Over a million developers have joined DZone.
{{announcement.body}}
{{announcement.title}}

Spring, JMS, Listener Adapters, and Containers

DZone's Guide to

Spring, JMS, Listener Adapters, and Containers

· Java Zone ·
Free Resource

Build vs Buy a Data Quality Solution: Which is Best for You? Gain insights on a hybrid approach. Download white paper now!

In order to receive JMS messages, Spring provides the concept of message listener containers. These are beans that can be tied to receive messages that arrive at certain destinations. This post will examine the different ways in which containers can be configured.

A simple example is below where the DefaultMessageListenerContianer has been configured to watch one queue (the property jms.queue.name) and has a reference to a myMessageListener bean which implements the MessageListener interface (ie onMessage):

<bean id="jmsContainer" class="org.springframework.jms.listener.DefaultMessageListenerContainer">
    <property name="connectionFactory" ref="connectionFactory" />
    <property name="destinationName" value="${jms.queue.name}" />
    <property name="messageListener" ref="myMessageListener" />
</bean> 

This is all very well but means that the myMessageListener bean will have to handle the JMS Message object and process accordingly depending upon the type of javax.jms.Message and its payload. For example:

if (message instanceof MapMessage) {
    // cast, get object, do something
}

An alternative is to use a MessageListenerAdapter. This class abstracts away the above processing and leaves your code to deal with just the message's payload. For example:

<bean id="jmsContainer" class="org.springframework.jms.listener.DefaultMessageListenerContainer">
    <property name="connectionFactory" ref="connectionFactory" />
    <property name="destinationName" value="${jms.queue.name}" />
    <property name="messageListener" ref="myMessageAdapter" />
</bean>

<bean id="myMessageAdapter" class="org.springframework.jms.listener.adapter.MessageListenerAdapter">
    <property name="delegate" ref="myMessageReceiverDelegate" />
    <property name="defaultListenerMethod" value="processMessage" />
</bean>

The delegate is a reference to a myMessageReceiverDelegate bean which has one or more methods called processMessage. It does not need to implement the MessageListener interface. This method can be overload to handle different payload types. Spring behind the scenes will determine which gets called. For example:


public void processMessage(final HashMap message) {
    // do something
}

public void processMessage(final String message) {
    // do something
}

For the given approach though, only one queue can be tied to the container. Another approach is to tie many listeners (therefore many queues) to the one container, The below Spring XML, using the jms namespace, shows how two listeners for different queues can be tied to one container:

<jms:listener-container container-type="default"
  connection-factory="connectionFactory" acknowledge="auto"> 
    <jms:listener destination="${jms.queue.name1}" ref="myMessageReceiverDelegate" method="processMessage" /> 
    <jms:listener destination="${jms.queue.name2}" ref="myMessageReceiverDelegate" method="processMessage" /> 
</jms:listener-container>

The myMessageReceiverDelegate bean is treated as an adapter delegate, therefore does not need to implement the MessageListener interface. Each listener can have a different delegate but for the above example, all messages arriving at the two queues are processed by the one receiver bean ie myMessageReceiverDelegate.


If there is a need to check the message type and extract the payload, then the listener can use a class which implements the MessageListener interface (eg the myMessageListener bean used in the first example). The onMessage method will then be called when messages arrive at the specified destination:

<jms:listener-container container-type="default"
  connection-factory="connectionFactory" acknowledge="auto"> 
    <jms:listener destination="${jms.queue.name1}" ref="myMessageListener" /> 
    <jms:listener destination="${jms.queue.name2}" ref="myMessageListener" /> 
</jms:listener-container>


Build vs Buy a Data Quality Solution: Which is Best for You? Maintaining high quality data is essential for operational efficiency, meaningful analytics and good long-term customer relationships. But, when dealing with multiple sources of data, data quality becomes complex, so you need to know when you should build a custom data quality tools effort over canned solutions. Download our whitepaper for more insights into a hybrid approach.

Topics:
java ,enterprise-integration ,spring ,jms

Published at DZone with permission of

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}