we learned from production use.

The Problem: Manual Access Control Doesn’t Scale

In many organizations, LDAP or Active Directory is the source of truth for user entitlements. Teams use group membership to define access to systems and data. However, Kubernetes has no built-in support for LDAP-based role-based access control (RBAC), which leads to several issues:

  • When someone joins a project and is added to a group like ds-readonly, their Kubernetes access doesn't update automatically.
  • Users who leave a project or change teams may retain access they no longer need.
  • Access requests rely on manual RoleBinding creation, leading to slow onboarding and potential configuration errors.

At our peak, we were processing 10–15 namespace access requests per week, each requiring validation and manual intervention. Revoking access was even worse — often overlooked until an audit or security review surfaced stale permissions.

This not only slowed down developer productivity but also created serious compliance risks. Auditors found users with lingering edit access to sensitive namespaces months after they had left the corresponding LDAP group.

Solution Overview: Automating With Python + CronJobs

Here’s how the system works:

  • LDAP Sync Script: Connects securely to the LDAP server, fetches group membership, and evaluates recent changes using whenChanged.
  • Namespace Mapping via ConfigMap: LDAP entitlements are mapped to Kubernetes namespaces and access roles (e.g., view/edit) using a ConfigMap.
  • RBAC Enforcement: Users are granted or revoked access via RoleBindings managed through kubectl.
  • Scheduled CronJob: The automation runs every 4 hours inside a Kubernetes CronJob.
  • Kubernetes Secrets: Securely store LDAP credentials and TLS CA certs.

The result is a hands-free access lifecycle — when someone joins or leaves a group, their access updates automatically, without human intervention.

Deep Dive: Python Script Logic

1. Connecting to LDAP Securely

We use the ldap3 library and TLS to establish a secure connection. LDAP credentials and CA certificates are injected via Kubernetes Secrets to avoid hardcoding.

Python
 
from ldap3 import Server, Connection, Tls
import ssl

tls_config = Tls(validate=ssl.CERT_REQUIRED, version=ssl.PROTOCOL_TLSv1_2, ca_certs_file="/certs/ca.crt")
server = Server("ldaps://ldap.example.com", use_ssl=True, tls=tls_config)
conn = Connection(server, user=os.getenv("LDAP_USER"), password=os.getenv("LDAP_PASSWORD"))

try:
    conn.bind()
except Exception as e:
    logging.error(f"Failed to connect to LDAP: {e}")
    sys.exit(1)


2. Filtering Valid LDAP Users

We extract human user IDs from group member strings using regex, skipping service accounts and irrelevant entries:

Python
 
import re

pattern = r"CN=(c[f]\d{5,6})"
for member in entry.member:
    match = re.search(pattern, str(member))
    if match:
        entitlement_members.append(match.group().replace("CN=", ""))


3. ConfigMap-Based Namespace Mapping

A Kubernetes ConfigMap named namespace-entitlement-mapping defines how entitlements map to namespaces and access types.:

YAML
 
data:
  ds-readonly: "data-science-ns,ro"
  ds-editor: "data-science-ns,rw"


The script fetches this using:

Python
 
kubectl get configmap namespace-entitlement-mapping -o jsonpath={.data}


Each entry tells the script which namespace to apply the RoleBinding in, and which ClusterRole (kubeflow-view or kubeflow-edit) to assign.

4. Managing RoleBindings

Using kubectl, the script compares existing RoleBindings with current LDAP membership, and performs:

  • Create RoleBinding if user is new. 
  • Update RoleBinding if access type changed.
  • Delete RoleBinding if user is no longer in the group.

Sample creation logic:

Python
 
kubectl apply -f /tmp/rolebinding-cf12345.yaml


YAML template:

Python
 
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  name: namespace-cf12345
  namespace: data-science-ns
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: ClusterRole
  name: kubeflow-view
subjects:
- kind: User
  name: cf12345
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io


This file is created in /tmp, applied with kubectl apply, and then removed.

5. Automation via Kubernetes CronJob

The script runs every 4 hours via Kubernetes CronJob:

YAML
 
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: CronJob
metadata:
  name: ldap-rbac-sync
spec:
  schedule: "0 */4 * * *"
  jobTemplate:
    spec:
      template:
        spec:
          containers:
          - name: ldap-sync
            image: registry.example.com/ldap-sync:latest
            env:
            - name: LDAP_USER
              valueFrom:
                secretKeyRef:
                  name: ldap-creds
                  key: username
            - name: LDAP_PASSWORD
              valueFrom:
                secretKeyRef:
                  name: ldap-creds
                  key: password
            volumeMounts:
            - name: ldap-cert
              mountPath: /certs
          volumes:
          - name: ldap-cert
            secret:
              secretName: ldap-ca
          restartPolicy: OnFailure


This keeps our Kubernetes RBAC consistent with LDAP, without manual intervention.

Results

  • 90% drop in manual access requests
  • Onboarding time reduced from 2 business days to <4 hours
  • Access stays accurate and auditable via logs
  • Idempotent updates: Script only makes changes when needed

Lessons Learned

  1. Avoid kubectl subprocesses for complex flows. They’re hard to test, parse, and secure. The Kubernetes Python client is a better long-term choice.
  2. LDAP’s whenChanged attribute is a huge performance win. Use it to avoid unnecessary syncing and reduce cluster churn.
  3. Always validate LDAP certificates. Skipping TLS validation introduces potential for man-in-the-middle attacks.
  4. Design for idempotency. Every change should be safe to repeat, especially in scheduled jobs.
  5. Start simple — a script + ConfigMap was all we needed. No need to introduce a complex policy engine at the outset.

What’s Next?

Although this solution works well for our current setup, future enhancements could include:

  • This solution works well today, but future improvements could include:
  • Switching to the Kubernetes Python API client for native RoleBinding management
  • Emitting Prometheus metrics for sync success/failure
  • Using annotations to track source entitlement for audit visibility
  • Supporting cloud identity platforms like Azure AD or Okta

We also plan to extend this model to cluster-wide access controls, such as admin privileges for platform teams and temporary access windows for contractors.

Conclusion

This Python-based LDAP sync system helped us regain control over Kubernetes namespace access. It’s lightweight, secure, and designed for operational clarity. Best of all, it aligns access management with real-world team structures already defined in LDAP.

If your team is still manually managing RBAC, this approach offers a practical path to automation — one that improves security, scales with your team, and reduces operational friction.

Kubernetes Python (language) Sync (Unix)

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Docker and Kubernetes Transforming Modern Deployment
  • Deploying Python and Java Applications to Kubernetes With Korifi
  • Don’t Let Kubernetes Developers Suffer From Solved Problems
  • Building an AI Nutrition Coach With OpenAI, Gradio, and gTTS

Partner Resources

×

Comments

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 100
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends: