DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Zones

Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

Generative AI has transformed nearly every industry. How can you leverage GenAI to improve your productivity and efficiency?

SBOMs are essential to circumventing software supply chain attacks, and they provide visibility into various software components.

Related

  • Applying DevOps to API Development for APIOps
  • Advanced Argo Rollouts With Datadog Metrics for Progressive Delivery
  • Source-Driven Development in Salesforce: Managing Metadata and API Versions
  • DORA Metrics: Tracking and Observability With Jenkins, Prometheus, and Observe

Trending

  • The AWS Playbook for Building Future-Ready Data Systems
  • Understanding Time Series Databases
  • How to Build a Real API Gateway With Spring Cloud Gateway and Eureka
  • The Battle of the Frameworks: Choosing the Right Tech Stack
  1. DZone
  2. Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
  3. DevOps and CI/CD
  4. Preventing Downtime in Public Safety Systems: DevOps Lessons from Production

Preventing Downtime in Public Safety Systems: DevOps Lessons from Production

In public systems, failure is inevitable. DevOps teams need rollbacks, structured observability, kill switches, and chaos drills to maintain trust.

By 
Naga Srinivasa Rao Balajepally user avatar
Naga Srinivasa Rao Balajepally
·
Jun. 19, 25 · Opinion
Likes (0)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
1.6K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Public safety systems can’t afford to fail silently. An unnoticed deployment bug, delayed API response, or logging blind spot can derail operations across city agencies. In environments like these, DevOps isn’t a workflow; it’s operational survival.

With over two decades in software engineering and more than a decade leading municipal cloud platforms, I’ve built systems for cities that can't afford latency or silence. This article shares lessons we’ve gathered over years of working in high-stakes environments, where preparation, not luck, determines stability. The technical decisions described here emerged not from theory but from repeated trials, long nights, and the obligation to keep city services functional under load.

Incident: When a Feature Deployed and Alerts Went Quiet

In one rollout, a vehicle release notification module passed integration and staging tests. The CI pipeline triggered a green build, the version deployed, and nothing flagged. Hours later, city desk agents began reporting citizen complaints, alerts weren’t firing for a specific condition involving early-hour vehicle releases.

The root cause? A misconfigured conditional in the notification service logic that silently failed when a timestamp edge case was encountered. Worse, no alert fired because the logging layer lacked contextual flags to differentiate a silent skip from a processed success. Recovery required a hotfix pushed mid-day with temporary logic patching and full log reindexing.

The aftermath helped us reevaluate how we handle exception tracking, how we monitor non-events, and how we treat “no news” not as good news, but as something to investigate by default.

Lesson 1: Don’t Deploy What You Can’t Roll Back

After reevaluating our deployment strategy, we didn’t stop at staging improvements. We moved quickly to enforce safeguards that could protect the system in production. We re-architected our Azure DevOps pipeline with staged gates, rollback triggers, and dark launch toggles. Deployments now use feature flags via LaunchDarkly, isolating new features behind runtime switches. When anomalies appear, spikes in failed notifications, API response drift, or event lag, the toggle rolls the feature out of traffic. Each deploy attaches a build hash and environment tag. If a regression is reported, we can roll back based on hashtag lineage and revert to the last known-good state without rebuilding the pipeline.

The following YAML template outlines the CI/CD flow used to manage controlled rollouts and rollback gating:

YAML
 
trigger:

  branches:

    include:

      - main



jobs:

  - job: DeployApp

    steps:

      - task: AzureWebApp@1

        inputs:

          appName: 'vehicle-location services-service'

          package: '$(System.ArtifactsDirectory)/release.zip'

      - task: ManualValidation@0

        inputs:

          instructions: 'Verify rollback readiness before production push'


This flow is paired with a rollback sequence that includes automatic traffic redirection to a green-stable instance, a cache warm-up verification, and a post-revert log streaming process with delta diff tagging. These steps reduce deployment anxiety and allow us to mitigate failures within minutes. Since implementing this approach, we've seen improved confidence during high-traffic deploy windows, particularly when agencies have enforcement seasons.

Lesson 2: Logging is for Action, Not Just Audit

We knew better visibility was next. The same incident revealed that while the notification service logged outputs, it didn’t emit semantic failure markers. Now, every service operation logs a set of structured, machine-readable fields: a unique job identifier, UTC-normalized timestamp, result tags, failure codes, and retry attempt metadata. Here's an example:

INFO [release-notify] job=VRN_2398745 | ts=2024-11-10T04:32:10Z | result=FAIL | code=E103 | attempts=3

These logs are indexed and aggregated using Azure Monitor. We use queries like the following to track exception rate deltas across time:

AppTraces

| where Timestamp > ago(10m)

| summarize Count = count() by ResultCode, bin(Timestamp, 1m)

| where Count > 5 and ResultCode startswith "E"

When retry rates exceed 3% in any 10-minute window, automated alerts are dispatched to Teams channels and escalated via PagerDuty. This kind of observability ensures we’re responding to faults long before users experience them. In a few cases, we've even detected upstream vendor slowdowns before our partners formally acknowledged issues.

"A silent failure is still a failure, we just don’t catch it until it costs us."

Lesson 3: Every Pipeline Should Contain a Kill Switch

With observability in place, we still needed the ability to act quickly. To address this, we integrated dry-run validators into every deployment pipeline. These simulate the configuration delta before release. If a change introduces untracked environment variables, API version mismatches, or broken migration chains, the pipeline exits with a non-zero status and immediately alerts the on-call team.

In addition, gateway-level kill switches let us unbind problematic services within seconds. For example:

HTTP
 
POST /admin/service/v1/kill
Content-Type: application/json
JSON
 
POST /admin/service/v1/kill

Body: { "service": "notification-notify", "reason": "spike-anomaly" }


This immediately takes the target service offline, returning a controlled HTTP 503 with a fallback message. It's an emergency brake, but one that saved us more than once. We've added lightweight kill switch verification as part of post-deploy smoke tests to ensure the route binding reacts properly.

Lesson 4: Failures Are Normal. Ignoring Them Isn't.

None of this matters if teams panic during an incident. We conduct chaos drills every month. These include message queue overloads, DNS lag, and cold database cache scenarios. For each simulation, the system must surface exceptions within 15 seconds, trigger alerts within 20 seconds, and either retry or activate a fallback depending on severity.

In one exercise, we injected malformed GPS coordinate records for location service. The system detected the malformed payload, tagged the source batch ID, rerouted it to a dead-letter queue, and preserved processing continuity for all other jobs. It’s not about perfection; it’s about graceful degradation and fast containment. We’ve also learned that how teams respond, not just whether systems recover, affects long-term product reliability and on-call culture.

Final Words: Engineer for Failure, Operate for Trust

What these lessons have reinforced is that uptime isn’t a metric; it’s a reflection of operational integrity. Systems that matter most need to be built to fail without collapsing.

  • Don’t deploy without a rollback plan. Reversibility is insurance.
  • Observability only works if your logs are readable and relevant.
  • Build in controls that let you shut down safely when needed.
  • Simulate failure regularly. Incident response starts before the outage.

These principles haven’t made our systems perfect, but they’ve made them resilient. And in public infrastructure, resilience isn’t optional. It’s the baseline.

You can’t promise availability unless you architect for failure. And you can’t recover fast unless your pipelines are built to react, not just deploy.

API Continuous Integration/Deployment DevOps

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Applying DevOps to API Development for APIOps
  • Advanced Argo Rollouts With Datadog Metrics for Progressive Delivery
  • Source-Driven Development in Salesforce: Managing Metadata and API Versions
  • DORA Metrics: Tracking and Observability With Jenkins, Prometheus, and Observe

Partner Resources

×

Comments

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 100
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends: