Contents of page : Custom HashMap > Entry Putting 5 key-value pairs in HashMap (step-by-step)> Methods used in custom HashMap > What will happen if map already contains mapping for key? Complexity calculation of put and get methods in HashMap > put method - worst Case complexity > put method - best Case complexity > get method - worst Case complexity > get method - best Case complexity > Summary of complexity of methods in HashMap > Custom HashMap > This is very important and trending topic. In this post i will be explaining HashMap custom implementation in lots of detail with diagrams which will help you in visualizing the HashMap implementation. I will be explaining how we will put and get key-value pair in HashMap by overriding- >equals method - helps in checking equality of entry objects. >hashCode method - helps in finding bucket’s index on which data will be stored. We will maintain bucket (ArrayList) which will store Entry (LinkedList). Entry We store key-value pair by usingEntry Entry contains K key, V value and Entrynext (i.e. next entry on that location of bucket). static class Entry { K key; V value; Entry next; public Entry(K key, V value, Entry next){ this.key = key; this.value = value; this.next = next; } } Putting 5 key-value pairs in custom HashMap (step-by-step)> I will explain you the whole concept of HashMap by putting 5 key-value pairs in HashMap. Initially, we have bucket of capacity=4. (all indexes of bucket i.e. 0,1,2,3 are pointing to null) Let’s put first key-value pair in HashMap- Key=21, value=12 newEntry Object will be formed like this > We will calculate hash by using our hash(K key) method - in this case it returns key/capacity= 21%4= 1. So, 1 will be the index of bucket on which newEntry object will be stored. We will go to 1stindex as it is pointing to null we will put our newEntry object there. At completion of this step, our HashMap will look like this- Let’s put second key-value pair in HashMap- Key=25, value=121 newEntry Object will be formed like this > We will calculate hash by using our hash(K key) method - in this case it returns key/capacity= 25%4= 1. So, 1 will be the index of bucket on which newEntry object will be stored. We will go to 1st index, it contains entry with key=21, we will compare two keys(i.e. compare 21 with 25 by using equals method), as two keys are different we check whether entry with key=21’s next is null or not, if next is null we will put our newEntry objecton next. At completion of this step our HashMap will look like this- Let’s put third key-value pair in HashMap- Key=30, value=151 newEntry Object will be formed like this > We will calculate hash by using our hash(K key) method - in this case it returns key/capacity= 30%4= 2. So, 2 will be the index of bucket on which newEntry object will be stored. We will go to 2nd index as it is pointing to null we will put our newEntry object there. At completion of this step, our HashMap will look like this- Let’s put fourth key-value pair in HashMap- Key=33, value=15 Entry Object will be formed like this > We will calculate hash by using our hash(K key) method - in this case it returns key/capacity= 33%4= 1, So, 1 will be the index of bucket on whichnewEntry object will be stored. We will go to 1st index - >it contains entry with key=21, we will compare two keys (i.e. compare 21 with 33 by using equals method, as two keys are different, proceed to next of entry with key=21 (proceed only if next is not null). >now, next contains entry with key=25, we will compare two keys (i.e. compare 25 with 33 by using equals method, as two keys are different, now next of entry with key=25 is pointing to null so we won’t proceed further, we will put our newEntry object on next. At completion of this step our HashMap will look like this- Let’s put fifth key-value pair in HashMap- Key=35, value=89 Repeat above mentioned steps. At completion of this step our HashMap will look like this- Must read: LinkedHashMap Custom implementation Methods used in custom HashMap > public void put(K newKey, V data) -Method allows you put key-value pair in HashMap -If the map already contains a mapping for the key, the old value is replaced. -provide complete functionality how to override equals method. -provide complete functionality how to override hashCode method. public V get(K key) Method returns value corresponding to key. public boolean remove(K deleteKey) Method removes key-value pair from HashMapCustom. public void display() -Method displays all key-value pairs present in HashMapCustom., -insertion order is not guaranteed, for maintaining insertion order refer LinkedHashMapCustom. private int hash(K key) -Method implements hashing functionality, which helps in finding the appropriate bucket location to store our data. -This is very important method, as performance of HashMapCustom is very much dependent on this method's implementation. What will happen if map already contains mapping for key? If the map already contains a mapping for the key, the old value is replaced. Complexity calculation of put and get methods in HashMap > put method - worst Case complexity > O(n). But how complexity is O(n)? Initially, let's say map is like this - And we have to insert newEntry Object with Key=25, value=121 We will calculate hash by using our hash(K key) method - in this case it returns key/capacity= 25%4= 1. So, 1 will be the index of bucket on which newEntry object will be stored. We will go to 1st index, it contains entry with key=21, we will compare two keys(i.e. compare 21 with 25 by using equals method), as two keys are different we check whether entry with key=21’s next is null or not, if next is null we will put our newEntry objecton next. At completion of this step our HashMap will look like this- Now let’s do complexity calculation - Earlier there was 1 element in HashMap and for putting newEntry Object we iterated on it. Hence complexity was O(n). Note: We may calculate complexity by adding more elements in HashMap as well, but to keep explanation simple i kept less elements in HashMap. put method - best Case complexity > O(1). But how complexity is O(n)? Let's say map is like this - And we have to insert newEntry Object with Key=30, value=151 We will calculate hash by using our hash(K key) method - in this case it returns key/capacity= 30%4= 2. So, 2 will be the index of bucket on which newEntry object will be stored. We will go to 2nd index as it is pointing to null we will put our newEntry object there. At completion of this step our HashMap will look like this- Now let’s do complexity calculation - Earlier there 2 elements in HashMap but we were able to put newEntry Object in first go. Hence complexity was O(1). get method - worst Case complexity > O(n). But how complexity is O(n)? Initially, let's say map is like this - And we have to get Entry Object with Key=25, value=121 We will calculate hash by using our hash(K key) method - in this case it returns key/capacity= 25%4= 1. So, 1 will be the index of bucket on which Entry object is stored. We will go to 1st index, it contains entry with key=21, we will compare two keys(i.e. compare 21 with 25 by using equals method), as two keys are different we check whether entry with key=21’s next is null or not, next is not null so we will repeat same process and ultimately will be able to get Entry object. Now let’s do complexity calculation - There were 2 elements in HashMap and for getting Entry Object we iterated on both of them. Hence complexity was O(n). Note: We may calculate complexity by using HashMap of larger size, but to keep explanation simple i kept less elements in HashMap. get method - best Case complexity > O(1). But how complexity is O(n)? Initially, let's say map is like this - And we have to get Entry Object with Key=30, value=151 We will calculate hash by using our hash(K key) method - in this case it returns key/capacity= 30%4= 2. So, 2 will be the index of bucket on which Entry object is stored. We will go to 2nd index and get Entry object. Now let’s do complexity calculation - There were 3 elements in HashMap but we were able to get Entry Object in first go. Hence complexity was O(1). Summary of complexity of methods in HashMap > Operation/ method Worst case Best case put(K key, V value) O(n) O(1) get(Object key) O(n) O(1) REFER: http://javamadesoeasy.com/2015/02/hashmap-custom-implementation.html HashMap Custom implementation - put, get, remove Employee object.

Video and slideshow for Trisha Gee's lecture on whether Groovy is better for testing than Java and why, along with other resources to learn more about testing.

Different events can cause the JVM to pause all the application threads. Such pauses are called Stop-The-World (STW) pauses. The most common cause for an STW pause to be triggered is garbage collection (example in github) , but different JIT actions (example), biased lock revocation (example), certainJVMTI operations , and many more also require the application to be stopped. The points at which the application threads may be safely stopped are called, surprise, safepoints. This term is also often used to refer to all the STW pauses. It is more or less common that GC logs are enabled. However, this does not capture information on all the safepoints. To get it all, use these JVM options: 1.-XX:+PrintGCApplicationStoppedTime -XX:+PrintGCApplicationConcurrentTime If you are wondering about the naming explicitly referring to GC, don’t be alarmed – turning on these options logs all of the safepoints, not just garbage collection pauses. If you run a following example (source in github) with the flags specified above 01.public class FullGc { 02. private static final Collection

Written by Dave Syer on the Spring blog In this article we look at how to bind a Spring Boot application to data services (JDBC, NoSQL, messaging etc.) and the various sources of default and automatic behaviour in Cloud Foundry, providing some guidance about which ones to use and which ones will be active under what conditions. Spring Boot provides a lot of autoconfiguration and external binding features, some of which are relevant to Cloud Foundry, and many of which are not. Spring Cloud Connectors is a library that you can use in your application if you want to create your own components programmatically, but it doesn’t do anything “magical” by itself. And finally there is the Cloud Foundry java buildpack which has an “auto-reconfiguration” feature that tries to ease the burden of moving simple applications to the cloud. The key to correctly configuring middleware services, like JDBC or AMQP or Mongo, is to understand what each of these tools provides, how they influence each other at runtime, and and to switch parts of them on and off. The goal should be a smooth transition from local execution of an application on a developer’s desktop to a test environment in Cloud Foundry, and ultimately to production in Cloud Foundry (or otherwise) with no changes in source code or packaging, per the twelve-factor application guidelines. There is some simple source code accompanying this article. To use it you can clone the repository and import it into your favourite IDE. You will need to remove two dependencies from the complete project to get to the same point where we start discussing concrete code samples, namely spring-boot-starter-cloud-connectors and auto-reconfiguration. NOTE: The current co-ordinates for all the libraries being discussed are org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-*:1.2.3.RELEASE,org.springframework.boot:spring-cloud-*-connector:1.1.1.RELEASE,org.cloudfoundry:auto-reconfiguration:1.7.0.RELEASE. TIP: The source code in github includes a docker-compose.yml file (docs here). You can use that to create a local MySQL database if you don’t have one running already. You don’t actually need it to run most of the code below, but it might be useful to validate that it will actually work. Punchline for the Impatient If you want to skip the details, and all you need is a recipe for running locally with H2 and in the cloud with MySQL, then start here and read the rest later when you want to understand in more depth. (Similar options exist for other data services, like RabbitMQ, Redis, Mongo etc.) Your first and simplest option is to simply do nothing: do not define a DataSource at all but put H2 on the classpath. Spring Boot will create the H2 embedded DataSource for you when you run locally. The Cloud Foundry buildpack will detect a database service binding and create a DataSource for you when you run in the cloud. If you add Spring Cloud Connectors as well, your app will also work in other cloud platforms, as long as you include a connector. That might be good enough if you just want to get something working. If you want to run a serious application in production you might want to tweak some of the connection pool settings (e.g. the size of the pool, various timeouts, the important test on borrow flag). In that case the buildpack auto-reconfiguration DataSource will not meet your requirements and you need to choose an alternative, and there are a number of more or less sensible choices. The best choice is probably to create a DataSource explicitly using Spring Cloud Connectors, but guarded by the “cloud” profile: @Configuration @Profile("cloud") public class DataSourceConfiguration { @Bean public Cloud cloud() { return new CloudFactory().getCloud(); } @Bean @ConfigurationProperties(DataSourceProperties.PREFIX) public DataSource dataSource() { return cloud().getSingletonServiceConnector(DataSourceclass, null); } } You can use spring.datasource.* properties (e.g. in application.properties or a profile-specific version of that) to set the additional properties at runtime. The “cloud” profile is automatically activated for you by the buildpack. Now for the details. We need to build up a picture of what’s going on in your application at runtime, so we can learn from that how to make a sensible choice for configuring data services. Layers of Autoconfiguration Let’s take a a simple app with DataSource (similar considerations apply to RabbitMQ, Mongo, Redis): @SpringBootApplication public class CloudApplication { @Autowired private DataSource dataSource; public static void main(String[] args) { SpringApplication.run(CloudApplication.class, args); } } This is a complete application: the DataSource can be @Autowired because it is created for us by Spring Boot. The details of the DataSource (concrete class, JDBC driver, connection URL, etc.) depend on what is on the classpath. Let’s assume that the application uses Spring JDBC via the spring-boot-starter-jdbc (or spring-boot-starter-data-jpa), so it has aDataSource implementation available from Tomcat (even if it isn’t a web application), and this is what Spring Boot uses. Consider what happens when: Classpath contains H2 (only) in addition to the starters: the DataSource is the Tomcat high-performance pool from DataSourceAutoConfiguration and it connects to an in memory database “testdb”. Classpath contains H2 and MySQL: DataSource is still H2 (same as before) because we didn’t provide any additional configuration for MySQL and Spring Boot can’t guess the credentials for connecting. Add spring-boot-starter-cloud-connectors to the classpath: no change inDataSource because the Spring Cloud Connectors do not detect that they are running in a Cloud platform. The providers that come with the starter all look for specific environment variables, which they won’t find unless you set them, or run the app in Cloud Foundry, Heroku, etc. Run the application in “cloud” profile with spring.profiles.active=cloud: no change yet in the DataSource, but this is one of the things that the Java buildpack does when your application runs in Cloud Foundry. Run in “cloud” profile and provide some environment variables to simulate running in Cloud Foundry and binding to a MySQL service: VCAP_APPLICATION={"name":"application","instance_id":"FOO"} VCAP_SERVICES={"mysql":[{"name":"mysql","tags":["mysql"],"credentials":{"uri":"mysql://root:root@localhost/test"}]} (the “tags” provides a hint that we want to create a MySQL DataSource, the “uri” provides the location, and the “name” becomes a bean ID). The DataSource is now using MySQL with the credentials supplied by the VCAP_* environment variables. Spring Boot has some autoconfiguration for the Connectors, so if you looked at the beans in your application you would see a CloudFactory bean, and also the DataSource bean (with ID “mysql”). Theautoconfiguration is equivalent to adding @ServiceScan to your application configuration. It is only active if your application runs in the “cloud” profile, and only if there is no existing @Bean of type Cloud, and the configuration flagspring.cloud.enabled is not “false”. Add the “auto-reconfiguration” JAR from the Java buildpack (Maven co-ordinatesorg.cloudfoundry:auto-reconfiguration:1.7.0.RELEASE). You can add it as a local dependency to simulate running an application in Cloud Foundry, but it wouldn’t be normal to do this with a real application (this is just for experimenting with autoconfiguration). The auto-reconfiguration JAR now has everything it needs to create a DataSource, but it doesn’t (yet) because it detects that you already have a bean of type CloudFactory, one that was added by Spring Boot. Remove the explicit “cloud” profile. The profile will still be active when your app starts because the auto-reconfiguration JAR adds it back again. There is still no change to theDataSource because Spring Boot has created it for you via the @ServiceScan. Remove the spring-boot-starter-cloud-connectors dependency, so that Spring Boot backs off creating a CloudFactory. The auto-reconfiguration JAR actually has its own copy of Spring Cloud Connectors (all the classes with different package names) and it now uses them to create a DataSource (in a BeanFactoryPostProcessor). The Spring Boot autoconfigured DataSource is replaced with one that binds to MySQL via theVCAP_SERVICES. There is no control over pool properties, but it does still use the Tomcat pool if available (no support for Hikari or DBCP2). Remove the auto-reconfiguration JAR and the DataSource reverts to H2. TIP: use web and actuator starters with endpoints.health.sensitive=false to inspect the DataSource quickly through “/health”. You can also use the “/beans”, “/env” and “/autoconfig” endpoints to see what is going in in the autoconfigurations and why. NOTE: Running in Cloud Foundry or including auto-reconfiguration JAR in classpath locally both activate the “cloud” profile (for the same reason). The VCAP_* env vars are the thing that makes Spring Cloud and/or the auto-reconfiguration JAR create beans. NOTE: The URL in the VCAP_SERVICES is actually not a “jdbc” scheme, which should be mandatory for JDBC connections. This is, however, the format that Cloud Foundry normally presents it in because it works for nearly every language other than Java. Spring Cloud Connectors or the buildpack auto-reconfiguration, if they are creating a DataSource, will translate it into a jdbc:* URL for you. NOTE: The MySQL URL also contains user credentials and a database name which are valid for the Docker container created by the docker-compose.yml in the sample source code. If you have a local MySQL server with different credentials you could substitute those. TIP: If you use a local MySQL server and want to verify that it is connected, you can use the “/health” endpoint from the Spring Boot Actuator (included in the sample code already). Or you could create a schema-mysql.sql file in the root of the classpath and put a simple keep alive query in it (e.g. SELECT 1). Spring Boot will run that on startupso if the app starts successfully you have configured the database correctly. The auto-reconfiguration JAR is always on the classpath in Cloud Foundry (by default) but it backs off creating any DataSource if it finds a org.springframework.cloud.CloudFactorybean (which is provided by Spring Boot if the CloudAutoConfiguration is active). Thus the net effect of adding it to the classpath, if the Connectors are also present in a Spring Boot application, is only to enable the “cloud” profile. You can see it making the decision to skip auto-reconfiguration in the application logs on startup: 015-04-14 15:11:11.765 INFO 12727 --- [ main] urceCloudServiceBeanFactoryPostProcessor : Skipping auto-reconfiguring beans of type javax.sql.DataSource 2015-04-14 15:11:57.650 INFO 12727 --- [ main] ongoCloudServiceBeanFactoryPostProcessor : Skipping auto-reconfiguring beans of type org.springframework.data.mongodb.MongoDbFactory 2015-04-14 15:11:57.650 INFO 12727 --- [ main] bbitCloudServiceBeanFactoryPostProcessor : Skipping auto-reconfiguring beans of type org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.connection.ConnectionFactory 2015-04-14 15:11:57.651 INFO 12727 --- [ main] edisCloudServiceBeanFactoryPostProcessor : Skipping auto-reconfiguring beans of type org.springframework.data.redis.connection.RedisConnectionFactory ... etc. Create your own DataSource The last section walked through most of the important autoconfiguration features in the various libraries. If you want to take control yourself, one thing you could start with is to create your own instance of DataSource. You could do that, for instance, using aDataSourceBuilder which is a convenience class and comes as part of Spring Boot (it chooses an implementation based on the classpath): @SpringBootApplication public class CloudApplication { @Bean public DataSource dataSource() { return DataSourceBuilder.create().build(); } ... } The DataSource as we’ve defined it is useless because it doesn’t have a connection URL or any credentials, but that can easily be fixed. Let’s run this application as if it was in Cloud Foundry: with the VCAP_* environment variables and the auto-reconfiguration JAR but not Spring Cloud Connectors on the classpath and no explicit “cloud” profile. The buildpack activates the “cloud” profile, creates a DataSource and binds it to the VCAP_SERVICES. As already described briefly, it removes your DataSource completely and replaces it with a manually registered singleton (which doesn’t show up in the “/beans” endpoint in Spring Boot). Now add Spring Cloud Connectors back into the classpath the application and see what happens when you run it again. It actually fails on startup! What has happened? The@ServiceScan (from Connectors) goes and looks for bound services, and creates bean definitions for them. That’s a bit like the buildpack, but different because it doesn’t attempt to replace any existing bean definitions of the same type. So you get an autowiring error because there are 2 DataSources and no way to choose one to inject into your application in various places where one is needed. To fix that we are going to have to take control of the Cloud Connectors (or simply not use them). Using a CloudFactory to create a DataSource You can disable the Spring Boot autoconfiguration and the Java buildpack auto-reconfiguration by creating your own Cloud instance as a @Bean: @Bean public Cloud cloud() { return new CloudFactory().getCloud(); } @Bean @ConfigurationProperties(DataSourceProperties.PREFIX) public DataSource dataSource() { return cloud().getSingletonServiceConnector(DataSource.class, null); } Pros: The Connectors autoconfiguration in Spring Boot backed off so there is only oneDataSource. It can be tweaked using application.properties via spring.datasource.*properties, per the Spring Boot User Guide. Cons: It doesn’t work without VCAP_* environment variables (or some other cloud platform). It also relies on user remembering to ceate the Cloud as a @Bean in order to disable the autoconfiguration. Summary: we are still not in a comfortable place (an app that doesn’t run without some intricate wrangling of environment variables is not much use in practice). Dual Running: Local with H2, in the Cloud with MySQL There is a local configuration file option in Spring Cloud Connectors, so you don’t have to be in a real cloud platform to use them, but it’s awkward to set up despite being boiler plate, and you also have to somehow switch it off when you are in a real cloud platform. The last point there is really the important one because you end up needing a local file to run locally, but only running locally, and it can’t be packaged with the rest of the application code (for instance violates the twelve factor guidelines). So to move forward with our explicit @Bean definition it’s probably better to stick to mainstream Spring and Spring Boot features, e.g. using the “cloud” profile to guard the explicit creation of a DataSource: @Configuration @Profile("cloud") public class DataSourceConfiguration { @Bean public Cloud cloud() { return new CloudFactory().getCloud(); } @Bean @ConfigurationProperties(DataSourceProperties.PREFIX) public DataSource dataSource() { return cloud().getSingletonServiceConnector(DataSource.class, null); } } With this in place we have a solution that works smoothly both locally and in Cloud Foundry. Locally Spring Boot will create a DataSource with an H2 embedded database. In Cloud Foundry it will bind to a singleton service of type DataSource and switch off the autconfigured one from Spring Boot. It also has the benefit of working with any platform supported by Spring Cloud Connectors, so the same code will run on Heroku and Cloud Foundry, for instance. Because of the @ConfigurationProperties you can bind additional configuration to the DataSource to tweak connection pool properties and things like that if you need to in production. NOTE: We have been using MySQL as an example database server, but actually PostgreSQL is at least as compelling a choice if not more. When paired with H2 locally, for instance, you can put H2 into its “Postgres compatibility” mode and use the same SQL in both environments. Manually Creating a Local and a Cloud DataSource If you like creating DataSource beans, and you want to do it both locally and in the cloud, you could use 2 profiles (“cloud” and “local”), for example. But then you would have to find a way to activate the “local” profile by default when not in the cloud. There is already a way to do that built into Spring because there is always a default profile called “default” (by default). So this should work: @Configuration @Profile("default") // or "!cloud" public class LocalDataSourceConfiguration { @Bean @ConfigurationProperties(DataSourceProperties.PREFIX) public DataSource dataSource() { return DataSourceBuilder.create().build(); } } @Configuration @Profile("cloud") public class CloudDataSourceConfiguration { @Bean public Cloud cloud() { return new CloudFactory().getCloud(); } @Bean @ConfigurationProperties(DataSourceProperties.PREFIX) public DataSource dataSource() { return cloud().getSingletonServiceConnector(DataSource.class, null); } } The “default” DataSource is actually identical to the autoconfigured one in this simple example, so you wouldn’t do this unless you needed to, e.g. to create a custom concreteDataSource of a type not supported by Spring Boot. You might think it’s all getting a bit complicated, but in fact Spring Boot is not making it any harder, we are just dealing with the consequences of needing to control the DataSource construction in 2 environments. Using a Non-Embedded Database Locally If you don’t want to use H2 or any in-memory database locally, then you can’t really avoid having to configure it (Spring Boot can guess a lot from the URL, but it will need that at least). So at a minimum you need to set some spring.datasource.* properties (the URL for instance). That that isn’t hard to do, and you can easily set different values in different environments using additional profiles, but as soon as you do that you need to switch off the default values when you go into the cloud. To do that you could define thespring.datasource.* properties in a profile-specific file (or document in YAML) for the “default” profile, e.g. application-default.properties, and these will not be used in the “cloud” profile. A Purely Declarative Approach If you prefer not to write Java code, or don’t want to use Spring Cloud Connectors, you might want to try and use Spring Boot autoconfiguration and external properties (or YAML) files for everything. For example Spring Boot creates a DataSource for you if it finds the right stuff on the classpath, and it can be completely controlled through application.properties, including all the granular features on the DataSource that you need in production (like pool sizes and validation queries). So all you need is a way to discover the location and credentials for the service from the environment. The buildpack translates Cloud Foundry VCAP_*environment variables into usable property sources in the Spring Environment. Thus, for instance, a DataSource configuration might look like this: spring.datasource.url: ${cloud.services.mysql.connection.jdbcurl:jdbc:h2:mem:testdb} spring.datasource.username: ${cloud.services.mysql.connection.username:sa} spring.datasource.password: ${cloud.services.mysql.connection.password:} spring.datasource.testOnBorrow: true The “mysql” part of the property names is the service name in Cloud Foundry (so it is set by the user). And of course the same pattern applies to all kinds of services, not just a JDBCDataSource. Generally speaking it is good practice to use external configuration and in particular @ConfigurationProperties since they allow maximum flexibility, for instance to override using System properties or environment variables at runtime. Note: similar features are provided by Spring Boot, which provides vcap.services.*instead of cloud.services.*, so you actually end up with more than one way to do this. However, the JDBC urls are not available from the vcap.services.* properties (non-JDBC services work fine with tthe corresponding vcap.services.*credentials.url). One limitation of this approach is it doesn’t apply if the application needs to configure beans that are not provided by Spring Boot out of the box (e.g. if you need 2 DataSources), in which case you have to write Java code anyway, and may or may not choose to use properties files to parameterize it. Before you try this yourself, though, beware that actually it doesn’t work unless you also disable the buildpack auto-reconfiguration (and Spring Cloud Connectors if they are on the classpath). If you don’t do that, then they create a new DataSource for you and Spring Boot cannot bind it to your properties file. Thus even for this declarative approach, you end up needing an explicit @Bean definition, and you need this part of your “cloud” profile configuration: @Configuration @Profile("cloud") public class CloudDataSourceConfiguration { @Bean public Cloud cloud() { return new CloudFactory().getCloud(); } } This is purely to switch off the buildpack auto-reconfiguration (and the Spring Boot autoconfiguration, but that could have been disabled with a properties file entry). Mixed Declarative and Explicit Bean Definition You can also mix the two approaches: declare a single @Bean definition so that you control the construction of the object, but bind additional configuration to it using@ConfigurationProperties (and do the same locally and in Cloud Foundry). Example: @Configuration public class LocalDataSourceConfiguration { @Bean @ConfigurationProperties(DataSourceProperties.PREFIX) public DataSource dataSource() { return DataSourceBuilder.create().build(); } } (where the DataSourceBuilder would be replaced with whatever fancy logic you need for your use case). And the application.properties would be the same as above, with whatever additional properties you need for your production settings. A Third Way: Discover the Credentials and Bind Manually Another approach that lends itself to platform and environment independence is to declare explicit bean definitions for the @ConfigurationProperties beans that Spring Boot uses to bind its autoconfigured connectors. For instance, to set the default values for a DataSourceyou can declare a @Bean of type DataSourceProperties: @Bean @Primary public DataSourceProperties dataSourceProperties() { DataSourceProperties properties = new DataSourceProperties(); properties.setInitialize(false); return properties; } This sets a default value for the “initialize” flag, and allows other properties to be bound fromapplication.properties (or other external properties). Combine this with the Spring Cloud Connectors and you can control the binding of the credentials when a cloud service is detected: @Autowired(required="false") Cloud cloud; @Bean @Primary public DataSourceProperties dataSourceProperties() { DataSourceProperties properties = new DataSourceProperties(); properties.setInitialize(false); if (cloud != null) { List infos = cloud.getServiceInfos(RelationalServiceInfo.class); if (infos.size()==1) { RelationalServiceInfo info = (RelationalServiceInfo) infos.get(0); properties.setUrl(info.getJdbcUrl()); properties.setUsername(info.getUserName()); properties.setPassword(info.getPassword()); } } return properties; } and you still need to define the Cloud bean in the “cloud” profile. It ends up being quite a lot of code, and is quite unnecessary in this simple use case, but might be handy if you have more complicated bindings, or need to implement some logic to choose a DataSource at runtime. Spring Boot has similar *Properties beans for the other middleware you might commonly use (e.g. RabbitProperties, RedisProperties, MongoProperties). An instance of such a bean marked as @Primary is enough to reset the defaults for the autoconfigured connector. Deploying to Multiple Cloud Platforms So far, we have concentrated on Cloud Foundry as the only cloud platform in which to deploy the application. One of the nice features of Spring Cloud Connectors is that it supports other platforms, either out of the box or as extension points. Thespring-boot-starter-cloud-connectors even includes Heroku support. If you do nothing at all, and rely on the autoconfiguration (the lazy programmer’s approach), then your application will be deployable in all clouds where you have a connector on the classpath (i.e. Cloud Foundry and Heroku if you use the starter). If you take the explicit @Bean approach then you need to ensure that the “cloud” profile is active in the non-Cloud Foundry platforms, e.g. through an environment variable. And if you use the purely declarative approach (or any combination involving properties files) you need to activate the “cloud” profile and probably also another profile specific to your platform, so that the right properties files end up in theEnvironment at runtime. Summary of Autoconfiguration and Provided Behaviour Spring Boot provides DataSource (also RabbitMQ or Redis ConnectionFactory, Mongo etc.) if it finds all the right stuff on the classpath. Using the “spring-boot-starter-*” dependencies is sufficient to activate the behaviour. Spring Boot also provides an autowirable CloudFactory if it finds Spring Cloud Connectors on the classpath (but switches off only if it finds a @Bean of type Cloud). The CloudAutoConfiguration in Spring Boot also effectively adds a @CloudScan to your application, which you would want to switch off if you ever needed to create your ownDataSource (or similar). The Cloud Foundry Java buildpack detects a Spring Boot application and activates the “cloud” profile, unless it is already active. Adding the buildpack auto-reconfiguration JAR does the same thing if you want to try it locally. Through the auto-reconfiguration JAR, the buildpack also kicks in and creates aDataSource (ditto RabbitMQ, Redis, Mongo etc.) if it does not find a CloudFactory bean or a Cloud bean (amongst others). So including Spring Cloud Connectors in a Spring Boot application switches off this part of the “auto-reconfiguration” behaviour (the bean creation). Switching off the Spring Boot CloudAutoConfiguration is easy, but if you do that, you have to remember to switch off the buildpack auto-reconfiguration as well if you don’t want it. The only way to do that is to define a bean definition (can be of type Cloud orCloudFactory for instance). Spring Boot binds application.properties (and other sources of external properties) to@ConfigurationProperties beans, including but not limited to the ones that it autoconfigures. You can use this feature to tweak pool properties and other settings that need to be different in production environments. General Advice and Conclusion We have seen quite a few options and autoconfigurations in this short article, and we’ve only really used thee libraries (Spring Boot, Spring Cloud Connectors, and the Cloud Foundry buildpack auto-reconfiguration JAR) and one platform (Cloud Foundry), not counting local deployment. The buildpack features are really only useful for very simple applications because there is no flexibility to tune the connections in production. That said it is a nice thing to be able to do when prototyping. There are only three main approaches if you want to achieve the goal of deploying the same code locally and in the cloud, yet still being able to make necessary tweaks in production: Use Spring Cloud Connectors to explicitly create DataSource and other middleware connections and protect those @Beans with @Profile("cloud"). The approach always works, but leads to more code than you might need for many applications. Use the Spring Boot default autoconfiguration and declare the cloud bindings usingapplication.properties (or in YAML). To take full advantage you have to expliccitly switch off the buildpack auto-reconfiguration as well. Use Spring Cloud Connectors to discover the credentials, and bind them to the Spring Boot@ConfigurationProperties as default values if present. The three approaches are actually not incompatible, and can be mixed using@ConfigurationProperties to provide profile-specific overrides of default configuration (e.g. for setting up connection pools in a different way in a production environment). If you have a relatively simple Spring Boot application, the only way to choose between the approaches is probably personal taste. If you have a non-Spring Boot application then the explicit @Bean approach will win, and it may also win if you plan to deploy your application in more than one cloud platform (e.g. Heroku and Cloud Foundry). NOTE: This blog has been a journey of discovery (who knew there was so much to learn?). Thanks go to all those who helped with reviews and comments, in particularScott Frederick, who spotted most of the mistakes in the drafts and always had time to look at a new revision.

When processing large data sets, we often want to do some simple checks, such as number of unique items, most frequent items, and whether some items exist in the data set. The common approach is to use some kind of deterministic data structure like HashSet or Hashtable for such purposes. But when the data set we are dealing with becomes very large, such data structures are simply not feasible because the data is too big to fit in the memory. It becomes even more difficult for streaming applications which typically require data to be processed in one pass and perform incremental updates. Probabilistic data structures are a group of data structures that are extremely useful for big data and streaming applications. Generally speaking, these data structures use hash functions to randomize and compactly represent a set of items. Collisions are ignored but errors can be well-controlled under certain threshold. Comparing with error-free approaches, these algorithms use much less memory and have constant query time. They usually support union and intersection operations and therefore can be easily parallelized. This article will introduce three commonly used probabilistic data structures: Bloom filter, HyperLogLog, and Count-Min sketch. Membership Query - Bloom filter A Bloom filter is a bit array of m bits initialized to 0. To add an element, feed it to k hash functions to get k array position and set the bits at these positions to 1. To query an element, feed it to k hash functions to obtain k array positions. If any of the bits at these positions is 0, then the element is definitely not in the set. If the bits are all 1, then the element might be in the set. A Bloom filter with 1% false positive rate only requires 9.6 bits per element regardless of the size of the elements. For example, if we have inserted x, y, z into the bloom filter, with k=3 hash functions like the picture above. Each of these three elements has three bits each set to 1 in the bit array. When we look up for w in the set, because one of the bits is not set to 1, the bloom filter will tell us that it is not in the set. Bloom filter has the following properties: False positive is possible when the queried positions are already set to 1. But false negative is impossible. Query time is O(k). Union and intersection of bloom filters with same size and hash functions can be implemented with bitwise OR and AND operations. Cannot remove an element from the set. Bloom filter requires the following inputs: m: size of the bit array n: estimated insertion p: false positive probability The optimum number of hash functions k can be determined using the formula: Given false positive probability p and the estimated number of insertions n, the length of the bit array can be calculated as: The hash functions used for bloom filter should generally be faster than cryptographic hash algorithms with good distribution and collision resistance. Commonly used hash functions for bloom filter include Murmur hash, fnv series of hashes and Jenkins hashes. Murmur hash is the fastest among them. MurmurHash3 is used by Google Guava library's bloom filter implementation. Cardinality - HyperLogLog HyperLogLog is a streaming algorithm used for estimating the number of distinct elements (the cardinality) of very large data sets. HyperLogLog counter can count one billion distinct items with an accuracy of 2% using only 1.5 KB of memory. It is based on the bit pattern observation that for a stream of randomly distributed numbers, if there is a number x with the maximum of leading 0 bits k, the cardinality of the stream is very likely equal to 2^k. For each element si in the stream, hash function h(si) transforms si into string of random bits (0 or 1 with probability of 1/2): The probability P of the bit patterns: 0xxxx... → P = 1/2 01xxx... → P = 1/4 001xx... → P = 1/8 The intuition is that when we are seeing prefix 0k 1..., it's likely there are n ≥ 2k+1 different strings. By keeping track of prefixes 0k 1... that have appeared in the data stream, we can estimate the cardinality to be 2p, where p is the length of the largest prefix. Because the variance is very high when using single counter, in order to get a better estimation, data is split into m sub-streams using the first few bits of the hash. The counters are maintained by m registers each has memory space of multiple of 4 bytes. If the standard deviation for each sub-stream is σ, then the standard deviation for the averaged value is only σ/√m. This is called stochastic averaging. For instance for m=4, The elements are split into m stream using the first 2 bits (00, 01, 10, 11) which are then discarded. Each of the register stores the rest of the hash bits that contains the largest 0k 1 prefix. The values in the m registers are then averaged to obtain the cardinality estimate. HyperLogLog algorithm uses harmonic mean to normalize result. The algorithm also makes adjustment for small and very large values. The resulting error is equal to 1.04/√m. Each of the m registers uses at most log2log2 n + O(1) bits when cardinalities ≤ n need to be estimated. Union of two HyperLogLog counters can be calculated by first taking the maximum value of the two counters for each of the m registers, and then calculate the estimated cardinality. Frequency - Count-Min Sketch Count-Min sketch is a probabilistic sub-linear space streaming algorithm. It is somewhat similar to bloom filter. The main difference is that bloom filter represents a set as a bitmap, while Count-Min sketch represents a multi-set which keeps a frequency distribution summary. The basic data structure is a two dimensional d x w array of counters with d pairwise independent hash functions h1 ... hd of range w. Given parameters (ε,δ), set w = [e/ε], and d = [ln1/δ]. ε is the accuracy we want to have and δ is the certainty with which we reach the accuracy. The two dimensional array consists of wd counts. To increment the counts, calculate the hash positions with the d hash functions and update the counts at those positions. The estimate of the counts for an item is the minimum value of the counts at the array positions determined by the d hash functions. The space used by Count-Min sketch is the array of w*d counters. By choosing appropriate values for d and w, very small error and high probability can be achieved. Example of Count-Min sketch sizes for different error and probability combination: ε 1 - δ w d wd 0.1 0.9 28 3 84 0.1 0.99 28 5 140 0.1 0.999 28 7 196 0.01 0.9 272 3 816 0.01 0.99 272 5 1360 0.01 0.999 272 7 1940 0.001 0.999 2719 7 19033 Count-Min sketch has the following properties: Union can be performed by cell-wise ADD operation O(k) query time Better accuracy for higher frequency items (heavy hitters) Can only cause over-counting but not under-counting Count-Min sketch can be used for querying single item count or "heavy hitters" which can be obtained by keeping a heap structure of all the counts. Summary Probabilistic data structures have many applications in modern web and data applications where the data arrives in a streaming fashion and needs to be processed on the fly using limited memory. Bloom filter, HyperLogLog, and Count-Min sketch are the most commonly used probabilistic data structures. There are a lot of research on various streaming algorithms, synopsis data structures and optimization techniques that are worth investigating and studying. If you haven't tried these data structures, you will be amazed how powerful they can be once you start using them. It may be a little bit intimidating to understand the concept initially, but the implementation is actually quite simple. Google Guava has Bloom filter implementation using murmur hash. Clearspring's Java library stream-lib and Twitter's Scala library Algebird have implementation for all three data structures and other useful data structures that you can play with. I have included the links below. Links http://bigsnarf.wordpress.com/2013/02/08/probabilistic-data-structures-for-data-analytics/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom_filter http://algo.inria.fr/flajolet/Publications/FlFuGaMe07.pdf http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en/us/pubs/archive/40671.pdf http://research.neustar.biz/2012/10/25/sketch-of-the-day-hyperloglog-cornerstone-of-a-big-data-infrastructure/ http://dimacs.rutgers.edu/~graham/pubs/papers/cm-full.pdf http://www.moneyscience.com/pg/blog/ThePracticalQuant/read/438348/realtime-analytics-hokusai-adds-a-temporal-component-to-countmin-sketch http://people.cs.umass.edu/~mcgregor/711S12/sketches1.pdf https://github.com/addthis/stream-lib https://github.com/twitter/algebird

In order to understand how locks work, implementing custom locks is a good way. This post will show how to implement Filter and Bakery locks at Java (which are spin locks) and will compare their performances with Java's ReentrantLock. Filter and Bakery locks satisfies mutual exclusion and are starvation free algorithms also, Bakery lock is a first-come-first-served lock [1]. For performance testing, a counter value is incremented up to 10000000 with different lock types, different number of threads and different number of times. Test system configuration is: Intel Core I7 (has 8 cores – 4 of them are real), Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Java 1.7.0_60. Filter lock has n-1 levels which maybe considered as “waiting rooms”. A thread must traverse this waiting rooms before acquiring the lock. There are two important properties for levels [2]: 1) At least one thread trying to enter level l succeeds. 2) If more than one thread is trying to enter level l, then at least one is blocked (i.e., continues to wait at that level). Filter lock is implemented as follows: /** * @author Furkan KAMACI */ public class Filter extends AbstractDummyLock implements Lock { /* Due to Java Memory Model, int[] not used for level and victim variables. Java programming language does not guarantee linearizability, or even sequential consistency, when reading or writing fields of shared objects [The Art of Multiprocessor Programming. Maurice Herlihy, Nir Shavit, 2008, pp.61.] */ private AtomicInteger[] level; private AtomicInteger[] victim; private int n; /** * Constructor for Filter lock * * @param n thread count */ public Filter(int n) { this.n = n; level = new AtomicInteger[n]; victim = new AtomicInteger[n]; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { level[i] = new AtomicInteger(); victim[i] = new AtomicInteger(); } } /** * Acquires the lock. */ @Override public void lock() { int me = ConcurrencyUtils.getCurrentThreadId(); for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) { level[me].set(i); victim[i].set(me); for (int k = 0; k < n; k++) { while ((k != me) && (level[k].get() >= i && victim[i].get() == me)) { //spin wait } } } } /** * Releases the lock. */ @Override public void unlock() { int me = ConcurrencyUtils.getCurrentThreadId(); level[me].set(0); } } Bakery lock algorithm maintains the first-come-first-served property by using a distributed version of the number-dispensing machines often found in bakeries: each thread takes a number in the doorway, and then waits until no thread with an earlier number is trying to enter it [3]. Bakery lock is implemented as follows: /** * @author Furkan KAMACI */ public class Bakery extends AbstractDummyLock implements Lock { /* Due to Java Memory Model, int[] not used for level and victim variables. Java programming language does not guarantee linearizability, or even sequential consistency, when reading or writing fields of shared objects [The Art of Multiprocessor Programming. Maurice Herlihy, Nir Shavit, 2008, pp.61.] */ private AtomicBoolean[] flag; private AtomicInteger[] label; private int n; /** * Constructor for Bakery lock * * @param n thread count */ public Bakery(int n) { this.n = n; flag = new AtomicBoolean[n]; label = new AtomicInteger[n]; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) { flag[i] = new AtomicBoolean(); label[i] = new AtomicInteger(); } } /** * Acquires the lock. */ @Override public void lock() { int i = ConcurrencyUtils.getCurrentThreadId(); flag[i].set(true); label[i].set(findMaximumElement(label) + 1); for (int k = 0; k < n; k++) { while ((k != i) && flag[k].get() && ((label[k].get() < label[i].get()) || ((label[k].get() == label[i].get()) && k < i))) { //spin wait } } } /** * Releases the lock. */ @Override public void unlock() { flag[ConcurrencyUtils.getCurrentThreadId()].set(false); } /** * Finds maximum element within and {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger} array * * @param elementArray element array * @return maximum element */ private int findMaximumElement(AtomicInteger[] elementArray) { int maxValue = Integer.MIN_VALUE; for (AtomicInteger element : elementArray) { if (element.get() > maxValue) { maxValue = element.get(); } } return maxValue; } } For such kind of algorithms, it should be provided or used a thread id system which starts from 0 or 1 and increments one by one. Threads' names set appropriately for that purpose. It should also be considererd that: Java programming language does not guarantee linearizability, or even sequential consistency, when reading or writing fields of shared objects [4]. So, level and victim variables for Filter lock, flag and label variables for Bakery lock defined as atomic variables. For one, who wants to test effects of Java Memory Model can change that variables into int[] and boolean[] and run algorithm with more than 2 threads. Than, can see that algorithm will hang for either Filter or Bakery even threads are alive. To test algorithm performances, a custom counter class implemented which has a getAndIncrement method as follows: /** * gets and increments value up to a maximum number * * @return value before increment if it didn't exceed a defined maximum number. Otherwise returns maximum number. */ public long getAndIncrement() { long temp; lock.lock(); try { if (value >= maxNumber) { return value; } temp = value; value = temp + 1; } finally { lock.unlock(); } return temp; } There is a maximum number barrier to fairly test multiple application configurations. Consideration is that: there is a piece amount of work (incrementing a variable up to a desired number) and with different number of threads how fast you can finish it. So, for comparison, there should be a “job” equality. This approach also tests unnecessary work load with that piece of code: if (value >= maxNumber) { return value; } for multiple threads when it is compared an approach that calculating unit work performance of threads (i.e. does not putting a maximum barrier, iterating in a loop up to a maximum number and than dividing last value to thread number). This configuration used for performance comparison: Threads 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 Retry Count 20 Maximum Number 10000000 This is the chart of results which includes standard errors: First of all, when you run a block of code within Java several time, there is an internal optimization for codes. When algorithm is run multiple times and first output compared to second output this optimization's effect can be seen. First elapsed time mostly should be greater than second line because of that. For example: currentTry = 0, threadCount = 1, maxNumber = 10000000, lockType = FILTER, elapsedTime = 500 (ms) currentTry = 1, threadCount = 1, maxNumber = 10000000, lockType = FILTER, elapsedTime = 433 (ms) Conclusion: From the chart, it can bee seen that Bakery lock is faster than Filter Lock with a low standard error. Reason is Filter Lock's lock method. At Bakery Lock, as a faired approach threads runs one by one but at Filter Lock they computes with each other. Java's ReentrantLock has best when compared to others. On the other hand Filter Lock gets worse linearly but Bakery and ReentrantLock are not (Filter lock may have a linear graphic when it run with much more threads). More thread count does not mean less elapsed time. 2 threads maybe worse than 1 thread because of thread creating and locking/unlocking. When thread count starts to increase, elapsed time gets better for Bakery and ReentrantLock. However when thread count keep going to increase than it gets worse. Reason is real core number of the test computer which runs algorithms. Source code for implementing filter and bakery locks in Java can be downloaded from here: https://github.com/kamaci/filbak [1] The Art of Multiprocessor Programming. Maurice Herlihy, Nir Shavit, 2008, pp.31.-33. [2] The Art of Multiprocessor Programming. Maurice Herlihy, Nir Shavit, 2008, pp.28. [3] The Art of Multiprocessor Programming. Maurice Herlihy, Nir Shavit, 2008, pp.31. [4] The Art of Multiprocessor Programming. Maurice Herlihy, Nir Shavit, 2008, pp.61.

uniVocity-parsers is an open-source project CSV/TSV/Fixed-width file parser library in Java, providing many capabilities to read/write files with simplified API, and powerful features as shown below. Unlike other libraries out there, uniVocity-parsers built its own architecture for parsing text files, which focuses on maximum performance and flexibility while making it easy to extend and build new parsers. Contents Overview Installation Features Overview Reading CSV/TSV/Fixed-width Files Writing CSV/TSV/Fixed-width Files Performance and Flexibility Design and Implementations 1. Overview I'm a Java developer working on a web-based system to evaluate telecommunication carriers' network and work out reports. In the system, the CSV format was heavily involved for the network-related data, such as real-time network status (online/offline) for the broadband subscribers, and real-time traffic for each subscriber. Generally the size of a single CSV file would exceed 1GB, with millions of rows included. And we were using the library JavaCSV as the CSV file parser. As growth in the capacity of carriers' network and the time duration our system monitors, the size of data in CSV increased so much. My team and I have to work out a solution to achieve better performance (even in seconds) in CSV files processing, and better extendability to provide much more customized functionality. We came across this library uniVocity-parsers as a final solution after a lot of testing and analysis, and we found it great. In addition of better performance and extendability, the library provides developers with simplified APIs, detailed documents & tutorials and commercial support for highly customized functionality. This project is hosted at Github with 62 stars & 8 forks (at the time of writing). Tremendous documents & tutorials are provided at here and here. You can find more examples and news here as well. In addition, the well-known open-source project Apache Camel integrates uniVocity-parsers for reading and writing CSV/TSV/Fixed-width files. Find more details here. 2. Installation I'm using version 1.5.1 , but refer to the official download page to see if there's a more recent version available. The project is also available in the maven central repository, so you can add this to your pom.xml: com.univocity univocity-parsers 1.5.1 3. Features Overview uniVocity-parsers provides a list of powerful features, which can fulfill all requirements you might have for processing tabular presentations of data. Check the following overview chart for the features: 4. Reading Tabular Presentations Data Read all rows of a csv CsvParser parser = new CsvParser(new CsvParserSettings()); List allRows = parser.parseAll(getReader("/examples/example.csv")); For full list of demos in reading features, refer to: https://github.com/uniVocity/univocity-parsers#reading-csv 5. Writing Tabular Presentations Data Write data in CSV format with just 2 lines of code: List rows = someMethodToCreateRows(); CsvWriter writer = new CsvWriter(outputWriter, new CsvWriterSettings()); writer.writeRowsAndClose(rows); For full list of demos in writing features, refer to: https://github.com/uniVocity/univocity-parsers/blob/master/README.md#writing 6. Performance and Flexibility Here is the performance comparison we tested for uniVocity-parsers and JavaCSV in our system: File size Duration for JavaCSV parsing Duration for uniVocity-parsers parsing 10MB, 145453 rows 1138ms 836ms 100MB, 809008 rows 23s 6s 434MB, 4499959 rows 91s 28s 1GB, 23803502 rows 245s 70s Here are some performance comparison tables for almost all CSV parsers libraries in existence. And you can find that uniVocity-parsers got significantly ahead of other libraries in performance. uniVocity-parsers achieved its purpose in performance and flexibility with the following mechanisms: Read input on separate thread (enable by invoking CsvParserSettings.setReadInputOnSeparateThread()) Concurrent row processor (refer to ConcurrentRowProcessor which implements RowProcessor) Extend ColumnProcessor to process columns with your own business logic Extend RowProcessor to read rows with your own business logic 7. Design and Implementations A bunch of processors in uniVocity-parsers are core modules, which are responsible for reading/writing data in rows and columns, and execute data conversions. Here is the diagram of processors: You can create your own processors easily by implementing the RowProcessor interface or extending the provided implementations. In the following example I simply used an anonymous class: CsvParserSettings settings = new CsvParserSettings(); settings.setRowProcessor(new RowProcessor() { /** * initialize whatever you need before processing the first row, with your own business logic **/ @Override public void processStarted(ParsingContext context) { System.out.println("Started to process rows of data."); } /** * process the row with your own business logic **/ StringBuilder stringBuilder = new StringBuilder(); @Override public void rowProcessed(String[] row, ParsingContext context) { System.out.println("The row in line #" + context.currentLine() + ": "); for (String col : row) { stringBuilder.append(col).append("\t"); } } /** * After all rows were processed, perform any cleanup you need **/ @Override public void processEnded(ParsingContext context) { System.out.println("Finished processing rows of data."); System.out.println(stringBuilder); } }); CsvParser parser = new CsvParser(settings); List allRows = parser.parseAll(new FileReader("/myFile.csv")); The library offers a whole lot more features. I recommend you to have a look as it really made a difference in our project.

written by josh long on the spring blog applications generated more and more data than ever before and a huge part of the challenge - before it can even be analyzed - is accommodating the load in the first place. apache’s kafka meets this challenge. it was originally designed by linkedin and subsequently open-sourced in 2011. the project aims to provide a unified, high-throughput, low-latency platform for handling real-time data feeds. the design is heavily influenced by transaction logs. it is a messaging system, similar to traditional messaging systems like rabbitmq, activemq, mqseries, but it’s ideal for log aggregation, persistent messaging, fast (_hundreds_ of megabytes per second!) reads and writes, and can accommodate numerous clients. naturally, this makes it perfect for cloud-scale architectures! kafka powers many large production systems . linkedin uses it for activity data and operational metrics to power the linkedin news feed, and linkedin today, as well as offline analytics going into hadoop. twitter uses it as part of their stream-processing infrastructure. kafka powers online-to-online and online-to-offline messaging at foursquare. it is used to integrate foursquare monitoring and production systems with hadoop-based offline infrastructures. square uses kafka as a bus to move all system events through square’s various data centers. this includes metrics, logs, custom events, and so on. on the consumer side, it outputs into splunk, graphite, or esper-like real-time alerting. netflix uses it for 300-600bn messages per day. it’s also used by airbnb, mozilla, goldman sachs, tumblr, yahoo, paypal, coursera, urban airship, hotels.com, and a seemingly endless list of other big-web stars. clearly, it’s earning its keep in some powerful systems! installing apache kafka there are many different ways to get apache kafka installed. if you’re on osx, and you’re using homebrew, it can be as simple as brew install kafka . you can also download the latest distribution from apache . i downloaded kafka_2.10-0.8.2.1.tgz , unzipped it, and then within you’ll find there’s a distribution of apache zookeeper as well as kafka, so nothing else is required. i installed apache kafka in my $home directory, under another directory, bin , then i created an environment variable, kafka_home , that points to $home/bin/kafka . start apache zookeeper first, specifying where the configuration properties file it requires is: $kafka_home/bin/zookeeper-server-start.sh $kafka_home/config/zookeeper.properties the apache kafka distribution comes with default configuration files for both zookeeper and kafka, which makes getting started easy. you will in more advanced use cases need to customize these files. then start apache kafka. it too requires a configuration file, like this: $kafka_home/bin/kafka-server-start.sh $kafka_home/config/server.properties the server.properties file contains, among other things, default values for where to connect to apache zookeeper ( zookeeper.connect ), how much data should be sent across sockets, how many partitions there are by default, and the broker id ( broker.id - which must be unique across a cluster). there are other scripts in the same directory that can be used to send and receive dummy data, very handy in establishing that everything’s up and running! now that apache kafka is up and running, let’s look at working with apache kafka from our application. some high level concepts.. a kafka broker cluster consists of one or more servers where each may have one or more broker processes running. apache kafka is designed to be highly available; there are no master nodes. all nodes are interchangeable. data is replicated from one node to another to ensure that it is still available in the event of a failure. in kafka, a topic is a category, similar to a jms destination or both an amqp exchange and queue. topics are partitioned, and the choice of which of a topic’s partition a message should be sent to is made by the message producer. each message in the partition is assigned a unique sequenced id, its offset . more partitions allow greater parallelism for consumption, but this will also result in more files across the brokers. producers send messages to apache kafka broker topics and specify the partition to use for every message they produce. message production may be synchronous or asynchronous. producers also specify what sort of replication guarantees they want. consumers listen for messages on topics and process the feed of published messages. as you’d expect if you’ve used other messaging systems, this is usually (and usefully!) asynchronous. like spring xd and numerous other distributed system, apache kafka uses apache zookeeper to coordinate cluster information. apache zookeeper provides a shared hierarchical namespace (called znodes ) that nodes can share to understand cluster topology and availability (yet another reason that spring cloud has forthcoming support for it..). zookeeper is very present in your interactions with apache kafka. apache kafka has, for example, two different apis for acting as a consumer. the higher level api is simpler to get started with and it handles all the nuances of handling partitioning and so on. it will need a reference to a zookeeper instance to keep the coordination state. let’s turn now turn to using apache kafka with spring. using apache kafka with spring integration the recently released apache kafka 1.1 spring integration adapter is very powerful, and provides inbound adapters for working with both the lower level apache kafka api as well as the higher level api. the adapter, currently, is xml-configuration first, though work is already underway on a spring integration java configuration dsl for the adapter and milestones are available. we’ll look at both here, now. to make all these examples work, i added the libs-milestone-local maven repository and used the following dependencies: org.apache.kafka:kafka_2.10:0.8.1.1 org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-integration:1.2.3.release org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter:1.2.3.release org.springframework.integration:spring-integration-kafka:1.1.1.release org.springframework.integration:spring-integration-java-dsl:1.1.0.m1 using the spring integration apache kafka with the spring integration xml dsl first, let’s look at how to use the spring integration outbound adapter to send message instances from a spring integration flow to an external apache kafka instance. the example is fairly straightforward: a spring integration channel named inputtokafka acts as a conduit that forwards message messages to the outbound adapter, kafkaoutboundchanneladapter . the adapter itself can take its configuration from the defaults specified in the kafka:producer-context element or it from the adapter-local configuration overrides. there may be one or many configurations in a given kafka:producer-context element. here’s the java code from a spring boot application to trigger message sends using the outbound adapter by sending messages into the incoming inputtokafka messagechannel . package xml; import org.apache.commons.logging.log; import org.apache.commons.logging.logfactory; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.qualifier; import org.springframework.boot.commandlinerunner; import org.springframework.boot.springapplication; import org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.springbootapplication; import org.springframework.context.annotation.bean; import org.springframework.context.annotation.dependson; import org.springframework.context.annotation.importresource; import org.springframework.integration.config.enableintegration; import org.springframework.messaging.messagechannel; import org.springframework.messaging.support.genericmessage; @springbootapplication @enableintegration @importresource("/xml/outbound-kafka-integration.xml") public class demoapplication { private log log = logfactory.getlog(getclass()); @bean @dependson("kafkaoutboundchanneladapter") commandlinerunner kickoff(@qualifier("inputtokafka") messagechannel in) { return args -> { for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { in.send(new genericmessage<>("#" + i)); log.info("sending message #" + i); } }; } public static void main(string args[]) { springapplication.run(demoapplication.class, args); } } using the new apache kafka spring integration java configuration dsl shortly after the spring integration 1.1 release, spring integration rockstar artem bilan got to work on adding a spring integration java configuration dsl analog and the result is a thing of beauty! it’s not yet ga (you need to add the libs-milestone repository for now), but i encourage you to try it out and kick the tires. it’s working well for me and the spring integration team are always keen on getting early feedback whenever possible! here’s an example that demonstrates both sending messages and consuming them from two different integrationflow s. the producer is similar to the example xml above. new in this example is the polling consumer. it is batch-centric, and will pull down all the messages it sees at a fixed interval. in our code, the message received will be a map that contains as its keys the topic and as its value another map with the partition id and the batch (in this case, of 10 records), of records read. there is a messagelistenercontainer -based alternative that processes messages as they come. package jc; import org.apache.commons.logging.log; import org.apache.commons.logging.logfactory; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.autowired; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.qualifier; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.value; import org.springframework.boot.commandlinerunner; import org.springframework.boot.springapplication; import org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.springbootapplication; import org.springframework.context.annotation.bean; import org.springframework.context.annotation.configuration; import org.springframework.context.annotation.dependson; import org.springframework.integration.integrationmessageheaderaccessor; import org.springframework.integration.config.enableintegration; import org.springframework.integration.dsl.integrationflow; import org.springframework.integration.dsl.integrationflows; import org.springframework.integration.dsl.sourcepollingchanneladapterspec; import org.springframework.integration.dsl.kafka.kafka; import org.springframework.integration.dsl.kafka.kafkahighlevelconsumermessagesourcespec; import org.springframework.integration.dsl.kafka.kafkaproducermessagehandlerspec; import org.springframework.integration.dsl.support.consumer; import org.springframework.integration.kafka.support.zookeeperconnect; import org.springframework.messaging.messagechannel; import org.springframework.messaging.support.genericmessage; import org.springframework.stereotype.component; import java.util.list; import java.util.map; /** * demonstrates using the spring integration apache kafka java configuration dsl. * thanks to spring integration ninja artem bilan * for getting the java configuration dsl working so quickly! * * @author josh long */ @enableintegration @springbootapplication public class demoapplication { public static final string test_topic_id = "event-stream"; @component public static class kafkaconfig { @value("${kafka.topic:" + test_topic_id + "}") private string topic; @value("${kafka.address:localhost:9092}") private string brokeraddress; @value("${zookeeper.address:localhost:2181}") private string zookeeperaddress; kafkaconfig() { } public kafkaconfig(string t, string b, string zk) { this.topic = t; this.brokeraddress = b; this.zookeeperaddress = zk; } public string gettopic() { return topic; } public string getbrokeraddress() { return brokeraddress; } public string getzookeeperaddress() { return zookeeperaddress; } } @configuration public static class producerconfiguration { @autowired private kafkaconfig kafkaconfig; private static final string outbound_id = "outbound"; private log log = logfactory.getlog(getclass()); @bean @dependson(outbound_id) commandlinerunner kickoff( @qualifier(outbound_id + ".input") messagechannel in) { return args -> { for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { in.send(new genericmessage<>("#" + i)); log.info("sending message #" + i); } }; } @bean(name = outbound_id) integrationflow producer() { log.info("starting producer flow.."); return flowdefinition -> { consumer spec = (kafkaproducermessagehandlerspec.producermetadataspec metadata)-> metadata.async(true) .batchnummessages(10) .valueclasstype(string.class) .valueencoder(string::getbytes); kafkaproducermessagehandlerspec messagehandlerspec = kafka.outboundchanneladapter( props -> props.put("queue.buffering.max.ms", "15000")) .messagekey(m -> m.getheaders().get(integrationmessageheaderaccessor.sequence_number)) .addproducer(this.kafkaconfig.gettopic(), this.kafkaconfig.getbrokeraddress(), spec); flowdefinition .handle(messagehandlerspec); }; } } @configuration public static class consumerconfiguration { @autowired private kafkaconfig kafkaconfig; private log log = logfactory.getlog(getclass()); @bean integrationflow consumer() { log.info("starting consumer.."); kafkahighlevelconsumermessagesourcespec messagesourcespec = kafka.inboundchanneladapter( new zookeeperconnect(this.kafkaconfig.getzookeeperaddress())) .consumerproperties(props -> props.put("auto.offset.reset", "smallest") .put("auto.commit.interval.ms", "100")) .addconsumer("mygroup", metadata -> metadata.consumertimeout(100) .topicstreammap(m -> m.put(this.kafkaconfig.gettopic(), 1)) .maxmessages(10) .valuedecoder(string::new)); consumer endpointconfigurer = e -> e.poller(p -> p.fixeddelay(100)); return integrationflows .from(messagesourcespec, endpointconfigurer) .>>handle((payload, headers) -> { payload.entryset().foreach(e -> log.info(e.getkey() + '=' + e.getvalue())); return null; }) .get(); } } public static void main(string[] args) { springapplication.run(demoapplication.class, args); } } the example makes heavy use of java 8 lambdas. the producer spends a bit of time establishing how many messages will be sent in a single send operation, how keys and values are encoded (kafka only knows about byte[] arrays, after all) and whether messages should be sent synchronously or asynchronously. in the next line, we configure the outbound adapter itself and then define an integrationflow such that all messages get sent out via the kafka outbound adapter. the consumer spends a bit of time establishing which zookeeper instance to connect to, how many messages to receive (10) in a batch, etc. once the message batches are recieved, they’re handed to the handle method where i’ve passed in a lambda that’ll enumerate the payload’s body and print it out. nothing fancy. using apache kafka with spring xd apache kafka is a message bus and it can be very powerful when used as an integration bus. however, it really comes into its own because it’s fast enough and scalable enough that it can be used to route big-data through processing pipelines. and if you’re doing data processing, you really want spring xd ! spring xd makes it dead simple to use apache kafka (as the support is built on the apache kafka spring integration adapter!) in complex stream-processing pipelines. apache kafka is exposed as a spring xd source - where data comes from - and a sink - where data goes to. spring xd exposes a super convenient dsl for creating bash -like pipes-and-filter flows. spring xd is a centralized runtime that manages, scales, and monitors data processing jobs. it builds on top of spring integration, spring batch, spring data and spring for hadoop to be a one-stop data-processing shop. spring xd jobs read data from sources , run them through processing components that may count, filter, enrich or transform the data, and then write them to sinks. spring integration and spring xd ninja marius bogoevici , who did a lot of the recent work in the spring integration and spring xd implementation of apache kafka, put together a really nice example demonstrating how to get a full working spring xd and kafka flow working . the readme walks you through getting apache kafka, spring xd and the requisite topics all setup. the essence, however, is when you use the spring xd shell and the shell dsl to compose a stream. spring xd components are named components that are pre-configured but have lots of parameters that you can override with --.. arguments via the xd shell and dsl. (that dsl, by the way, is written by the amazing andy clement of spring expression language fame!) here’s an example that configures a stream to read data from an apache kafka source and then write the message a component called log , which is a sink. log , in this case, could be syslogd, splunk, hdfs, etc. xd> stream create kafka-source-test --definition "kafka --zkconnect=localhost:2181 --topic=event-stream | log"--deploy and that’s it! naturally, this is just a tase of spring xd, but hopefully you’ll agree the possibilities are tantalizing. deploying a kafka server with lattice and docker it’s easy to get an example kafka installation all setup using lattice , a distributed runtime that supports, among other container formats, the very popular docker image format. there’s a docker image provided by spotify that sets up a collocated zookeeper and kafka image . you can easily deploy this to a lattice cluster, as follows: ltc create --run-as-root m-kafka spotify/kafka from there, you can easily scale the apache kafka instances and even more easily still consume apache kafka from your cloud-based services. next steps you can find the code for this blog on my github account . we’ve only scratched the surface! if you want to learn more (and why wouldn’t you?), then be sure to check out marius bogoevici and dr. mark pollack’s upcoming webinar on reactive data-pipelines using spring xd and apache kafka where they’ll demonstrate how easy it can be to use rxjava, spring xd and apache kafka!

Parse your Java stack trace log information with the Logstash tool.

I find it very difficult to debug the Java client application written for MQ. Most of the error messages are self explanatory but some of the error messages are difficult to diagnose and find the cause. Enable tracing would really help to identify the root of the problem. In this post, we will see how to enable tracing on Java applications. MQ Trace Simple MQ Trace enabling can be done by adding a JVM parameter like this java -Dcom.ibm.mq.commonservices=trace.properties ... Create trace.properties with the following attributes Diagnostics.MQ=enabled Diagnostics.Java=explorer,wmqjavaclasses,all Diagnostics.Java.Trace.Detail=high Diagnostics.Java.Trace.Destination.File=enabled Diagnostics.Java.Trace.Destination.Console=disabled Diagnostics.Java.Trace.Destination.Pathname=/tmp/trace Diagnostics.Java.FFDC.Destination.Pathname=/tmp/FFDC Diagnostics.Java.Errors.Destination.Filename=/tmp/errors/AMQJERR.LOG oints to be noted Add libraries of IBM JRE (From the directory $JRE_HOME/lib) to CLASSPATH Create the directories /tmp/FFDC, /tmp/trace and /tmp/errors Add read permission to trace.properties Keep an eye on the log file size and make sure to disable logging when not required. Otherwise, it will keep filling the disk space. (Logs size will become some gigs in few hours easily) One you start the Java Client, it will start printing the trace into the mentioned files. If you want to disable the tracing, make the Diagnostics.MQ property value to disabled so that trace will be stopped. JSSE Debug In case of secure connection with MQ, if you want to enable debug for JSSE, then you can use the JVM parameter java.net.debug with different values -Djavax.net.debug=true This prints full trace of JSSE, this can be limited to only handshake by changing the value of the parameter to ssl:handshake -Djavax.net.debug=ssl:handshake This prints only the trace related to handshake, all other trace will be simply ignored. For more articles read my blog . Happy Learning!!!!

On this post, we will make a hands-on about Mockito and DBUnit, two libraries from Java's open source ecosystem which can help us in improving our JUnit tests on focus and independence. But why mocking is so important on our unit tests? Focusing the tests Let's imagine a Java back-end application with a tier-like architecture. On this application, we could have 2 tiers: The service tier, which have the business rules and make as a interface for the front-end; The entity tier, which have the logic responsible for making calls to a database, utilizing techonologies like JDBC or JPA; Of course, on a architecture of this kind, we will have the following dependence of our tiers: Service >>> Entity On this kind of architecture, the most common way of building our automated tests is by creating JUnit Test Classes which test each tier independently, thus we can make running tests that reflect only the correctness of the tier we want to test. However, if we simply create the classes without any mocking, we will got problems like the following: On the JUnit tests of our service tier, for example, if we have a problem on the entity tier, we will have also our tests failed, because the error from the entity tier will reverberate across the tiers; If we have a project where different teams are working on the same system, and one team is responsible for the construction of the service tier, while the other is responsible for the construction of the entity tier, we will have a dependency of one team with the other before the tests could be made; To resolve such issues, we could mock the entity tier on the service tier's unit test classes, so we can have independence and focus of our tests on the service tier, which it belongs. independence One point that it is specially important when we make our JUnit test classes in the independence department is the entity tier. Since in our example this tier is focused in the connection and running of SQL commands on a database, it makes a break on our independence goal, since we will need a database so we can run our tests. Not only that, if a test breaks any structure that it is used by the subsequent tests, all of them will also fail. It is on this point that enters our other library, DBUnit. With DBUnit, we can use embedded databases, such as HSQLDB, to make our database exclusive to the running of our tests. So, without further delay, let's begin our hands-on! Hands-on For this lab, we will create a basic CRUD for a Client entity. The structure will follow the simple example we talked about previously, with the DAO (entity) and Service tiers. We will use DBUnit and JUnit to test the DAO tier, and Mockito with JUnit to test the Service tier. First, let's create a Maven project, without any archetype and include the following dependencies on pom.xml: . . . junit junit 4.12 org.dbunit dbunit 2.5.0 org.mockito mockito-all 1.10.19 org.hibernate hibernate-entitymanager 4.3.8.Final org.hsqldb hsqldb 2.3.2 org.springframework spring-core 4.1.4.RELEASE org.springframework spring-context 4.1.5.RELEASE org.springframework spring-test 4.1.5.RELEASE org.springframework spring-tx 4.1.5.RELEASE org.springframework spring-orm 4.1.5.RELEASE . . . On the previous snapshot, we included not only the Mockito, DBUnit and JUnit libraries, but we also included Hibernate to implement the persistence layer and Spring 4 to use the IoC container and the transaction management. We also included the Spring Test library, which includes some features that we will use later on this lab. Finally, to simplify the setup and remove the need of installing a database to run the code, we will use HSQLDB as our database. Our lab will have the following structure: One class will represent the application itself, as a standalone class, where we will consume the tiers, like a real application would do; We will have another 2 classes, each one with JUnit tests, that will test each tier independently; First, we define a persistence unit, where we define the name of the unit and the properties to make Hibernate create the table for us and populate her with some initial rows. The code of the persistence.xml can be seen bellow: com.alexandreesl.handson.model.Client And the initial data to populate the table can be seen bellow: insert into Client(id,name,sex, phone) values (1,'Alexandre Eleuterio Santos Lourenco','M','22323456'); insert into Client(id,name,sex, phone) values (2,'Lucebiane Santos Lourenco','F','22323876'); insert into Client(id,name,sex, phone) values (3,'Maria Odete dos Santos Lourenco','F','22309456'); insert into Client(id,name,sex, phone) values (4,'Eleuterio da Silva Lourenco','M','22323956'); insert into Client(id,name,sex, phone) values (5,'Ana Carolina Fernandes do Sim','F','22123456'); In order to not making the post burdensome, we will not discuss the project structure during the lab, but just show the final structure at the end. The code can be found on a Github repository, at the end of the post. With the persistence unit defined, we can start coding! First, we create the entity class: package com.alexandreesl.handson.model; import javax.persistence.Column; import javax.persistence.Entity; import javax.persistence.Id; import javax.persistence.Table; @Table(name = "Client") @Entity public class Client { @Id private long id; @Column(name = "name", nullable = false, length = 50) private String name; @Column(name = "sex", nullable = false) private String sex; @Column(name = "phone", nullable = false) private long phone; public long getId() { return id; } public void setId(long id) { this.id = id; } public String getName() { return name; } public void setName(String name) { this.name = name; } public String getSex() { return sex; } public void setSex(String sex) { this.sex = sex; } public long getPhone() { return phone; } public void setPhone(long phone) { this.phone = phone; } } In order to create the persistence-related beans to enable Hibernate and the transaction manager, alongside all the rest of the beans necessary for the application, we use a Java-based Spring configuration class. The code of the class can be seen bellow: package com.alexandreesl.handson.core; import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean; import org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScan; import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration; import org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource; import org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager; import org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean; import org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.Database; import org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaDialect; import org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaVendorAdapter; import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.EnableTransactionManagement; @Configuration @EnableTransactionManagement @ComponentScan({ "com.alexandreesl.handson.dao", "com.alexandreesl.handson.service" }) public class AppConfiguration { @Bean public DriverManagerDataSource dataSource() { DriverManagerDataSource dataSource = new DriverManagerDataSource(); dataSource.setDriverClassName("org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver"); dataSource.setUrl("jdbc:hsqldb:mem://standalone"); dataSource.setUsername("sa"); dataSource.setPassword(""); return dataSource; } @Bean public JpaTransactionManager transactionManager() { JpaTransactionManager transactionManager = new JpaTransactionManager(); transactionManager.setEntityManagerFactory(entityManagerFactory() .getNativeEntityManagerFactory()); transactionManager.setDataSource(dataSource()); transactionManager.setJpaDialect(jpaDialect()); return transactionManager; } @Bean public HibernateJpaDialect jpaDialect() { return new HibernateJpaDialect(); } @Bean public HibernateJpaVendorAdapter jpaVendorAdapter() { HibernateJpaVendorAdapter jpaVendor = new HibernateJpaVendorAdapter(); jpaVendor.setDatabase(Database.HSQL); jpaVendor.setDatabasePlatform("org.hibernate.dialect.HSQLDialect"); return jpaVendor; } @Bean public LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean entityManagerFactory() { LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean entityManagerFactory = new LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean(); entityManagerFactory .setPersistenceXmlLocation("classpath:META-INF/persistence.xml"); entityManagerFactory.setPersistenceUnitName("persistence"); entityManagerFactory.setDataSource(dataSource()); entityManagerFactory.setJpaVendorAdapter(jpaVendorAdapter()); entityManagerFactory.setJpaDialect(jpaDialect()); return entityManagerFactory; } } And finally, we create the classes that represent the tiers itself. This is the DAO class: package com.alexandreesl.handson.dao; import javax.persistence.EntityManager; import javax.persistence.PersistenceContext; import org.springframework.stereotype.Component; import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional; import com.alexandreesl.handson.model.Client; @Component public class ClientDAO { @PersistenceContext private EntityManager entityManager; @Transactional(readOnly = true) public Client find(long id) { return entityManager.find(Client.class, id); } @Transactional public void create(Client client) { entityManager.persist(client); } @Transactional public void update(Client client) { entityManager.merge(client); } @Transactional public void delete(Client client) { entityManager.remove(client); } } And this is the service class: package com.alexandreesl.handson.service; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired; import org.springframework.stereotype.Component; import com.alexandreesl.handson.dao.ClientDAO; import com.alexandreesl.handson.model.Client; @Component public class ClientService { @Autowired private ClientDAO clientDAO; public ClientDAO getClientDAO() { return clientDAO; } public void setClientDAO(ClientDAO clientDAO) { this.clientDAO = clientDAO; } public Client find(long id) { return clientDAO.find(id); } public void create(Client client) { clientDAO.create(client); } public void update(Client client) { clientDAO.update(client); } public void delete(Client client) { clientDAO.delete(client); } } The reader may notice that we created a getter/setter to the DAO class on the Service class. This is not necessary for the Spring injection, but we made this way to get easier to change the real DAO by a Mockito's mock on the tests class. Finally, we code the class we talked about previously, the one that consume the tiers: package com.alexandreesl.handson.core; import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext; import org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigApplicationContext; import com.alexandreesl.handson.model.Client; import com.alexandreesl.handson.service.ClientService; public class App { public static void main(String[] args) { ApplicationContext context = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext( AppConfiguration.class); ClientService service = (ClientService) context .getBean(ClientService.class); System.out.println(service.find(1).getName()); System.out.println(service.find(3).getName()); System.out.println(service.find(5).getName()); Client client = new Client(); client.setId(6); client.setName("Celina do Sim"); client.setPhone(44657688); client.setSex("F"); service.create(client); System.out.println(service.find(6).getName()); System.exit(0); } } If we run the class, we can see that the console print all the clients we searched for and that Hibernate is initialized properly, proving our implementation is a success: Mar 28, 2015 1:09:22 PM org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigApplicationContext prepareRefresh INFO: Refreshing org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigApplicationContext@6433a2: startup date [Sat Mar 28 13:09:22 BRT 2015]; root of context hierarchy Mar 28, 2015 1:09:22 PM org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource setDriverClassName INFO: Loaded JDBC driver: org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver Mar 28, 2015 1:09:22 PM org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean createNativeEntityManagerFactory INFO: Building JPA container EntityManagerFactory for persistence unit 'persistence' Mar 28, 2015 1:09:22 PM org.hibernate.jpa.internal.util.LogHelper logPersistenceUnitInformation INFO: HHH000204: Processing PersistenceUnitInfo [ name: persistence ...] Mar 28, 2015 1:09:22 PM org.hibernate.Version logVersion INFO: HHH000412: Hibernate Core {4.3.8.Final} Mar 28, 2015 1:09:22 PM org.hibernate.cfg.Environment INFO: HHH000206: hibernate.properties not found Mar 28, 2015 1:09:22 PM org.hibernate.cfg.Environment buildBytecodeProvider INFO: HHH000021: Bytecode provider name : javassist Mar 28, 2015 1:09:22 PM org.hibernate.annotations.common.reflection.java.JavaReflectionManager INFO: HCANN000001: Hibernate Commons Annotations {4.0.5.Final} Mar 28, 2015 1:09:23 PM org.hibernate.dialect.Dialect INFO: HHH000400: Using dialect: org.hibernate.dialect.HSQLDialect Mar 28, 2015 1:09:23 PM org.hibernate.hql.internal.ast.ASTQueryTranslatorFactory INFO: HHH000397: Using ASTQueryTranslatorFactory Mar 28, 2015 1:09:23 PM org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaExport execute INFO: HHH000227: Running hbm2ddl schema export Mar 28, 2015 1:09:23 PM org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaExport execute INFO: HHH000230: Schema export complete Alexandre Eleuterio Santos Lourenco Maria Odete dos Santos Lourenco Ana Carolina Fernandes do Sim Celina do Sim Now, let's move on for the tests themselves. For the DBUnit tests, we create a Base class, which will provide the base DB operations which all of our JUnit tests will benefit. On the @PostConstruct method, which is fired after all the injections of the Spring context are made - reason why we couldn't use the @BeforeClass annotation, because we need Spring to instantiate and inject the EntityManager first - we use DBUnit to make a connection to our database, with the class DatabaseConnection and populate the table using the DataSet class we created, passing a XML structure that represents the data used on the tests. This operation of populating the table is made by the DatabaseOperation class, which we use with the CLEAN_INSERT operation, that truncate the table first and them insert the data on the dataset. Finally, we use one of JUnit's event listeners, the @After event, which is called after every test case. On our scenario, we use this event to call the clear() method on the EntityManager, which forces Hibernate to query against the Database for the first time at every test case, thus eliminating possible problems we could have between our test cases because of data that it is different on the second level cache than it is on the DB. The code for the base class is the following: package com.alexandreesl.handson.dao.test; import java.io.InputStream; import java.sql.SQLException; import javax.annotation.PostConstruct; import javax.persistence.EntityManager; import javax.persistence.EntityManagerFactory; import javax.persistence.PersistenceUnit; import org.dbunit.DatabaseUnitException; import org.dbunit.database.DatabaseConfig; import org.dbunit.database.DatabaseConnection; import org.dbunit.database.IDatabaseConnection; import org.dbunit.dataset.IDataSet; import org.dbunit.dataset.xml.FlatXmlDataSetBuilder; import org.dbunit.ext.hsqldb.HsqldbDataTypeFactory; import org.dbunit.operation.DatabaseOperation; import org.hibernate.HibernateException; import org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl; import org.junit.After; public class BaseDBUnitSetup { private static IDatabaseConnection connection; private static IDataSet dataset; @PersistenceUnit public EntityManagerFactory entityManagerFactory; private EntityManager entityManager; @PostConstruct public void init() throws HibernateException, DatabaseUnitException, SQLException { entityManager = entityManagerFactory.createEntityManager(); connection = new DatabaseConnection( ((SessionImpl) (entityManager.getDelegate())).connection()); connection.getConfig().setProperty( DatabaseConfig.PROPERTY_DATATYPE_FACTORY, new HsqldbDataTypeFactory()); FlatXmlDataSetBuilder flatXmlDataSetBuilder = new FlatXmlDataSetBuilder(); InputStream dataSet = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader() .getResourceAsStream("test-data.xml"); dataset = flatXmlDataSetBuilder.build(dataSet); DatabaseOperation.CLEAN_INSERT.execute(connection, dataset); } @After public void afterTests() { entityManager.clear(); } } The xml structure used on the test cases is the following: And the code of our test class of the DAO tier is the following: package com.alexandreesl.handson.dao.test; import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull; import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull; import org.junit.Test; import org.junit.runner.RunWith; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired; import org.springframework.test.context.ContextConfiguration; import org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner; import org.springframework.test.context.transaction.TransactionConfiguration; import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional; import com.alexandreesl.handson.core.test.AppTestConfiguration; import com.alexandreesl.handson.dao.ClientDAO; import com.alexandreesl.handson.model.Client; @RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) @ContextConfiguration(classes = AppTestConfiguration.class) @TransactionConfiguration(defaultRollback = true) public class ClientDAOTest extends BaseDBUnitSetup { @Autowired private ClientDAO clientDAO; @Test public void testFind() { Client client = clientDAO.find(1); assertNotNull(client); client = clientDAO.find(2); assertNotNull(client); client = clientDAO.find(3); assertNull(client); client = clientDAO.find(4); assertNull(client); client = clientDAO.find(5); assertNull(client); } @Test @Transactional public void testInsert() { Client client = new Client(); client.setId(3); client.setName("Celina do Sim"); client.setPhone(44657688); client.setSex("F"); clientDAO.create(client); } @Test @Transactional public void testUpdate() { Client client = clientDAO.find(1); client.setPhone(12345678); clientDAO.update(client); } @Test @Transactional public void testRemove() { Client client = clientDAO.find(1); clientDAO.delete(client); } } The code is very self explanatory so we will just focus on explaining the annotations at the top-level class. The @RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) annotationchanges the JUnit base class that runs our test cases, using rather one made by Spring that enable support of the IoC container and the Spring's annotations. The @TransactionConfiguration(defaultRollback = true) annotation is from Spring's test library and change the behavior of the @Transactional annotation, making the transactions to roll back after execution, instead of a commit. That ensures that our test cases wont change the structure of the DB, so a test case wont break the execution of his followers. The reader may notice that we changed the configuration class to another one, exclusive for the test cases. It is essentially the same beans we created on the original configuration class, just changing the database bean to point to a different DB then the previously one, showing that we can change the database of our tests without breaking the code. On a real world scenario, the configuration class of the application would be pointing to a relational database like Oracle, DB2, etc and the test cases would use a embedded database such as HSQLDB, which we are using on this case: package com.alexandreesl.handson.core.test; import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean; import org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScan; import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration; import org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource; import org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager; import org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean; import org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.Database; import org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaDialect; import org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaVendorAdapter; import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.EnableTransactionManagement; @Configuration @EnableTransactionManagement @ComponentScan({ "com.alexandreesl.handson.dao", "com.alexandreesl.handson.service" }) public class AppTestConfiguration { @Bean public DriverManagerDataSource dataSource() { DriverManagerDataSource dataSource = new DriverManagerDataSource(); dataSource.setDriverClassName("org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver"); dataSource.setUrl("jdbc:hsqldb:mem://standalone-test"); dataSource.setUsername("sa"); dataSource.setPassword(""); return dataSource; } @Bean public JpaTransactionManager transactionManager() { JpaTransactionManager transactionManager = new JpaTransactionManager(); transactionManager.setEntityManagerFactory(entityManagerFactory() .getNativeEntityManagerFactory()); transactionManager.setDataSource(dataSource()); transactionManager.setJpaDialect(jpaDialect()); return transactionManager; } @Bean public HibernateJpaDialect jpaDialect() { return new HibernateJpaDialect(); } @Bean public HibernateJpaVendorAdapter jpaVendorAdapter() { HibernateJpaVendorAdapter jpaVendor = new HibernateJpaVendorAdapter(); jpaVendor.setDatabase(Database.HSQL); jpaVendor.setDatabasePlatform("org.hibernate.dialect.HSQLDialect"); return jpaVendor; } @Bean public LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean entityManagerFactory() { LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean entityManagerFactory = new LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean(); entityManagerFactory .setPersistenceXmlLocation("classpath:META-INF/persistence.xml"); entityManagerFactory.setPersistenceUnitName("persistence"); entityManagerFactory.setDataSource(dataSource()); entityManagerFactory.setJpaVendorAdapter(jpaVendorAdapter()); entityManagerFactory.setJpaDialect(jpaDialect()); return entityManagerFactory; } } If we run the test class, we can see that it runs the test cases successfully, showing that our code is a success. If we see the console, we can see that transactions were created and rolled back, respecting our configuration: . . . ar 28, 2015 2:29:55 PM org.springframework.test.context.transaction.TransactionContext startTransaction INFO: Began transaction (1) for test context [DefaultTestContext@644abb8f testClass = ClientDAOTest, testInstance = com.alexandreesl.handson.dao.test.ClientDAOTest@1a411233, testMethod = testInsert@ClientDAOTest, testException = [null], mergedContextConfiguration = [MergedContextConfiguration@70325d20 testClass = ClientDAOTest, locations = '{}', classes = '{class com.alexandreesl.handson.core.test.AppTestConfiguration}', contextInitializerClasses = '[]', activeProfiles = '{}', propertySourceLocations = '{}', propertySourceProperties = '{}', contextLoader = 'org.springframework.test.context.support.DelegatingSmartContextLoader', parent = [null]]]; transaction manager [org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager@7c2327fa]; rollback [true] Mar 28, 2015 2:29:55 PM org.springframework.test.context.transaction.TransactionContext endTransaction INFO: Rolled back transaction for test context [DefaultTestContext@644abb8f testClass = ClientDAOTest, testInstance = com.alexandreesl.handson.dao.test.ClientDAOTest@1a411233, testMethod = testInsert@ClientDAOTest, testException = [null], mergedContextConfiguration = [MergedContextConfiguration@70325d20 testClass = ClientDAOTest, locations = '{}', classes = '{class com.alexandreesl.handson.core.test.AppTestConfiguration}', contextInitializerClasses = '[]', activeProfiles = '{}', propertySourceLocations = '{}', propertySourceProperties = '{}', contextLoader = 'org.springframework.test.context.support.DelegatingSmartContextLoader', parent = [null]]]. Mar 28, 2015 2:29:55 PM org.springframework.test.context.transaction.TransactionContext startTransaction INFO: Began transaction (1) for test context [DefaultTestContext@644abb8f testClass = ClientDAOTest, testInstance = com.alexandreesl.handson.dao.test.ClientDAOTest@2adddc06, testMethod = testRemove@ClientDAOTest, testException = [null], mergedContextConfiguration = [MergedContextConfiguration@70325d20 testClass = ClientDAOTest, locations = '{}', classes = '{class com.alexandreesl.handson.core.test.AppTestConfiguration}', contextInitializerClasses = '[]', activeProfiles = '{}', propertySourceLocations = '{}', propertySourceProperties = '{}', contextLoader = 'org.springframework.test.context.support.DelegatingSmartContextLoader', parent = [null]]]; transaction manager [org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager@7c2327fa]; rollback [true] Mar 28, 2015 2:29:55 PM org.springframework.test.context.transaction.TransactionContext endTransaction INFO: Rolled back transaction for test context [DefaultTestContext@644abb8f testClass = ClientDAOTest, testInstance = com.alexandreesl.handson.dao.test.ClientDAOTest@2adddc06, testMethod = testRemove@ClientDAOTest, testException = [null], mergedContextConfiguration = [MergedContextConfiguration@70325d20 testClass = ClientDAOTest, locations = '{}', classes = '{class com.alexandreesl.handson.core.test.AppTestConfiguration}', contextInitializerClasses = '[]', activeProfiles = '{}', propertySourceLocations = '{}', propertySourceProperties = '{}', contextLoader = 'org.springframework.test.context.support.DelegatingSmartContextLoader', parent = [null]]]. Mar 28, 2015 2:29:55 PM org.springframework.test.context.transaction.TransactionContext startTransaction INFO: Began transaction (1) for test context [DefaultTestContext@644abb8f testClass = ClientDAOTest, testInstance = com.alexandreesl.handson.dao.test.ClientDAOTest@4905c46b, testMethod = testUpdate@ClientDAOTest, testException = [null], mergedContextConfiguration = [MergedContextConfiguration@70325d20 testClass = ClientDAOTest, locations = '{}', classes = '{class com.alexandreesl.handson.core.test.AppTestConfiguration}', contextInitializerClasses = '[]', activeProfiles = '{}', propertySourceLocations = '{}', propertySourceProperties = '{}', contextLoader = 'org.springframework.test.context.support.DelegatingSmartContextLoader', parent = [null]]]; transaction manager [org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager@7c2327fa]; rollback [true] Mar 28, 2015 2:29:55 PM org.springframework.test.context.transaction.TransactionContext endTransaction INFO: Rolled back transaction for test context [DefaultTestContext@644abb8f testClass = ClientDAOTest, testInstance = com.alexandreesl.handson.dao.test.ClientDAOTest@4905c46b, testMethod = testUpdate@ClientDAOTest, testException = [null], mergedContextConfiguration = [MergedContextConfiguration@70325d20 testClass = ClientDAOTest, locations = '{}', classes = '{class com.alexandreesl.handson.core.test.AppTestConfiguration}', contextInitializerClasses = '[]', activeProfiles = '{}', propertySourceLocations = '{}', propertySourceProperties = '{}', contextLoader = 'org.springframework.test.context.support.DelegatingSmartContextLoader', parent = [null]]]. Now let's move on to the Service tests, with the help of Mockito. The class to test the Service tier is very simple, as we can see bellow: package com.alexandreesl.handson.service.test; import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; import org.junit.BeforeClass; import org.junit.Test; import org.mockito.Mockito; import org.mockito.invocation.InvocationOnMock; import org.mockito.stubbing.Answer; import com.alexandreesl.handson.dao.ClientDAO; import com.alexandreesl.handson.model.Client; import com.alexandreesl.handson.service.ClientService; public class ClientServiceTest { private static ClientDAO clientDAO; private static ClientService clientService; @BeforeClass public static void beforeClass() { clientService = new ClientService(); clientDAO = Mockito.mock(ClientDAO.class); clientService.setClientDAO(clientDAO); Client client = new Client(); client.setId(0); client.setName("Mocked client!"); client.setPhone(11111111); client.setSex("M"); Mockito.when(clientDAO.find(Mockito.anyLong())).thenReturn(client); Mockito.doThrow(new RuntimeException("error on client!")) .when(clientDAO).delete((Client) Mockito.any()); Mockito.doNothing().when(clientDAO).create((Client) Mockito.any()); Mockito.doAnswer(new Answer

Introduction In my , I explained the Hibernate configurations required for batching INSERT and UPDATE statements. This post will continue this topic with DELETE statements batching. Domain model entities We’ll start with the following entity model: The Post entity has a one-to-many association to a Comment and a one-to-one relationship with the PostDetails entity: @OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = "post", orphanRemoval = true) private List comments = new ArrayList<>(); @OneToOne(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = "post", orphanRemoval = true, fetch = FetchType.LAZY) private PostDetails details; The up-coming tests will be run against the following data: doInTransaction(session -> { int batchSize = batchSize(); for(int i = 0; i < itemsCount(); i++) { int j = 0; Post post = new Post(String.format( "Post no. %d", i)); post.addComment(new Comment( String.format( "Post comment %d:%d", i, j++))); post.addComment(new Comment(String.format( "Post comment %d:%d", i, j++))); post.addDetails(new PostDetails()); session.persist(post); if(i % batchSize == 0 && i > 0) { session.flush(); session.clear(); } } }); Hibernate Configuration As , the following properties are required for batching INSERT and UPDATE statements: properties.put("hibernate.jdbc.batch_size", String.valueOf(batchSize())); properties.put("hibernate.order_inserts", "true"); properties.put("hibernate.order_updates", "true"); properties.put("hibernate.jdbc.batch_versioned_data", "true"); Next, we are going to check if DELETE statements are batched as well. JPA Cascade Delete Because is convenient, I’m going to prove that CascadeType.DELETE and JDBC batching don’t mix well. The following tests is going to: Select some Posts along with Comments and PostDetails Delete the Posts, while propagating the delete event to Comments and PostDetails as well @Test public void testCascadeDelete() { LOGGER.info("Test batch delete with cascade"); final AtomicReference startNanos = new AtomicReference<>(); addDeleteBatchingRows(); doInTransaction(session -> { List posts = session.createQuery( "select distinct p " + "from Post p " + "join fetch p.details d " + "join fetch p.comments c") .list(); startNanos.set(System.nanoTime()); for (Post post : posts) { session.delete(post); } }); LOGGER.info("{}.testCascadeDelete took {} millis", getClass().getSimpleName(), TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis( System.nanoTime() - startNanos.get() )); } Running this test gives the following output: Query:{[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][55,0]} {[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][56,0]} Query:{[delete from PostDetails where id=?][3]} Query:{[delete from Post where id=? and version=?][3,0]} Query:{[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][54,0]} {[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][53,0]} Query:{[delete from PostDetails where id=?][2]} Query:{[delete from Post where id=? and version=?][2,0]} Query:{[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][52,0]} {[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][51,0]} Query:{[delete from PostDetails where id=?][1]} Query:{[delete from Post where id=? and version=?][1,0]} Only the Comment DELETE statements were batched, the other entities being deleted in separate database round-trips. The reason for this behaviour is given by the ActionQueue sorting implementation: if ( session.getFactory().getSettings().isOrderUpdatesEnabled() ) { // sort the updates by pk updates.sort(); } if ( session.getFactory().getSettings().isOrderInsertsEnabled() ) { insertions.sort(); } While INSERTS and UPDATES are covered, DELETE statements are not sorted at all. A JDBC batch can only be reused when all statements belong to the same database table. When an incoming statement targets a different database table, the current batch has to be released, so that the new batch matches the current statement database table: public Batch getBatch(BatchKey key) { if ( currentBatch != null ) { if ( currentBatch.getKey().equals( key ) ) { return currentBatch; } else { currentBatch.execute(); currentBatch.release(); } } currentBatch = batchBuilder().buildBatch(key, this); return currentBatch; } If you enjoy reading this article, you might want to subscribe to my newsletter and get a discount for my book as well. Orphan removal and manual flushing A work-around is to dissociate all Child entities while manually flushing the HibernateSession before advancing to a new Child association: @Test public void testOrphanRemoval() { LOGGER.info("Test batch delete with orphan removal"); final AtomicReference startNanos = new AtomicReference<>(); addDeleteBatchingRows(); doInTransaction(session -> { List posts = session.createQuery( "select distinct p " + "from Post p " + "join fetch p.details d " + "join fetch p.comments c") .list(); startNanos.set(System.nanoTime()); posts.forEach(Post::removeDetails); session.flush(); posts.forEach(post -> { for (Iterator commentIterator = post.getComments().iterator(); commentIterator.hasNext(); ) { Comment comment = commentIterator.next(); comment.post = null; commentIterator.remove(); } }); session.flush(); posts.forEach(session::delete); }); LOGGER.info("{}.testOrphanRemoval took {} millis", getClass().getSimpleName(), TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis( System.nanoTime() - startNanos.get() )); } This time all DELETE statements are properly batched: Query:{[delete from PostDetails where id=?][2]} {[delete from PostDetails where id=?][3]} {[delete from PostDetails where id=?][1]} Query:{[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][53,0]} {[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][54,0]} {[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][56,0]} {[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][55,0]} {[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][52,0]} {[delete from Comment where id=? and version=?][51, Query:{[delete from Post where id=? and version=?][2,0]} {[delete from Post where id=? and version=?][3,0]} {[delete from Post where id=? and version=?][1,0]} SQL Cascade Delete A better solution is to use SQL cascade deletion, instead of JPA entity state propagation mechanism. This way, we can also reduce the DML statements count. Because Hibernate Session acts as a , we must be extra cautious when mixing entity state transitions with database-side automatic actions, as the Persistence Context might not reflect the latest database changes. The Post entity one-to-manyComment association is marked with the Hibernate specific @OnDelete annotation, so that the auto-generated database schema includes the ON DELETE CASCADE directive: @OneToMany(cascade = { CascadeType.PERSIST, CascadeType.MERGE}, mappedBy = "post") @OnDelete(action = OnDeleteAction.CASCADE) private List comments = new ArrayList<>(); Generating the following DDL: alter table Comment add constraint FK_apirq8ka64iidc18f3k6x5tc5 foreign key (post_id) references Post on delete cascade The same is done with the PostDetails entity one-to-one Post association: @OneToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY) @JoinColumn(name = "id") @MapsId @OnDelete(action = OnDeleteAction.CASCADE) private Post post; And the associated DDL: alter table PostDetails add constraint FK_h14un5v94coafqonc6medfpv8 foreign key (id) references Post on delete cascade The CascadeType.ALL and orphanRemoval were replaced with CascadeType.PERSIST and CascadeType.MERGE, because we no longer want Hibernate to propagate the entity removal event. The test only deletes the Post entities. doInTransaction(session -> { List posts = session.createQuery( "select p from Post p") .list(); startNanos.set(System.nanoTime()); for (Post post : posts) { session.delete(post); } }); The DELETE statements are properly batched as there’s only one target table. Query:{[delete from Post where id=? and version=?][1,0]} {[delete from Post where id=? and version=?][2,0]} {[delete from Post where id=? and version=?][3,0]} If you enjoyed this article, I bet you are going to love my book as well. Conclusion If INSERT and UPDATE statements batching is just a matter of configuration, DELETE statements require some additional steps, which may increase the data access layer complexity. Code available on GitHub. If you have enjoyed reading my article and you’re looking forward to getting instant email notifications of my latest posts, consider .

In Java, formatting a number according to a locale-specific currency format is pretty simple. You use an instance of java.text.NumberFormat class by instantiating it through NumberFormat.getCurrencyInstance() and invoke one of the format() methods. Following is a code-snippet from https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/i18n/format/numberFormat.html static public void displayCurrency( Locale currentLocale) { Double currencyAmount = new Double(9876543.21); Currency currentCurrency = Currency.getInstance(currentLocale); NumberFormat currencyFormatter = NumberFormat.getCurrencyInstance(currentLocale); System.out.println( currentLocale.getDisplayName() + ", " + currentCurrency.getDisplayName() + ": " + currencyFormatter.format(currencyAmount)); } However, if an application allows users to enter an amount as a string using separators and currency symbols, there is quite a possibility that currency format may not have been followed according to the locale. For example, user can use a wrong thousand or decimal separator, or a wrong currency symbol altogether. In that case, the application should incorporate a mechanism to first ensure that format is followed and then parse that string to convert it into a proper number in order to perform several mathematical calculations in a currency format independent manner. It is important to note that parsing a string using java.text.NumberFormat#public Number parse(String source) method requires that the currency string must contain a value following the locale-specific pattern defined in java.text.DecimalFormat and symbols defined in java.text.DecimalFormatSymbols. If the pattern and/or symbols are not followed, program will throw java.text.ParseException. For example, currency pattern for it_CH = Italian (Switzerland) is ¤ #,##0.00 and grouping separator is ', hence SFr. 1'234.56 is valid while 1,234.56 SFr. is invalid In order to check the validity of a currency amount before actually parsing it, Apache Commons Validator project's org.apache.commons.validator.routines.CurrencyValidator comes in real handy. All you have to do is to construct its object and call public boolean isValid(String value,Locale locale) method to check whether locale-specific format is followed or not. Once you are done with validation and found that number is valid, you can then parse the number by calling the parse() method. Following code snippet shows how to validate and parse. Note that the validation is lenient and if currency symbol is not already present in the string, it appends appropriate currency symbol according to the pattern and then validate and parse it. /** * Converts given item price into a number based on given * currency code. * * It works generically for all currencies supported by Java * * * @param itemPrice currency amount * @param currencyCode 3-letter ISO country code * @return {@link String} containing stripped price or same as given price * if parsing failed or formatter couldn't be constructed * @author Muhammad Haris */ public static Double convertPrice(String itemPrice, String currencyCode) { Double itemPriceConverted = null; Locale currencyLocale = LocaleUtility .getLocaleAgainstCurrency(currencyCode); DecimalFormat currencyFormatter = getCurrencyFormatter(currencyLocale); if (currencyFormatter != null) { itemPrice = appendCurrencySymbol(itemPrice, currencyFormatter); try { Number number = currencyFormatter.parse(itemPrice); itemPriceConverted = number.doubleValue(); } catch (ParseException e) { LOG.error("Failed to parse currency: " + currencyCode + ", value: " + itemPrice + ". " + e.getMessage(), e); } } else { LOG.error("No appropriate formatter found for currency: " + currencyCode + ", value: " + itemPrice + ". "); } return itemPriceConverted; } /** * Gets currency formatter against given currency locale * * @param currencyCode * {@link String} containing 3 letter ISO currency code * @return {@link NumberFormat} object specialized for the currency or null * if it couldn't be composed * @author Muhammad Haris */ public static DecimalFormat getCurrencyFormatter(Locale currencyLocale) { if (currencyLocale != null) { return (DecimalFormat) NumberFormat .getCurrencyInstance(currencyLocale); } return null; } /** * Appends appropriate currency symbol to the given price using the pattern * defined in the given currency formatter * * @param itemPrice * {@link String} containing price of the item in locale specific * format * @param currencyFormatter * {@link DecimalFormat} object containing currency locale * specific formatting info * @author Muhammad Haris */ public static String appendCurrencySymbol(String itemPrice, DecimalFormat currencyFormatter) { String currencySymbol = currencyFormatter.getDecimalFormatSymbols() .getCurrencySymbol(); String pattern = currencyFormatter.toPattern(); if (!itemPrice.contains(currencySymbol)) { if (pattern.startsWith("¤ ")) { itemPrice = currencySymbol + " " + itemPrice; } else if (pattern.endsWith(" ¤")) { itemPrice = itemPrice + " " + currencySymbol; } else if (pattern.startsWith("¤")) { itemPrice = currencySymbol + itemPrice; } else if (pattern.endsWith("¤")) { itemPrice = itemPrice + currencySymbol; } } return itemPrice; }

Currently I am working on a project, where we have faced the problem of the huge size of daily logs. We have some environment, which exists on the same shared file system, so if logs on some environment will consume free disk space, it will cause crashing of other environments. Our log policy uses daily rolling of logs (every day a new log file is created and logs are stored only for N last days, any log that becomes older than N days will be deleted). And on a usual day this logic is ok, but in case of any errors it can be dangerous. For example, some module has lost connection to the database and starts logging an error with details, attempting to restore connection every 10 seconds. It works in case of any minor network issue, when connection is restored in minutes, maybe hours... But in case of serious issues the connection could not be restored without participation of the developer. Imagine then that it happens in the night when everybody is offline and nobody is looking at the issue in real time (just forgot to mention: these are dev environments, not prod). As a result the module will produce a huge log with a lot of identical errors. Going further... What if the issue happens on the database side and all modules on the environment lose connection? Correct, every module will produce logs at high rate. In the morning a developer will find out logs files of some GB, no free space on the shared disk and all other dev environments in a dead state, due to lack of space. There are some ways to resolve this issue and improve stability of development environments: increase disk space; review logging policy on the application level: produce less messages; review the recovery policy of the module: for example, increase time between attempts to reestablish connection; review logging policy on the logger level: introduce a log size limit, enable ZIP for old logs; Increase disk space. In enterprise development? Huh... you might be kidding? It could last for ages. No, of course, it's possible, but still we have limits. Though it will require more than one day to exhaust disk space, it can still fail on long weekends. What is about changing the logging policy? First of all, it can involve more complicated logic of messages output and possibly decrease chances of finding the root cause of some problem due to lack of details. Secondly, it requires changes of the code and, by the way, application code is really huge, so it is a challenge to carefully review all the code to find messages which can be output less often. Changing the module recovery policy: there is also a problem with code changes, also it is not clear what a new time interval between recover attempts should be, and how it will affect other modules. For example, in case of a minor issue, recovering of the module in 10 seconds will save working state of dependant module, but, for example, recovery time of 15 seconds will cause crash of other modules, so minor issue will become a serious problem. As a result the most painless way is to introduce the log size limit. The project uses log4j of version 1.2.17 currently. Short investigation shows that log rolling on a daily basis taking into account log size at the same time is not possible out of the box (you can find DailyRollingFileAppender and RollingFileAppender, but they act independently). It can be done in log4j starting from version 2. Migrating to log4j 2 promises to be very painful due to API changes and the size of our project (also at that time log4j 2 was in beta). So we took a look in the direction of log4j 3rd party appenders. As a result we found and started to use TimeAndSizeRollingAppender. It comes as a maven dependency and can be configured as any other log4j appender: All params here have clear names, I suppose. To put it simply the above configuration allows you to have 10 log files on the disk at the same time irrespective of the reason why a new file was created: because of the daily roll or because of the file size exceeded the specified limit. Every day a new log file will be created, the previous day log will be renamed accordingly to DatePattern param, in addition to this MaxFileSize sets file size limit, once it exceeds - a new log file will also be created. In both cases the oldest log will be deleted, if number of files become greater than MaxRollFileCount. Pay attention to the compression settings. CompressionAlgorithm enables compression of old logs and CompressionMinQueueSize defines the max number of existing uncompressed files. So in this case latest 5 logs will be stored uncompressed, all other log files will be compressed. Such feature is good, because you are able to see the latest logs without decompressing them. This appender will save the file system from unexpected logs growing. Of course, you can lose the original error message during log rolling, but it depends on the way you output errors. At least you will surely see the error message that spams you log, but overall system stability will not be affected by 'no free space' error.

Previously we’ve explored how to parse XML data using NodeJS as well as PHP. Continuing on the trend of parsing data using various programming languages, this time we’re going to take a look at parsing XML data using the dom4j library with Java. Now dom4j, is not the only way to parse XML data in Java. There are many other ways including using the SAX parser. Everyone will have their own opinions on which of the many to use. To keep up with my previous two XML tutorials, we’re going to use the following XML data saved in a file called data.xml at the root of the project: Code Blog Nic Raboy Nic Raboy Maria Campos With our XML content figured out, let’s make sure we structure our project like the following: project root src xmlparser MainDriver.java libs dom4j-1.6.1.jar build.xml data.xml Based on our project structure, you can probably tell that we’re going to be using Apache Ant for building. Say what you want about using Ant, but I’m still one of many who still uses it. Feel free to make changes to Apache Maven or other to better meet your needs. We’re now ready to crack open our src/xmlparser/MainDriver.java to start adding our parse logic. package xmlparser; import java.io.*; import java.util.*; import org.dom4j.*; import org.dom4j.io.*; public class MainDriver { public static void main(String[] args) { } public static void printRecursive(Element element) { } public static Document readFile(String filename) throws Exception { } } To further explain our intentions, the readFile(String filename) function will load the data.xmlfile and return it as a Document object for further parsing. The printRecursive(Element element)function will iterate through each node of the XML and print it out if it contains text. All levels of the XML will be iterated through. So let’s start with readFile(String filename): public static Document readFile(String filename) throws Exception { SAXReader reader = new SAXReader(); Document document = reader.read(new File(filename)); return document; } Nothing really to the above code. In fact, I pulled most of it from the dom4j quick-start code. The printRecursive(Element element) function is where things get more complex: public static void printRecursive(Element element) { for(int i = 0, size = element.nodeCount(); i < size; i++) { Node node = element.node(i); if(node instanceof Element) { Element currentNode = (Element) node; if(currentNode.isTextOnly()) { System.out.println(currentNode.getText()); } printRecursive(currentNode); } } } Some of the above code was taken from the dom4j quick-start, but the rest is some custom work. We are basically looking at each node and trying to visit any available children. If none exist, bail out. We also only want to print if there is text. Finally, we’re looking at the main(String[] args) function to bring it all together: public static void main(String[] args) { try { Element root = readFile("data.xml").getRootElement(); printRecursive(root); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } Just like that we’ve printed our each node of our XML document. In case you’re interested in the build.xml code, it can be seen below: To test the project you’d just run ant buildandrun from your command prompt or Terminal. Assuming of course you have Apache Ant configured correctly. The dom4j library is very thorough so I recommend have a look at the Javadocs that go with it.

Clustering is a very important thing to master for any serious user of an application server. Clustering allows for high availability by making your application available on secondary servers when the primary instance is down or it lets you scale up or out by increasing the server density on the host, or by adding servers on other hosts. It can even help to increase performance with effective load balancing between servers based on their respective hardware. Andy Overton has already covered how to set up a cluster of servers in standalone mode fronted by mod_cluster for load balancing, so in this post I'll cover clustering in domain mode. I won't rehash mod_cluster settings, so this will just cover the set up of a doman controller on one host, and the host controller and server instances on another host. To follow along with this blog, you'll need to download either JBoss EAP 6.x or WildFly. I'll be using WildFly 8.2 on Xubuntu 14.04. I'll be using $WF_HOME to refer to your WildFly home directory. Configuring the Domain Controller The domain controller needs both the domain.xml and host.xml configured. In the $WF_HOME/domain/configuration directory, you'll see that those two files are joined by a host-master.xml and a host-slave.xml. These are preconfigured host.xml files which you can use to give you a head start in making a host.xml for the domain controller (master) and host controller (slave) to use. You can either change the name of the file to be host.xml, so it will get picked up and used by default, or you can specify the host configuration you want to use on the command line by adding the --host-config argument: domain.sh --host-config=host-master.xml Whether you choose to modify the host.xml or the host-master.xml, you need to make sure that the empty element has been added to the section. This is so that when WildFly looks to see which server is the domain controller, it knows to become the domain controller itself. The other change is optional, but recommended. We need to tell the domain controller to bind its management interface to the correct IP address because, by default, it will bind to localhost, so the management communication it needs to do with the remote hosts won't be able to reach the domain controller at all! We can set this address permanently in the host.xml by making sure the inet-address value is set to the right IP, by changing the 127.0.0.1 in the example below to the correct IP: The result of that is that the default bind IP of the management interface is no longer localhost, although you can still override this value by starting JBoss with the variable left of the colon as a -D argument: domain.sh -Djboss.bind.address.management=10.0.0.1 Next, we need to modify the domain.xml file, where we need to define our server groups; essentially just defining the cluster. Each server group is named, so we can reference it later, and references a particular profile which needs to be one of the profiles named and defined in the same XML file. As I mentioned in my previous blog, domain mode has several profiles in the same file (domain.xml) rather than multiple files for each, like standalone mode (standalone.xml, standalone-ha.xml etc.). In the screenshot, there are two server groups defined - "main-server-group" which references the "full" profile, and "other-server-group" which references the "full-ha" profile. These are just the defaults which come with WildFly, so you're free to use them and modify the settings or create your own from scratch. Whichever you choose, it's a good idea to rename your server group to something meaningful, like a description of the workload, or the application name. Configuring the Host Controllers Every host server which you want to be part of the cluster must have the host.xml file configured. We've already configured the host.xml on the domain controller, so now we'll focus on the host controller. Remember, this process can be repeated on any number of hosts, depending on how many servers you want in your server group and their topology. First, we need to make sure that the domain controller and the host controller can communicate, and to do that we need a valid management user. On the domain controller, run the add-user.sh or add-user.bat script. You will need to make sure to: Choose a management user Make sure the user is different than the one you would use to log in to the web console Confirm that the new user will connect one AS process to another AS process Make a note of the secret value (this is very important!) You will find that you get prompts similar to the following: mike@mike-C2B2:~$ /opt/wildfly/wildfly-8.2.0.Final/bin/add-user.sh What type of user do you wish to add? a) Management User (mgmt-users.properties) b) Application User (application-users.properties) (a): a Enter the details of the new user to add. Using realm 'ManagementRealm' as discovered from the existing property files. Username : mgmt Password recommendations are listed below. To modify these restrictions edit the add-user.properties configuration file. - The password should not be one of the following restricted values {root, admin, administrator} - The password should contain at least 8 characters, 1 alphabetic character(s), 1 digit(s), 1 non-alphanumeric symbol(s) - The password should be different from the username Password : Re-enter Password : What groups do you want this user to belong to? (Please enter a comma separated list, or leave blank for none)[ ]: About to add user 'mgmt' for realm 'ManagementRealm' Is this correct yes/no? yes Added user 'mgmt' to file '/opt/wildfly/wildfly-8.2.0.Final/standalone/configuration/mgmt-users.properties' Added user 'mgmt' to file '/opt/wildfly/wildfly-8.2.0.Final/domain/configuration/mgmt-users.properties' Added user 'mgmt' with groups to file '/opt/wildfly/wildfly-8.2.0.Final/standalone/configuration/mgmt-groups.properties' Added user 'mgmt' with groups to file '/opt/wildfly/wildfly-8.2.0.Final/domain/configuration/mgmt-groups.properties' Is this new user going to be used for one AS process to connect to another AS process? e.g. for a slave host controller connecting to the master or for a Remoting connection for server to server EJB calls. yes/no? yes To represent the user add the following to the server-identities definition Once we have the secret value for our management user, we can add it to the host.xml file. I'm choosing to modify the host-slave.xml file, since much of the configuration I need is done for me: Next, we need to tell the host controller where to look for the domain controller. We set this to for the domain controller's host.xml file, but in the host-slave.xml we have an example tag filled out for us. All we need to do is add the domain controller's IP or hostname exactly as we did for the management bind address earlier. So our host-slave.xml should go from this: to this: This way, like with the management interface on the domain controller, the default address will be 10.0.0.1, but it can also be overridden on the command line if needed. Once we've sorted the communication out, we need to tell the host controller to actually start some server instances! At the bottom of the host-slave.xml file, there are two predefined servers to use: These are already configured to become members of the two server groups configured in the domain.xml. Note that the second server has to have a port offset. Despite it being in a different server group, it's still going to run on the same host and will attempt to bind to the same ports as the first server unless we tell it not to! We would also need to do the same thing if we added other server instances. Optionally, we can make things a little easier for ourselves when managing a lot of servers on a lot of hosts. We can give each server instance its own unique name, but we can also name the host by adding a name attribute to the parent tag, changing it from: to So both in the logs and in the admin console, you should see this host controller referred to as "host1". Now, if you wanted to name your server instances the same across hosts, you'll be able to tell which is which! If all you wanted was to configure a single domain controller and a single host controller, then that's all we need to do to get them speaking to each other. You can then carry on and configure mod_cluster and Apache to forward requests on to the right server, or just deploy your applications and connect to them directly.

Many Java developers regarded the JDK's version seven release as somewhat a disappointment. On the surface, merely a few language and library extensions made it into the release, namely Project Coin and NIO2. But under the covers, the seventh version of the platform shipped the single biggest extension to the JVM's type system ever introduced after its initial release. Adding the invokedynamic instruction did not only lay the foundation for implementing lambda expressions in Java 8, it also was a game changer for translating dynamic languages into the Java byte code format. While the invokedynamic instruction is an implementation detail for executing a language on the Java virtual machine, understanding the functioning of this instruction gives true insights into the inner workings of executing a Java program. This article gives a beginner's view on what problem the invokedynamic instruction solves and how it solves it. Method handles Method handles are often described as a retrofitted version of Java's reflection API, but this is not what they are meant to represent. While method handles can represent a method, constructor or field, they are not intended to describe properties of these class members. It is for example not possible to directly extract metadata from a method handle such as modifiers or annotation values of the represented method. And while method handles allow for the invocation of a referenced method, their main purpose is to be used together with an invokedynamic call site. For gaining a better understanding of method handles, looking at them as an imperfect replacement for the reflection API is however a reasonable starting point. Method handles cannot be instantiated. Instead, method handles are created by using a designated lookup object. These objects are themselves created by using a factory method that is provided by the MethodHandles class. Whenever this factory is invoked, it first creates a security context which ensures that the resulting lookup object can only locate methods that are also visible to the class from which the factory method was invoked. A lookup object can then be created as follows: class Example { void doSomething() { MethodHandles.Lookup lookup = MethodHandles.lookup(); } private void foo() { /* ... */ } } As argued before, the above lookup object could only be used to locate methods that are also visible to the Example class such asfoo. It would for example be impossible to look up a private method of another class. This is a first major difference to using the reflection API where private methods of outside classes can be located just as any other method and where these methods can even be invoked after marking such a method as accessible. Method handles are therefore sensible of their creation context which is a first major difference to the reflection API. Apart from that, a method handle is more specific than the reflection API by describing a specific type of method rather than representing just any method. In a Java program, a method's type is a composite of both the method's return type and the types of its parameters. For example, the only method of the following Counter class returns an int representing the number of characters of the only String-typed argument: class Counter { static int count(String name) { return name.length(); } } A representation of this method's type can be created by using another factory. This factory is found in the MethodType class which also represents instances of created method types. Using this factory, the method type for Counter::count can be created by handing over the method's return type and its parameter types bundled as an array: MethodType methodType = MethodType.methodType(int.class, new Class[] {String.class}); By using the lookup object that was created before and the above method type, it is now possible to locate a method handle that represents the Counter::count method as depicted in the following code: MethodType methodType = MethodType.methodType(int.class, new Class[] {String.class}); MethodHandles.Lookup lookup = MethodHandles.lookup(); MethodHandle methodHandle = lookup.findStatic(Counter.class, "count", methodType); int count = methodHandle.invokeExact("foo"); assertThat(count, is(3)); At first glance, using a method handle might seem like an overly complex version of using the reflection API. However, keep in mind that the direct invocation of a method using a handle is not the main intent of its use. The main difference of the above example code and of invoking a method via the reflection API is only revealed when looking into the differences of how the Java compiler translates both invocations into Java byte code. When a Java program invokes a method, this method is uniquely identified by its name and by its (non-generic) parameter types and even by its return type. It is for this reason that it is possible to overload methods in Java. And even though the Java programming language does not allow it, the JVM does in theory allow to overload a method by its return type. Following this principle, a reflective method call is executed as a common method call of the Method::invoke method. This method is identified by its two parameters which are of the types Object and Object[]. In addition to this, the method is identified by its Object return type. Because of this signature, all arguments to this method need to always be boxed and enclosed in an array. Similarly, the return value needs to be boxed if it was primitive or null is returned if the method was void. Method handles are the exception to this rule. Instead of invoking a method handle by referring to the signature ofMethodHandle::invokeExact signature which takes an Object[] as its single argument and returns Object, method handles are invoked by using a so-called polymorphic signature. A polymorphic signature is created by the Java compiler dependant on the types of the actual arguments and the expected return type at a call site. For example, when invoking the method handle as above with int count = methodHandle.invokeExact("foo"); the Java compiler translates this invocation as if the invokeExact method was defined to accept a single single argument of typeString and returning an int type. Obviously, such a method does not exist and for (almost) any other method, this would result in a linkage error at runtime. For method handles, the Java Virtual Machine does however recognize this signature to be polymorphic and treats the invocation of the method handle as if the Counter::count method that the handle refers to was inset directly into the call site. Thus, the method can be invoked without the overhead of boxing primitive values or the return type and without placing the argument values inside an array. At the same time, when using the invokeExact invocation, it is guaranteed to the Java virtual machine that the method handle always references a method at runtime that is compatible to the polymorphic signature. For the example, the JVM expected that the referenced method actually accepts a String as its only argument and that it returns a primitive int. If this constraint was not fulfilled, the execution would instead result in a runtime error. However, any other method that accepts a single String and that returns a primitive int could be successfully filled into the method handle's call site to replace Counter::count. In contrast, using the Counter::count method handle at the following three invocations would result in runtime errors, even though the code compiles successfully: int count1 = methodHandle.invokeExact((Object) "foo"); int count2 = (Integer) methodHandle.invokeExact("foo"); methodHandle.invokeExact("foo"); The first statement results in an error because the argument that is handed to the handle is too general. While the JVM expected a String as an argument to the method, the Java compiler suggested that the argument would be an Object type. It is important to understand that the Java compiler took the casting as a hint for creating a different polymorphic signature with anObject type as a single parameter type while the JVM expected a String at runtime. Note that this restriction also holds for handing too specific arguments, for example when casting an argument to an Integer where the method handle required aNumber type as its argument. In the second statement, the Java compiler suggested to the runtime that the handle's method would return an Integer wrapper type instead of the primitive int. And without suggesting a return type at all in the third statement, the Java compiler implicitly translated the invocation into a void method call. Hence, invokeExact really does mean exact. This restriction can sometimes be too harsh. For this reason, instead of requiring an exact invocation, the method handle also allows for a more forgiving invocation where conversions such as type castings and boxings are applied. This sort of invocation can be applied by using the MethodHandle::invoke method. Using this method, the Java compiler still creates a polymorphic signature. This time, the Java virtual machine does however test the actual arguments and the return type for compatibility at run time and converts them by applying boxings or castings, if appropriate. Obviously, these transformations can sometimes add a runtime overhead. Fields, methods and constructors: handles as a unified interface Other than Method instances of the reflection API, method handles can equally reference fields or constructors. The name of theMethodHandle type could therefore be seen as too narrow. Effectively, it does not matter what class member is referenced via a method handle at runtime as long as its MethodType, another type with a misleading name, matches the arguments that are passed at the associated call site. Using the appropriate factories of a MethodHandles.Lookup object, a field can be looked up to represent a getter or a setter. Using getters or setters in this context does not refer to invoking an actual method that follows the Java bean specification. Instead, the field-based method handle directly reads from or writes to the field but in shape of a method call via invoking the method handle. By representing such field access via method handles, field access or method invocations can be used interchangeably. As an example for such interchange, take the following class: class Bean { String value; void print(String x) { System.out.println(x); } } For the above Bean class, the following method handles can be used for either writing a string to the value field or for invoking the print method with the same string as an argument: MethodHandle fieldHandle = lookup.findSetter(Bean.class, "value", String.class); MethodType methodType = MethodType.methodType(void.class, new Class[] {String.class}); MethodHandle methodHandle = lookup.findVirtual(Bean.class, "print", methodType); As long as the method handle call site is handed an instance of Bean together with a String while returning void, both method handles could be used interchangeably as shown here: anyHandle.invokeExact((Bean) mybean, (String) myString); Note that the polymorphic signature of the above call site does not match the method type of the above handle. However, within Java byte code, non-static methods are invoked as if they were static methods with where the this reference is handed as a first, implicit argument. A non-static method's nominal type does therefore diverge from its actual runtime type. Similarly, access to a non-static field requires an instance to be access. Similarly to fields and methods, it is possible to locate and invoke constructors which are considered as methods with a voidreturn value for their nominal type. Furthermore, one can not only invoke a method directly but even invoke a super method as long as this super method is reachable for the class from which the lookup factory was created. In contrast, invoking a super method is not possible at all when relying on the reflection API. If required, it is even possible to return a constant value from a handle. Performance metrics Method handles are often described as being a more performant as the Java reflection API. At least for recent releases of the HotSpot virtual machine, this is not true. The simplest way of proving this is writing an appropriate benchmark. Then again, is not all too simple to write a benchmark for a Java program which is optimized while it is executed. The de facto standard for writing a benchmark has become using JMH, a harness that ships under the OpenJDK umbrella. The full benchmark can be found as a gist in my GitHub profile. In this article, only the most important aspects of this benchmark are covered. From the benchmark, it becomes obvious that reflection is already implemented quite efficiently. Modern JVMs know a concept named inflation where a frequently invoked reflective method call is replaced with runtime generated Java byte code. What remains is the overhead of applying the boxing for passing arguments and receiving a return values. These boxings can sometimes be eliminated by the JVM's Just-in-time compiler but this is not always possible. For this reason, using method handles can be more performant than using the reflection API if method calls involve a significant amount of primitive values. This does however require that the exact method signatures are already known at compile time such that the appropriate polymorphic signature can be created. For most use cases of the reflection API, this guarantee can however not be given because the invoked method's types are not known at compile time. In this case, using method handles does not offer any performance benefits and should not be used to replace it. Creating an invokedynamic call site Normally, invokedynamic call sites are created by the Java compiler only when it needs to translate a lambda expression into byte code. It is worthwhile to note that lambda expressions could have been implemented without invokedynamic call sites altogether, for example by converting them into anonymous inner classes. As a main difference to the suggested approach, using invokedynamic delays the creation of a similar class to runtime. We are looking into class creation in the next section. For now, bear however in mind that invokedynamic does not have anything to do with class creation, it only allows to delay the decision of how to dispatch a method until runtime. For a better understanding of invokedynamic call sites, it helps to create such call sites explicitly in order to look at the mechanic in isolation. To do so, the following example makes use of my code generation framework Byte Buddy which provides explicit byte code generation of invokedynamic call sites without requiring a any knowledge of the byte code format. Any invokedynamic call site eventually yields a MethodHandle that references the method to be invoked. Instead of invoking this method handle manually, it is however up to the Java runtime to do so. Because method handles have become a known concept to the Java virtual machine, these invocations are then optimized similarly to a common method call. Any such method handle is received from a so-called bootstrap method which is nothing more than a plain Java method that fulfills a specific signature. For a trivial example of a bootstrap method, look at the following code: class Bootstrapper { public static CallSite bootstrap(Object... args) throws Throwable { MethodType methodType = MethodType.methodType(int.class, new Class[] {String.class}) MethodHandles.Lookup lookup = MethodHandles.lookup(); MethodHandle methodHandle = lookup.findStatic(Counter.class, "count", methodType); return new ConstantCallSite(methodHandle); } } For now, we do not care much about the arguments of the method. Instead, notice that the method is static what is as a matter of fact a requirement. Within Java byte code, an invokedynamic call site references the full signature of a bootstrap method but not a specific object which could have a state and a life cycle. Once the invokedynamic call site is invoked, control flow is handed to the referenced bootstrap method which is now responsible for identifying a method handle. Once this method handle is returned from the bootstrap method, it is invoked by the Java runtime. As obvious from the above example, a MethodHandle is not returned directly from a bootstrap method. Instead, the handle is wrapped inside of a CallSite object. Whenever a bootstrap method is invoked, the invokedynamic call site is later permanently bound to the CallSite object that is returned from this method. Consequently, a bootstrap method is only invoked a single time for any call site. Thanks to this intermediate CallSite object, it is however possible to exchange the referenced MethodHandle at a later point. For this purpose, the Java class library already offers different implementations of CallSite. We have already seen a ConstantCallSite in the example code above. As the name suggests, a ConstantCallSite always references the same method handle without a possibility of a later exchange. Alternatively, it is however also possible to for example use aMutableCallSite which allows to change the referenced MethodHandle at a later point in time or it is even possible to implement a custom CallSite class. With the above bootstrap method and Byte Buddy, we can now implement a custom invokedynamic instruction. For this, Byte Buddy offers the InvokeDynamic instrumentation that accepts a bootstrap method as its only mandatory argument. Such instrumentations are then fed to Byte Buddy. Assuming the following class: abstract class Example { abstract int method(); } we can use Byte Buddy to subclass Example in order to override method. We are then going to implement this method to contain a single invokedynamic call site. Without any further configuration, Byte Buddy creates a polymorphic signature that resembles the method type of the overridden method. However, for non-static methods, the this reference is set as a first, implicit argument. Assuming that we want to bind the Counter::count method which expects a String as a single argument, we could not bind this handle to Example::method because of this type mismatch. Therefore, we need to create a different call site without the implicit argument but with an String in its place. This can be achieved by using Byte Buddy's domain specific language: Instrumentation invokeDynamic = InvokeDynamic .bootstrap(Bootstrapper.class.getDeclaredMethod(“bootstrap”, Object[].class)) .withoutImplicitArguments() .withValue("foo"); With this instrumentation in place, we can finally extend the Example class and override method to implement the invokedynamic call site as in the following code snippet: Example example = new ByteBuddy() .subclass(Example.class) .method(named(“method”)).intercept(invokeDynamic) .make() .load(Example.class.getClassLoader(), ClassLoadingStrategy.Default.INJECTION) .getLoaded() .newInstance(); int result = example.method(); assertThat(result, is(3)); As obvious from the above assertion, the characters of the "foo" string were counted correctly. By setting appropriate break points in the code, it is further possible to validate that the bootstrap method is called and that control flow further reaches theCounter::count method. So far, we did not gain much from using an invokedynamic call site. The above bootstrap method would always bindCounter::count and can therefore only produce a valid result if the invokedynamic call site really wanted to transform a Stringinto an int. Obviously, bootstrap methods can however be more flexible thanks to the arguments they receive from the invokedynamic call site. Any bootstrap method receives at least three arguments: As a first argument, the bootstrap method receives a MethodHandles.Lookup object. The security context of this object is that of the class that contains the invokedynamic call site that triggered the bootstrapping. As discussed before, this implies that private methods of the defining class could be bound to the invokedynamic call site using this lookup instance. The second argument is a String representing a method name. This string serves as a hint to indicate from the call site which method should be bound to it. Strictly speaking, this argument is not required as it is perfectly legal to bind a method with another name. Byte Buddy simply serves the the name of the overridden method as this argument, if not specified differently. Finally, the MethodType of the method handle that is expected to be returned is served as a third argument. For the example above, we specified explicitly that we expect a String as a single parameter. At the same time, Byte Buddy derived that we require an int as a return value from looking at the overridden method, as we again did not specify any explicit return type. It is up to the implementor of a bootstrap method what exact signature this method should portray as long as it can at least accept these three arguments. If the last parameter of a bootstrap method represents an Object array, this last parameter is treated as a varargs and can therefore accept any excess arguments. This is also the reason why the above example bootstrap method is valid. Additionally, a bootstrap method can receive several arguments from an invokedynamic call site as long as these arguments can be stored in a class's constant pool. For any Java class, a constant pool stores values that are used inside of a class, largely numbers or string values. As of today, such constants can be primitive values of at least 32 bit size, Strings, Classes,MethodHandles and MethodTypes. This allows bootstrap methods to be used more flexible, if locating a suitable method handle requires additional information in form of such arguments. Lambda expressions Whenever the Java compiler translates a lambda expression into byte code, it copies the lambda's body into a private method inside of the class in which the expression is defined. These methods are named lambda$X$Y with X being the name of the method that contains the lambda expression and with Y being a zero-based sequence number. The parameters of such a method are those of the functional interface that the lambda expression implements. Given that the lambda expression makes no use of non-static fields or methods of the enclosing class, the method is also defined to be static. For compensation, the lambda expression is itself substituted by an invokedynamic call site. On its invocation, this call site requests the binding of a factory for an instance of the functional interface. As arguments to this factory, the call site supplies any values of the lambda expression's enclosing method which are used inside of the expression and a reference to the enclosing instance, if required. As a return type, the factory is required to provide an instance of the functional interface. For bootstrapping a call site, any invokedynamic instruction currently delegates to the LambdaMetafactory class which is included in the Java class library. This factory is then responsible for creating a class that implements the functional interface and which invokes the appropriate method that contains the lambda's body which, as described before, is stored in the original class. In the future, this bootstrapping process might however change which is one of the major advantages of using invokedynamic for implementing lambda expressions. If one day, a better suited language feature was available for implementing lambda expressions, the current implementation could simply be swapped out. In order to being able to create a class that implements the functional interface, any call site representing a lambda expression provides additional arguments to the bootstrap method. For the obligatory arguments, it already provides the name of the functional interface's method. Also, it provides a MethodType of the factory method that the bootstrapping is supposed to yield as a result. Additionally, the bootstrap method is supplied another MethodType that describes the signature of the functional interface's method. To that, it receives a MethodHandle referencing the method that contains the lambda's method body. Finally, the call site provides a MethodType of the generic signature of the functional interface's method, i.e. the signature of the method at the call site before type-erasure was applied. When invoked, the bootstrap method looks at these arguments and creates an appropriate implementation of a class that implements the functional interface. This class is created using the ASM library, a low-level byte code parser and writer that has become the de facto standard for direct Java byte code manipulation. Besides implementing the functional interface's method, the bootstrap method also adds an appropriate constructor and a static factory method for creating instances of the class. It is this factory method that is later bound to the invokedyanmic call site. As arguments, the factory receives an instance to the lambda method's enclosing instance, in case it is accessed and also any values that are read from the enclosing method. As an example, consider the following lambda expression: class Foo { int i; void bar(int j) { Consumer consumer = k -> System.out.println(i + j + k); } } In order to be executed, the lambda expression requires access to both the enclosing instance of Foo and to the value j of its enclosing method. Therefore, the desugared version of the above class looks something like the following where the invokedynamic instruction is represented by some pseudo-code: class Foo { int i; void bar(int j) { Consumer consumer = ; } private /* non-static */ void lambda$foo$0(int j, int k) { System.out.println(this.i + j + k); } } In order to being able to invoke lambda$foo$0, both the enclosing Foo instance and the j variable are handed to the factory that is bound by the invokedyanmic instruction. This factory then receives the variables it requires in order to create an instance of the generated class. This generated class would then look something like the following: class Foo$$Lambda$0 implements Consumer { private final Foo _this; private final int j; private Foo$$Lambda$0(Foo _this, int j) { this._this = _this; this.j = j; } private static Consumer get$Lambda(Foo _this, int j) { return new Foo$$Lambda$0(_this, j); } public void accept(Object value) { // type erasure _this.lambda$foo$0(_this, j, (Integer) value); } } Eventually, the factory method of the generated class is bound to the invokedynamic call site via a method handle that is contained by a ConstantCallSite. However, if the lambda expression is fully stateless, i.e. it does not require access to the instance or method in which it is enclosed, the LambdaMetafactory returns a so-called constant method handle that references an eagerly created instance of the generated class. Hence, this instance serves as a singleton to be used for every time that the lambda expression's call site is reached. Obviously, this optimization decision affects your application's memory footprint and is something to keep in mind when writing lambda expressions. Also, no factory method is added to a class of a stateless lambda expression. You might have noticed that the lambda expression's method body is contained in a private method which is now invoked from another class. Normally, this would result in an illegal access error. To overcome this limitation, the generated classes are loaded using so-called anonymous class loading. Anonymous class loading can only be applied when a class is loaded explicitly by handing a byte array. Also, it is not normally possible to apply anonymous class loading in user code as it is hidden away in the internal classes of the Java class library. When a class is loaded using anonymous class loading, it receives a host class of which it inherits its full security context. This involves both method and field access rights and the protection domain such that a lambda expression can also be generated for signed jar files. Using this approch, lambda expression can be considered more secure than anonymous inner classes because private methods are never reachable from outside of a class. Under the covers: lambda forms Lambda forms are an implementation detail of how MethodHandles are executed by the virtual machine. Because of their name, lambda forms are however often confused with lambda expressions. Instead, lambda forms are inspired by lambda calculus and received their name for that reason, not for their actual usage to implement lambda expressions in the OpenJDK. In earlier versions of the OpenJDK 7, method handles could be executed in one of two modes. Method handles were either directly rendered as byte code or they were dispatched using explicit assembly code that was supplied by the Java runtime. The byte code rendering was applied to any method handle that was considered to be fully constant throughout the lifetime of a Java class. If the JVM could however not prove this property, the method handle was instead executed by dispatching it to the supplied assembly code. Unfortunately, because assembly code cannot be optimized by Java's JIT-compiler, this lead to non-constant method handle invocations to "fall off the performance cliff". As this also affected the lazily bound lambda expressions, this was obviously not a satisfactory solution. LambdaForms were introduced to solve this problem. Roughly speaking, lambda forms represent byte code instructions which, as stated before, can be optimized by a JIT-compiler. In the OpenJDK, a MethodHandle's invocation semantics are today represented by a LambdaForm to which the handle carries a reference. With this optimizable intermediate representation, the use of non-constant MethodHandles has become significantly more performant. As a matter of fact, it is even possible to see a byte-code compiled LambdaForm in action. Simply place a break point inside of a bootstrap method or inside of a method that is invoked via a MethodHandle. Once the break point kicks it, the byte code-translated LambdaForms can be found on the call stack. Why this matters for dynamic languages Any language that should be executed on the Java virtual machine needs to be translated to Java byte code. And as the name suggests, Java byte code aligns rather close to the Java programming language. This includes the requirement to define a strict type for any value and before invokedynamic was introduced, a method call required to specify an explicit target class for dispatching a method. Looking at the following JavaScript code, specifying either information is however not possible when translating the method into byte code: 1 2 3 function (foo) { foo.bar(); } Using an invokedynamic call site, it has become possible to delay the identification of the method's dispatcher until runtime and furthermore, to rebind the invocation target, in case that a previous decision needs to be corrected. Before, using the reflection API with all of its performance drawbacks was the only real alternative to implementing a dynamic language. The real profiteer of the invokedynamic instruction are therefore dynamic programming languages. Adding the instruction was a first step away from aligning the byte code format to the Java programming language, making the JVM a powerful runtime even for dynamic languages. And as lambda expressions proved, this stronger focus on hosting dynamic languages on the JVM does neither interfere with evolving the Java language. In contrast, the Java programming languages gained from these efforts.

Before we dig into CAS (Compare And Swap) strategy and how is it used by atomic constructs like AtomicInteger, first consider this code: public class MyApp { private volatile int count = 0; public void upateVisitors() { ++count; //increment the visitors count } } This sample code is tracking the count of visitors to the application. Is there anything wrong with this code? What will happen if multiple threads try to update count? Actually the problem is simply marking count as volatile does not guarantee atomicity and ++count is not an atomic operations. To read more check this. Can we solve this problem if we mark the method itself synchronized as shown below: public class MyApp { private int count = 0; public synchronized void upateVisitors() { ++count; //increment the visitors count } } Will this work? If yes then what changes have we made actually? Does this code guarantee atomicity? Yes. Does this code guarantee visibility? Yes. Then what is the problem? It makes use of locking and that introduces lot of delay and overhead. Check this article. This is very expensive way of making things work. To overcome these problems atomic constructs were introduced. If we make use of an AtomicInteger to track the count it will work. public class MyApp { private AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0); public void upateVisitors() { count.incrementAndGet(); //increment the visitors count } } The classes that support atomic operations e.g. AtomicInteger, AtomicLong etc. makes use of CAS. CAS does not make use of locking rather it is very optimistic in nature. It follows these steps: Compare the value of the primitive to the value we have got in hand. If the values do not match it means some thread in between has changed the value. Else it will go ahead and swap the value with new value. Check the following code in AtomicLong class: public final long incrementAndGet() { for (;;) { long current = get(); long next = current + 1; if (compareAndSet(current, next)) return next; } } In JDK 8 the above code has been changed to a single intrinsic: public final long incrementAndGet() { return unsafe.getAndAddLong(this, valueOffset, 1L) + 1L; } What advantage this single intrinsic have? Actually this single line is JVM intrinsic which is translated by JIT into an optimized instruction sequence. In case of x86 architecture it is just a single CPU instruction LOCK XADD which might yield better performance than classic load CAS loop. Now think about the possibility when we have high contention and a number of threads want to update the same atomic variable. In that case there is a possibility that locking will outperform the atomic variables but in realistic contention levels atomic variables outperform lock. There is one more construct introduced in Java 8, LongAdder. As per the documentation: This class is usually preferable to AtomicLong when multiple threads update a common sum that is used for purposes such as collecting statistics, not for fine-grained synchronization control. Under low update contention, the two classes have similar characteristics. But under high contention, expected throughput of this class is significantly higher, at the expense of higher space consumption. So LongAdder is not always a replacement for AtomicLong. We need to consider the following aspects: When no contention is present AtomicLong performs better. LongAdder will allocate Cells (a final class declared in abstract class Striped64) to avoid contention which consumes memory. So in case we have a tight memory budget we should prefer AtomicLong. That's all folks. Hope you enjoyed it.

How does the Fork/Join framework act under different configurations? Just like the upcoming episode of Star Wars, there has been a lot of excitement mixed with criticism around Java 8 parallelism. The syntactic sugar of parallel streams brought some hype almost like the new lightsaber we’ve seen in the trailer. With many ways now to do parallelism in Java, we wanted to get a sense of the performance benefits and the dangers of parallel processing. After over 260 test runs, some new insights rose from the data and we wanted to share these with you in this post. Fork/Join Framework vs. Parallel Streams vs. ExecutorService: The Ultimate Fork/Join Benchmark http://t.co/CMNfYZe58Z pic.twitter.com/6WExlmbyo6 — Takipi (@takipid) January 20, 2015 ExecutorService vs. Fork/Join Framework vs. Parallel Streams A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.... I mean, some 10 years ago concurrency was available in Java only through 3rd party libraries. Then came Java 5 and introduced the java.util.concurrent library as part of the language, strongly influenced by Doug Lea. The ExecutorService became available and provided us a straightforward way to handle thread pools. Of course java.util.concurrent keeps evolving and in Java 7 the Fork/Join framework was introduced, building on top of the ExecutorService thread pools. With Java 8 streams, we’ve been provided an easy way to use Fork/Join that remains a bit enigmatic for many developers. Let’s find out how they compare to one another. We’ve taken 2 tasks, one CPU-intensive and the other IO-intensive, and tested 4 different scenarios with the same basic functionality. Another important factor is the number of threads we use for each implementation, so we tested that as well. The machine we used had 8 cores available so we had variations of 4, 8, 16 and 32 threads to get a sense of the general direction the results are going. For each of the tasks, we’ve also tried a single threaded solution, which you’ll not see in the graphs since, well, it took much much longer to execute. To learn more about exactly how the tests ran you can check out the groundwork section below. Now, let’s get to it. Indexing a 6GB file with 5.8M lines of text In this test, we’ve generated a huge text file, and created similar implementations for the indexing procedure. Here’s what the results looked like: ** Single threaded execution: 176,267msec, or almost 3 minutes. ** Notice the graph starts at 20000 milliseconds. 1. Fewer threads will leave CPUs unutilized, too many will add overhead The first thing you notice in the graph is the shape the results are starting to take - you can get an impression of how each implementation behaves from only these 4 data points. The tipping point here is between 8 and 16 threads, since some threads are blocking in file IO, and adding more threads than cores helped utilize them better. When 32 threads are in, performance got worse because of the additional overhead. 2. Parallel Streams are the best! Almost 1 second better than the runner up: using Fork/Join directly Syntactic sugar aside (lambdas! we didn’t mention lambdas), we’ve seen parallel streams perform better than the Fork/Join and the ExecutorService implementations. 6GB of text indexed in 24.33 seconds. You can trust Java here to deliver the best result. 3. But… Parallel Streams also performed the worst: The only variation that went over 30 seconds This is another reminder of how parallel streams can slow you down. Let’s say this happens on machines that already run multithreaded applications. With a smaller number of threads available, using Fork/Join directly could actually be better than going through parallel streams - a 5 second difference, which makes for about an 18% penalty when comparing these 2 together. 4. Don’t go for the default pool size with IO in the picture When using the default pool size for Parallel Streams, the same number of cores on the machine (which is 8 here), performed almost 2 seconds worse than the 16 threads version. That’s a 7% penalty for going with the default pool size. The reason this happens is related with blocking IO threads. There’s more waiting going on, so introducing more threads lets us get more out of the CPU cores involved while other threads wait to be scheduled instead of being idle. How do you change the default Fork/Join pool size for parallel streams? You can either change the common Fork/Join pool size using a JVM argument: [java] -Djava.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.common.parallelism=16 [/java] (All Fork/Join tasks are using a common static pool the size of the number of your cores by default. The benefit here is reducing resource usage by reclaiming the threads for other tasks during periods of no use.) Or... You can use this trick and run Parallel Streams within a custom Fork/Join pool. This overrides the default use of the common Fork/Join pool and lets you use a pool you’ve set up yourself. Pretty sneaky. In the tests, we’ve used the common pool. 5. Single threaded performance was 7.25x worse than the best result Parallelism provided a 7.25x improvement, and considering the machine had 8 cores, it got pretty close to the theoretic 8x prediction! We can attribute the rest to overhead. With that being said, even the slowest parallelism implementation we tested, which this time was parallel streams with 4 threads (30.24sec), performed 5.8x better than the single threaded solution (176.27sec). What happens when you take IO out of the equation? Checking if a number is prime For the next round of tests, we’ve eliminated IO altogether and examined how long it would take to determine if some really big number is prime or not. How big? 19 digits. 1,530,692,068,127,007,263, or in other words: one quintillion seventy nine quadrillion three hundred sixty four trillion thirty eight billion forty eight million three hundred five thousand thirty three. Argh, let me get some air. Anyhow, we haven’t used any optimization other than running to its square root, so we checked all even numbers even though our big number doesn’t divide by 2 just to make it process longer. Spoiler alert: it’s a prime, so each implementation ran the same number of calculations. Here’s how it turned out: ** Single threaded execution: 118,127msec, or almost 2 minutes. ** Notice the graph starts at 20000 milliseconds 1. Smaller differences between 8 and 16 threads Unlike the IO test, we don’t have IO calls here so the performance of 8 and 16 threads was mostly similar, except for the Fork/Join solution. We’ve actually ran a few more sets of tests to make sure we’re getting good results here because of this “anomaly” but it turned out very similar time after time. We’d be glad to hear your thoughts about this in the comment section below. 2. The best results are similar for all methods We see that all implementations share a similar best result of around 28 seconds. No matter which way we tried to approach it, the results came out the same. This doesn’t mean that we’re indifferent to which method to use. Check out the next insight. 3. Parallel streams handle the thread overload better than other implementations This is the more interesting part. With this test, we see again that the the top results for running 16 threads are coming from using parallel streams. Moreover, in this version, using parallel streams was a good call for all variations of thread numbers. 4. Single threaded performance was 4.2x worse than the best result In addition, the benefit of using parallelism when running computationally intensive tasks is almost 2 times worse than the IO test with file IO. This makes sense since it’s a CPU intensive test, unlike the previous one where we could get an extra benefit from cutting down the time our cores were waiting on threads stuck with IO. Conclusion I’d recommend going to the source to learn more about when to use parallel streams and applying careful judgement anytime you do parallelism in Java. The best path to take would be running similar tests to these in a staging environment where you can try and get a better sense of what you’re up against. The factors you have to be mindful of are of course the hardware you’re running on (and the hardware you’re testing on), and the total number of threads in your application. This includes the common Fork/Join pool and code other developers on your team are working on. So try to keep those in check and get a full view of your application before adding parallelism of your own. Groundwork To run this test we’ve used an EC2 c3.2xlarge instance with 8 vCPUs and 15GB of RAM. A vCPU means there’s hyperthreading in place so in fact we have here 4 physical cores that each act as if it were 2. As far as the OS scheduler is concerned, we have 8 cores here. To try and make it as fair as we could, each implementation ran 10 times and we’ve taken the average run time of runs 2 through 9. That’s 260 test runs, phew! Another thing that was important is the processing time. We’ve chosen tasks that would take well over 20 seconds to process so the differences will be easier to spot and less affected by external factors. What’s next? The raw results are available right here, and the code is on GitHub. Please feel free to tinker around with it and let us know what kind of results you’re getting. If you have any more interesting insights or explanations for the results that we’ve missed, we’d be happy to read them and add it to the post. Originally posted on Takipi's blog

Apache Spark, Solr, and Zookeeper work together to create a fault-tolerant, distributed ETL system that converts RDBMS data into Solr documents.