DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Newsletter
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • The Hidden Engineering Cost of XML in Enterprise Development Workflows
  • Schema Evolution in Event-Driven Systems: Avro/Protobuf Strategies That Don’t Break Consumers
  • How to Convert XLS to XLSX in Java
  • Enhancing Avro With Semantic Metadata Using Logical Types

Trending

  • The Permission Was Valid. The Action Was Not Authorized.
  • Moving 900+ GB of Prometheus Without a Cutover Weekend
  • Treat Salesforce Configuration Like Code: Release Discipline in a Copado Pipeline
  • Solving Comprehension Debt in AI-Generated Codebases

Draft This article hasn't been published, so readers can't see it.

In moderation This article is waiting for review, so readers can't see it yet.

Deleted This article has been deleted, so readers can't see it.

  1. DZone
  2. Coding
  3. Languages
  4. XML to Avro Conversion

XML to Avro Conversion

By 
Joe Stein
·
Mar. 07, 14 · Interview
Post on X (opens in a new tab) Share on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
27.3K Views

Join the DZone community Save articles, join the discussion, and download Refcards and Trend Reports with a free account.

Join for free Already a member? Log in

We all know what XML is right?  Just in case not, no problem here is what it is all about. 

<root>
<node>5</node>
</root>

Now, what the computer really needs is the number five and some context around it. In XML you (human and computer) can see how it represents context to five. Now lets say instead you have a business XML document like FPML

<FpML xmlns="http://www.fpml.org/2007/FpML-4-4" xmlns:fpml="http://www.fpml.org/2007/FpML-4-4" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="4-4" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.fpml.org/2007/FpML-4-4 ../fpml-main-4-4.xsd http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig# ../xmldsig-core-schema.xsd" xsi:type="RequestTradeConfirmation">
<!--  start of distinct  -->
<strike>
<strikePrice>32.00</strikePrice>
</strike>
<numberOfOptions>150000</numberOfOptions>
<optionEntitlement>1.00</optionEntitlement>
<equityPremium>
<payerPartyReference href="party2"/>
<receiverPartyReference href="party1"/>
<paymentAmount>
<currency>EUR</currency>
<amount>405000</amount>
</paymentAmount>
<paymentDate>
<unadjustedDate>2001-07-17Z</unadjustedDate>
<dateAdjustments>
<businessDayConvention>NONE</businessDayConvention>
</dateAdjustments>
</paymentDate>
<pricePerOption>
<currency>EUR</currency>
<amount>2.70</amount>
</pricePerOption>
</equityPremium>
</equityOption>
<calculationAgent>
<calculationAgentPartyReference href="party1"/>
</calculationAgent>
<documentation>
<masterAgreement>
<masterAgreementType>ISDA2002</masterAgreementType>
</masterAgreement>
<contractualDefinitions>ISDA2002Equity</contractualDefinitions>
<!--
 populate credit support document with correct value
-->
<creditSupportDocument>TODO</creditSupportDocument>
</documentation>
<governingLaw>GBEN</governingLaw>
</trade>
<party id="party1">
<partyId>Party A</partyId>
</party>
<party id="party2">
<partyId>Party B</partyId>
</party>
</FpML>

That is a lot of extra unnecessary data points. Now lets look at this using Apache Avro.

With Avro, the context and the values are separated. This means the schema/structure of what the information is does not get stored or streamed over and over and over and over (and over) again.

The Avro schema is hashed. So the data structure only holds the value and the computer understands the fingerprint (the hash) of the schema and can retrieve the schema using the fingerprint.

0x d7a8fbb307d7809469ca9abcb0082e4f8d5651e46d3cdb762d02d0bf37c9e592

This type of implementation is pretty typical in the data space.

When you do this you can reduce your data between 20%-80%. When I tell folks this they immediately ask, “why such a large gap of unknowns”. The answer is because not every XML is created the same. But that is the problem because you are duplicating the information the computer needs to understand the data. XML is nice for humans to read, sure … but that is not optimized for the computer.

Here is a converter we are working on https://github.com/stealthly/xml-avro to help get folks off of XML and onto lower cost, open source systems. This allows you to keep parts of your systems (specifically the domain business code) using the XML and not having to be changed (risk mitigation) but store and stream the data with less overhead (optimize budget).


XML avro

Published at DZone with permission of Joe Stein. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • The Hidden Engineering Cost of XML in Enterprise Development Workflows
  • Schema Evolution in Event-Driven Systems: Avro/Protobuf Strategies That Don’t Break Consumers
  • How to Convert XLS to XLSX in Java
  • Enhancing Avro With Semantic Metadata Using Logical Types

Partner Resources

×

Comments

Loading comments

The comments didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

Likes

Loading

The next likes didn't load. Please try again.

The likes didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

See who liked this

Log in or join DZone for free to see who liked this article.

Log in Join for free
  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook