DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Newsletter
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Detecting Duplicates With Machine Learning in 2026: From String Metrics to Embeddings and LLMs
  • Building and Serving a Custom Model With Azure ML, Then Wiring It Into a Foundry Agent
  • How Multi-Agent Systems can replace most of Manual ML Validation decisions - The Karpathy Loop Approach
  • Architecting Production AI Across Clouds: Patterns That Decide System Survival

Trending

  • Full-Text Search Meets the Graph: Apache Lucene Inside Neo4j
  • How to Contain Partial Failures in Distributed Systems
  • Controller and Data Access: Understanding Two-Layer Architecture Through Abstraction and Encapsulation
  • AI-Era Cybersecurity, Part 1: Mapping Glasswing, Daybreak, Lightwell and the Tools Racing to Find and Fix Bugs

Draft This article hasn't been published, so readers can't see it.

In moderation This article is waiting for review, so readers can't see it yet.

Deleted This article has been deleted, so readers can't see it.

  1. DZone
  2. Data Engineering
  3. AI/ML
  4. Machine Learning Models: Bias Mitigation Strategies

Machine Learning Models: Bias Mitigation Strategies

Discrimination-aware Machine Learning models are helping to change the way technology detects and mitigates bias.

By 
Ajitesh Kumar
·
Nov. 20, 18 · Opinion
Post on X (opens in a new tab) Share on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
13.6K Views

Join the DZone community Save articles, join the discussion, and download Refcards and Trend Reports with a free account.

Join for free Already a member? Log in

In this post, you will learn about some of the bias mitigation strategies that can be applied in ML Model Development lifecycle (MDLC) to achieve discrimination-aware Machine Learning models. The primary objective is to achieve a higher accuracy model while ensuring that the models are lesser discriminant in relation to sensitive/protected attributes. In simple words, the output of the classifier should not correlate with protected or sensitive attributes. Building such ML models becomes the multi-objective optimization problem. The quality of the classifier is measured by its accuracy and the discrimination it makes on the basis of sensitive attributes; the more accurate, the better, and the less discriminant (based on sensitive attributes), the better. The following are some of the bias mitigation strategies:

  • Pre-processing algorithms
  • In-processing algorithms
  • Post-processing algorithms

Here is a diagram representing the bias mitigation strategies for Machine Learning models:

Bias mitigation strategies for Machine lEarning models

Pre-Processing Algorithms

Pre-processing algorithms are used to mitigate bias prevalent in the training data. The idea is to apply one of the following techniques for preprocessing the training data set and then apply classification algorithms for learning an appropriate classifier.

  • Reweighing: Reweighing is a data preprocessing technique that recommends generating weights for the training examples in each (group, label) combination differently to ensure fairness before classification. The idea is to apply appropriate weights to different tuples in the training dataset to make the training dataset discrimination free with respect to the sensitive attributes. Instead of reweighing, one could also apply techniques (non-discrimination constraints) such as suppression (remove sensitive attributes) or massaging the dataset — modify the labels (change the labels appropriately to remove discrimination from the training data). However, the reweighing technique is more effective than the other two mentioned earlier.
  • Optimized preprocessing: The idea is to learn a probabilistic transformation that edits the features and labels in the data with group fairness, individual distortion, and data fidelity constraints and objectives.
  • Learning fair representations: The idea is to find a latent representation that encodes the data well while obfuscating information about protected attributes.
  • Disparate impact remover: Feature values are appropriately edited to increase group fairness while preserving rank-ordering within groups.

In-Processing Algorithms

  • Adversarial Debiasing: A classifier model is learned to maximize prediction accuracy and simultaneously reduce an adversary's ability to determine the protected attribute from the predictions. This approach leads to a fair classifier as the predictions cannot carry any group discrimination information that the adversary can exploit.
  • Prejudice remover: The idea is to add a discrimination-aware regularization term to the learning objective.

Post-Processing Algorithms

  • Equalized odds postprocessing: The algorithm solves a linear program to find probabilities with which to change output labels to optimize equalized odds.
  • Calibrated equalized odds postprocessing: The algorithm optimizes over calibrated classifier score outputs to find probabilities with which to change output labels with an equalized odds objective.
  • Reject option classification: The idea is to give favorable outcomes to unprivileged groups and unfavorable outcomes to privileged groups in a confidence band around the decision boundary with the highest uncertainty.

Summary

In this post, you learned about bias mitigation strategies to build higher performing models while making sure that the models are lesser discriminant. The techniques presented in this post will be updated at regular intervals based on ongoing research.

References

  • AI Fairness 360
  • Data pre-processing techniques for classification without discrimination
Machine learning

Published at DZone with permission of Ajitesh Kumar. See the original article here.

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Detecting Duplicates With Machine Learning in 2026: From String Metrics to Embeddings and LLMs
  • Building and Serving a Custom Model With Azure ML, Then Wiring It Into a Foundry Agent
  • How Multi-Agent Systems can replace most of Manual ML Validation decisions - The Karpathy Loop Approach
  • Architecting Production AI Across Clouds: Patterns That Decide System Survival

Partner Resources

×

Comments

Loading comments

The comments didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

Likes

Loading

The next likes didn't load. Please try again.

The likes didn't load

Please try again in a moment.

See who liked this

Log in or join DZone for free to see who liked this article.

Log in Join for free
  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook