DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Zones

Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

Last call! Secure your stack and shape the future! Help dev teams across the globe navigate their software supply chain security challenges.

Modernize your data layer. Learn how to design cloud-native database architectures to meet the evolving demands of AI and GenAI workloads.

Releasing software shouldn't be stressful or risky. Learn how to leverage progressive delivery techniques to ensure safer deployments.

Avoid machine learning mistakes and boost model performance! Discover key ML patterns, anti-patterns, data strategies, and more.

Related

  • Application Security in Technical Product Management
  • Embracing DevSecOps: Staying Ahead of the Curve for Enhanced Software Security
  • SAST and SCA Complemented with Dynamic Observability for CVE Prioritization
  • How DevSecOps Can Combat Zero-Day Threats

Trending

  • AI-Based Threat Detection in Cloud Security
  • Performance Optimization Techniques for Snowflake on AWS
  • Scalable System Design: Core Concepts for Building Reliable Software
  • Unlocking AI Coding Assistants Part 3: Generating Diagrams, Open API Specs, And Test Data
  1. DZone
  2. Software Design and Architecture
  3. Security
  4. 3 Phases of SAST: When and Why to Use SAST at Different Points in the SDLC

3 Phases of SAST: When and Why to Use SAST at Different Points in the SDLC

SAST helps businesses develop and deploy applications that are inherently more secure.

By 
Yatin Patil user avatar
Yatin Patil
·
Mar. 20, 19 · Presentation
Likes (4)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
14.5K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Static application security testing (SAST), also known as static analysis, is a common security testing method that can be performed in three distinct ways: on the developer’s desktop as they write code; as a step in an automated build process; or by simply pointing a tool at the desired source code project files. Each technique has advantages and limitations, and all three can be used in concert as part of a comprehensive secure SDLC. This article will explain the nuances of SAST techniques and explore how to get the most out of your SAST tool based on your needs and use cases.

Image title

Today, almost every company has become a software or tech company, whether they’re prepared for it from a cybersecurity standpoint or not. While software sales may not be a source of revenue for every organization, it’s likely that software is a key business enabler in all organizations.

Companies often rush to bring applications to market to stay competitive. They build consumer-facing websites and mobile applications to engage with customers and partners in a variety of ways. But if security vulnerabilities aren’t eradicated from these applications, they may expose sensitive customer and business data, which could severely damage or cripple the business.

While most organizations spend significantly more on network security than application security, more than 80 percent of cyberattacks target the application layer. For this often-overlooked reason, securing the application itself is imperative to securing the organization’s business data and, ultimately, its reputation.

Considering that most cyberattacks target software vulnerabilities within the application layer, a comprehensive analysis of application code is essential to ensuring both its quality and security. This is what static application security testing (SAST) tools provide.

At a high level, there are three phases of the software development life cycle (SDLC) where SAST lowers the security risks in the application.

  • During development, engineers designing and writing the application incorporate SAST scans into their development workflow and tooling.
  • After development and before production deployment, security teams use SAST tools to scan applications for security vulnerabilities.
  • The process of releasing applications into production takes the application through the DevOps machinery, leading to production deployment. This phase also involves SAST to ensure that vulnerabilities are detected before going into production.

Let’s look at each phase in more detail.

The design and development phase is one of the most influential parts of the SDLC in terms of fundamental security activities. SAST tools, which offer the most value during the development phase, analyze application code to identify security vulnerabilities and software quality issues (a.k.a. implementation bugs). This takes place in two ways: analysis of software builds and analysis on the desktop as developers write code. These techniques are complementary, ensuring issues are flagged and fixed as the code is developed.

Build Integration

Build integration, as its name implies, integrates the SAST tool into the software build system. This provides the most comprehensive picture of the code, its dependencies, the build configuration, and other environmental factors. With this comprehensive picture, SAST identifies cross-module factors such as tainted data flow analysis, SQL or command injection, hardcoded credentials, and a host of other issues.

Desktop Analysis

Desktop analysis, relying on a baseline build and its scan results, incrementally analyzes the developer’s changes during a local build. This correlation between the two scan methods gives developers the best opportunity to produce applications that have already been fixed of known bugs and vulnerabilities. Applications come out of the development phase as robust and bug-free as the design and development practices enable.

Analysis Without Build

Beyond development, most enterprises employ security teams that are responsible for tracking security risk across the organization’s IT assets, network, and application portfolio. Security teams are also usually responsible for compliance policies the organization must meet. To assess the security landscape, these teams need to scan applications and track vulnerabilities independently. Unlike developers, security teams are not software engineers and are, therefore, not able to work directly with build systems. Their mission is simple: track vulnerabilities. Thus, they need a way to run SAST on applications. The solution is analysis without build — in other words, scanning source code directly (without first having to conduct a full build operation) to identify vulnerabilities. This method allows security teams to gather vulnerability information independently by simply pointing to a project’s source repository (on a local SCM system or on Git). Analysis without build is ideal for languages like Java, JavaScript, and C# that are interpretive or where the code can be modeled fairly accurately without requiring compilation.

Conclusion

Now that we’ve examined the three ways in which SAST can be used to produce secure applications before deployment, note that each has its own purpose and sweet spot. Build integration is unmatched in its ability to have a comprehensive picture from the build. Desktop analysis is extremely convenient and unobtrusive for developers to use as they code, enabling them to produce their best code before checking it in. And analysis without build is valuable for security teams (language permitting) to assess the vulnerability and risk profile of an application. Together, these methods help businesses in all industries develop and deploy applications that are inherently more secure.

mobile app security Software development Build (game engine) Vulnerability Security testing

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Application Security in Technical Product Management
  • Embracing DevSecOps: Staying Ahead of the Curve for Enhanced Software Security
  • SAST and SCA Complemented with Dynamic Observability for CVE Prioritization
  • How DevSecOps Can Combat Zero-Day Threats

Partner Resources

×

Comments

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 100
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • support@dzone.com

Let's be friends: