Choosing Between Baked and Fried Provisioning
Choosing Between Baked and Fried Provisioning
Just like eggs, web applications get consumed (though, in a slightly different way). What's your preference, baked or fried?
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Access over 20 APIs and mobile SDKs, up to 250k transactions free with no credit card required
Provisioning always requires resources from somewhere. The resources are packages in remote repositories, compressed files from Internet addresses, and they have all kinds of sizes and formats. Depending on where they are and the available bandwidth, the download process can last longer than expected. If provisioning is a repetitive task, like in automated tests, you might want to use baked images, in order to save time.
Baked images are previously prepared with software and configuration. For this reason, they are usually bigger than the ones used in fried provisioning. In order to maintain a baked images repository, storage is really a point of consideration, mainly if the images are versioned. Downloading and uploading baked images has also its cost, so it’s better to minimize it as much as possible.
Just like baked eggs, baked images are ready to be consumed, there’s no need to add something special. For sure it requires some effort in advance, but it pays off if you have to use a virtual machine right away.
Baked images also empower the use of immutable servers, because most of the time they don’t require extra intervention after instantiation. In addition, if something goes wrong with the image instance, it’s better to recreate it, rather than repair it. That makes baked images preferable to be used in autoscaling, once they are rapidly instantiated and ready.
On the other hand, fried provisioning is based on raw images, usually with just the operating system installed. These lightweight images, once instantiated, must be provisioned with all the required software and configuration, in order to be ready-to-use. Analogously to fried eggs, you must follow the recipe and combine all the ingredients to the point where they are ready to be consumed.
One concern about fried provisioning, when it is executed repeatedly, is how to avoid breaking it. During the process, a package manager, like apt, is usually used to install the required software. Unless you are specific on what version the package manager must install, the latest one will be installed. Unexpected behaviors can happen with untested, newer versions, including a break in the provisioning process. For that reason, always be specific on what version must be installed.
Codeyourinfra Provisioning Options
Since the version 1.4.0 of the Codeyourinfra project on GitHub, it's been possible for the development environment to be initialized with both provisioning options: fried (the default) and baked. It means that the original base image, a minimized version of a Vagrant box with Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS, can now be replaced by a baked one. The baked images are available at Vagrant Cloud and can be downloaded not only by those who want to use the Codeyourinfra’s development environment but also by the ones who want an image ready to use.
It’s quite simple choosing one provisioning option or the other. If you want to use the baked image, set the environment variable PROVISIONING_OPTION to baked, otherwise let it unset, because the fried option is the default, or specify the environment variable as fried.
Baking the Image
The process of building the baked images was simple. I could have used a tool like Packer for automating it, but I manually followed this steps:
vagrant up <machine>, where <machine> is the name of the VM defined in the Vagrantfile. The VM is then initialized from the minimal/trusty64 Vagrant box and provisioned by Ansible.
vagrant ssh <machine>, in order to connect to the VM through SSH. The user is vagrant. The VM is ready to use, the perfect moment to take a snapshot of the image. Before that, in order to get a smaller image, it’s recommended that you free up disk space:
vagrant package <machine> –output baked.box, for finally creating the baked image file, which was then uploaded to the Vagrant Cloud.
sudo apt-get clean sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/EMPTY bs=1M sudo rm -f /EMPTY cat /dev/null > ~/.bash_history && history -c && exit
The Initialization Duration
Vagrant, by default, does not show, along with the command’s output, a timestamp in each step executed. Hence you are not able to easily know how long the environment initialization takes. In order to overcome this limitation, another environment variable was introduced: APPEND_TIMESTAMP. If it is set to true, the current datetime is prepended in every output line, so you can measure the initialization duration.
Each Vagrant file, when executed, now loads right in the beginning of the Ruby code below, that overrides the default Vagrant output behavior if the APPEND_TIMESTAMP flag is turned on. Actually, Vagrant already has an issue on GitHub addressing such enhancements, where this code was presented as a turnaround solution.
append_timestamp = ENV['APPEND_TIMESTAMP'] || 'false' if append_timestamp != 'true' && append_timestamp != 'false' puts 'APPEND_TIMESTAMP must be \'true\' or \'false\'.' abort end if append_timestamp == 'true' def $stdout.write string log_datas=string if log_datas.gsub(/\r?\n/, "") != '' log_datas=::Time.now.strftime("%d/%m/%Y %T")+" "+log_datas.gsub(/\r\n/, "\n") end super log_datas end def $stderr.write string log_datas=string if log_datas.gsub(/\r?\n/, "") != '' log_datas=::Time.now.strftime("%d/%m/%Y %T")+" "+log_datas.gsub(/\r\n/, "\n") end super log_datas end end
Feel free to experiment with the provisioning options along with the timestamp appending flag set to true! You now have a better environment to try the Codeyourinfra project solutions.
Published at DZone with permission of Gustavo Carmo . See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.