DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Please enter at least three characters to search
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Zones

Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

Modernize your data layer. Learn how to design cloud-native database architectures to meet the evolving demands of AI and GenAI workkloads.

Secure your stack and shape the future! Help dev teams across the globe navigate their software supply chain security challenges.

Releasing software shouldn't be stressful or risky. Learn how to leverage progressive delivery techniques to ensure safer deployments.

Avoid machine learning mistakes and boost model performance! Discover key ML patterns, anti-patterns, data strategies, and more.

Related

  • How To Improve GraphQL API Security
  • Keep Your Application Secrets Secret
  • Penetration Test Types for (REST) API Security Tests
  • Unlocking the Benefits of a Private API in AWS API Gateway

Trending

  • Java's Quiet Revolution: Thriving in the Serverless Kubernetes Era
  • AI, ML, and Data Science: Shaping the Future of Automation
  • Docker Model Runner: Streamlining AI Deployment for Developers
  • AI Meets Vector Databases: Redefining Data Retrieval in the Age of Intelligence
  1. DZone
  2. Software Design and Architecture
  3. Security
  4. Why GraphQL API Security Is Unique

Why GraphQL API Security Is Unique

Securing GraphQL APIs requires some unique considerations for developer and security teams — here's what to know as you scale your GraphQL adoption.

By 
Shahar Binyamin user avatar
Shahar Binyamin
·
Sep. 12, 23 · Analysis
Likes (6)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
4.8K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Enterprise security teams have had since 2015 to familiarize themselves with GraphQL API security. But many — if not most — still haven’t captured the security nuances of the popular open-source query language. Simply understanding GraphQL’s processes and vulnerable attack vectors isn’t sufficient; it’s also necessary to recognize exploit attempts and nefarious queries (and trigger actions whenever those threats arise). A complete GraphQL security strategy must also be ready to defeat attacks designed to infiltrate GraphQL specifically. A more generalized API security strategy isn’t going to cut it, as headlines continue to prove. 

Security teams likely have either a web application firewall (WAF) performing active application monitoring to detect threats or a comparable in-house solution that leverages access logs to monitor threat behavior. They also likely depend on specific indicators when monitoring for anomalous activity — including HTTP methods and response status codes, sensitive API routes, and API parameters. Keeping an eye on these indicators can identify attacks where clients try to overwhelm a registration endpoint, perform multiple unsuccessful logins, attempt account enumeration, or tamper with key parameters.

With REST APIs, monitoring these events is relatively simple. An application only needs to return HTTP status codes that adhere to the RFC 2616 protocol for clients and security teams to receive and understand clear activity signals (as long as security teams have a relatively accurate API inventory). This traditional monitoring approach relies on HTTP components. For example, the following rule uses the GET HTTP method and the 403 Forbidden response code to trigger a security alert if a client trying to access forbidden locations on the /v1/user/<id>/profile route (available for most REST APIs):

Python
 
alert if (http.method=GET and response.status_code=403 and http.uri=”/v1/user/<id>/profile”) 


GraphQL routes don’t matter in the same way. First, GraphQL uses its own singular route (usually /graphql). But more importantly, client intentions with respect to GraphQL APIs are determined by the query itself. GraphQL APIs may allow GET and POST methods, but only the query offers an accurate picture of what the client is really trying to accomplish. Therefore, traditional monitoring rules based on HTTP components aren’t at all effective at monitoring GraphQL API security.

GraphQL APIs also don’t return traditional HTTP status codes. It varies between different implementations of the GraphQL server, but it will usually return a 200 OK code to a query regardless of whether errors exist. Errors can instead be monitored by checking the server response using a dedicated errors JSON key.

The following example query lets a user receive their own user details by providing their user ID number:

Python
 
query {
   user(id: 1000) {
      email
      name
      address
  }
}


A client with the authorization to view user ID 1000 will receive a response like this (provided that the ID exists):

Python
 
{
  "data": {
    "user": [
      {
        "email": "test@example.com",
        "name": "test user",
        "address": "123 Hollywood Blvd",
      }
    ]
 }
}


However, a client without the correct authorization will receive a GraphQL response like this:

Python
 
{
  "errors": [
    "message": “You are not authorized to view this user.”
 ]
}


In each of these three scenarios, the GraphQL server might simply send a 200 OK HTTP code, making monitoring more challenging than with REST APIs. Traditional monitoring tools based on standard HTTP access logs will provide unhelpful log lines, such as these:

Python
 

1.2.3.4 - - [02/Aug/2022:18:27:46 +0000] "POST /graphql HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-"
"curl/7.43.0" - 539
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Aug/2022:18:27:46 +0000] "POST /graphql HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-"
"curl/7.43.0" - 539
1.2.3.4 - - [02/Aug/2022:18:27:46 +0000] "POST /graphql HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-"
"curl/7.43.0" - 539


Proper security monitoring requires full visibility into both query and response payloads and tooling to contextualize threat events. Unfortunately, GraphQL also allows for batching multiple queries in a single HTTP request, offering attackers the ability to hide a number of actions within just one HTTP packet. The following example query would appear as a single HTTP request while making three separate queries:

Python
 
query {
  alias1000: user(id: 1000) {
      email
      name
      address
  }
  alias1001: user(id: 1001) {
      email
      name
      address
  }
  alias1002: user(id: 1002) {
      email
      name
      address
  }
}


It gets even better for attackers eager to conceal their activities: some GraphQL servers support arrays of batched queries, which look like this:

Python
 
import requests

queries = [
  {
    "query":"query { user(id: 1000) { email name address }}",
    "query":"query { user(id: 1001) { email name address }}",
    "query":"query { user(id: 1002) { email name address }}"
  }
]

r = requests.post('http://test.inigo.local/graphql', json=queries)

print(r.json())


All this shows that GraphQL simply cannot be effectively secured using incumbent API security strategies alone. Security teams must introduce processes specifically designed to provide a robust observability layer for safeguarding GraphQL APIs and applications and be able to identify threat activity even if it’s hidden within arrays of batched queries.

Open-source GraphQL offers tremendous advantages for developers and enterprises but also opens the door to a unique set of security risks. Any organization currently utilizing GraphQL alongside generalized traditional protections should take action now to introduce an effective GraphQL security strategy.

API GraphQL Open source security

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • How To Improve GraphQL API Security
  • Keep Your Application Secrets Secret
  • Penetration Test Types for (REST) API Security Tests
  • Unlocking the Benefits of a Private API in AWS API Gateway

Partner Resources

×

Comments
Oops! Something Went Wrong

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 100
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • support@dzone.com

Let's be friends:

Likes
There are no likes...yet! 👀
Be the first to like this post!
It looks like you're not logged in.
Sign in to see who liked this post!