Replacing Legacy Systems With Data Streaming: The Strangler Fig Approach
Modernize legacy systems without the risk of a full rewrite. Strangler Fig + data streaming enables scalable, real-time transformation.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Join For FreeOrganizations looking to modernize legacy applications often face a high-stakes dilemma: Do they attempt a complete rewrite or find a more gradual, low-risk approach? Enter the Strangler Fig Pattern, a method that systematically replaces legacy components while keeping the existing system running. Unlike the “Big Bang” approach, where companies try to rewrite everything at once, the Strangler Fig Pattern ensures smooth transitions, minimizes disruptions, and allows businesses to modernize at their own pace. Data streaming transforms the Strangler Fig Pattern into a more powerful, scalable, and truly decoupled approach. Let’s explore why this approach is superior to traditional migration strategies.
What Is the Strangler Fig Design Pattern?
The Strangler Fig Pattern is a gradual modernization approach that allows organizations to replace legacy systems incrementally. The pattern was coined and popularized by Martin Fowler to avoid risky “big bang” system rewrites.
Inspired by the way strangler fig trees grow around and eventually replace their host, this pattern surrounds the old system with new services until the legacy components are no longer needed. By decoupling functionalities and migrating them piece by piece, businesses can minimize disruptions, reduce risk, and ensure a seamless transition to modern architectures.
When combined with data streaming, this approach enables real-time synchronization between old and new systems, making the migration even smoother.
Why Strangler Fig Is Better Than a Big Bang Migration or Rewrite
Many organizations have learned the hard way that rewriting an entire system in one go is risky. A Big Bang migration or rewrite often:
- Takes years to complete, leading to stale requirements by the time it’s done
- Disrupts business operations, frustrating customers and teams
- Requires a high upfront investment with unclear ROI
- Involves hidden dependencies, making the transition unpredictable
The Strangler Fig Pattern takes a more incremental approach:
- It allows gradual replacement of legacy components one service at a time
- Reduces business risk by keeping critical systems operational during migration
- Enables continuous feedback loops, ensuring early wins
- Keeps costs under control, as teams modernize based on priorities
Here is an example from the Industrial IoT space for the strangler fig pattern leveraging data streaming to modernizing OT Middleware:
Instead of replacing everything at once, this method surrounds the old system with new components until the legacy system is fully replaced—just like a strangler fig tree growing around its host.
Better Than Reverse ETL: A Migration With Data Consistency Across Operational and Analytical Applications
Some companies attempt to work around legacy constraints using Reverse ETL—extracting data from analytical systems and pushing it back into modern operational applications. On paper, this looks like a clever workaround. In reality, Reverse ETL is a fragile, high-maintenance anti-pattern that introduces more complexity than it solves.
Reverse ETL carries several critical flaws:
- Batch-based by nature: Data remains at rest in analytical lakehouses like Snowflake, Databricks, Google BigQuery, Microsoft Fabric or Amazon Redshift. It is then periodically moved—usually every few hours or once a day—back into operational systems. This results in outdated and stale data, which is dangerous for real-time business processes.
- Tightly coupled to legacy systems: Reverse ETL pipelines still depend on the availability and structure of the original legacy systems. A schema change, performance issue, or outage upstream can break downstream workflows—just like with traditional ETL.
- Slow and inefficient: It introduces latency at multiple stages, limiting the ability to react to real-world events at the right moment. Decision-making, personalization, fraud detection, and automation all suffer.
- Not cost-efficient: Reverse ETL tools often introduce double processing costs—you pay to compute and store the data in the warehouse, then again to extract, transform, and sync it back into operational systems. This increases both financial overhead and operational burden, especially as data volumes scale.
In short, Reverse ETL is a short-term fix for a long-term challenge. It’s a temporary bridge over the widening gap between real-time operational needs and legacy infrastructure.
Why Data Streaming With Apache Kafka and Flink is an Excellent Fit for the Strangler Fig Pattern
Many modernization efforts fail because they tightly couple old and new systems, making transitions painful. Data streaming with Apache Kafka and Flink changes the game by enabling real-time, event-driven communication.
1. True Decoupling of Old and New Systems
Data streaming using Apache Kafka with its event-driven streaming and persistence layer enables organizations to:
- Decouple producers (legacy apps) from consumers (modern apps)
- Process real-time and historical data without direct database dependencies
- Allow new applications to consume events at their own pace
This avoids dependency on old databases and enables teams to move forward without breaking existing workflows.
2. Real-Time Replication With Persistence
Unlike traditional migration methods, data streaming supports:
- Real-time synchronization of data between legacy and modern systems
- Durable persistence to handle retries, reprocessing, and recovery
- Scalability across multiple environments (on-prem, cloud, hybrid)
This ensures data consistency without downtime, making migrations smooth and reliable.
3. Supports Any Technology and Communication Paradigm
Data streaming’s power lies in its event-driven architecture, which supports any integration style—without compromising scalability or real-time capabilities.
The data product approach using Kafka Topics with data contracts handles:
- Real-time messaging for low-latency communication and operational systems
- Batch processing for analytics, reporting and AI/ML model training
- Request-response for APIs and point-to-point integration with external systems
- Hybrid integration—syncing legacy databases with cloud apps, uni- or bi-directionally
This flexibility lets organizations modernize at their own pace, using the right communication pattern for each use case while unifying operational and analytical workloads on a single platform.
4. No Time Pressure – Migrate at Your Own Pace
One of the biggest advantages of the Strangler Fig Pattern with data streaming is flexibility in timing.
- No need for overnight cutovers—migrate module by module
- Adjust pace based on business needs—modernization can align with other priorities
- Handle delays without data loss—thanks to durable event storage
This ensures that companies don’t rush into risky migrations but instead execute transitions with confidence.
5. Intelligent Processing in the Data Migration Pipeline
In a Strangler Fig Pattern, it’s not enough to just move data from old to new systems—you also need to transform, validate, and enrich it in motion.
While Apache Kafka provides the backbone for real-time event streaming and durable storage, Apache Flink adds powerful stream processing capabilities that elevate the modernization journey.
With Apache Flink, organizations can:
- Real-time preprocessing: Clean, filter, and enrich legacy data before it’s consumed by modern systems.
- Data product migration: Transform old formats into modern, domain-driven event models.
- Improved data quality: Validate, deduplicate, and standardize data in motion.
- Reusable business logic: Centralize processing logic across services without embedding it in application code.
- Unified streaming and batch: Support hybrid workloads through one engine.
Apache Flink allows you to roll out trusted, enriched, and well-governed data products—gradually, without disruption. Together with Kafka, it provides the real-time foundation for a smooth, scalable transition from legacy to modern.
The Future of IT Modernization and Legacy Migrations With Strangler Fig Using Data Streaming
The Strangler Fig Pattern is the most pragmatic approach to modernizing enterprise systems, and data streaming makes it even more powerful.
By decoupling old and new systems, enabling real-time synchronization, and supporting multiple architectures, data streaming with Apache Kafka and Flink provides the flexibility, reliability, and scalability needed for successful migrations and long-term integrations between legacy and cloud-native applications.
As enterprises continue to strengthen, this approach ensures that modernization doesn’t become a bottleneck, but a business enabler. If your organization is considering legacy modernization, data streaming is the key to making the transition seamless and risk-free.
Are you ready to transform your legacy systems without the risks of a big bang rewrite? What’s one part of your legacy system you’d “strangle” first—and why? If you could modernize just one workflow with real-time data tomorrow, what would it be?
Published at DZone with permission of Kai Wähner, DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
Comments