DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Optimizing Front-End Performance
  • The Bill You Didn't See Coming
  • Latency Is Cheap, Bandwidth Is Not
  • Make Static Sites Feel Dynamic With APIs Only (No Backend Needed)

Trending

  • Understanding MCP Architecture: LLM + API vs Model Context Protocol
  • Ingesting Fixed-Width Mainframe Files Into Delta Lake: The Details Nobody Writes Down
  • 5 Layers of Prompt Injection Defense You Can Wire Into Any Node.js App
  • You Secured the Code. Did You Secure the Model?
  1. DZone
  2. Software Design and Architecture
  3. Performance
  4. Webpack Lazy Loading On Rails With CDN Support

Webpack Lazy Loading On Rails With CDN Support

By 
Swizec Teller user avatar
Swizec Teller
·
Jul. 03, 15 · Interview
Likes (0)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
13.3K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Webpack is the best module bundler I’ve ever used. Just this week I used it to reduce the JS footprint of an app from 906KB to 87KB for mobile visitors. An 800KB difference!

Webpack‘s core premise is that you can require('./foo') your JavaScripts. That sea of <script> tags or concatenated code and variables injected into the global namespace is gone.

In theory we’ve had that for a while. RequireJS and its AMD have been out for a while, but it’s always felt clunky. Don’t think I’ve used it more than once in the wild. Too clunky.

Browserify was better. Using CommonJS it brought the same syntax we’ve had in node.js into the browser. Less clunky and easier to reason about. But to my knowledge, not all that popular in the wild.

The problem with Browserify is that, at least in my experience, it takes a lot of setup to work well. And it’s kind of slow. Compile times run into the many seconds range.

Webpack is fast. Like super fast. Compiling a huge codebase rarely takes more than a second. Every time I change something it’s already compiled by the time I refresh the browser.

Magic.

Lazy loading your code

Another great feature of Webpack is that it can perform a sort of minimal bundle coverage for your dependency graph. Instead of making one huge bundle that’s got all your code, it makes a few smaller discrete ones.

Users no longer have to download all the code for /admin_panel when they’re looking at /user_profile. Not only that, Webpack automagically downloads the required javascripts when needed.

This is called lazy loading and it is magic.

It’s easy in theory, whenever you require a dependency like this:

require.ensure([], function () {
   var more_code = require('./more_code');
});

Webpack will say “Oop, that’s an optional dependency!”. It will package everything that might get required by that require call into a separate bundle. In this case just ./more_code.js.

If your path includes a variable, Webpack understands that too and puts everything that could match in a bundle. So with require('./'+module_name+'View.js'), for instance, it will bundle all JavaScript files that end with View into one file.

Webpack splits your bundle on every require.ensure call. Then when your code needs something, Webpack makes a jsonp call to get it from your server.

This is great in development. Not great in production.

In my tests on a Heroku Rails app, doing a HEAD call to our app took some 200ms, while the same call to amazon’s CloudFlare took only 10ms.

Our app is an order of magnitude slower than a proper static file server. Oops.

Lazy Loading with CDN support

First of all, you have to get Webpack working with Rails. The best guide I’ve found comes from Justin Gordon, here. He takes you through the whole process in detail.

The nutshell version goes like this:

  1. Use npm to install Webpack and its things
  2. Configure it in webpack.rails.config.js
  3. Add a call to webpack -w --config=webpack.rails.config.js to your startup sequence (I like using grunt start of some sort)
  4. Remove all //= require in application.js and replace with //= require generated/rails-bundle.js
  5. Make an assets.rake task that looks like this gist

You can find the details in Gordon’s long blogpost. It’s really good. Although personally I didn’t go as far as moving all my JavaScripts out of app/assets and I didn’t set up hot code loading for local dev.

Now, to make Webpack understand that static assets should be loaded from a CloudFlare CDN, you have to change its output settings.

config.output = {
    filename: in_dev() 
        ? 'rails-bundle.js'
        : '[id].[chunkhash].rails-bundle.js',
    path: 'app/assets/javascripts/generated',
    publicPath: getCDN()+'/assets/generated/'
};

There’s two tricks here:

  1. We tell Webpack to fingerprint files with [chunkhash] unless we’re in local development. This gives us long-term caching because of unique filenames
  2. We prefix the publicPath with a CDN URL. This “tricks” Webpack into loading them from there

The in_dev and getCDN make the config easier to understand. They look like this:

function getCDN() {
    var CDNs = {
        staging: '.cloudfront.net',
        production: '.cloudfront.net',
        preproduction: '.cloudfront.net'
    };
 
    if (!in_dev()) {
        return "//"+CDNs[process.env.RAILS_ENV.toLowerCase()];
    }
 
    return "";
};
 
function in_dev() {
    return !process.env.RAILS_ENV || process.env.RAILS_ENV == 'development';
}

They both look at the RAILS_ENV environment variable to decide which situation Webpack is running under. It works great, but does mean that we have two places to set the config for CDN. Here and the regular Ruby config.

Now, because our files are fingerprinted, Rails’s asset pipeline no longer knows how to insert them. The filename 0.some_weird_hash.rails-bundle.js changes every time Webpack compiles our code.

The simplest fix I’ve found is to copy the file in that assets.rake task. Like this:

FileUtils.copy_file(Pathname.glob(path+'0.*.rails-bundle.js').first,
                        File.join(path, 'rails-bundle.js'))

Now the main bundle file will always have the same name in production and application.js will be able to include it so you don’t have to hack the asset pipeline. Perfect.

Benefits

There are many reasons you’d want to use Webpack in your Rails application. My main motivation was that our users were just loading way too much JavaScript. They don’t need the desktop homepage app when they’re on mobile. And they definitely don’t need the whole user dashboard when they’re looking at the homepage.

For mobile users the change has been significant. From downloading all of 906KB before, to just 87KB. Sure, there’s still some overhead on top of that for libraries, but we can load those from 3rd party CDNs now so they could already be cached.

The other huge benefit is that our code is easier to deal with. Instead of shoving everything into a huge carefully namespaced global object, we can just require what we need.

Life is better.

Content delivery network Lazy loading

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Optimizing Front-End Performance
  • The Bill You Didn't See Coming
  • Latency Is Cheap, Bandwidth Is Not
  • Make Static Sites Feel Dynamic With APIs Only (No Backend Needed)

Partner Resources

×

Comments

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook