Creational Design Pattern Series: Factory Method Pattern
Learn more about your favorite design pattern — the factory method pattern.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Join For FreeThe factory method design pattern is one of the well-known “Gang of Four” (GoF) design patterns. It is a creational design pattern that uses factory methods to deal with creating instances without specifying the exact class of the object that will be created.
This design pattern is based on one of the OOPs concepts, which is encapsulation. In general, we write object creation code on client side programs, but in the factory pattern, we encapsulate object creation code inside the factory method. So, depending on the data provided to the factory, it can return an object of one of several possible classes listed within a program.
In this article, let us look at a small but complete example of the Factory Pattern.
The pattern basically works as shown below in the UML diagram:
A Person Interface
First, let’s create a Person interface. Any Person that the factory returns must implement this Java interface. We’ll just specify that any class that calls itself a Person must implement a run method.
public interface Person {
public void run();
}
Concrete Classes
We will create three concrete classes that implement the Person interface. This is an important part of the Factory Pattern.
Note that the Super class in the factory method pattern can be an interface, abstract class, or normal class.
public class ConcretePersonA implements Person {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ConcretePersonA.class);
public void run() {
LOGGER.info("{} running",ConcretePersonA.class.getSimpleName());
}
}
public class ConcretePersonB implements Person {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ConcretePersonB.class);
public void run() {
LOGGER.info("{} running",ConcretePersonB.class.getSimpleName());
}
}
public class ConcretePersonC implements Person {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ConcretePersonC.class);
public void run() {
LOGGER.info("{} running", ConcretePersonC.class.getSimpleName());
}
}
The Factory Class
Let’s define a Factory
class, which is a PersonFactory
class. As you can see from the code below, the PersonFactory
has a staticgetPerson
method that returns a Person
that depends on the type that has been provided.
public class PersonFactory {
public static Person getPerson(String type)
{
if ("BaseRun".equals(type)) {
return new ConcretePersonA();
}
else if ("LongRun".equals(type) ) {
return new ConcretePersonB();
}
else if ("ProgressionRun".equals(type) ) {
return new ConcretePersonC();
}
return null;
}
}
Here, the signature of the factory method states that it will be returning a class of type Person
. The factory doesn’t say it’s returning a ConcretePersonA
, ConcretePersonB
, or ConcretePersonC
— it just says it’s returning something that implements the Person interface.
Running the Example
Now that we created a Person factory, the Person interface, and all the concrete persons that implement this interface. We will now create a “driver” program, FactoryPattern
, to test the Person factory.
public class FactoryPattern
{
public static void main( String[] args )
{
Person person = PersonFactory.getPerson("BaseRun");
person.run();
person = PersonFactory.getPerson("LongRun");
person.run();
person = PersonFactory.getPerson("ProgressionRun");
person.run();
}
}
Here, we created an instance of each type of Person.
Conclusion
The main reason the factory pattern is used is that it introduces weak coupling instead of tight coupling, hiding concrete classes from the application. It provides customization hooks and the implementation comfortably accommodates new changes.
The factory must be used for a family of objects. If the classes doesn't extend a common base class or interface, they cannot be used in a factory design template.
The source code can be found in my GitHub repository.
In the next post, we will look at the Abstract Factory design pattern.
Published at DZone with permission of Swathi Prasad, DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
Comments