DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Zones

Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

How does AI transform chaos engineering from an experiment into a critical capability? Learn how to effectively operationalize the chaos.

Data quality isn't just a technical issue: It impacts an organization's compliance, operational efficiency, and customer satisfaction.

Are you a front-end or full-stack developer frustrated by front-end distractions? Learn to move forward with tooling and clear boundaries.

Developer Experience: Demand to support engineering teams has risen, and there is a shift from traditional DevOps to workflow improvements.

Related

  • Exploring Cloud-Based Testing With the Elastic Execution Grid
  • Integrating Selenium With Amazon S3 for Test Artifact Management
  • Software Specs 2.0: An Elaborate Example
  • Integrating Cursor and LLM for BDD Testing With Playwright MCP (Model Context Protocol)

Trending

  • From ETL to ELT to Real-Time: Modern Data Engineering with Databricks Lakehouse
  • Java Enterprise Matters: Why It All Comes Back to Jakarta EE
  • Safeguarding Cloud Databases: Best Practices and Risks Engineers Must Avoid
  • Mastering Fluent Bit: Controlling Logs With Fluent Bit on Kubernetes (Part 4)
  1. DZone
  2. Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
  3. Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
  4. The Economics of TDD

The Economics of TDD

Why is TDD so successful? Because it can help us accelerate development and reduce costs over a project’s lifecycle.

By 
Tomas Fernandez user avatar
Tomas Fernandez
·
Feb. 27, 22 · Analysis
Likes (4)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
13.4K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

From a management standpoint, Test-Driven Development (TDD) can be a difficult sell. It involves a relatively large upfront investment, has no obvious business benefits, and (most important of all) the customer is paying for functionality, not tests.

Tempting as it is to cut testing in order to reach the next milestone in the project, it is a mistake because, as we’ll see, TDD can help us accelerate development and reduce costs over a project’s lifecycle.

What Is TDD?

TDD is a set of principles for software development that uses testing as the catalyst for design. The TDD cycle consists of three phases:

  1. Write a test: the test defines the code’s behavior, the input, and the expected outputs.
  2. Implement: write the minimal code that makes the test pass.
  3. Refactor: improve the implementation, and make it more general, faster, or more readable. The test ensures that the implementation remains valid during this phase.
TDD cycle

TDD is not a synonym for testing. You cannot simply add some tests to your project and say you’re doing TDD. For example, the old-school waterfall development method also uses tests, albeit at the end of the process, and is pretty much the antithesis of TDD.

Waterfall development cycle

The problem is that the testing phase comes too late. By the time tests are executed, too many design decisions have been made without grounding feedback. Serious issues revealed by tests implemented at this stage often send the project back to the drawing board.

TDD’s defining characteristic is using tests to drive design. This means that tests appear at the very beginning of the design process, before any code is written.

TDD waterfall cycle

TDD creates a short test<->implement feedback loop that promotes fast iteration. It allows trying different designs and multiple implementations during development. This helps developers find optimal solutions in a timely manner, giving them confidence in their code and keeping the project on track.

According to a survey conducted by IEEE, TDD has several benefits:

  • Shorter time to market: TDD projects finished 30% faster on average.
  • Fewer defects: TDD produced code with fewer failures. Bug reduction was found to be between 40% and 80%.
  • Improved quality: some projects received an 80% bump in readability, understandability, and perceived code quality

How TDD Reduces Costs

To put things in more concrete terms, we’ll define effort as the amount of work needed to implement a new feature, fix a bug, or change part of an application.

The effort is not constant; it changes as the codebase grows. In the waterfall method, the effort starts low and rises steadily. The problem is, like we saw earlier, that feedback comes too late to be helpful, so developers need to rely on guesswork and intuition.

Waterfall time vs. effort

TDD switches things around. Initially, the effort is high because we’re writing tests instead of implementing features. Additionally, we need to factor in the fact that switching to TDD takes a while to get the hang of.

Once you zoom out, however, TDD does not increase development costs. In fact, after a certain threshold, TDD becomes much more efficient than waterfall.

TDD time vs. effort

In a world where time is money, the initial cost of TDD is offset by the effort saved down the road. As a project advances, changing code gets easier because:

  • Tests save you a lot of debugging effort.
  • You have immediate feedback when something breaks.
  • Having a clear direction and a robust design results in more focused code.
  • Code tends to be cleaner, more decoupled, and thus easier to change.

TDD’s Pitfalls

TDD is not something that you can just plug into your development workflow. Frequently, TDD requires a cultural change, both in management and engineering teams.

Writing tests is a different skill from writing code and requires experience to master. Implementing TDD in a half-baked manner won’t get you the promised payoff for the initial investment. In fact, a poorly-written test suite will block development.

TDD time vs. effort and ROI

Management must set clear expectations and a coherent roadmap, ensuring that developers are on board and properly trained before attempting to adopt TDD. Failing to understand and properly apply TDD causes poor results. This, in turn, results in developers feeling like they’re wasting their time and general disappointment throughout the organization. These are a few signs that indicate when TDD is not going according to plan:

  • Teams are trying to reach 100% coverage.
  • A prevailing mentality that tests are only about finding bugs.
  • The test suite is not easy to run.
  • Not all the tests are automated.
  • The test suite runs slowly.
  • The CI/CD pipeline takes more than 10 minutes to run.
  • Tests are too tightly-coupled to the implementation.
  • A prevailing belief that TDD is a fire-and-forget solution (as opposed to an investment that needs periodic maintenance in order to keep tests fast).

Conclusion

Getting started with TDD can be challenging, but it’s a game-changer. The increased speed and ROI cannot be compared with other development methods such as waterfall.

Testing

Published at DZone with permission of Tomas Fernandez. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Exploring Cloud-Based Testing With the Elastic Execution Grid
  • Integrating Selenium With Amazon S3 for Test Artifact Management
  • Software Specs 2.0: An Elaborate Example
  • Integrating Cursor and LLM for BDD Testing With Playwright MCP (Model Context Protocol)

Partner Resources

×

Comments

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 100
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends: