DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Zones

Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

How are you handling the data revolution? We want your take on what's real, what's hype, and what's next in the world of data engineering.

Generative AI has transformed nearly every industry. How can you leverage GenAI to improve your productivity and efficiency?

SBOMs are essential to circumventing software supply chain attacks, and they provide visibility into various software components.

Related

  • Java vs. Scala: Comparative Analysis for Backend Development in Fintech
  • Event-Driven Fractals
  • Easily Update and Reload SSL for a Server and an HTTP Client
  • JSP vs Servlet: Difference and Comparison

Trending

  • Parallel Data Conflict Resolution in Enterprise Workflows: Pessimistic vs. Optimistic Locking at Scale
  • Event Storming Workshops: A Closer Look at Different Approaches
  • Building V1 Gen-AI Products at Scale: Technical Product Patterns That Work
  • Stabilizing ETL Pipelines With Airflow, Presto, and Metadata Contracts
  1. DZone
  2. Coding
  3. Languages
  4. Modernizing Apache Spark Applications With GenAI: Migrating From Java to Scala

Modernizing Apache Spark Applications With GenAI: Migrating From Java to Scala

Compare Java and Scala for Spark data engineering, explore their trade-offs, and learn how GenAI tools like Amazon Q assist in code modernization.

By 
Srikanth Daggumalli user avatar
Srikanth Daggumalli
·
Arun Ayilliath Keezhadath user avatar
Arun Ayilliath Keezhadath
·
Updated by 
Arun Ayilliath Keezhadath user avatar
Arun Ayilliath Keezhadath
·
Jul. 04, 25 · Tutorial
Likes (0)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
2.0K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

If you're working on big data projects using Spark, you've likely come across discussions within your team about Java vs. Scala vs. Python, along with comparisons in terms of implementation, API support, and feasibility. These technologies are typically chosen on a case-by-case basis depending on the specific use case.

For example, data engineering teams often prefer to use Scala over Java because of:

  • Native language advantage (Spark itself is written in Scala)
  • Better compatibility with Spark's core APIs
  • Early access to the latest Spark features
  • More idiomatic patterns
  • Functional programming features
  • Less boilerplate code—typically 20–30% less compared to Java—which boosts productivity and speeds up development cycles
  • Stronger type safety and compile-time checks
  • Performance benefits

On the other hand, data science teams tend to lean toward Python because of its extensive support for machine learning libraries. However, PySpark (Python for Spark) comes with some translation overhead. That is, when you write Spark code in Scala or Java, it executes natively within the Spark engine. In contrast, PySpark runs Python code that must communicate with the JVM through a process called Py4J, introducing serialization and inter-process communication delays. This can raise performance concerns in PySpark.

The goal of this post is to provide a well-rounded comparison between Java and Scala from a data engineering perspective, and to show how generative AI code assistants can help modernize Java codebases to Scala, without discounting the strengths of either language.

In a Nutshell, What to Choose?

Both Java and Scala will do the job for you. Java is object-oriented programming language, whereas Scala is a functional language with object-oriented concepts. 

With the new Generative AI services/tools such as Amazon Q Developer, ChatGPT,  GitHub Copilot, and Google's Gemini code assist etc., developers/software engineers can save a significant amount of coding time (more than 50%) and boost productivity. These GenAI tools are integrated with popular IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) and will be handy to the developers with natural language capabilities. So, considering these GenAI tools makes the job easy.

Keep an eye on API support in terms of understanding the limitations and seamless implementation. For instance, Enterprise applications were mainly developed on Java and have vast API availability, whereas Scala is often used for more distributed high-compute applications like Apache Spark.

Migration from Java to Scala, or vice versa, is generally unnecessary unless faced with specific challenges such as a talent scarcity or corporate-wide technology alignment initiatives

Microservice architecture, which has become a de facto standard nowadays, can be implemented in both Java and Scala. Also, other languages like GO etc.

Perspective Decision

Developer perspective 

The decision will be guided by programming expertise, comfort level, and years of experience.

Project Management perspective: 

From the project management perspective, you don’t want to go with all the technical jargon. Instead, you want to quickly absorb the comprehensive comparison. below is a quick comparison in a nutshell.

  • Learning curve: Learning Scala isn’t easy, especially for developers new to the language — but as the saying goes, "Once a programmer, always a programmer." There may be a steep learning curve, but it's definitely manageable with persistence.
  • Project timelines: Java is more verbose in terms of lines of code, while Scala leverages type inference and functional constructs. As a result, code implementation may progress faster in Java, especially for teams already familiar with its syntax.
  • Business Continuity Plan (BCP) and resource availability in market: Java’s been around since 1996, while Scala came along later in 2004. That means it’s usually easier to find experienced Java developers, especially when you need to plan for things like business continuity, than it is to find people with strong Scala skills. 
  • Development team: Traditionally, development teams would stick to a single programming language for a given project. But with modern development trends, it’s becoming more common for developers to be familiar with, and even use, multiple languages during implementation. The great thing is, Java and Scala can interoperate seamlessly, allowing teams to combine the strengths of both in a single project.

Java and Scala Comparison

Feature

Java

Scala

Programming

Primarily,  object-oriented programming (OOPS) language. 

From Java 8 version, functional language features are supported

Primarily, Functional language and object-oriented concepts are supported

Lazy Evaluation

(Key differentiator)

Does not support lazy evaluation

Scala's key feature is lazy evaluation, which allows differing time-consuming computation until absolutely needed by using the keyword “lazy”. Supports Lazy evaluation


For example, in the following Scala code, loading images is a slow process; it shall be done only if needed to show images. This can be done using Lazy evaluation 

Scala
 
lazy val images = getImages() // 'lazy' ensures images are loaded only when accessed. 

if (viewProfile) 

{ 

showImages(images) 

} else if (editProfile) { showImages(images) 

showEditor() 

} else { 

// Do something without loading images }


Implementation pace

Code is more verbose. So, implementation pace can be high compared to Scala

Less verbose thus reducing the no. of lines of code and improved code pace compared to Java 

Code Compilation 

‘javac’ compiler which compiles the java code into byte code.

‘scalac’ compiler which compiles the scala code into byte code

Compile Time

Faster. Java also has Just-in-compiler which converts frequently executed code to machine native instruction to speed up the execution 

Slower due to type inference and functional features but use of SBT (Scala Build Tool) could fast up the compilation time.

Runtime environment

JVM (Java Virtual Machine) based. The byte code generated by javac compiler runs on java virtual machine (JVM)

JVM (Java Virtual Machine) based. The byte code generated by the ‘scalac’ compiler runs on a Java virtual machine (JVM). Scala also takes advantage of ubiquity, administrative tools, profiling, garbage collection etc.

REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) Support

Supported through JShell which was introduced in Java 9 version

Built-in and natively supported. Scala supports REPL, allowing developers to explore datasets and prototype applications easily without going through a full-blown development cycle.

Succinct and Concise code

Java is always on the firing line for being too verbose. Any code written in java in 5 to 6 lines can be written in Scala in 2 to 3 lines. 


e.g.: A Java Hello World program:


Java
 
public class HelloJava 

{

 public static void main(String[] args) 

{ 

System.out.println(“Hello World !!!”) } 

}

Java 8 introduced functional interfaces and streaming, which considerably reduces the number of lines of code in certain scenarios.

Scala reduces the number of lines of code by clever use of type inference, treating everything as an object. Scala is designed to express common programming patterns in an elegant, concise, immutable and type safe way. Scala compiler avoids the developer to write those things explicitly that the compiler can infer. 


e.g.: A Scala Hello World program:


Scala
 
Object HelloScala 

{ 

def main(args : Array[String]):Unit { println(“HelloWorld!!!”) 

}

}


OperatorOverloading

Java does not support Operator overloading except of strings ‘+’

Scala supports Operator Overloading. We can overload any operator here and can create new operators of any type.

E.g.

Scala
 
class Complex(val real: Int, val image: Int) {

  def +(that: Complex): Complex = new Complex(this.real + that.real, this.image + that.image)

  override def toString: String = s"$real + ${image}i"

}


val c1 = new Complex(2, 3)

val c2 = new Complex(1, 4)

println(c1 + c2) // Output: 3 + 7i



Backward Compatibility

(Key differentiator)

Java provides backward compatibility that means ,later versions of Java  can run code written in older versions and can execute it.

Scala has all advantages of java except backward compatibility that is a key difference between java and Scala

Concurrency

Threads

Actors (lightweight threads)

Thread Safety

Need to handle thread safety programmatically. So little extra effort compared to Scala

Inherently immutable objects. 

Learning Curve


Steeper learning curve due to functional programming concepts and advanced type system

Gentler learning curve

IDE ( Integrated Development Environment) support

Good IDE support (IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse), build tools (sbt, Maven, Gradle)

Excellent IDE support (IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse, NetBeans), mature build tools (Maven, Gradle)


How GenAI Code Assistants Help Modernize Spark Application From Java to Scala

Generative AI services/tools helps to boost productivity: Adopting and using new GenAI tools such as Amazon Q Developer, ChatGPT,  GitHub Copilot, and Google's Gemini code assist, etc.

  • Use Natural Language (aka NLP features) 
  • Learning curve or transition phase can be minimized and improve the coding standards.
  • These tools also help to do the coding documentation, code reviews and unit test cases. 
  • Saving coding time and boost productivity
  • Multi language support. like Java, Scala, SQL etc. More information can be found here. 

Modernizing Spark and Java Applications

In this section, we'll explore how Amazon Q (Generative AI Code Assistant) can support the modernization of Java to Scala, as well as the upgrade of Spark versions.

1. Install Amazon Q in your IDE. Please refer these installation instructions. The following shows the Amazon Q plugin enabled Visual Studio IDE Visual Studio Code IDE with Amazon Q Plugin

Visual Studio Code IDE with Amazon Q Plugin


2. Code Generation: In the following screenshot, i am showing that a sample Java Apache Spark code is generated using a prompt, "show apache spark code to read a dataset from s3 file names sales_dataset.csv and marketing_compaign_dataset.csv and perform join operation in java" you can create file in your repo instead of showing or pick your own spark code. Spark Code Generation example using prompt

Spark Code conversion from Java to Scala with a prompt


Prompt: "Convert this java code to Scala"
code conversion from Java to Scala

Code Conversion from Java to Scala


3. Now that we've seen the high-level code conversion, let's take a closer look at the file level. For this example, I'll be using a Spark Example repo featuring the classic WordCount program written in Java. Spark Java Example - JavaWordCount.java

Spark Java Example 


4. Let’s convert the Java code to Scala. In the example below, the red boxes highlight the prompt I used: “Convert JavaWordCount.java program to Scala”, along with Amazon Q’s response. Amazon Q not only converted the Java code to Scala but also created a new Scala file named WordCount.scala in the same repository directory. Amazon Q - Code Conversion from Java to Scala

Amazon Q - Code Conversion from Java to Scala


5. Next, let’s click on the WordCount.scala file to view the code generated by Amazon Q. As shown in the image below (highlighted in green), a new window opens displaying the WordCount.scala file, along with a tag indicating it was “Generated by Amazon Q.” Amazon Q - Converted/Generated Scala Code File

Amazon Q - Converted/Generated Scala Code File


When upgrading from an older version of Spark to a newer one, it’s important to be aware of potential breaking changes that could affect your existing code. For example, in Spark 2.4, the DATE_ADD(a, b) function allowed the second argument b to be a decimal. But starting with Spark 3.5, this argument must be an integer — decimal values are no longer supported. In the next section, we’ll walk through how to migrate a Spark 2.4 project to Spark 3.5.

Prompt: "Create a spark 2.4 version code with DATE_ADD(a,b) function previously allowed b to be decimal"

Amazon Q - Spark 2.4 Code Generation


Prompt: "now modernize this code to spark 3.4"

Amazon Q - Spark 3.5 Code Generation

Note: Although edge cases will invariably require manual attention, a GenAI assistant offers a powerful advantage by tackling the bulk of the Spark code conversion, potentially transforming a traditionally challenging migration into a far more efficient undertaking.

Conclusion

Using a generative AI assistant like Amazon Q can make code modernization tasks faster and more manageable. It helps not just with converting code, but also:

  • Upgrading to newer library or framework versions
  • Generating code based on simple prompts
  • Reviewing and debugging existing code
  • Writing basic unit tests
  • Producing lightweight documentation by analyzing the code structure

It’s especially useful when dealing with large legacy projects or unfamiliar codebases.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed here are strictly personal and do not constitute an official statement from our employer.
Comparison (grammar) Java (programming language) Scala (programming language)

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Java vs. Scala: Comparative Analysis for Backend Development in Fintech
  • Event-Driven Fractals
  • Easily Update and Reload SSL for a Server and an HTTP Client
  • JSP vs Servlet: Difference and Comparison

Partner Resources

×

Comments

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 100
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends: