Over a million developers have joined DZone.
{{announcement.body}}
{{announcement.title}}

What Is the Difference Between Using Private Flow Versus VM Transport?

DZone's Guide to

What Is the Difference Between Using Private Flow Versus VM Transport?

VM transports and private flows can both serve their purposes. Read on to see when each could be useful.

Free Resource

Migrating from On-Prem to Cloud Middleware? Here’s what Aberdeen Group says leading companies should be considering. Brought to you in partnershp with Liaison Technologies

MuleSoft Image


In this post, I will show the differences between chaining flows with VM transport versus chaining flows with flow reference. When I need to divide my Mule flows into reusable units, I often break them into smaller flows and then chain them together in a main flow.

Flows can be chained together using flow-refs or using VM connectors; most recent examples use the flow-refs. However, flow-refs are a Mule 3 addition, and in Mule 2, VM connectors were used to chain flows.

Given this background and with flow-refs being more of the recommended approach, is there a scenario when we would want to use VM connectors? Yes, there is! But the majority of the time flow-refs are preferred over the VM transport, and here is why.

VM connector creates a transport barrier in the flow: In a transport barrier, your Mule message goes through an entire serialization and deserialization process that results in a new Mule message with the same payload. Read about the effect of transport barrier on a mule message here.

When to Choose a VM Transport Over a Flow Reference

One case would be that VM endpoints enable message redelivery strategies to be configured in your exception handling blocks — this is not possible with flow-refs. VMs can do this because they internally use a queue to hold messages while flow-refs are similar to simple method calls.

Look at the sample flow below; here, the message will be redelivered five times and is enabled by the use of VM inbound.

VM-inbound


Contrast that to a private flow and chaining with flow-refs: If an exception occurs in the called flow, even though we have a rollback strategy configured, it will not execute because there is no internal queue involved.

flow and vmflow


To summarize, don't hesitate to use VM transports if you need redelivery of messages. There are also differences in the use of thread pools between private flows and VMs, but I will leave that for another post. The sample source code for this post is available on GitHub

If you want to learn more about Mule ESB, Mule ESB is a great platform for developers to connect applications together quickly and easily. Feel free to try Anypoint Platform for 30 days

Is iPaaS solving the right problems? Not knowing the fundamental difference between iPaaS and iPaaS+ could cost you down the road. Brought to you in partnership with Liaison Technologies.

Topics:
connectors ,endpoints ,connector ,vm ,mule esb ,transport

Published at DZone with permission of Sudarshan Sreenivasan. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

THE DZONE NEWSLETTER

Dev Resources & Solutions Straight to Your Inbox

Thanks for subscribing!

Awesome! Check your inbox to verify your email so you can start receiving the latest in tech news and resources.

X

{{ parent.title || parent.header.title}}

{{ parent.tldr }}

{{ parent.urlSource.name }}