DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Newsletter
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Designing a Polling Pipeline for Rate-Limited APIs Without Losing Data
  • Decoupling a Data Pipeline From the Tables It Was Never Supposed to Depend On
  • Share Delta Lake Tables Between Databricks and Snowflake
  • Why Vulnerability Management Fails Without Reliable Asset Data

Trending

  • Designing the Runtime Layer for Stateful AI Agents: Where Agent Substrate Fits
  • Why Kotlin or Java Is the Wrong Question For Enterprises
  • How to Hide Sensitive Information Before You Share a File
  • From Issue to Reviewable Patch: Build a Sandboxed Coding Agent With Deep Agents and Automated Tests

Draft This article hasn't been published, so readers can't see it.

In moderation This article is waiting for review, so readers can't see it yet.

Deleted This article has been deleted, so readers can't see it.

  1. DZone
  2. Data Engineering
  3. Data
  4. Pagination: Server Side or Client Side?

Pagination: Server Side or Client Side?

By 
Nitin Aggarwal
·
Jan. 27, 09 · Tutorial
Post on X (opens in a new tab) Share on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
75.4K Views

Join the DZone community Save articles, join the discussion, and download Refcards and Trend Reports with a free account.

Join for free Already a member? Log in

Numerous times in your projects you might have to face a situation where you need to pull chunks of data dynamically. The obvious issue that you then face is pagination\sorting and filtering. You then start to think if it would be better to handle it all at the server side or should hold back and handle it on the client side.

Well there is no clear winner amongst the two; neither there is a right or wrong approach.

The right answer depends on your priorities and the size of the data set to be paginated.

If you have large number of pages doing it on client side will make your user download all the data at first which might not be needed, and will defeat the primary benefit of pagination. In such a scenario you are better of requesting pages in chunks from the server via AJAX. So let the server do the pagination. You can also pre-fetch the next few pages the user will likely view to make the interface seem more responsive. However, when implementing it, you need to make sure that you’re optimizing your SQL properly. For instance, I believe in MySQL, if you use the LIMIT option it doesn’t use the index so you need to rewrite your SQL to use the index properly.

If there are only few pages, grabbing it all up-front and paginating on the client may be a better choice. That gives you the obvious benefit of faster subsequent page loads. Unless really required we should not choose the Server side pagination in such a case.

Server side pagination is better for:

  • Large data set
  • Faster initial page load
  • Accessibility for those not running JavaScript
  • Complex view business logic
  • Resilience to concurrent changes

Client side pagination is better for:

  • Small data set
  • Faster subsequent page loads
  • Sort & filter requirements supported fully (unless results greater than max size).

To sum up, if you’re paginating for primarily cosmetic reasons, it makes more sense to handle it client side. And if you’re paginating to reduce initial load time, server side is the obvious choice. Of course, client side’s advantage on subsequent page load times diminishes if you utilize Ajax to load subsequent pages.

for more information click here

Comments\suggestions are welcome.

Data (computing)

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Designing a Polling Pipeline for Rate-Limited APIs Without Losing Data
  • Decoupling a Data Pipeline From the Tables It Was Never Supposed to Depend On
  • Share Delta Lake Tables Between Databricks and Snowflake
  • Why Vulnerability Management Fails Without Reliable Asset Data

Partner Resources

×

Comments

Loading comments

The comments didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

Likes

Loading

The next likes didn't load. Please try again.

The likes didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

See who liked this

Log in or join DZone for free to see who liked this article.

Log in Join for free
  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook