DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Newsletter
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Series (1/4): Toward a Shared Language Between Humans and Machines — Why Machines Still Struggle to Understand Us
  • Every Generation Fears the Machine. Here Is How the AI Job Panic Usually Ends
  • Who Should Grade Your AI? Rules vs LLM Judges vs Humans
  • Threat Modeling Context-Aware AI: A STRIDE Walkthrough

Trending

  • Applying Microservices Lessons to Multi-Agent AI Systems
  • Should Developers Switch From SQLite to DuckDB?
  • Part 4: Multi-Agent Orchestration — Pairing Goose With Quarkus Flow State Machines
  • Stop Writing Database Migration Scripts: Declarative Schema Sync for Java

Draft This article hasn't been published, so readers can't see it.

In moderation This article is waiting for review, so readers can't see it yet.

Deleted This article has been deleted, so readers can't see it.

  1. DZone
  2. Data Engineering
  3. AI/ML
  4. Series: Toward a Shared Language Between Humans and Machines

Series: Toward a Shared Language Between Humans and Machines

Modern LLMs are fluent, but lack "world experience." We must explore the foundations needed for genuine common ground between human meaning and machine logic.

By 
Frederic Jacquet
DZone Core CORE ·
Oct. 23, 25 · Opinion
Post on X (opens in a new tab) Share on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
1.8K Views

Join the DZone community Save articles, join the discussion, and download Refcards and Trend Reports with a free account.

Join for free Already a member? Log in

Large language models (LLMs) today produce fluent and coherent texts, to the point of giving the illusion of a real conversation. But behind this apparent mastery arises an interesting question: do machines really understand us, or are they only predicting words?

In a four-part series, we will explore one of the deepest challenges of artificial intelligence: building a true common ground between human meaning and machine logic. From cognitive limits to quantum horizons, and including the strategic role of humans, each article will shed light on one facet of these questions.

Part 1: Why Machines Still Struggle to Understand Us

We will begin with the fundamental fractures that separate human words from machine calculations. Whether it is the absence of lived experience, the absence of a “world,” or the gap between our human intentions and algorithmic operations, these fractures create a deep divide between our modes of communication.

Read the full article here.

Part 2: From Multimodality to World Models: Teaching Machines How to Experience

Can perception bridge this gap? We will explore multimodal systems, digital twins, and the world models that research is attempting to develop, all aiming to give machines a form of grounding in reality.

Read the full article here.

Part 3: Can Quantum Language Break the Limits of Simulation?

Beyond imitation, could quantum computing encode meaning into qubits and open a radically new path? This part will examine how the quantum processing of language combines the fascination of cutting-edge research with very real breakthroughs.

Read the full article here.

Part 4: Humans as Co-Creators: Humans and AI as Co-Creators: Toward a Shared Language

In the end, the future of human-machine communication does not lie in replacing humans with machines, but in co-creation. We will analyze the ethical, cultural, and strategic choices that will allow AI to be guided as a partner, not as a replacement.

Read the full article here.

Across these four essays, the idea is to draw out a central message: the challenge is not only technical. Over the course of the four articles, we will establish that it is also cultural, ethical, and political. Building a shared language with machines requires preserving what makes human intelligence unique, while daring to imagine new forms of collaboration.

I invite you to read this series with curiosity and an open mind. Each article is meant as both an exploration and an invitation to reflect, question, and discuss. I would be truly glad to hear your thoughts, reactions, or even disagreements on these topics. 

After all, building a shared language between humans and machines begins with dialogue between humans themselves.

AI Machine large language model

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Series (1/4): Toward a Shared Language Between Humans and Machines — Why Machines Still Struggle to Understand Us
  • Every Generation Fears the Machine. Here Is How the AI Job Panic Usually Ends
  • Who Should Grade Your AI? Rules vs LLM Judges vs Humans
  • Threat Modeling Context-Aware AI: A STRIDE Walkthrough

Partner Resources

×

Comments

Loading comments

The comments didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

Likes

Loading

The next likes didn't load. Please try again.

The likes didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

See who liked this

Log in or join DZone for free to see who liked this article.

Log in Join for free
  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook