Unlock the Mysteries of AWS Lambda Invocation: Asynchronous vs. Synchronous
Unlock the full potential of your AWS Lambda functions with this deep dive into the differences between asynchronous and synchronous invocations for maximum efficiency.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Lambda is an incredibly useful cloud computing platform, allowing businesses to run their code without managing infrastructure. However, the invocation type of Lambda functions can be confusing for newcomers. By understanding the key differences between asynchronous and synchronous invocations, you'll be able to set up your Lambda functions for maximum efficiency. Here's a deep dive into the mysteries of AWS Lambda invocation.
Overview of the AWS Lambda Function Invocation Process
The AWS Lambda Function Invocation Process begins when an event triggers the function. This event can come from a variety of sources, including HTTP requests, changes to data in an Amazon S3 bucket, or updates to a DynamoDB table. Once the event occurs, AWS Lambda automatically provisions and runs the necessary compute resources to process the request.
There are two types of invocation methods in AWS Lambda: Synchronous and Asynchronous.
The main difference between these two methods is the way in which they handle the response from the function. In synchronous invocation, the caller waits for the response from the function before continuing. This means that the function must execute completely before the caller can proceed. On the other hand, asynchronous invocation immediately returns a response to the caller, allowing it to continue with other tasks while the function executes in the background.
Synchronous invocation is ideal for situations where a response is required immediately, such as when you're building a user-facing application or an API. Asynchronous invocation, on the other hand, is useful when you don't need an immediate response or when you have long-running tasks that require more time to execute.
Regardless of which method you choose, AWS Lambda allows you to easily scale your functions to meet demand and pay only for the compute time that you consume. By choosing the right invocation method, you can optimize the performance of your Lambda functions and reduce costs.
Asynchronous vs. Synchronous Invocation
Let's take a closer look at some scenarios where you might choose to use synchronous or asynchronous invocation.
Synchronous invocation is well-suited for tasks that require immediate feedback. For instance, if you're building an e-commerce website and a customer places an order, you'll want to know immediately whether the order was successful or not. In this case, you would use a synchronous invocation to ensure that the customer receives a response as soon as possible.
Here is an example AWS CLI command to invoke a function named "aFunction" with input data from a file named
aws lambda invoke --function-name aFunction --payload file://input.json output.txt
Asynchronous invocation, on the other hand, is great for tasks that involve long-running processes or batch jobs. For example, suppose that you're processing a large amount of data and need to perform some complex computations on it. In this case, you could use an asynchronous invocation to kick off the computation and return a response to the user while the computation continues to run in the background.
For asynchronous invocation, Lambda places the event in a queue and returns a success response without additional information. A separate process reads events from the queue and sends them to your function. To invoke a function asynchronously, set the invocation type parameter to
aws lambda invoke --function-name my-function --invocation-type Event --function-name aFunction --payload file://input.json output.txt
Another example of when to use asynchronous invocation is when you're integrating multiple services together. Suppose that you have a workflow that involves several different services, each of which must be invoked in turn. By using asynchronous invocation, you can decouple the services from one another and allow them to execute independently, improving overall performance and scalability.
In conclusion, choosing the right invocation method is critical for optimizing the performance and scalability of your AWS Lambda functions. By understanding the differences between synchronous and asynchronous invocation and using them appropriately, you can ensure that your applications are responsive, efficient, and cost-effective.
Error Handling and Automatic Retries
Another important feature of AWS Lambda is its built-in error handling and automatic retries. When a function encounters an error, Lambda automatically retries the execution using the same event data. This can be useful for transient errors such as network timeouts or temporary resource constraints. You can control the number of retries and the time between retries using the function's configuration settings. If the retries are unsuccessful, Lambda can either discard the event or send it to a dead-letter queue (DLQ) for further analysis.
AWS recommends the use of Lambda Destinations. Lambda Destinations is a feature that allows you to define a destination for the asynchronous invocations of your AWS Lambda function. With Lambda Destinations, you can route failed invocations to a DLQ or another function for further processing. You can also send successful invocations to a queue or a stream for downstream processing. This feature provides more visibility and control over the behavior of your function, especially when handling asynchronous invocations at scale. By defining destinations for your function's invocations, you can monitor and troubleshoot issues more effectively and create more resilient serverless architectures.
A DLQ is a feature in AWS that allows you to capture and store events or messages that could not be processed by a function. When a function fails to process an event, it can send the event to a DLQ instead of discarding it. This can be useful for debugging and troubleshooting purposes because you can analyze the failed events to determine the cause of the failure. In addition, you can set up alerts to notify you when events are sent to the DLQ, which can help you proactively identify and resolve issues. The DLQ can be configured for both synchronous and asynchronous invocations and can be used in conjunction with Lambda Destinations for more advanced error-handling scenarios. Overall, the dead letter queue is a powerful tool that can help you build robust and reliable serverless applications on AWS.
How To Choose Between Asynchronous and Synchronous Invocation?
Choosing the right invocation method between synchronous and asynchronous depends on the specific needs of your application. If your function is short-lived and you need immediate feedback from it, then synchronous invocation is the way to go. It provides a simple and straightforward way of executing functions and handling errors. However, if your function takes longer to execute or if you're integrating multiple services together, asynchronous invocation may be the better choice. It allows for greater scalability and performance since the caller is not blocked while long-running tasks are executed in the background. Additionally, you can use a combination of both synchronous and asynchronous invocation methods depending on your application's requirements. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each method, you can choose the right invocation method that optimizes the performance and scalability of your AWS Lambda functions.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
Part 3 of My OCP Journey: Practical Tips and Examples
Knowing and Valuing Apache Kafka’s ISR (In-Sync Replicas)
Mastering Time Series Analysis: Techniques, Models, and Strategies
Never Use Credentials in a CI/CD Pipeline Again