Single-Tenant vs. Multi-Tenant Architecture: Breaking Down the Key Differences
This article compares single-tenant and multi-tenant architecture, highlighting their differences and performance scenarios.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
SaaS applications and services are at the core of today’s businesses, and a quick glance at the market indicates that this trend isn’t going to stop anytime soon. Gartner forecasts that SaaS spending will reach $197 billion in 2023, up 17.9% from last year, with another 17.7% growth expected in 2024 to $232 billion.
Furthermore, the average number of SaaS applications used by organizations worldwide reached 130 in 2022, up from 80 in 2020 and just 16 in 2017. As the number of SaaS products and vendors continues to grow, one of the most important decisions they need to make is how to seamlessly and successfully deliver their software to their customer base.
Today, delivery models are centered around two types of architectures: single-tenancy and multi-tenancy. Let’s dive into the specifics.
Single-Tenant and Multi-Tenant
Architectures: A Primer
Under a single-tenant architecture, a single customer, also known as a tenant, utilizes a dedicated app instance and retains a majority of the control when it comes to customizing the software and its infrastructure. Since the tenants operate independently, they enjoy an increased level of flexibility than they would with shared infrastructure. This gives them more control over things like security, backup capabilities, and software reliability.
Meanwhile, as the name indicates, multi-tenant archit
While users within a multi-tenant architecture
At a high level, multi-tenant
That said, the security implications mean that multi-tenant architecture
Single-Tenant Architecture: Strengths and Weaknesses
Not surprisingly, single-tenant
- Better Security: Users of a single-tenant environment usually have a higher level of security because their data is physically separated from that of others. This eliminates the possibility that one user will accidentally access someone else’s data due to configuration errors or cybercriminal activity.
- Easier Backup and Migration: Since each system is run on one dedicated SaaS instance, users have more control over backup and recovery because the instance can be assigned to a dedicated backup system. This also makes migration between environments much easier.
- A High Level of Control: Single tenancy gives users increased control over the entire environment, which provides more flexibility when it comes to customized configurations and new software versions or updates.
On the flip side, some disadvantages of single tenancy include:
- Higher Maintenance Costs: Single-tenancy can be expensive for SaaS providers, and those costs are often passed on to end customers. This makes it extremely important to accurately understand the cost-per-customer to weigh the economic tradeoffs of adopting this approach.
- Lower Scalability: Scaling single-te
nant environments is challenging because the architecture doesn’t efficiently use shared resources.
- Fewer Updates: SaaS users under single tenancy often won’t receive all software updates, particularly if they conflict with individual customizations or components.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Strengths and Weaknesses
Generally speaking, the advantages and disadvantages of multi-tenancy are the inverses of single-tenant
- Lower Costs: Costs-per-user are lower with multi-tenancy because all of the resources are shared, just like the costs.
- Improved Maintenance: Since updates are applied to the entire system, they affect all users, meaning system upgrades and ongoing maintenance aren’t handled by individual end-users. This ultimately frees up resources for end customers without sacrificing crucial maintenance and updates.
- Highly Efficient Usage: Using a shared resource model results in optimized resource usage and efficiency.
- Easier Setup and Onboarding: Multi-tenancy generally gives users a more seamless experience since the environment is mostly identical for all customers (outside of optional configuration settings). This makes it easier for new customers to get up and running relatively quickly.
Meanwhile, the disadvantages of multi-tenancy include:
- Lower Availability of Resources: If one customer experiences increased workloads, it could affect other clients that share the same resources — a phenomenon often referred to as the “noisy neighbor problem.”
- Higher Security Risks: Data stored in multi-tenancy cloud apps aren’t typically controlled by the user, which inherently adds risk because it means they need to rely on the SaaS provider’s data security systems and processes. If a breach targeting the SaaS provider or even one SaaS customer occurs, it could impact multiple users.
- Increased Fragmentation: The duplication of components could result in wasted resources as more tenants are added. If each customer uses its own SQL database, for example, it would significantly deplete resources.
Choosing the Right Architecture for Your SaaS Application
When navigating between single-tenant or multi
1. Speed and Performance
Since multiple customers share resources when using a multi-tenant architecture, speed and performance could be impacted for individual tenants. That said, modern mapping and resource distribution can alleviate this risk by optimizing the use of resources for more efficiency and improved performance. This could come with an associated cost, however — some vendors offer improved performance under service-level agreements (SLAs) at a higher price.
Single-tenancy can be more straightforward since the main factors that impact performance are the demands placed on the app, infrastructure, and overarching hardware that supports the environment.
2. Security and Dependability
With each customer’s environment isolated under single-tenant
Meanwhile, multi-tenancy offers much more limited isolation between customers, although isolation can be increased if each customer uses its own database. And since a multi-tenant architecture
3. Setup and Maintenance
From a cost perspective, multi-tenancy is typically the better option because management and maintenance costs are shared among multiple tenants. In most cases, SaaS vendors handle the bulk of general maintenance, requiring less effort from customers when it comes to initial setup or updates.
Single-tenant architectures isolate customers, meaning they’re on the hook for their own management and maintenance costs. This could make setup, maintenance, and customization more resource-intensive and, in some cases, slow down operations. If a SaaS vendor does maintain new single-tenant instances for each new user, those costs are almost always transferred to the customer, leading to an overall higher subscription price.
4. Scalability and Efficiency
Single tenancy gives users more transparent and predictable scalability because each has its own application instance and can scale at any time by changing sizing or launching additional instances.
Since resources are shared in a multi-tenant architecture, the vendor can utilize them more effectively and shift computing resources when and where they are needed. This means that a customer’s environment is ultimately scalable even if they don’t always have full visibility into how or why it is achieved.
5. Backup and Restore Capabilities
Again, a single-tenant architecture
6. Customization and Control
Similar to the above, single-tenant architect
Conversely, multi-tenancy gives users less control over their environments, and they usually don’t have the option to decide which software updates are applied. Most features are universal across customers, although a few remain open to tenant customization.
The Final Verdict
There is no easy answer for organizations deciding between single-tenant and mult
In general terms, a single-tenant architecture
For smaller and more nimble organizations that want to get up and running quickly, a multi-tenant architecture
You’ll need to cover all crucial bases like user management, authentication flows, billing and subscription management, and more. Managing roles and permissions also becomes extremely important, especially while going down the multi-tenant
As always, making a final decision involves doing the proper research and identifying how each architecture meets the specific needs of the business. In the end, finding a suitable balance between cost and flexibility will give most organizations the best chance at success. Pick wisely!
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.