Shift-Right Testing: Smart Automation Through AI and Observability
Shift-right testing uses AI and observability to validate software in production-like environments, helping uncover real-world issues post-release.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Join For FreeConventional testing practices have mainly focused on discovering problems before the software is released to the market, also referred to as shift-left testing. Nevertheless, due to the heightened pace of software development owing to DevOps and CI/CD, many real-world conditions that do not mimic the live environment can go undetected in pre-production environments.
This is where shift-right testing comes in. Therefore, it is possible to improve the effectiveness of the strategies implemented by QA automation engineers through testing in production-like environments and with the help of AI-driven observability.
What Is Shift-Right Testing?
Shift-right testing goes beyond the conventional approach of performing pre-release testing, thereby enabling the development teams to deploy the software in real-time conditions. This approach includes canary releases where new features are released to a subset of users before the full launch. It also involves A/B testing, where two versions of the application are compared in real time.
Another important feature is chaos engineering, which implies that failures are deliberately introduced to check the strength of the system. This paper shows that observability-driven testing is an essential part of the shift-right approach as it helps to improve test coverage using real-time data.
Why Shift-Right? The Need for Real-World Validation
No matter how accurately the staging environment replicates the production environment, there are always unknown factors that emerge when real users use the system. Shift-right testing ensures that defects, performance bottlenecks, and usability issues are found in the live environments. The observability tools that are powered by AI, including Datadog, Honeycomb, and New Relic, offer automated monitoring, anomaly detection, and predictive analysis. These tools allow the QA team to analyze logs, metrics, and traces in real time, look for patterns and possible failures and leaks, and perform automated root cause analysis to reduce the need for manual debugging.
Feature toggles enhance the risk management process as they enable safe deployment where features can be released, tested and reverted back to the previous state in case of an issue. Tools like LaunchDarkly and Split.io enables the QA team to validate the new changes in production without affecting all the users at once.
How to Perform Shift-Right Testing With the Help of AI and Observability
It is crucial to integrate AI-based monitoring into the test automation strategies. The observability tools, such as Dynatrace and OpenTelemetry, gather real-time performance data and use machine learning models to detect anomalies that may lead to failure. Synthetic monitoring can also be used for proactive testing where the representative of users can interact with the application in production and track URLs, APIs, UI, and system behavior constantly.
Chaos engineering is the practice of injecting controlled failures into the system to assess its robustness with the help of tools like Chaos Monkey and Gremlin. This helps validate the actual behavior of a system in a production-like environment. All the testing feedback loops are also automated to ensure that Shift-Right is applied consistently by using AI-powered test analytics tools like Testim and Applitools to learn from test case selection. This makes it possible to use production data to inform the automatic generation of test suites, thus increasing coverage and precision.
Real-time alerting and self-healing mechanisms also enhance shift-right testing. Observability tools can be set up to send out alerts whenever a test fails and auto-remediation scripts to enable the environment to repair itself when test environments fail without the need to involve the IT staff.
Simulating Chaos Engineering
To ensure system resilience, a chaos engineering experiment can be performed in a similar manner as this script that I made that terminates instances to test recovery using Python:
To detect anomalies, we can use the help of AI to make the work smarter and efficient. Here’s a draft code for that as well:
Case Study: Shift-Right Testing in Action
Netflix has led the way in embracing shift-right testing methodologies, specifically by its development of chaos engineering methodologies. To ensure system resilience, Netflix developed Chaos Monkey, a system that randomly terminates production instances to test the ability of the system to recover from failure. This led to the development of Chaos Kong, which is able to simulate the failure of whole regions, thereby directing engineering teams to make services more resilient. Such pre-emptive actions have ensured minimum disruption, providing a seamless viewing experience for consumers.
Similarly, Capital One embraced shift-right testing by reorienting its DevOps practices to facilitate a microservices architecture. It employed continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines with automated compliance gates that ensured each microservice met high-quality standards prior to deployment. This improved delivery velocity without compromising quality, demonstrating the effectiveness of shift-right testing in a financial services context.
Conclusion
Shift-right testing, together with AI and observability, is a game-changer for modern QA automation. By actively observing the production environments, incorporating real-time feedback, and using machine learning-based recommendations, it becomes possible to provide quality software at scale without jeopardizing the velocity of delivery. For QA engineers who want to enhance their skills, implementing the Shift-Right approach is not a choice but a necessity in the current DevOps environment. So, are you ready to take testing to the next level?
To sum up, using AI-driven observability tools such as Datadog, New Relic, or Honeycomb can help us better understand the production systems. Using feature flags and canary releases in test strategies can make the rollouts more controlled and safe.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
Comments