DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Beyond Manual Annotation: Engineering Self-Correcting Pseudo-Labeling Pipelines
  • Building Threat Intelligence Pipelines Using Python, APIs, and Elasticsearch
  • Implementing Secure API Gateways for Microservices Architecture
  • Contract-First Integration: Building Scalable Systems With Flyway, OpenAPI, and Kafka

Trending

  • Building a Spring AI Assistant With MCP Servers: A Step-by-Step Tutorial
  • Slopsquatting: Building a Scanner That Catches AI-Hallucinated Packages Before They Reach Production
  • Building Threat Intelligence Pipelines Using Python, APIs, and Elasticsearch
  • 5 AI Security Incidents That Broke Things in Production (and What They Have in Common)
  1. DZone
  2. Data Engineering
  3. Databases
  4. Latency Cost of Implementing API Policies (Anypoint Platform)

Latency Cost of Implementing API Policies (Anypoint Platform)

A quick analysis of the latency cost associated with implementing API policies. Depending on the type of API policy, that latency is up to ~0.38 milliseconds.

By 
Sadik Ali user avatar
Sadik Ali
·
Feb. 03, 21 · Analysis
Likes (3)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
5.3K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Practicing an API policy to API invocations sums treating overhead, which rises in increased latency (decreased response time) as seen by API clients. Depending on the type of API policy, that latency is up to 0.38 milliseconds (approx.) per HTTP request.

Latency overhead graph

Improvement in HTTP request-response latency into the application of several API policies, which are enforced set in the API implementation.

Measurement Outlined for Above Graph

Measures for the above Figure are performed appropriating API Gateway 2.0, 1kB payloads, c3.xlarge (4-vCore, 7.5GB RAM, standard disks, 1Gbit network).

The non-function requirements for the "Integration" product and "Self-Service App" product are a combination of constraints on throughput, response time, security, and reliability.

  • Anypoint API Manager and API policies manage APIs and API invocations and can force NFRs on that level in multiple areas.
  • API policies can be implemented directly in an API implementation. that is a Mule application or in a distinctly extended API proxy
  • Client ID-based API policies require API clients to be registered for access to an API example.
    • Must pass client ID/secret with every API invocation, likely implicitly via OAuth 2.0 access token.
  • The Hotel Management C4E has specified guidelines for the API policies to apply to System APIs, Process APIs, and Experience APIs.
  • C4E has created reusable RAML fragments for API policies and published them to Anypoint Exchange.
API

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Beyond Manual Annotation: Engineering Self-Correcting Pseudo-Labeling Pipelines
  • Building Threat Intelligence Pipelines Using Python, APIs, and Elasticsearch
  • Implementing Secure API Gateways for Microservices Architecture
  • Contract-First Integration: Building Scalable Systems With Flyway, OpenAPI, and Kafka

Partner Resources

×

Comments

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook