JBoss Modules Suck, It’s Impossible To Use Custom Resteasy/JAX-RS Under JBoss 7
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Join For FreeSince JBoss EAP 6.1 / AS 7.2.0 is modular and you can exclude what modules are visible to your webapp, you would expect it to be easy to ignore the built-in implementation of JAX-RS (Rest Easy 2.3.6) and use a custom one (3.0.6). However, sadly, this is not the case. You are stuck with what the official guide suggests, i.e.upgrading Rest Easy globally – provided that no other webapp running on the server becomes broken by the upgrade.
This should be enough to exclude the built-in Rest Easy and be able to use a version included in the webapp:
<!-- jboss-deployment-structure.xml --> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <jboss-deployment-structure> <deployment> <exclude-subsystems> <subsystem name="resteasy"/> </exclude-subsystems> </deployment> </jboss-deployment-structure>
However it is far from working. This nearly does the job (though few of the exclusions might be unnecessary):
<!-- jboss-deployment-structure.xml --> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <jboss-deployment-structure> <deployment> <exclude-subsystems> <subsystem name="resteasy"/> </exclude-subsystems> <exclusions> <module name="org.apache.log4j" /> <module name="org.apache.commons.logging"/> <module name="org.jboss.as.jaxrs"/> <module name="org.jboss.resteasy.resteasy-jaxrs"/> <module name="org.jboss.resteasy.resteasy-cdi"/> <module name="org.jboss.resteasy.jackson-provider"/> <module name="org.jboss.resteasy.resteasy-atom-provider"/> <module name="org.jboss.resteasy.resteasy-hibernatevalidator-provider"/> <module name="org.jboss.resteasy.resteasy-jaxb-provider"/> <module name="org.jboss.resteasy.resteasy-jettison-provider"/> <module name="org.jboss.resteasy.resteasy-jsapi"/> <module name="org.jboss.resteasy.resteasy-multipart-provider"/> <module name="org.jboss.resteasy.resteasy-yaml-provider"/> <module name="org.codehaus.jackson.jackson-core-asl"/> <module name="org.codehaus.jackson.jackson-jaxrs"/> <module name="org.codehaus.jackson.jackson-mapper-asl"/> <module name="org.codehaus.jackson.jackson-xc"/> <module name="org.codehaus.jettison"/> <module name="javax.ws.rs.api"/> </exclusions> </deployment> </jboss-deployment-structure>
However, only nearly. The problem is that the exclusion of javax.ws.rs.api has no effect. It seems as the core Java EE APIs cannot be excluded. Dead end.
BTW, this are my final jax-rs related dependencies:
// resteasyVersion = '3.0.6.Final' compile group: 'org.jboss.resteasy', name: 'jaxrs-api', version: resteasyVersion compile group: 'org.jboss.resteasy', name: 'resteasy-jaxrs', version: resteasyVersion compile group: 'org.jboss.resteasy', name: 'resteasy-jackson2-provider', version: resteasyVersion // JSONP compile group: 'org.jboss.resteasy', name: 'async-http-servlet-3.0', version: resteasyVersion // Required at runtime compile group: 'org.jboss.resteasy', name: 'resteasy-servlet-initializer', version: resteasyVersion // Required at runtime
An approximate history of failed attempts
I do not remember anymore exactly all the dead ends I went through but here is an approximate overview of the exceptions I got at deployment or runtime.
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.HttpServlet30Dispatcher
- fixed likely by adding org.jboss.resteasy:async-http-servlet-3.0:3.0.6.Final
to the dependencies
java.lang.ClassCastException: myapp.rs.RestApplication cannot be cast to javax.servlet.Servlet
- fixed likely by adding org.jboss.resteasy:resteasy-servlet-initializer:3.0.6.Final
to the dependencies
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.jboss.resteasy.spi.ResteasyProviderFactory.<init>(Lorg/jboss/resteasy/spi/ResteasyProviderFactory;)V
- fixed likely by adding more of the RestEasy/Jackson modules to the exclusion list
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.jboss.resteasy.specimpl.BuiltResponse.getHeaders()Ljavax/ws/rs/core/MultivaluedMap;
- this is the ultimate one that cannot be fixed; the problem is that BuiltResponse
from resteasy-jaxrs
inherits from javax.ws.rs.core.Response
however the version of this class from jaxrs-api-3.0.6.Final.jar is ignored in favour of Response
from JAX-RS 1.1 from the javax.ws.rs.api
module (/jboss-eap-6.1.0/modules/system/layers/base/javax/ws/rs/api/main/jboss-jaxrs-api_1.1_spec-1.0.1.Final-redhat-2.jar
), which lacks the getHeaders
method and, as mentioned, cannot be excluded. (Thanks to allprog for hinting at this confilct!)
Conclusion
The only way to use a newer JAX-RS is to upgrade the JBoss modules. If that would break some other webapps, you are stuck.
Lessons learned: Application servers with the plenty of out-of-the-box, well-integrated (?) functionality seem attractive but when you run into conflicting libraries and classloading issues, their value diminishes rapidly. Starting with something simple that you control fully, such as Jettty, is perhaps in the long run a better solution. Also, running multiple webapps on the same server was perhaps smart in 2000 but is not worth the pain nowadays. We have plenty of disk space and memory so reuse of libraries is unimportant and the ability to manage global settings for all apps at one place has certainly better alternatives. Microservices FTW!
Update: As Yannick has pointed out , the conclusion seems too general and unjustified. That is because I have arrived to it already before and this problem with JBoss serves only as another confirmation.
Solution?
Bill Burke has proposed a solution :
I’ve lived through your pain and here’s a solution that works on AS7.1.1, EAP6.x, and Wildfly:
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/server/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jboss-deployment-structure.xml
JBoss Modules don’t suck. The implicit dependencies do. The culprit is the “javaee.api” module which you have missing from your exclude. This module includes every single Java EE API. I haven’t tried, but I think if you reduce your excludes to just that module and the “resteasy” subsystem, it will work....
FYI, I believe the “javaee.api” module problem is fixed in Wildfly so you won’t have to do the extra exclude.
Published at DZone with permission of Jakub Holý, DZone MVB. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
Comments