DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Please enter at least three characters to search
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Zones

Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

The software you build is only as secure as the code that powers it. Learn how malicious code creeps into your software supply chain.

Apache Cassandra combines the benefits of major NoSQL databases to support data management needs not covered by traditional RDBMS vendors.

Generative AI has transformed nearly every industry. How can you leverage GenAI to improve your productivity and efficiency?

Modernize your data layer. Learn how to design cloud-native database architectures to meet the evolving demands of AI and GenAI workloads.

Related

  • What Do You Need To Know About DevOps Lifecycle Phases?
  • CI/CD Metrics You Should Be Monitoring
  • CI/CD Tools and Technologies: Unlock the Power of DevOps
  • Simplified Development With Azure DevOps

Trending

  • How Kubernetes Cluster Sizing Affects Performance and Cost Efficiency in Cloud Deployments
  • Exploring Intercooler.js: Simplify AJAX With HTML Attributes
  • Unit Testing Large Codebases: Principles, Practices, and C++ Examples
  • Designing a Java Connector for Software Integrations
  1. DZone
  2. Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
  3. DevOps and CI/CD
  4. The Cost of Ignoring Static Code Analysis

The Cost of Ignoring Static Code Analysis

Unit testing is an unmissable part of the development process. But too many forget static code analysis plays just as vital a role in creating quality software.

By 
Peter McKee user avatar
Peter McKee
·
Mar. 19, 24 · Analysis
Likes (1)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
5.1K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Within the software development community, there’s no denying the importance of unit testing. We all understand the need to isolate code for testing and quality assurance; it’s an unquestionable necessity in writing code. But how can we be sure that the code we deploy is as good as it can possibly be? The answer is: static code analysis.

Too often, businesses choose not to prioritize static analysis — which ultimately impacts the quality of their software. The truth is that we can’t afford to sidestep this part of the CI/CD development pipeline if we want to create the best possible software that helps a business compete and win in their market.

To ignore static analysis is to make a major mistake. Here’s why.

Companies Need a Combination of Testing

Businesses should employ both static analysis and unit testing to ensure the code’s readiness for development. However, developers don’t often pay the same attention to both practices, and ignoring the former means that buggy, costly code can likely fall through the cracks.

Here’s the thing. Dynamic analysis, which works at runtime, serves a different purpose than static analysis, which looks at the internal structure of an application and works on a variety of different code languages. The same can’t be said for dynamic testing. Short-sightedly, many developers view static analysis as a method to find bugs and problematic patterns without having to compile code.

And it’s great for that! But it’s not everything. Developers must understand why a part of their code may be an issue and how they can come up with a better solution, or they aren’t really doing their job. Static analysis, often perceived as overly complex to justify the effort, makes a huge difference here. In reality, static analysis isn’t all that complicated now that we have the right tools that help do it correctly.

Challenges With Unit Testing

Unit testing can’t cover every problem or bug. It’s simply not a failsafe, which leads to bigger issues in software down the line. Developers tend to forget that static analysis is a way to cover themselves. And with developer burnout reaching a critical point, this cannot be underestimated, particularly as software becomes more business-critical.

Here’s where static analysis kicks in. This kind of testing enables a developer to cover all code execution paths and help them best understand where their code has issues, and why those issues exist.

Static analysis tools possess a level of accuracy that manual source code review cannot surpass. Every developer knows that to err is to just be human, but the automated tools associated with static analysis help with that problem in the code creation process.

Static Analysis Isn’t a Perfect Substitute for Human Verification

Static analysis isn’t perfect, but it does eliminate a lot of problems that unit testing can’t fix. It’s a cog in the machine that makes software great. But, of course, there are drawbacks.

Automated tools can’t do it all. Everyone knows that. Automated tools can’t figure out developer intent or context; they’re no replacement for the humans behind the code. These tools also can’t determine the intent behind a mistake, which renders them imperfect. Coders will grasp the context, which ultimately results in a quality product.

Automated static analysis can also sometimes lead to false negatives or positives, as all it can do is report the error. At this point, a developer can only report the issue without truly fixing it. This can lead to indeterminate outcomes, causing delays in the development process, or erroneously reporting defects that don’t exist. Sometimes, they also fail to find a problem. Developers can’t eliminate any code-checking practice. 

Developers always need to double-check their work and their peers’ work. As we become more dependent upon automated tools, this becomes even more critical; there’s just no replacement for human cognition. While these tools can help us accelerate processes and get work done more quickly, and easily, they’re not a failsafe. Human developers will always hold a vital role in the software development process.

Here’s the Fix

Simply put, the best way for developers to guarantee they are producing top-quality code is by implementing both unit testing and static code analysis. It’s just the truth. Without both processes in place in the software development lifecycle, developers are risking the quality of their code.

I can think of a case personally where incorporating static analysis alongside unit testing saved a project. It was about encrypting passwords for a login screen. This functionality could pass a unit test — the user enters their username and password, which allows them to log in. But that didn’t mean that it was necessarily secure. The algorithm that encrypts or hashes the password could’ve been compromised. So, even though the functionality worked — it wasn’t secure. Static analysis catches something like that when unit testing can’t.

The great thing about static analysis is that it can detect problems before you’re even able to test software in real time. As developers, we aspire to write clean code, code that is consistent, intentional, adaptable, and responsible. Addressing mistakes or identifying errors early in the coding development process leads to a higher-quality end result in the long term, ultimately saving time by resolving issues upfront.

Incorporating both static analysis and unit testing ensures that your software is top-quality with any issues being addressed earlier on in the CI/CD pipeline. At a time when companies are wasting hundreds of trillions of dollars annually on fixing bad code, prioritizing a combination of analysis and testing is necessary.

DevOps Testing

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • What Do You Need To Know About DevOps Lifecycle Phases?
  • CI/CD Metrics You Should Be Monitoring
  • CI/CD Tools and Technologies: Unlock the Power of DevOps
  • Simplified Development With Azure DevOps

Partner Resources

×

Comments
Oops! Something Went Wrong

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 100
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • support@dzone.com

Let's be friends:

Likes
There are no likes...yet! 👀
Be the first to like this post!
It looks like you're not logged in.
Sign in to see who liked this post!