DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Alternative Structured Concurrency
  • Beyond Java Streams: Exploring Alternative Functional Programming Approaches in Java
  • Using Java Stream Gatherers To Improve Stateful Operations
  • Thread-Safety Pitfalls in XML Processing

Trending

  • When Snowflake Lies to You: Understanding False Failures in dbt Pipelines
  • Using LLMs to Automate Data Cleaning and Transformation Pipelines
  • Integrating AI-Driven Decision-Making in Agile Frameworks: A Deep Dive into Real-World Applications and Challenges
  • A Scalable Framework for Enterprise Salesforce Optimization: Turning Outcomes Into an Operating System
  1. DZone
  2. Coding
  3. Java
  4. Maintaining PriorityQueue Order With Java Streams

Maintaining PriorityQueue Order With Java Streams

The priority order of a PriorityQueue is not preserved when iterating or traversing, but fortunately, there are clean solutions for achieving this.

By 
Grzegorz Piwowarek user avatar
Grzegorz Piwowarek
·
Sep. 18, 17 · Tutorial
Likes (5)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
9.7K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

The tricky thing about working with PriorityQueues is that, ironically, they do not always behave according to the PriorityQueue semantics.

PriorityQueue Traversal

If we have a look at PriorityQueue.iterator() documentation, we'll see that, unintuitively, iterator() is not traversing the queue according to its priority order:

Returns an iterator over the elements in this queue. The iterator does not return the elements in any particular order.

The same behavior can be noticed when trying to use Java Stream API for processing PriorityQueue's elements using the instance obtained by the stream() method — the Stream instance depends on the Spliterator instance which does not guarantee the traversal order according to the priority.

PriorityQueue<String> queue = new PriorityQueue<>(comparing(String::length));
List<String> content = Arrays.asList("1", "333", "22", "55555", "4444");
queue.addAll(content);

assertThat(queue.stream())
  .containsExactlyElementsOf(content);


We can see that the insertion order gets preserved regardless of the fact is that our queue should be providing Strings according to their length.

There are two solutions for dealing with this.

Solution #1

To take elements from the queue according to their priority order, we can use the poll() method.

In this case, we can generate a Stream from consecutive elements returned by poll() using Stream.generate() method:

List<String> result = Stream.generate(queue::poll)
  .limit(queue.size())
  .collect(Collectors.toList());

assertThat(result)
  .containsExactly("1", "22", "333", "4444", "55555");
assertThat(queue)
  .isEmpty();

The problem with this implementation is that it's not concurrent-modification-friendly. Until Java 9 gets released, we can't terminate the generated Stream dynamically so we need to rely on limiting the Stream size to the queue size.

After consuming a Stream instance, we end up with a modified queue — the poll() method removes queue elements until it's empty.

Eventually, this functionality can be extracted to the separate utility method:

static <T> Stream<T> drainToStream(PriorityQueue<T> queue) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(queue);
    return Stream.generate(queue::poll)
      .limit(queue.size());
}

Java 9

Since Java 9, it'll be possible to rewrite it in a concurrent-friendly way:

static <T> Stream<T> drainToStream(PriorityQueue<T> queue) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(queue);
    return Stream.generate(queue::poll)
      .takeWhile(Objects::nonNull)
}

Solution #2

The other approach involves just sorting the Stream instance, obtained by calling the stream() method, using the same comparator that the queue uses. We need to remember that this will work as long as the queue was initialized using a custom comparator:

List<String> result = queue.stream()
  .sorted(queue.comparator())
  .collect(Collectors.toList());

assertThat(result)
  .containsExactly("1", "22", "333", "4444", "55555");
assertThat(queue)
  .isNotEmpty();


If we store Comparable objects in the queue and depend on their natural order, this becomes even simpler because we do not need to pass the Comparator instance around:

PriorityQueue<String> queue = new PriorityQueue<>();
queue.addAll(Arrays.asList("1", "333", "22", "55555", "4444"));

List<String> result = queue.stream()
  .sorted()
  .collect(Collectors.toList());

assertThat(result)
  .containsExactly("1", "22", "333", "4444", "55555");
assertThat(queue)
  .isNotEmpty();


The important part of this implementation is that after creating a Stream instance, our original queue remains intact.

Eventually, this functionality can be extracted to the separate utility method:

static <T> Stream<T> asStream(PriorityQueue<T> queue) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(queue);
    Comparator<? super T> comparator = queue.comparator();
    return comparator != null
      ? queue.stream().sorted(comparator)
      : queue.stream().sorted();
}

Conclusion

The priority order of the PriorityQueue is not preserved when iterating/traversing so, essentially, we need to create our Stream instances ourselves.

The working code snippets can be found on GitHub.

Stream (computing) Java (programming language)

Published at DZone with permission of Grzegorz Piwowarek. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Alternative Structured Concurrency
  • Beyond Java Streams: Exploring Alternative Functional Programming Approaches in Java
  • Using Java Stream Gatherers To Improve Stateful Operations
  • Thread-Safety Pitfalls in XML Processing

Partner Resources

×

Comments

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook