Why a synchronized StringBuffer was never a good idea
By
·
·
Interview
Likes
(0)
Likes
There are no likes...yet! 👀
Be the first to like this post!
It looks like you're not logged in.
Sign in to see who liked this post!
Comment
Save
21.9K Views
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Join For FreeIntroduction
StringBuffer is a synchronized class for mutable strings. The main problem with making it synchronized is that- It was usually used as a local variable so making it synchronized just made it slower.
- It was never a good idea to use it in a multi-threaded way. This problem is that developers assumed that methods which used StringBuffer were themselves thread safe when they were not.
The problem with StringBuffer
This is an example from a real class which is used in production in many trading systems. It's not a commonly used but you might assume that StringBuffer gives you thread safety, when it doesn't.
private StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
public void addProperty(String name, String value) {
if (value != null && value.length() > 0) {
if (sb.length() > 0) {
sb.append(',');
}
sb.append(name).append('=').append(value);
}
}
While individual calls are thread safe, multiple calls are not. It is almost impossible to find a good use for StringBuffer that doesn't involve multiple calls (including toString)
A puzzle
Imagine three threads call (in no particular order)
T1: addProperty("a", "b");
T2: addProperty("c", "d");
T3: sb.toString(); write a program which will generate every possible output of T3's sb.toString()
I found 89. With thread safety, you might reduce this to 4.
Note: if you used StringBuilder it would be worse, but at least you might not assume your method is thread safe when it is not. e.g. SimpleDateFormat uses StringBuffer ;)
dev
Strings
Production (computer science)
IT
Published at DZone with permission of Peter Lawrey. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
Comments