Series (3/4): Toward a Shared Language Between Humans and Machines — Quantum Language and the Limits of Simulation

Imagine compressing thousands of dimensions of meaning into a few qubits capable of processing all that information in parallel. That is the promise of Quantum Natural Language Processing. But can we truly translate the richness of human language into the abstract logic of quantum mechanics, without any grounding in reality? This article explores that frontier where science fiction and fundamental research meet.

Research in this field experiments with translations by leveraging quantum parallelism and entanglement. In other words, it uses the unique properties of qubits to process multiple meanings simultaneously and to establish connections between them.

A Necessary Detour: The Fundamentals of Quantum Computing

Before introducing Quantum Natural Language Processing, it is helpful to recall a few essential principles of quantum computing. These concepts make it easier to understand why quantum approaches inspire so much hope in overcoming classical limitations.

Qubits and Superposition

Unlike classical bits, which can take the value 0 or 1, qubits can exist simultaneously in a combination of both states thanks to superposition. This property makes it possible to represent and manipulate information much more densely, paving the way for massively accelerated parallel computations.

Quantum Entanglement

Another fundamental phenomenon is entanglement: two qubits can be linked in such a way that the state of one instantly influences the other, regardless of the distance between them. It is a key resource for quantum communication and computation, as it makes possible the secure and correlated transmission of information.

Quantum Teleportation

Based on the principle of entanglement, quantum teleportation does not involve moving a particle, but transferring the quantum state of one qubit to another at a distance. The first experimental demonstration of this phenomenon was achieved in 1997 by Anton Zeilinger’s team at the University of Innsbruck. Using pairs of entangled photons, they succeeded in transmitting the polarization state of a photon to another, proving that information could be “teleported” without any physical transfer of matter. The experiment relied on a Bell-state measurement and a classical communication channel, laying the foundation for all subsequent implementations.

Beyond the technical feat, this experiment highlights the potential of a future quantum network capable of linking distant nodes with a level of security and fidelity unattainable by classical systems.

Quantum Channels and Repeaters

Transmitting quantum information is no trivial task: the slightest disturbance can destroy a quantum state. Quantum channels, optical fibers, satellite communications, or semiconductor devices such as quantum dots, ensure this fragile transport. To cover long distances, quantum repeaters are used to “regenerate” entanglement and correct errors in order to preserve the coherence of quantum states.

Quantum Nodes and Memory

A quantum network relies on nodes equipped with quantum processors and memories, capable of storing and processing information. Distributed architectures, in which information circulates and transforms according to radically new physical rules, depend on these building blocks.

These principles (superposition, entanglement, teleportation, channels, and repeaters) form the foundation of a future where quantum networks will make it possible to process language simultaneously and securely, on a scale still unattainable for classical computing today.

The idea, then, is to represent meaning in a more compact way and to overcome some of the limitations of classical methods. In practical terms, QNLP aims to define language processing procedures adapted to current quantum devices. To achieve this, it leverages the ability of qubits to encode high-dimensional vectors within a reduced space. Eight qubits can thus store a classical vector of 256 dimensions, and twelve qubits one of 4,096 dimensions.

This compression makes it possible to perform calculations that would require enormous amounts of memory and power in a classical system, since each dimension would need to be stored and manipulated separately, but that becomes much lighter and faster on a quantum processor, which can handle all these dimensions simultaneously thanks to the superposed states of the qubits.

I know, you weren’t supposed to fall into a crash course on quantum computing… but admit it, there’s something intriguingly sci-fi about it!

It should be noted, however, that this approach departs from the position of researchers such as Yann LeCun or Fei-Fei Li, who emphasize the essential role of perception and physical experience in achieving a true understanding of the world.

In any case, none of these approaches yet offers a definitive solution. But they open the way to a future in which humans and machines could gradually share a common space of meaning, no longer based on mere imitation but on the co-construction of a truly hybrid language.

To Be Continued…

Quantum technology opens a fascinating perspective, but it does not resolve the central dilemma: the absence of lived experience and values. To go further, we must place the human back at the center, not as a spectator, but as a co-creator of a shared language. The next article will address this ethical, cultural, and strategic dimension, where the future of human–machine understanding is at stake.

Links to the previous articles published in this series:

• Series: Toward a Shared Language Between Humans and Machines
• Series (1/4): Toward a Shared Language Between Humans and Machines — Why Machines Still Struggle to Understand Us
• Series (2/4): Toward a Shared Language Between Humans and Machines — From Multimodality to World Models: Teaching Machines to Experience

References

• Abbaszade, Mina; Zomorodi, Mariam; Salari, Vahid; Kurian, Philip. "Toward Quantum Machine Translation of Syntactically Distinct Languages". [link] 
• Brodsky, Sascha. "World models help AI learn what five-year-olds know about gravity". IBM. [link] 
• Gubelmann, Reto. "Pragmatic Norms Are All You Need – Why The Symbol Grounding Problem Does Not Apply to LLMs". [link]
• Harnad, Stevan. "The Symbol Grounding Problem". [link]
• LEO (Linguist Education Online). "Human Intelligence in the Age of AI: How Interpreters and Translators Can Thrive in 2025". [link]
• Meta AI. "Yann LeCun on a vision to make AI systems learn and reason like animals and humans". [link]
• Opara, Chidimma. "Distinguishing AI-Generated and Human-Written Text Through Psycholinguistic Analysis". [link]
• Qi, Zia; Perron, Brian E.; Wang, Miao; Fang, Cao; Chen, Sitao; Victor, Bryan G. "AI and Cultural Context: An Empirical Investigation of Large Language Models' Performance on Chinese Social Work Professional Standards". [link]
•  Roziere, Baptiste; Lachaux, Marie-Anne; Chanussot, Lowik; Lample, Guillaume. "Unsupervised Translation of Programming Languages". [link]
• Strickland, Eliza. "AI Godmother Fei-Fei Li Has a Vision for Computer Vision". IEEE Spectrum. [link]
• Trott, Sean. "Humans, LLMs, and the symbol grounding problem (pt. 1)". [link]
• Nature. “Chip-to-chip photonic quantum teleportation over optical fibers, 2025”. [link]