DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • When One Giant Payload Must Serve Many Small Consumers: Designing a Scalable Fanout Service
  • AWS Redshift Data Sharing: Unlocking the Power of Collaborative Analytics
  • Why Haven’t You Upgraded to HTTP/2?
  • Understanding the Integration of Embedded Systems in Consumer Electronics

Trending

  • Securing Loop Engineering: Six Trust Boundaries for Autonomous Agents
  • Agentic AI in 2026: How Autonomous AI Agents Are Replacing Manual Dev Work
  • A Practical Pipeline for Identifying Sensitive Columns Before Test Data Masking
  • Containerizing and Testing a Python Backtesting System With Docker and GitHub Actions

EasyNetQ: Multiple Handlers per Consumer

By 
Mike Hadlow user avatar
Mike Hadlow
·
Dec. 01, 13 · Interview
Likes (0)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
7.3K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

A common feature request for EasyNetQ has been to have some way of implementing a command pipeline pattern. Say you’ve got a component that is emitting commands. In a .NET application each command would most probably be implemented as a separate class. A command might look something like this:

public class AddUser
{
    public string Username { get; private set; }
    public string Email { get; private set; }

    public AddUser(string username, string email) 
    {
        Username = username;
        Email = email;
    }
}

Another component might listen for commands and act on them. Previously in EasyNetQ it would have been difficult to implement this pattern because a consumer (Subscriber) was always bound to a given message type. You would have had to use the lower level IAdvancedBus binary message methods and implement your own serialization and dispatch infrastructure.

But now EasyNetQ comes with multiple handlers per consumer out of the box.

From version 0.20 there’s a new overload of the Consume method that provides a fluent way for you to register multiple message type handlers to a single consumer, and thus a single queue.

Here’s an example:

bus = RabbitHutch.CreateBus("host=localhost");

var queue = bus.Advanced.QueueDeclare("multiple_types");

bus.Advanced.Consume(queue, x => x
        .Add<AddUser>((message, info) => 
            { 
                Console.WriteLine("Add User {0}", message.Body.Username);
            })
        .Add<DeleteUser>((message, info) =>
            {
                Console.WriteLine("Delete User {0}", message.Body.Username);
            })
    );

Now we can publish multiple message types to the same queue:

bus.Advanced.Publish(Exchange.GetDefault(), queue.Name, false, false, 
    new Message<AddUser>(new AddUser("Steve Howe", "[email protected]"))));
bus.Advanced.Publish(Exchange.GetDefault(), queue.Name, false, false, 
    new Message<DeleteUser>(new DeleteUser("Steve Howe")));

By Default, if a matching handler cannot be found for a message, EasyNetQ will throw an exception. You can change this behaviour, and simply ignore messages that do not have a handler, by setting the ThrowOnNoMatchingHandler property to false, like this:

bus.Advanced.Consume(queue, x => x
        .Add<AddUser>((message, info) => 
            { 
                Console.WriteLine("Add User {0}", message.Body.Username);
            })
        .Add<DeleteUser>((message, info) =>
            {
                Console.WriteLine("Delete User {0}", message.Body.Username);
            })
        .ThrowOnNoMatchingHandler = false
    );

Very soon there will be a send/receive pattern implemented at the IBus level to make this even easier. Watch this space!

Happy commanding!

consumer

Published at DZone with permission of Mike Hadlow. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • When One Giant Payload Must Serve Many Small Consumers: Designing a Scalable Fanout Service
  • AWS Redshift Data Sharing: Unlocking the Power of Collaborative Analytics
  • Why Haven’t You Upgraded to HTTP/2?
  • Understanding the Integration of Embedded Systems in Consumer Electronics

Partner Resources

×

Comments

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook