One of the challenges in building a distributed web application is in handling sessions. When you have multiple instances of an application running and session data is written to local files (as is the default behavior for the session handling functions in PHP) a user session can be lost when a session is started on one instance but subsequent requests are directed (via a load balancer) to other instances. To successfully manage sessions across multiple instances, you need a common data store. In this post I’ll show you how the Windows Azure SDK for PHP makes this easy by storing session data in Windows Azure Table storage. In the 4.0 release of the Windows Azure SDK for PHP, session handling via Windows Azure Table and Blob storage was included in the newly added SessionHandler class. Note: The SessionHandler class supports storing session data in Table storage or Blob storage. I will focus on using Table storage in this post largely because I haven’t been able to come up with a scenario in which using Blob storage would be better (or even necessary). If you have ideas about how/why Blob storage would be better, I’d love to hear them. The SessionHandler class makes it possible to write code for handling sessions in the same way you always have, but the session data is stored on a Windows Azure Table instead of local files. To accomplish this, precede your usual session handling code with these lines: require_once 'Microsoft/WindowsAzure/Storage/Table.php'; require_once 'Microsoft/WindowsAzure/SessionHandler.php'; $storageClient = new Microsoft_WindowsAzure_Storage_Table('table.core.windows.net', 'your storage account name', 'your storage account key'); $sessionHandler = new Microsoft_WindowsAzure_SessionHandler($storageClient , 'sessionstable'); $sessionHandler->register(); Now you can call session_start() and other session functions as you normally would. Nicely, it just works. Really, that’s all there is to using the SessionHandler, but I found it interesting to take a look at how it works. The first interesting thing to note is that the register method is simply calling the session_set_save_handler function to essentially map the session handling functionality to custom functions. Here’s what the method looks like from the source code: public function register() { return session_set_save_handler(array($this, 'open'), array($this, 'close'), array($this, 'read'), array($this, 'write'), array($this, 'destroy'), array($this, 'gc') ); } The reading, writing, and deleting of session data is only slightly more complicated. When writing session data, the key-value pairs that make up the data are first serialized and then base64 encoded. The serialization of the data allows for lots of flexibility in the data you want to store (i.e. you don’t have to worry about matching some schema in the data store). When storing data in a table, each entry must have a partition key and row key that uniquely identify it. The partition key is a string (“sessions” by default, but this is changeable in the class constructor) and the the row key is the session ID. (For more information about the structure of Tables, see this post.) Finally, the data is either updated (it it already exists in the Table) or a new entry is inserted. Here’s a portion of the write function: $serializedData = base64_encode(serialize($serializedData)); $sessionRecord = new Microsoft_WindowsAzure_Storage_DynamicTableEntity($this->_sessionContainerPartition, $id); $sessionRecord->sessionExpires = time(); $sessionRecord->serializedData = $serializedData; try { $this->_storage->updateEntity($this->_sessionContainer, $sessionRecord); } catch (Microsoft_WindowsAzure_Exception $unknownRecord) { $this->_storage->insertEntity($this->_sessionContainer, $sessionRecord); } Not surprisingly, when session data is read from the table, it is retrieved by session ID, base64 decoded, and unserialized. Again, here’s a snippet that show’s what is happening: $sessionRecord = $this->_storage->retrieveEntityById( $this->_sessionContainer, $this->_sessionContainerPartition, $id ); return unserialize(base64_decode($sessionRecord->serializedData)); As you can see, the SessionHandler class makes good use of the storage APIs in the SDK. To learn more about the SessionHandler class (and the storage APIs), check out the documentation on Codeplex. You can, of course, get the complete source code here: http://phpazure.codeplex.com/SourceControl/list/changesets. As I investigated the session handling in the Windows Azure SDK for PHP, I noticed that the absence of support for SQL Azure as a session store was conspicuous. I’m curious about how many people would prefer to use SQL Azure over Azure Tables as a session store. If you have an opinion on this, please let me know in the comments.

Every now and then some OOP purist comes and tells us that getters and setters are evil, because they break encapsulation. And you should never, ever use getters and setters because this is a sign of a bad design and leads to maintainability nightmares. Well, don’t worry, because those people are wrong. Not completely wrong of course, because getters and setters can break encapsulation, but in the usual scenario for regular business projects they don’t. What is the purpose of encapsulation? First, to hide how exactly an object performs its job. And to protect the internal data of an object, so that no external object can violate its state space. In other words, only the object knows which combination of field values is valid and which isn’t. Exposing fields to the outside world can leave the object in inconsistent state. For example what if you could change the backing array in an ArrayList, without setting the size field? The ArrayList instance will be inconsistent and will be violating its contract. So no getter and setter for the array list internal array. But the majority of objects for which people generate getters and setters are simple data holders. They don’t have any rules to enforce on their state, the state space consists of all possible combinations of values, and furthermore – there is nothing they can do with that data. And before you call me “anemic”, it doesn’t matter if you are doing “real OOP” with domain-driven design, where you have business logic & state in the same object, or you are doing fat service layer + anemic objects. Why it doesn’t matter? Because even in domain-driven projects you have DTOs. And DTOs are simply data holders, which need getters and setters. Another thing is that in many cases your object state is public anyway. Tools use reflection to make use of objects – view technologies use EL to access objects, ORMs use reflection to persist your entities, jackson uses reflection to serialize your objects to JSON, jasper reports uses reflection to get details from its model, etc. Virtually anything you do in the regular project out there requires data being passed outside of the application: to the user, to the database, to the printer, as a result of an API call. And you have to know what that data is. In EL you have ${foo.bar} – with, or without a getter, you consume that field. In an ORM you need to know what database types to use. In the documentation of your JSON API you should specify the structure (another topic here is whether rest-like services need documentation). The overall point here is that you win nothing by not having getters and setters on your data holder objects. Their internal state is public anyway, and it has to be. And any change in those fields means a change has to be made in other places. Change is something people fear – “you will have to change it everywhere in your project” .. well, yeah, you have, because it has changed. If you change the structure of an address from String to an Address class, it’s likely that you should revisit all places it is used and split it there as well. If you change a double to BigDecimal you’d better go and fix all your calculations. Another point – the above examples emphasized on reading the data. However, you must set that data somehow. You have roughly 3 options – constructor, builder, setters. A constructor with 15 arguments is obviously not an option. A builder for every object is just too verbose. So we use setters, because it is more practical and more readable. And that’s the main point here – setters and getters are practical when used on data holder objects. I have supported quite big projects that had a lot of setters and getters, and I had absolutely no problem with that. In fact, tracing “who sets that data” is the same as “where did this object (that encapsulates its data) came from”. And yes, in an ideal OO world you wouldn’t need data holders / DTOs, and there will be no flow of data in the system. But in the real world there is. To conclude – be careful with setters and getters on non-data-only objects. Encapsulation is a real thing. When designing a library, a component or some base frameworks in your project – don’t simply generate getters and setters. But for the regular data object – don’t worry, there’s no evil in that. From http://techblog.bozho.net/?p=621

The Goal by Eli Goldratt is a business book in the form of a novel, where the protagonist must save his factory from closing due to very low productivity. The Goal is not limited to the management of a large organization (not even to for-profit companies): you simply have to define different units of measurement, like goal units instead of making money, the default goal. In fact, from the applications of the Theory of Constraints in our field I think it applies to software development too. What follows is my translation of the themes of The Goal to our field. The Goal is... Mking money, of course. For the ones of you with knowledge in accounting, the original goal is: raising throghput, the amounts of items sold (not produced) in the unit of time. Lowering investment/inventory, all the money tied up in the system in the form of assets that could be sold or products that stay in a warehouse. Lowering operational expense, all the money that we have spent as support and that cannot be recovered. How does these measurements apply to software development? A team does not always have an impact on contract negotiation, so often talking about money is far from everyday reality (kudos to you if you can apply that point of the Agile Manifesto.) The goal for software development can be translated, in my opinion, to: raising the throughput, the amount of features delivered (deployed, not implemented or tested) in the unit of time. You can measure this amount in story points, since feature vary in size. lowering investment/inventory, all the time tied up in the system in the form of undeployed or untested features that clutter the code base. In a minor part, also investment in the form of hardware, but that's by far less important than the team's time. lower operational expense, the time spent by developers every day in order to support the development. Automation is a kind of time investment that will bring more time (and quality) in the future, lowering operational expense. Like for material products, WIP has storage and opportunity costs which goes into the operational expense. Kanban is a tool that tries to reduce WIP in order to foster the two latter points. Throughput accounting This kind of throughput accounting is emphasized in the novel, over the use of cost accounting, where each developer (ehm, factory worker) has to be occupied all the time, even if the work he is doing isn't moving towards the goal: neverending refactoring. Specification of a feature which cannot be implemented until two months are gone, and will have to be rewritten. Implementation of features which won't be merged with the main branch any time soon. With Test-Driven Development, we are getting good at moving a feature from implemented to tested directly in the same commit. Yet the missing step is getting the feature to the users: maybe that's also what Continuous Deployment is all about... Dependent events Dependent events and statistical fluctuations are production systems topics that make a balanced plant close to bankruptcy: however, we're not at the point in which we can model our team as precisely as a factory. The basic point is that a plant in which everyone is working all the time is inefficient: when an early stage (like defining a specification or implementing a feature) gets delayed, downstream step such as deployment are dalayed too. Converely, when an upstream step finish earlier, the downstream stage is already at maximum efficiency and cannot process the intermediate result faster. I wonder if this applies to software development too. In a factory, workers are specialized and can do just a few jobs across the plant. Since workers and machines have different production rates, there will be just one bottleneck: the slowest one. If products have to pass from the bottleneck, anyone producing faster than the bottleneck will just accumulate WIP in front of him. Continuing with our example, if the analyst or domain expert is churning out specifications for new features every day, most of them are just WIP in front of the development team. Once there is an established buffer, any additional specification won't raise throughput any faster; instead, it will raise the inventory (partial features) and the time spent in managing it. I think this is not always true in the most technical phases of development instead. For example, in a small team a developer may be moved to testing or refactoring, or setting up Continuous Integration or evaluation of a new library. Unless you have a DBA which can just manage databases, your developer is not fixed into a stage of the system. The bottleneck The previous example featured a bottleneck, the most famous concept of the Theory of Constraints introduced in the book. This translation to the software development case is mine and could be incomplete. A feature (or a user story) has to pass in a series of stations where different people will work on it to make it real: specification from a domain expert, implementation from a technical team, extended testing with optional customer validation, deployment which should be fast but at the same time must not kill the current version of the application. Each station has an average velocity. By definition, there is a station which is the slowest and can process fewest story points in the unit of time. This is the bottleneck. (This is not always true, as velocity may vary greatly in time with the addition of new people or hidden lines discovered in a feature. Becoming good at estimation and stabilizing a team are two objectives that help reach the assumption.) You can identify a bottleneck by looking at where is the WIP: it will accumulate in front of it. If you already have a kanban board, this phase is simpler... Once identified, the throughput of the system can only be improved by raising the bottleneck's capacity enough so that it is no more a bottleneck. You can move people to it (keeping an eye on communication costs); ensure it is used at maximum efficiency by freeing the specialized developers from other mundane tasks. Now you can restart and find a new bottleneck... Conclusions This is just a little introduction to the themes of the Theory of Constraints and Goldratt's teachings; I don't pretend to explain the whole book in an article. It is also against the Socratic method: you should reach the answers yourself, and these are just examples from my experience. There is more to Goldratt and The Goal than bottlenecks and throughput, such as continuous improvement. If you're working or managing in a software development team, I suggest you to read this book if you have the opportunity. Even when freelancing, it is an eye-opener in moving towards a Goal instead of busyworking; and it's written with a never boring teaching method.

Even a basic planning problem, such as bin packing, can be notoriously hard to solve and scale. One might consider the brute force algorithm. Let's take a look at how that algorithm works out on the cloud balance example of Drools Planner: Given a set of servers with different hardware (CPU, memory and network bandwidth) and given a set of processes with different hardware requirements, assign each process to 1 server and minimize the total cost of the active servers. The brute force algorithm is simple: try every combination between processes where each process is assigned to each server. For example, if we have 6 processes (P0, P1, P2, P3, P4, P5) and 2 servers (S0, S1), we'd try these solutions: P0->S0, P1->S0, P2->S0, P3->S0, P4->S0, P5->S0 P0->S0, P1->S0, P2->S0, P3->S0, P4->S0, P5->S1 P0->S0, P1->S0, P2->S0, P3->S0, P4->S1, P5->S0 P0->S0, P1->S0, P2->S0, P3->S0, P4->S1, P5->S1 ... P0->S1, P1->S1, P2->S1, P3->S1, P4->S1, P5->S1 On my machine, it takes 15ms to calculate the score of these 2^6 combinations. When I scale out to 9 processes and 3 servers, which are 3^9 combinations, it becomes 1582ms. So it scales like this: Notice that despite that the number of processes has not even doubled, the running time multiplied by 100! For comparison, I 've added the running time of the First Fit algorithm. And it gets worse: for 12 processes and 4 servers, which are 4^12 combinations, it take more than 17 minutes: What if we want to distribute 3000 processes over 1000 servers? With this kind of scalability, it will take too long. In fact, the brute force algorithm is useless. Luckily, Drools Planner implements several other optimization algorithms, which can handle such loads. If you want to know more about them, take a look at the Drools Planner manual or come to my talk at JUDCon London (31 Oct - 1 Nov). This article was originally posted on the Drools & jBPM blog.

So i thought to do a series of hibernate examples showing various features of hibernate. In the first part i wanted to show about the Delete Orphan feature and how it may be used with the use of a story line. So let us begin :) Prerequisites: In order for you to try out the following example you will need the below mentioned JAR files: org.springframework.aop-3.0.6.RELEASE.jar org.springframework.asm-3.0.6.RELEASE.jar org.springframework.aspects-3.0.6.RELEASE.jar org.springframework.beans-3.0.6.RELEASE.jar org.springframework.context.support-3.0.6.RELEASE.jar org.springframework.context-3.0.6.RELEASE.jar org.springframework.core-3.0.6.RELEASE.jar org.springframework.jdbc-3.0.6.RELEASE.jar org.springframework.orm-3.0.6.RELEASE.jar org.springframework.transaction-3.0.6.RELEASE.jar. org.springframework.expression-3.0.6.RELEASE.jar commons-logging-1.0.4.jar log4j.jar aopalliance-1.0.jar dom4j-1.1.jar hibernate-commons-annotations-3.2.0.Final.jar hibernate-core-3.6.4.Final.jar hibernate-jpa-2.0-api-1.0.0.Final.jar javax.persistence-2.0.0.jar jta-1.1.jar javassist-3.1.jar slf4j-api-1.6.2.jar mysql-connector-java-5.1.13-bin.jar commons-collections-3.0.jar For anyone who want the eclipse project to try this out, you can download it with the above mentioned JAR dependencies here. Introduction: Its year 2011. And The Justice League has grown out of proportion and are searching for a developer to help with creating a super hero registering system. A developer competent in Hibernate and ORM is ready to do the system and handle the persistence layer using Hibernate. For simplicity, He will be using a simple stand alone application to persist super heroes. This is how this example will layout: Table design Domain classes and Hibernate mappings DAO & Service classes Spring configuration for the application A simple main class to show how it all works Let the Journey Begin...................... Table Design: The design consists of three simple tables as illustrated by the diagram below; As you can see its a simple one-to-many relationship linked by a Join Table. The Join Table will be used by Hibernate to fill the Super hero list which is in the domain class which we will go on to see next. Domain classes and Hibernate mappings: There are mainly only two domain classes as the Join table in linked with the primary owning entity which is the Justice League entity. So let us go on to see how the domain classes are constructed with annotations; package com.justice.league.domain; import java.io.Serializable; import javax.persistence.Column; import javax.persistence.Entity; import javax.persistence.GeneratedValue; import javax.persistence.GenerationType; import javax.persistence.Id; import javax.persistence.Table; import org.hibernate.annotations.Type; @Entity @Table(name = "SuperHero") public class SuperHero implements Serializable { /** * */ private static final long serialVersionUID = -6712720661371583351L; @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO) @Column(name = "super_hero_id") private Long superHeroId; @Column(name = "super_hero_name") private String name; @Column(name = "power_description") private String powerDescription; @Type(type = "yes_no") @Column(name = "isAwesome") private boolean isAwesome; public Long getSuperHeroId() { return superHeroId; } public void setSuperHeroId(Long superHeroId) { this.superHeroId = superHeroId; } public String getName() { return name; } public void setName(String name) { this.name = name; } public String getPowerDescription() { return powerDescription; } public void setPowerDescription(String powerDescription) { this.powerDescription = powerDescription; } public boolean isAwesome() { return isAwesome; } public void setAwesome(boolean isAwesome) { this.isAwesome = isAwesome; } } As i am using MySQL as the primary database, i have used the GeneratedValue strategy as GenerationType.AUTO which will do the auto incrementing whenever a new super hero is created. All other mappings are familiar to everyone with the exception of the last variable where we map a boolean to a Char field in the database. We use Hibernate's @Type annotation to represent true & false as Y & N within the database field. Hibernate has many @Type implementations which you can read about here. In this instance we have used this type. Ok now that we have our class to represent the Super Heroes, lets go on to see how our Justice League domain class looks like which keeps tab of all super heroes who have pledged allegiance to the League. package com.justice.league.domain; import java.io.Serializable; import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.List; import javax.persistence.CascadeType; import javax.persistence.Column; import javax.persistence.Entity; import javax.persistence.FetchType; import javax.persistence.GeneratedValue; import javax.persistence.GenerationType; import javax.persistence.Id; import javax.persistence.JoinColumn; import javax.persistence.JoinTable; import javax.persistence.OneToMany; import javax.persistence.Table; @Entity @Table(name = "JusticeLeague") public class JusticeLeague implements Serializable { /** * */ private static final long serialVersionUID = 763500275393020111L; @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO) @Column(name = "justice_league_id") private Long justiceLeagueId; @Column(name = "justice_league_moto") private String justiceLeagueMoto; @Column(name = "number_of_members") private Integer numberOfMembers; @OneToMany(cascade = { CascadeType.ALL }, fetch = FetchType.EAGER, orphanRemoval = true) @JoinTable(name = "JUSTICE_LEAGUE_SUPER_HERO", joinColumns = { @JoinColumn(name = "justice_league_id") }, inverseJoinColumns = { @JoinColumn(name = "super_hero_id") }) private List superHeroList = new ArrayList(0); public Long getJusticeLeagueId() { return justiceLeagueId; } public void setJusticeLeagueId(Long justiceLeagueId) { this.justiceLeagueId = justiceLeagueId; } public String getJusticeLeagueMoto() { return justiceLeagueMoto; } public void setJusticeLeagueMoto(String justiceLeagueMoto) { this.justiceLeagueMoto = justiceLeagueMoto; } public Integer getNumberOfMembers() { return numberOfMembers; } public void setNumberOfMembers(Integer numberOfMembers) { this.numberOfMembers = numberOfMembers; } public List getSuperHeroList() { return superHeroList; } public void setSuperHeroList(List superHeroList) { this.superHeroList = superHeroList; } } The important fact to note here is the annotation @OneToMany(cascade = { CascadeType.ALL }, fetch = FetchType.EAGER, orphanRemoval = true). Here we have set orphanRemoval = true. So what does that do exactly? Ok so say that you have a group of Super Heroes in your League. And say one Super Hero goes haywire. So we need to remove Him/Her from the League. With JPA cascade this is not possible as it does not detect Orphan records and you will wind up with the database having the deleted Super Hero(s) whereas your collection still has a reference to it. Prior to JPA 2.0 you did not have the orphanRemoval support and the only way to delete orphan records was to use the following Hibernate specific(or ORM specific) annotation which is now deprecated; @org.hibernate.annotations.Cascade(org.hibernate.annotations.CascadeType.DELETE_ORPHAN) But with the introduction of the attribute orphanRemoval, we are now able to handle the deletion of orphan records through JPA. Now that we have our Domain classes DAO & Service classes: To keep with good design standards i have separated the DAO(Data access object) layer and the service layer. So let us see the DAO interface and implementation. Note that i have used HibernateTemplatethrough HibernateDAOSupportso as to keep away any Hibernate specific detail out and access everything in a unified manner using Spring. package com.justice.league.dao; import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Propagation; import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional; import com.justice.league.domain.JusticeLeague; @Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRED, readOnly = false) public interface JusticeLeagueDAO { public void createOrUpdateJuticeLeagure(JusticeLeague league); public JusticeLeague retrieveJusticeLeagueById(Long id); } In the interface layer i have defined the Transaction handling as Required. This is done so that whenever you do not need a transaction you can define that at the method level of that specific method and in more situations you will need a transaction with the exception of data retrieval methods. According to the JPA spec you need a valid transaction for insert/delete/update functions. So lets take a look at the DAO implementation; package com.justice.league.dao.hibernate; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Qualifier; import org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.support.HibernateDaoSupport; import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Propagation; import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional; import com.justice.league.dao.JusticeLeagueDAO; import com.justice.league.domain.JusticeLeague; @Qualifier(value="justiceLeagueHibernateDAO") public class JusticeLeagueHibernateDAOImpl extends HibernateDaoSupport implements JusticeLeagueDAO { @Override public void createOrUpdateJuticeLeagure(JusticeLeague league) { if (league.getJusticeLeagueId() == null) { getHibernateTemplate().persist(league); } else { getHibernateTemplate().update(league); } } @Transactional(propagation = Propagation.NOT_SUPPORTED, readOnly = false) public JusticeLeague retrieveJusticeLeagueById(Long id){ return getHibernateTemplate().get(JusticeLeague.class, id); } } Here i have defined an @Qualifier to let Spring know that this is the Hibernate implementation of the DAO class. Note the package name which ends with hibernate. This as i see is a good design concept to follow where you separate your implementation(s) into separate packages to keep the design clean. Ok lets move on to the service layer implementation. The service layer in this instance is just acting as a mediation layer to call the DAO methods. But in a real world application you will probably have other validations, security related procedures etc handled within the service layer. package com.justice.league.service; import com.justice.league.domain.JusticeLeague; public interface JusticeLeagureService { public void handleJusticeLeagureCreateUpdate(JusticeLeague justiceLeague); public JusticeLeague retrieveJusticeLeagueById(Long id); } package com.justice.league.service.impl; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Qualifier; import org.springframework.stereotype.Component; import com.justice.league.dao.JusticeLeagueDAO; import com.justice.league.domain.JusticeLeague; import com.justice.league.service.JusticeLeagureService; @Component("justiceLeagueService") public class JusticeLeagureServiceImpl implements JusticeLeagureService { @Autowired @Qualifier(value = "justiceLeagueHibernateDAO") private JusticeLeagueDAO justiceLeagueDAO; @Override public void handleJusticeLeagureCreateUpdate(JusticeLeague justiceLeague) { justiceLeagueDAO.createOrUpdateJuticeLeagure(justiceLeague); } public JusticeLeague retrieveJusticeLeagueById(Long id){ return justiceLeagueDAO.retrieveJusticeLeagueById(id); } } Few things to note here. First of all the @Component binds this service implementation with the name justiceLeagueService within the spring context so that we can refer to the bean as a bean with an id of name justiceLeagueService. And we have auto wired the JusticeLeagueDAO and defined an @Qualifier so that it will be bound to the Hibernate implementation. The value of the Qualifier should be the same name we gave the class level Qualifier within the DAO Implementation class. And Lastly let us look at the Spring configuration which wires up all these together; Spring configuration for the application: com.justice.league.**.* org.hibernate.dialect.MySQLDialect com.mysql.jdbc.Driver jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/my_test root password true org.hibernate.dialect.MySQLDialect Note that i have used the HibernateTransactionManager in this instance as i am running it stand alone. If you are running it within an application server you will almost always use a JTA Transaction manager. I have also used auto creation of tables by hibernate for simplicity purposes. The packagesToScan property instructs to scan through all sub packages(including nested packaged within them) under the root package com.justice.league.**.* to be scanned for @Entity annotated classes. We have also bounded the session factory to the justiceLeagueDAO so that we can work with the Hibernate Template. For testing purposes you can have the tag create initially if you want, and let hibernate create the tables for you. Ok so now that we have seen the building blocks of the application, lets see how this all works by first creating some super heroes within the Justice League A simple main class to show how it all works: As the first example lets see how we are going to persist the Justice League with a couple of Super Heroes; package com.test; import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.List; import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext; import org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext; import com.justice.league.domain.JusticeLeague; import com.justice.league.domain.SuperHero; import com.justice.league.service.JusticeLeagureService; public class TestSpring { /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { ApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext( "spring-context.xml"); JusticeLeagureService service = (JusticeLeagureService) ctx .getBean("justiceLeagueService"); JusticeLeague league = new JusticeLeague(); List superHeroList = getSuperHeroList(); league.setSuperHeroList(superHeroList); league.setJusticeLeagueMoto("Guardians of the Galaxy"); league.setNumberOfMembers(superHeroList.size()); service.handleJusticeLeagureCreateUpdate(league); } private static List getSuperHeroList() { List superHeroList = new ArrayList(); SuperHero superMan = new SuperHero(); superMan.setAwesome(true); superMan.setName("Clark Kent"); superMan.setPowerDescription("Faster than a speeding bullet"); superHeroList.add(superMan); SuperHero batMan = new SuperHero(); batMan.setAwesome(true); batMan.setName("Bruce Wayne"); batMan.setPowerDescription("I just have some cool gadgets"); superHeroList.add(batMan); return superHeroList; } } And if we go to the database and check this we will see the following output; mysql> select * from superhero; +---------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------------------------+ | super_hero_id | isAwesome | super_hero_name | power_description | +---------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------------------------+ | 1 | Y | Clark Kent | Faster than a speeding bullet | | 2 | Y | Bruce Wayne | I just have some cool gadgets | +---------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------------------------+ mysql> select * from justiceleague; +-------------------+-------------------------+-------------------+ | justice_league_id | justice_league_moto | number_of_members | +-------------------+-------------------------+-------------------+ | 1 | Guardians of the Galaxy | 2 | +-------------------+-------------------------+-------------------+ So as you can see we have persisted two super heroes and linked them up with the Justice League. Now let us see how that delete orphan works with the below example; package com.test; import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.List; import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext; import org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext; import com.justice.league.domain.JusticeLeague; import com.justice.league.domain.SuperHero; import com.justice.league.service.JusticeLeagureService; public class TestSpring { /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { ApplicationContext ctx = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext( "spring-context.xml"); JusticeLeagureService service = (JusticeLeagureService) ctx .getBean("justiceLeagueService"); JusticeLeague league = service.retrieveJusticeLeagueById(1l); List superHeroList = league.getSuperHeroList(); /** * Here we remove Batman(a.k.a Bruce Wayne) out of the Justice League * cos he aint cool no more */ for (int i = 0; i < superHeroList.size(); i++) { SuperHero superHero = superHeroList.get(i); if (superHero.getName().equalsIgnoreCase("Bruce Wayne")) { superHeroList.remove(i); break; } } service.handleJusticeLeagureCreateUpdate(league); } } Here we first retrieve the Justice League record by its primary key. Then we loop through and remove Batman off the League and again call the createOrUpdate method. As we have the remove orphan defined, any Super Hero not in the list which is in the database will be deleted. Again if we query the database we will see that batman has been removed now as per the following; mysql> select * from superhero; +---------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------------------------+ | super_hero_id | isAwesome | super_hero_name | power_description | +---------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------------------------+ | 1 | Y | Clark Kent | Faster than a speeding bullet | +---------------+-----------+-----------------+-------------------------------+ So that's it. The story of how Justice League used Hibernate to remove Batman automatically without being bothered to do it themselves. Next up look forward to how Captain America used Hibernate Criteria to build flexible queries in order to locate possible enemies. Watch out!!!! Have a great day people and thank you for reading!!!! If you have any suggestions or comments pls do leave them by. From http://dinukaroshan.blogspot.com/2011/09/hibernate-by-example-part-1-orphan.html

We often find ourselves tempted by the shortcut of using directly a record-like data structure provided by the language or a framework. There are many example scenarios where a record emerges: when you use a database for persistence (not only a with relational one) there can be a data structure containing the results of a query. when you use associative arrays, often they have a small number of fixed keys. Record-like structures are the equivalent of C structs, or Ruby hashes. This refactoring is a generalization of Replace Array with Object: in this case the starting point is not just an array which always has the same number and type of fields, but any data structure homoegeneous to it: Zend_Db_Table_Row, implementing a Row Data Gateway and giving access to a row in the database. stdClass instances (or arrays) fetched by PDOStatement. In some languages (see C) the record is a particular data structure which is not an object; in PHP, it is always an array or an object of some vendor class. Even ORMs based on Active Record are more advanced than this kind of usage: they usually let you add methods on the model classes, which are populated with data by the ORM itself. In this refactoring, we are talking about a data structure managed by the language of the persistence layer, and whose code you cannot modify. Why replacing a record-like structure? Generic classes do not let you add methods to manipulate their data: when using directly a Zend_Db_Table_Row or an associative array for storage of the result of a query, you have to resort continuously to foreign methods. Each time you need new logic, you have to compromise encapsulation on the object itself, and these methods get duplicated in various instance of client code. Solutions There are different ways to eliminate the coupling to a record-like structure. The first is to refactor to subclassing, where the data structure becomes an Active Record. You extends the vendor class with your own one: this option is only available if the structure is defined as an object. Moreover, the name of the class to instantiate must be configurable in the persistence mechanism. Zend_Db_Table_Record supports this kind of usage. A second option is to refactor to composition: Zend_Db examples exist also for this case. This approach can be used to avoid large hierarchies: your model classes compose the Zend_Db objects and hide the database; methods can be added for once at your own models. A third and final alternative is to use hydration: data is copied to your model objects, and records are thrown away after the fact. Doctrine 2 and Data Mappers in general choose this approach. Steps I will describe a short procedure for refactoring to hydration since it is the most complex approach and it is always applicable. The other are instead specific for the particular data structure (for example with Zend_Db you have to write some subclasses and configure some protected fields to contain the right class names.) Create a new class, as one of your models. Its state should be represented by one row (or more rows joined into one) in the database. This class should gain a private field for each of the record's fields, usually with getters and setters. This class should accept in the constructor or in a Factory Method an instance of the record, so that it can produce a new instance. If you want to decouple from the persistsnce, or you want to go two ways (also save and not only visualize, since this is not just a presentation model), look for a Data Mapper such as Doctrine 2, which will even hide all the record structures from you and manager associations where objects compose other ones. Example In the example, the data of a single user are returned in an array. I chose an array as the record-like structure to minimize the external dependencies of this code. find(42); $this->assertEquals('Giorgio', $giorgio['name']); } } /** * This is a Fake Table Data Gateway. The machinery for making it work with * a database will be distracting for our purposes, so they will be omitted. */ class UsersTable { /** * @return mixed the returned value can be a Zend_Db_Table_Row, * an Active Record, a stdClass, an associative array... * It should just represent a single entity. */ public function find($id) { // execute a PDOStatement and fetch the data return array('id' => 42, 'name' => 'Giorgio'); } } After the refactoring, we have a User class where we can add all the methods we need: find(42); $this->assertEquals('Giorgio', $giorgio->getName()); } } /** * This is a Fake Table Data Gateway. The machinery for making it work with * a database will be distracting for our purposes, so they will be omitted. */ class UsersTable { /** * @return mixed the returned value can be a Zend_Db_Table_Row, * an Active Record, a stdClass, an associative array... * It should just represent a single entity. */ public function find($id) { // execute a PDOStatement and fetch the data return User::fromRecord(array('id' => 42, 'name' => 'Giorgio')); } } class User { private $id; private $name; public static function fromRecord(array $record) { $object = new self(); $object->id = $record['id']; $object->name = $record['name']; return $object; } public function getName() { return $this->name; } }

If you're looking for a cloud expert, specifically someone who knows Amazon Web Services and EC2, you'll want to have a battery of questions to assess their knowledge.

In this article I'll discuss the most fundamental technique in concurrent programming known as memory barriers, or fences, that make the memory state within a processor visible to other processors. CPUs have employed many techniques to try and accommodate the fact that CPU execution unit performance has greatly outpaced main memory performance. In my “Write Combining” article I touched on just one of these techniques. The most common technique employed by CPUs to hide memory latency is to pipeline instructions and then spend significant effort, and resource, on trying to re-order these pipelines to minimise stalls related to cache misses. When a program is executed it does not matter if its instructions are re-ordered provided the same end result is achieved. For example, within a loop it does not matter when the loop counter is updated if no operation within the loop uses it. The compiler and CPU are free to re-order the instructions to best utilise the CPU provided it is updated by the time the next iteration is about to commence. Also over the execution of a loop this variable may be stored in a register and never pushed out to cache or main memory, thus it is never visible to another CPU. CPU cores contain multiple execution units. For example, a modern Intel CPU contains 6 execution units which can do a combination of arithmetic, conditional logic, and memory manipulation. Each execution unit can do some combination of these tasks. These execution units operate in parallel allowing instructions to be executed in parallel. This introduces another level of non-determinism to program order if it was observed from another CPU. Finally, when a cache-miss occurs, a modern CPU can make an assumption on the results of a memory load and continue executing based on this assumption until the load returns the actual data. Provided “program order” is preserved the CPU, and compiler, are free to do whatever they see fit to improve performance. Figure 1. Loads and stores to the caches and main memory are buffered and re-ordered using the load, store, and write-combining buffers. These buffers are associative queues that allow fast lookup. This lookup is necessary when a later load needs to read the value of a previous store that has not yet reached the cache. Figure 1 above depicts a simplified view of a modern multi-core CPU. It shows how the execution units can use the local registers and buffers to manage memory while it is being transferred back and forth from the cache sub-system. In a multi-threaded environment techniques need to be employed for making program results visible in a timely manner. I will not cover cache coherence in this article. Just assume that once memory has been pushed to the cache then a protocol of messages will occur to ensure all caches are coherent for any shared data. The techniques for making memory visible from a processor core are known as memory barriers or fences. Memory barriers provide two properties. Firstly, they preserve externally visible program order by ensuring all instructions either side of the barrier appear in the correct program order if observed from another CPU and, secondly, they make the memory visible by ensuring the data is propagated to the cache sub-system. Memory barriers are a complex subject. They are implemented very differently across CPU architectures. At one end of the spectrum there is a relatively strong memory model on Intel CPUs that is more simple than say the weak and complex memory model on a DEC Alpha with its partitioned caches in addition to cache layers. Since x86 CPUs are the most common for multi-threaded programming I’ll try and simplify to this level. Store Barrier A store barrier, “sfence” instruction on x86, forces all store instructions prior to the barrier to happen before the barrier and have the store buffers flushed to cache for the CPU on which it is issued. This will make the program state visible to other CPUs so they can act on it if necessary. A good example of this in action is the following simplified code from the BatchEventProcessor in the Disruptor. When the sequence is updated other consumers and producers know how far this consumer has progressed and thus can take appropriate action. All previous updates to memory that happened before the barrier are now visible. private volatile long sequence = RingBuffer.INITIAL_CURSOR_VALUE; // from inside the run() method T event = null; long nextSequence = sequence + 1L; while (running) { try { final long availableSequence = dependencyBarrier.waitFor(nextSequence); while (nextSequence <= availableSequence) { event = dependencyBarrier.getEvent(nextSequence); eventHandler.onEvent(event, nextSequence == availableSequence); nextSequence++; } sequence = event.getSequence(); // store barrier inserted here !!! } catch (final Exception ex) { exceptionHandler.handle(ex, event); sequence = event.getSequence(); // store barrier inserted here !!! nextSequence = event.getSequence() + 1L; } } Load Barrier A load barrier, “lfence” instruction on x86, forces all load instructions after the barrier to happen after the barrier and then wait on the load buffer to drain for that CPU. This makes program state exposed from other CPUs visible to this CPU before making further progress. A good example of this is when the BatchEventProcessor sequence referenced above is read by producers, or consumers, in the corresponding barriers of the Disruptor. Full Barrier A full barrier, "mfence" instruction on x86, is a composite of both load and store barriers happening on a CPU. Java Memory Model In the Java Memory Model a volatile field has a store barrier inserted after a write to it and a load barrier inserted before a read of it. Qualified final fields of a class have a store barrier inserted after their initialisation to ensure these fields are visible once the constructor completes when a reference to the object is available. Atomic Instructions and Software Locks Atomic instructions, such as the “lock ...” instructions on x86, are effectively a full barrier as they lock the memory sub-system to perform an operation and have guaranteed total order, even across CPUs. Software locks usually employ memory barriers, or atomic instructions, to achieve visibility and preserve program order. Performance Impact of Memory Barriers Memory barriers prevent a CPU from performing a lot of techniques to hide memory latency therefore they have a significant performance cost which must be considered. To achieve maximum performance it is best to model the problem so the processor can do units of work, then have all the necessary memory barriers occur on the boundaries of these work units. Taking this approach allows the processor to optimise the units of work without restriction. There is an advantage to grouping necessary memory barriers in that buffers flushed after the first one will be less costly because no work will be under way to refill them. From http://mechanical-sympathy.blogspot.com/2011/07/memory-barriersfences.html

DTOs, or data-transfer objects, are commonly used. What is not со commonly-known is that they originate from DDD (Domain-driven design). There it makes a lot of sense – domain objects have state, identity and business logic while DTOs have only state. But many projects today are using the anemic data model approach (my opinion) and still use DTOs. They are used whenever an object “leaves” the service layer or “leaves” the system (through web services, rmi, etc.). There are three approaches: every entity has at least one corresponding DTO. Usually more than one, for different scenarios in the view layer. When you display a user in a list you have one DTO, when you display it in a “user details” window you need a more extended DTO. I am not in favour of this approach because in too many cases the DTO and the domain structure have exactly the same structure and as a result there’s a lot of duplicated code + redundant mapping. Another thing is the variability of multiple DTOs. Even if they differ from the entity, they differ from one another with one or two fields. Why duplication is a bad thing? Because changes are to be made in two places, issues are traced harder when data passes through multiple objects, and because..it is duplication. Copy & paste within the same project is a sin. DTOs are only created when their structure significantly differs from the that of the entity. In all other cases the entity itself is used. The cases when you don’t want to show some fields (especially when exposing via web services to 3rd parties) exist, but are not that common. This can sometimes be handled via the serialization mechanism – mark them as @JsonIgnore or @XmlTransient for example – but in other cases the structures are just different. In these cases a DTO is due. For example you have a User and UserDetails, where UserDetails holds the details + the relations of the currently logged user to the given user. The latter has nothing to do with the entity, so you create a DTO. However in the case of a DirectMessage you have sender, recipient, text and datetime both in the DB and in the UI. No need to have a DTO. One caveat with this approach (as well as with the next one). Anemic entities usually come with an ORM (JPA in the case of Java). Whenever they exit the service layer they may be invalid, because of lazy collections that require an open session. You have two options here: use OpenSessionInView / OpenEntityManagerInView – thus your session stays open until you are finished preparing the response. This is easy to configure but is not my preferred option – it violates layer boundaries in a subtle way, and this sometimes leads to problems especially for novice developers Don’t use lazy collections. Lazy collections are unneeded. Either make them eager, if they are supposed to hold a small list of items (for example – the list of roles for a user), or if the data is likely to grow use queries. Yes, you are not going to show 1000 records at on go anyway, you will have to page it. Without lazy associations (@*ToOne are eager by default) you won’t have invalid objects when the session is closed Don’t use DTOs at all. Applicable a soon as there aren’t significantly varying structures. For smaller projects this is usually a good way to go. Everything mentioned in the above point applies here. So my preferred approach is the “middle way”. But it requires a lot of consideration in each case, which may not be applicable for bigger and/or less experienced teams. So one of the two “extremes” should be picked. Since the “no DTOs” approach also requires consideration – what to make @Transient, how does lazy collections affect the flow, etc, the “All DTOs” is usually chosen. But even though it is seemingly the safest approach, it has many pitfalls. First, how do you map from DTOs to entities and vice-versa? Three options: dedicated mapper classes constructors – the DTO constructor takes the entity and fills itself, and vice-versa (remember to also provide a default constructor) declarative mapping (e.g. Dozer). This is practically the same as the first option – it externalizes the mapping. It can even be used together with a dedicated mapper class map them in-line (whenever needed). This can generate unmaintainable code and is not preferred I prefer the constructor approach, at least because fewer classes are created. But they are essentially the same (DTOs are not famous for encapsulation, so all of your properties are exposed anyway). Here is a list of guidelines when using DTOs and either of the “mapping” approaches: Don’t generate too much redundant code. If two scenarios require slightly different DTOs, reuse. No need to create a new DTO for a difference of one or two fields Don’t put presentation logic in mappers/constructors. For example if (entity.isActive()) dto.setStatus("Active"); This should happen in the view layer Don’t sneak entities together with DTOs. DTOs should not have members which are entities. Generally, entities should not be used outside the service layer (this is a bit extreme, but if we use DTOs everywhere we should be consistent and stick to that practice) Don’t use the mappers/entity-to-dto constructors in controllers, use them in the service layer. The reason DTOs are used in the first place is that entities may be ORM-bound, and they may not valid outside a session (i.e. outside the service layer). If using mappers, prefer static mapper methods. Mappers don’t have state, so no need for them to be instantiated. (And they don’t have to be mocked, wrapped, etc). If using mappers, there’s no need for a separate mapper for each entity(+its multiple DTOs). Related entities can be grouped in one mapper. For example Company, CompanyProfile, CompanySubsidiary can use the same mapper class Just make sure you make all these decisions at the beginning of a project and figure out which is applicable in your scenario (team size and experience, project size, domain complexity). From http://techblog.bozho.net/?p=427

JSON data format is simple and still powerful. Nowadays you can encounter more and more web applications communicating using JSON format then a couple of years ago. It is simple for a developer to read the format, it is effective for a web browser to parse the format and there are databases using it as its primary data format. But what happens when the data structure changes? You need to migrate. And that is where acris-json-migration might help you! Example situation Let's shed a light into it and assume we have a data like this: { "firstName":"John" "secondName":"Doe" "street":"Over the rainbow" "streetNr":21 } Such data can be represented by following Java domain object: public class Person { String firstName; String secondName; String street; Integer streetNr; // ... and getters and setters... } Well, this seems like data about a person named John Doe. We stored it in a database and you can clearly see, that secondName is probably not the field name we really like to have. But a developer made a mistake and in second version of our domain model we are going to fix it: { "firstName":"John" "surname":"Doe" "street":"Over the rainbow" "streetNr":21 } Now you can see the point - thousands of data stored in the format defined by Person class in its version #1 but our program communicating in version #2 with changed secondName to surname in Person class. Clients can wonder why the don't see surnames, can't they? ;) One thing to remember (for the following context) - the class Person changed and there is only Person class in version #2. Simple migration script In this situation I would like to write a script: public class PersonV1toV2Script extends JacksonTransformationScript { @Override public void process(ObjectNode node) { rename(node, "secondName", "surname"); } } From the above example it is clear that the script will do the job. And you can do pretty anything with the whole tree of JSON data - adding new nodes, removing existing ones, transforming here and there - all thanks to Jackson's tree model. How can I execute it? There is a Transformer abstract class representing a transofmer responsible for passing JSON data to a script and writing it back. Currently there are tow kinds of transformers: Jackson-based JSONT-based Jackson-based is the preferred one and is more developed then JSONT-based. So to execute a transformation on a data set you have to specify only two lines of code: JacksonTransformer t = new JacksonTransformer(input, output); t.transform(PersonV1toV2Script.class.getName()); ... where input and output represent directories. In the input directory all files are treated as files containing JSON data and are transformed and written to the output directory. For a detailed test you can look into TransformerTest in the project. Conclusion The script's helper API is evolving and provides you with nice methods like removeIfExists or addNonExistent methods. We would like to hear about your use-cases which are not handled by acris-json-migration yet so the project can generally serve the purpose of JSON data migration.

There is little support for testing the database of your enterprise application. We will describe some problems and possible solutions based on Hibernate and JUnit.

Memory is stored within the cache system in units know as cache lines. Cache lines are a power of 2 of contiguous bytes which are typically 32-256 in size. The most common cache line size is 64 bytes. False sharing is a term which applies when threads unwittingly impact the performance of each other while modifying independent variables sharing the same cache line. Write contention on cache lines is the single most limiting factor on achieving scalability for parallel threads of execution in an SMP system. I’ve heard false sharing described as the silent performance killer because it is far from obvious when looking at code. To achieve linear scalability with number of threads, we must ensure no two threads write to the same variable or cache line. Two threads writing to the same variable can be tracked down at a code level. To be able to know if independent variables share the same cache line we need to know the memory layout, or we can get a tool to tell us. Intel VTune is such a profiling tool. In this article I’ll explain how memory is laid out for Java objects and how we can pad out our cache lines to avoid false sharing. Figure 1. Figure 1. above illustrates the issue of false sharing. A thread running on core 1 wants to update variable X while a thread on core 2 wants to update variable Y. Unfortunately these two hot variables reside in the same cache line. Each thread will race for ownership of the cache line so they can update it. If core 1 gets ownership then the cache sub-system will need to invalidate the corresponding cache line for core 2. When Core 2 gets ownership and performs its update, then core 1 will be told to invalidate its copy of the cache line. This will ping pong back and forth via the L3 cache greatly impacting performance. The issue would be further exacerbated if competing cores are on different sockets and additionally have to cross the socket interconnect. Java Memory Layout For the Hotspot JVM, all objects have a 2-word header. First is the “mark” word which is made up of 24-bits for the hash code and 8-bits for flags such as the lock state, or it can be swapped for lock objects. The second is a reference to the class of the object. Arrays have an additional word for the size of the array. Every object is aligned to an 8-byte granularity boundary for performance. Therefore to be efficient when packing, the object fields are re-ordered from declaration order to the following order based on size in bytes: doubles (8) and longs (8) ints (4) and floats (4) shorts (2) and chars (2) booleans (1) and bytes (1) references (4/8) With this knowledge we can pad a cache line between any fields with 7 longs. Within the Disruptor we pad cache lines around the RingBuffer cursor and BatchEventProcessor sequences. To show the performance impact let’s take a few threads each updating their own independent counters. These counters will be volatile longs so the world can see their progress. public final class FalseSharing implements Runnable { public final static int NUM_THREADS = 4; // change public final static long ITERATIONS = 500L * 1000L * 1000L; private final int arrayIndex; private static VolatileLong[] longs = new VolatileLong[NUM_THREADS]; static { for (int i = 0; i < longs.length; i++) { longs[i] = new VolatileLong(); } } public FalseSharing(final int arrayIndex) { this.arrayIndex = arrayIndex; } public static void main(final String[] args) throws Exception { final long start = System.nanoTime(); runTest(); System.out.println("duration = " + (System.nanoTime() - start)); } private static void runTest() throws InterruptedException { Thread[] threads = new Thread[NUM_THREADS]; for (int i = 0; i < threads.length; i++) { threads[i] = new Thread(new FalseSharing(i)); } for (Thread t : threads) { t.start(); } for (Thread t : threads) { t.join(); } } public void run() { long i = ITERATIONS + 1; while (0 != --i) { longs[arrayIndex].value = i; } } public final static class VolatileLong { public volatile long value = 0L; public long p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6; // comment out } } Results Running the above code while ramping the number of threads and adding/removing the cache line padding, I get the results depicted in Figure 2. below. This is measuring the duration of test runs on my 4-core Nehalem at home. Figure 2. The impact of false sharing can clearly be seen by the increased execution time required to complete the test. Without the cache line contention we achieve near linear scale up with threads. This is not a perfect test because we cannot be sure where the VolatileLongs will be laid out in memory. They are independent objects. However experience shows that objects allocated at the same time tend to be co-located. So there you have it. False sharing can be a silent performance killer. From http://mechanical-sympathy.blogspot.com/2011/07/false-sharing.html

The integration framework Apache Camel already supports several important cloud services (see my overview article at http://www.kai-waehner.de/blog/2011/07/09/cloud-computing-heterogeneity-will-require-cloud-integration-apache-camel-is-already-prepared for more details). This article describes the combination of Apache Camel and the Amazon Web Services (AWS) interfaces of Simple Storage Service (S3), Simple Queue Service (SQS) and Simple Notification Service (SNS). Thus, The concept of Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is used to access messaging systems and data storage without any need for configuration. Registration to AWS and Setup of Camel First, you have to register to the Amazon Web Services (for free). Most AWS services include a free monthly quota, which is absolutely sufficient to play around and develop some simple applications. As its name states, AWS uses technology-independent web services. Besides, APIs for several different programming languages are available to ease development. By the way, Camel uses the AWS SDK for Java (http://aws.amazon.com/sdkforjava), of course. The documentation is detailed and easy to understand, including tutorials, screenshots and code examples . Hint 1: You should read the introductions to S3, SQS and SNS (go to http://aws.amazon.com and click on „products“) and play around with the AWS Management Console (http://aws.amazon.com/console) before you continue. This step is very easy and takes less than one hour. Then, you will have a much better understanding about AWS and where Camel can help you! Hint 2: It really helps to look at the source code of the camel-aws component, It helps you to understand how Camel uses the AWS Java API internally. If you want to write tests, you can do it the same way. In the past, I was afraid of looking at „complex“ source code of open source frameworks. But there is no need to be scared! The camel-aws component (and most other camel components) contain only of a few classes. Everything is easy to understand. It helps you to understand Camel internals, the AWS API, and to spot and solve errors due to exceptions in your code. In the meanwhile, the current Camel version 2.8 supports three AWS services: S3, SQS and SNS. All of them use similar concepts. Therefore, they are included in one single camel component: „camel-aws“. You have to add the libraries to your existing Camel project. As always, the simplest way is to use Maven and add the following dependency to the pom.xml: org.apache.camel camel-aws ${camel-version} Configuration of the Camel Endpoint The implementation and configuration of all three services is very similar. The URI looks like this (the code shows the SQS service): aws-sqs://queue-name[?options] There are two alternatives to configure your endpoint. Using Parameters The easy way is to use two paramters in the URI of your endpoint: „accessKey“ and „secretKey“ (you receive both after your AWS registration). “aws-sqs://unique-queue-name?accessKey=“INSERT_ME“&secretKey=INSERT_ME” Be aware of the following problem, which can result in a strange, non-speaking exception (thanks to Brendan Long): You’ll need to URL encode any +’s in your secret key (otherwise, they’ll be treated as spaces). + = %2B, so if your secretkey was “my+secret\key”, your Camel URL should have “secretKey=my%2Bsecret\key”. “Within the query string, the plus sign is reserved as shorthand notation for a space. Therefore, real plus signs must be encoded. This method was used to make query URIs easier to pass in systems which did not allow spaces.” Source: WC3 URI Recommendations Adding a configured AmazonClient to the Registry If you need to do more configuration (e.g. because your system is behind a firewall), you have to add an AmazonClient object to your registry. The following code shows an example using SQS, but SNS and S3 use exactly the same concept. @Override protected JndiRegistry createRegistry() throws Exception { JndiRegistry registry = super.createRegistry(); AWSCredentials awsCredentials = new BasicAWSCredentials(“INSERT_ME”, “INSERT_ME”); ClientConfiguration clientConfiguration = new ClientConfiguration(); clientConfiguration.setProxyHost(“http://myProxyHost”); clientConfiguration.setProxyPort(8080); AmazonSQSClient client = new AmazonSQSClient(awsCredentials, clientConfiguration); registry.bind(“amazonSQSClient”, client); return registry; } This example overwrites the createRegistry() method of a JUnit test (extending CamelTestSupport). You can also add this information to your runtime Camel application, of course. Apache Camel and the Simple Storage Service (S3) Simple Storage Service (S3) is a key-value-store. You can store small to very large data. The usage is very easy. You create buckets and put key-value data into these buckets. You can also create folders within buckets to organize your data. That’s it. You can monitor your buckets using the AWS Management Console – an intuitive GUI supporting most AWS services. The following example shows both alternatives for accessing the Amazon services (as described above): Paramenters and the AmazonClient. // Transfer data from your file inbox to the AWS S3 service from(“file:files/inbox”) // This is the key of your key-value data .setHeader(S3Constants.KEY, simple(“This is a static key”)) // Using parameters for accessing the AWS service .to(“aws-s3://camel-integration-bucket-mwea-kw?accessKey=INSERT_ME&secretKey=INSERT_ME&region=eu-west-1″); // Transfer data from the AWS S3 service to your file outbox from(“aws-s3://camel-integration-bucket-mwea-kw?amazonS3Client=#amazonS3Client&region=eu-wes”) .to(“file:files/outbox”); There are some additional parameters, for instance you can submit the desired AWS region or delete data after receiving it (see http://camel.apache.org/aws-s3.html and the corresponding SQS and SNS sites for more details about parameters and message headers). As you see in the code, you can use the AWS-S3 endpoint for producing and for consuming messages. Each bucket must be unique, thus you have to add some specific information such as your company to its name. Hint: If a bucket does not exist, Camel is creating it automatically (as the AWS API does). This concept is also used for SQS queues and SNS topics. Apache Camel and the Simple Queue Service (SQS) The Simple Queue Service (SQS) is similar to a JMS provider such as WebSphere MQ or ActiveMQ (but with some differences). You create queues and send messages to them. Consumers receive the messages. Contrary to most other AWS services, you cannot monitor queues by using the AWS management console directly. You have to use the service „Cloudwatch“ (http://aws.amazon.com/cloudwatch) and start an EC2 instance to monitor queues and its content. As you can see in the following code example, the syntax and concepts are almost the same as for the S3 service: from(“file:inbox”) .to(“aws-sqs://camel-integration-queue-mwea-kw?accessKey=INSERT_ME&secretKey=INSERT_ME”); from(“aws-sqs://camel-integration-queue-mwea-kw?amazonSQSClient=#amazonSQSClient”) .to(“file:outbox?fileName=sqs-${date:now:yyyy.MM.dd-hh:mm:ss:SS}”); Again, you can use the AWS-SQS endpoint for producing and for consuming messages. Each queue name must be unique. There exist two important differences to JMS (copy & paste from the AWS documentation): Q: How many times will I receive each message? Amazon SQS is engineered to provide “at least once” delivery of all messages in its queues. Although most of the time each message will be delivered to your application exactly once, you should design your system so that processing a message more than once does not create any errors or inconsistencies. Q: Why are there separate ReceiveMessage and DeleteMessage operations? When Amazon SQS returns a message to you, that message stays in the queue, whether or not you actually received the message. You are responsible for deleting the message; the delete request acknowledges that you’re done processing the message. If you don’t delete the message, Amazon SQS will deliver it again on another receive request. Apache Camel and the Simple Notification Service (SNS) The Simple Notification Service (SNS) acts like JMS topics. You create a topic, consumers subscribe to the topic and then receive notifications. Several transport protocols are supported: HTTP(S), Email and SQS. Further interfaces will be added in the future, e.g. the Short Message Service (SMS) for mobile phones. Contrary to S3 and SQS, Camel only offers a producer endpoint for this AWS service. You can only create topics and send messages via Camel. The reason is simple: Camel already offers endpoints for consuming these messages: HTTP, Email and SQS are already available. There is one tradeoff: A consumer cannot subscribe to topics using Camel – at the moment. The AWS Management Console has to be used. A very interesting discussion can be read on the Camel JIRA issue regarding the following questions: Should Camel be able to subscribe to topics? Should the producer contain this feature or should there be a consumer? In my opinion, there should be a consumer which is able to subscribe to topics, otherwise Camel is missing a key part of the AWS SNS service! Please read the discussion and contribute your opinion: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3476. Apache Camel is already ready for the Cloud Computing Era AWS offers many more services for the cloud. Probably, it does not make sense to integrate everyone into Camel, but more AWS services will be supported in the future. For instance, SimpleDB and the Relational Database Service (RDS) are already planned and make sende, too: http://camel.apache.org/aws.html. The conclusion is easy: Apache Camel is already ready for the cloud computing era. Several important cloud services are already supported. Cloud integration will become very important in the future. Thus, Camel is on a very good way. Hopefully, we will see more cloud components, soon. I will continue to write articles about other Camel cloud components (and new AWS addons, ouf course). For instance, a component for the Platform as a Service (PaaS) product Google App Engine (GAE) is already available. If you have any additional important information, questions or other feedback, please write a comment. Thank you in advance… Best regards, Kai Wähner (Twitter: @KaiWaehner) [Content from my Blog: Cloud Integration with Apache Camel and Amazon Web Services (AWS): S3, SQS and SNS]

In my career spanning 15 years, the problem of Producer and Consumer is one that I have come across only a few times. In most programming cases, what we are doing is performing functions in a synchronous fashion where the JVM or the web container handles the complexities of multi-threading on its own. However, when writing certain kinds of use cases where we need this. Last week, I came acros one such use case that sent me 3 years back when I last did it. However, the way it was done last time was very different. When I first heard the problem statement, I knew instantly what was needed. However, my approach to doing it this time was going to be different from last time. It had simply to do with how I am viewing technology in my life today. I will not go into any non-technical side and will jump straight into the problem and its solution. I started to look at what existed in the market and did come across a couple of posts that helped me in channelizing my thoughts in the right way. Problem Statement We need a solution for a batch migration. We are migrating data form System 1 to System 2 and in the process we need to do three tasks: Load data from Database based on groups Process the data Update the records loaded in step#1 with modifications We have to handle 100s of groups and each group will have around 40K records. You can imagine the amount of time it would take if we were to perform this exercise in a synchronous fashion. Image here explains this problem in an effective way. Producer Consumer: The Problem Producer and Consumer Pattern Let us take a look at the Producer Consumer pattern to begin with. If you refer to the problem statement above and look at the image, we see that there are so many entities who are ready with their part of data. However, there are not enough workers who can process all the data. Hence, as the producers continue to line-up in a queue it just continues to grow. We see that the systems start to hog up threads and take a lot of time. Intermediate Solution Producer Consumer: The Intermediate approch We do have an intermediate solution. Refer to the image and you will immediately notice that the producers are piling up their work in a filing cabinet and the worker continues to pick it up as they get done with the previous task. However, this approach does have some glaring shortcomings: There is still one worker who has to do all the work. The external systems may be happy, but the task will still continue to exist until the worker has completed all of the tasks The producers will pile up their data in a queue and it needs resources to hold the same. Just as in this example the cabinet can fill up, the same can happen with the JVM resources too. We need to be careful how much data we are going to place in memory and in some cases it may not be much. The Solution Producer Consumer: The Solution The solution is what we see everyday in many places – like the cinema hall queue, Petrol Pumps etc. There are so many people who come in to book a ticket and based on how many people come in, the more people are added to issue tickets. Essentially, refer to image here and you will notice that Producers will keep adding their jobs to the cabinet and we have more workers to handle the work load. Java provided concurrency package to solve this issue. Till now, I have always worked on threading at a much lower level and this was first time I was going to work with this package. As I started to explore the web and read fellow bloggers with what they have to say, I came across one very good article. It helped in understanding the use of BlockingQueue in a very effective manner. However, the solutions provided by Dhruba would not have helped me in achieving the high throughput which is needed. So, I started to explore the use of ArrayBlockingQueue for the same. The Controller This is the first class where the contract between the producers and consumers are managed. The controller will setup 1 thread for the Producer and 2 threads for the consumer. Based on the needs we can create as many threads as we need; and even can even read the data from a properties or do some dynamic magic. For now, we will keep this simple. package com.kapil.techieforever.producerconsumer; import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.Executors; import java.util.concurrent.Future; public class TestProducerConsumer { public static void main(String args[]) { try { Broker broker = new Broker(); ExecutorService threadPool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(3); threadPool.execute(new Consumer("1", broker)); threadPool.execute(new Consumer("2", broker)); Future producerStatus = threadPool.submit(new Producer(broker)); // this will wait for the producer to finish its execution. producerStatus.get(); threadPool.shutdown(); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } I am using ExecuteService to create a thread pool and manage it. Instead of using the basic Thread implementation, this is a more effective way as it will handle the exiting and restarting the threads as needed. You will also notice that I am using Future class to get the status of the producer thread. This class is very effective and will halt my program from further execution. This is a nice way of replacing the “.join” method on the threads. Note: I am not using Future very effectively in this example; so you may have to try a few things as you feel fit. Also, you should note the Broker class which is being used as filing cabinet between the producers and consumers. We will see its implementation in just a little while. The Producer This class is responsible for producing the data that needs to be worked upon. package com.kapil.techieforever.producerconsumer; public class Producer implements Runnable { private Broker broker; public Producer(Broker broker) { this.broker = broker; } @Override public void run() { try { for (Integer i = 1; i < 5 + 1; ++i) { System.out.println("Producer produced: " + i); Thread.sleep(100); broker.put(i); } this.broker.continueProducing = Boolean.FALSE; System.out.println("Producer finished its job; terminating."); } catch (InterruptedException ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); } } } This class is doing the most simplest of things that it can do – adding an integer to the broker. Some key areas to note are: 1. There is a property on Broker which is updated in the end by the producer when its done producing. This is also known as the “final” or “poison” entry. This is used by the consumers to know that there are no more data coming up 2. I have used Thread.sleep to simulate that some producers may take more time to produce the data. You can tweak this value and see the consumers act The Consumer This class is responsible for reading the data from the broker and doing its job package com.kapil.techieforever.producerconsumer; public class Consumer implements Runnable { private String name; private Broker broker; public Consumer(String name, Broker broker) { this.name = name; this.broker = broker; } @Override public void run() { try { Integer data = broker.get(); while (broker.continueProducing || data != null) { Thread.sleep(1000); System.out.println("Consumer " + this.name + " processed data from broker: " + data); data = broker.get(); } System.out.println("Comsumer " + this.name + " finished its job; terminating."); } catch (InterruptedException ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); } } } This is again a simple class that reads the Integer and prints it on the console. However, key points to note are: 1. The loop to process data is an endless loop, that runs on two conditions – until the producer is consuming and there is some data with the broker 2. Again, the Thread.sleep is used to create effective and different scenarios The Broker package com.kapil.techieforever.producerconsumer; import java.util.concurrent.ArrayBlockingQueue; import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; public class Broker { public ArrayBlockingQueue queue = new ArrayBlockingQueue(100); public Boolean continueProducing = Boolean.TRUE; public void put(Integer data) throws InterruptedException { this.queue.put(data); } public Integer get() throws InterruptedException { return this.queue.poll(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS); } } The very first thing to note is that we are using ArrayBlockingQueue as the data holder. I am not going to say what this does, but insist you to read it on the JavaDocs here. however, I will explain that the producers are going to place the data in the queue and the consumers will fetch from the queue in FIFO format. But, if the producers are slow, the consumers will wait for data to come in and if the array is full, the producers will wait for it to fill up. Also, note that I am using the ‘poll’ function instead of get in the queue. This is to ensure that the consumers will not keep waiting for ever and the waiting will time out after a few seconds. This helps us in inter-communication and kill the consumers when all the data is processed. (Note: try replacing poll with get and you will see some interesting outputs). Code I have the code sitting on Google project hosting. Feel free to go across and download it from there. It is essentially an eclipse (Spring STS) project. You may also get additional packages and classes when you download it based on when you are downloading it. Feel free to look into those too and share your comments - You can browse the source code on the SVN browser or; - You can download it from the project itself From http://scratchpad101.com/2011/08/22/concurrency-pattern-producer-consumer/

when studying both the java nio and io api's, a question quickly pops into mind: when should i use io and when should i use nio? in this text i will try to shed some light on the differences between java nio and io, their use cases, and how they affect the design of your code. main differences of java nio and io the table below summarizes the main differences between java nio and io. i will get into more detail about each difference in the sections following the table. io nio stream oriented buffer oriented blocking io non blocking io selectors stream oriented vs. buffer oriented the first big difference between java nio and io is that io is stream oriented, where nio is buffer oriented. so, what does that mean? java io being stream oriented means that you read one or more bytes at a time, from a stream. what you do with the read bytes is up to you. they are not cached anywhere. furthermore, you cannot move forth and back in the data in a stream. if you need to move forth and back in the data read from a stream, you will need to cache it in a buffer first. java nio's buffer oriented approach is slightly different. data is read into a buffer from which it is later processed. you can move forth and back in the buffer as you need to. this gives you a bit more flexibility during processing. however, you also need to check if the buffer contains all the data you need in order to fully process it. and, you need to make sure that when reading more data into the buffer, you do not overwrite data in the buffer you have not yet processed. blocking vs. non-blocking io java io's various streams are blocking. that means, that when a thread invokes a read() or write(), that thread is blocked until there is some data to read, or the data is fully written. the thread can do nothing else in the meantime. java nio's non-blocking mode enables a thread to request reading data from a channel, and only get what is currently available, or nothing at all, if no data is currently available. rather than remain blocked until data becomes available for reading, the thread can go on with something else. the same is true for non-blocking writing. a thread can request that some data be written to a channel, but not wait for it to be fully written. the thread can then go on and do something else in the mean time. what threads spend their idle time on when not blocked in io calls, is usually performing io on other channels in the meantime. that is, a single thread can now manage multiple channels of input and output. selectors java nio's selectors allow a single thread to monitor multiple channels of input. you can register multiple channels with a selector, then use a single thread to "select" the channels that have input available for processing, or select the channels that are ready for writing. this selector mechanism makes it easy for a single thread to manage multiple channels. how nio and io influences application design whether you choose nio or io as your io toolkit may impact the following aspects of your application design: the api calls to the nio or io classes. the processing of data. the number of thread used to process the data. the api calls of course the api calls when using nio look different than when using io. this is no surprise. rather than just read the data byte for byte from e.g. an inputstream, the data must first be read into a buffer, and then be processed from there. the processing of data the processing of the data is also affected when using a pure nio design, vs. an io design. in an io design you read the data byte for byte from an inputstream or a reader. imagine you were processing a stream of line based textual data. for instance: name: anna age: 25 email: [email protected] phone: 1234567890 this stream of text lines could be processed like this: inputstream input = ... ; // get the inputstream from the client socket bufferedreader reader = new bufferedreader(new inputstreamreader(input)); string nameline = reader.readline(); string ageline = reader.readline(); string emailline = reader.readline(); string phoneline = reader.readline(); notice how the processing state is determined by how far the program has executed. in other words, once the first reader.readline() method returns, you know for sure that a full line of text has been read. the readline() blocks until a full line is read, that's why. you also know that this line contains the name. similarly, when the second readline() call returns, you know that this line contains the age etc. as you can see, the program progresses only when there is new data to read, and for each step you know what that data is. once the executing thread have progressed past reading a certain piece of data in the code, the thread is not going backwards in the data (mostly not). this principle is also illustrated in this diagram: java io: reading data from a blocking stream. a nio implementation would look different. here is a simplified example: bytebuffer buffer = bytebuffer.allocate(48); int bytesread = inchannel.read(buffer); notice the second line which reads bytes from the channel into the bytebuffer. when that method call returns you don't know if all the data you need is inside the buffer. all you know is that the buffer contains some bytes. this makes processing somewhat harder. imagine if, after the first read(buffer) call, that all what was read into the buffer was half a line. for instance, "name: an". can you process that data? not really. you need to wait until at leas a full line of data has been into the buffer, before it makes sense to process any of the data at all. so how do you know if the buffer contains enough data for it to make sense to be processed? well, you don't. the only way to find out, is to look at the data in the buffer. the result is, that you may have to inspect the data in the buffer several times before you know if all the data is inthere. this is both inefficient, and can become messy in terms of program design. for instance: bytebuffer buffer = bytebuffer.allocate(48); int bytesread = inchannel.read(buffer); while(! bufferfull(bytesread) ) { bytesread = inchannel.read(buffer); } the bufferfull() method has to keep track of how much data is read into the buffer, and return either true or false, depending on whether the buffer is full. in other words, if the buffer is ready for processing, it is considered full. the bufferfull() method scans through the buffer, but must leave the buffer in the same state as before the bufferfull() method was called. if not, the next data read into the buffer might not be read in at the correct location. this is not impossible, but it is yet another issue to watch out for. if the buffer is full, it can be processed. if it is not full, you might be able to partially process whatever data is there, if that makes sense in your particular case. in many cases it doesn't. the is-data-in-buffer-ready loop is illustrated in this diagram: java nio: reading data from a channel until all needed data is in buffer. summary nio allows you to manage multiple channels (network connections or files) using only a single (or few) threads, but the cost is that parsing the data might be somewhat more complicated than when reading data from a blocking stream. if you need to manage thousands of open connections simultanously, which each only send a little data, for instance a chat server, implementing the server in nio is probably an advantage. similarly, if you need to keep a lot of open connections to other computers, e.g. in a p2p network, using a single thread to manage all of your outbound connections might be an advantage. this one thread, multiple connections design is illustrated in this diagram: java nio: a single thread managing multiple connections. if you have fewer connections with very high bandwidth, sending a lot of data at a time, perhaps a classic io server implementation might be the best fit. this diagram illustrates a classic io server design: java io: a classic io server design - one connection handled by one thread. from http://tutorials.jenkov.com/java-nio/nio-vs-io.html

This refactoring is a specialization of Replace Data Value with Object: its goal is to replace a scalar or primitive structure (in this case, an ever-present array) with an object where we can host methods that act on those data. We have already seen a lightweight version of this refactoring in the code sample of that article: this time we go all the way to a real object, which has private fields representing the elements of the array. Usually the target of the refactoring is an associative array, but it may also be a numeric one, with a limited number of elements. When to introduce an object where a simple array already works? A clue that points to the need for this refactoring in numerical arrays is the fact that the elements are not homogeneous: they may be in type (all strings or integers) but not in meaning. For example, if two or them are flipped the array loses meaning or becomes very strange: array( 'FirstName LastName', '[email protected]' ) For associative arrays, the refactoring is viable everytime the number of elements is strictly fixed: array( 'name' => ... 'email' => ... ) Private fields are self-documenting, and they're easier to understand and maintain that the documentation of the keys of an array. Documentation on array structures always gets repeated in docblocks and doesn't have a real place to live in without a class; moreover, it's the death of encapsulation as nothing stops client code (even in the parts that should only pass the array to other methods) from accessing every single element of the array. And of course, a class is a place where to put methods, while an array cannot host them. Steps The technique described by Fowler for this refactoring is composed of many little steps: create a new class: it should contain only a public field encapsulating a little the array. Change the client code to use this new class in place of the primitive variable. In an iterative cycle, add a getter and a setter for each field and change client code. At each step, the relevant tests should be run. The methods should still use internally the elements of the array. When this phase has been completed, make the array private and see if the code still works. Add private fields to substitute the elements of the array, and change getters and setters accordingly. This change now ripples only into the source code of the new class. When you're finished, delete the field storing the array. Many little steps are often appropriate as the usage of the array spans over dozens of differente classes, and raises the risk of reaching an irreparably broken build. After you have reached the final state, an object with getters and setters, you can go on and remove methods accordingly for immutability or encapsulation; or move Foreign Methods to the new class now that it has become a first class citizen. Note that tests may encompass even end-to-end ones if the array was used on a large scale. For example, we replaced arrays with objects in the two upper layers of the application, forcing us to run tests at the end-to-end scale. Example In the initial state, a response is created by putting together an array. Client code is omitted for brevity, and only the creation part will be our target. true, 'content' => '{someJson:"ok"}' ); } } The array is moved onto a public field of a new class. true, 'content' => '{someJson:"ok"}' )); } } class HttpResponse { public $data; public function __construct(array $data) { $this->data = $data; } } We add setters (also getters in case we need them.) class HttpResponse { public $data; public function __construct(array $data) { $this->data = $data; } public function setSuccess($boolean) { $this->data['success'] = $boolean; } public function setContent($content) { $this->data['content'] = $content; } } The array becomes private, to check that only getters, setters and methods are really used externally. true, 'content' => '{someJson:"ok"}' )); $response->setSuccess(false); $response->setContent('{}'); $this->assertEquals(new HttpResponse(array( 'success' => false, 'content' => '{}' )), $response); } } class HttpResponse { private $data; public function __construct(array $data) { $this->setSuccess($data['success']); $this->setContent($data['content']); } public function setSuccess($boolean) { $this->data['success'] = $boolean; } public function setContent($content) { $this->data['content'] = $content; } } Private fields replace the array elements. We can start move logic into methods on the new class. class HttpResponse { private $success; private $content; public function __construct(array $data) { $this->setSuccess($data['success']); $this->setContent($data['content']); } public function setSuccess($boolean) { $this->success = $boolean; } public function setContent($content) { $this->content = $content; } }

Today I ran into a common situation: I needed to split a list into 2 sublists - elements that passed a predicate and elements that failed a predicate. I'm sure I've run into this problem several times, but it's been awhile and I'd forgotten what options were available to me. A quick look at http://clojure.github.com/clojure/ reveals several potential functions: partition-by, split-with, and group-by. partition-by From the docs: Usage: (partition-by f coll) Applies f to each value in coll, splitting it each time f returns a new value. Returns a lazy seq of partitions. Let's assume we have a collection of ints and we want to split them into a list of evens and a list of odds. The following REPL session shows the result of calling partition-by with our list of ints. user=> (partition-by even? [1 2 4 3 5 6]) ((1) (2 4) (3 5) (6)) The partition-by function works as described; unfortunately, it's not exactly what I'm looking for. I need a function that returns ((1 3 5) (2 4 6)). split-with From the docs: Usage: (split-with pred coll) Returns a vector of [(take-while pred coll) (drop-while pred coll)] The split-with function sounds promising, but a quick REPL session shows it's not what we're looking for. user=> (split-with even? [1 2 4 3 5 6]) [() (1 2 4 3 5 6)] As the docs state, the collection is split on the first item that fails the predicate - (even? 1). group-by From the docs: Usage: (group-by f coll) Returns a map of the elements of coll keyed by the result of f on each element. The value at each key will be a vector of the corresponding elements, in the order they appeared in coll. The group-by function works, but it gives us a bit more than we're looking for. user=> (group-by even? [1 2 4 3 5 6]) {false [1 3 5], true [2 4 6]} The result as a map isn't exactly what we desire, but using a bit of destructuring allows us to grab the values we're looking for. user=> (let [{evens true odds false} (group-by even? [1 2 4 3 5 6])] [evens odds]) [[2 4 6] [1 3 5]] The group-by results mixed with destructuring do the trick, but there's another option. juxt From the docs: Usage: (juxt f) (juxt f g) (juxt f g h) (juxt f g h & fs) Alpha - name subject to change. Takes a set of functions and returns a fn that is the juxtaposition of those fns. The returned fn takes a variable number of args, and returns a vector containing the result of applying each fn to the args (left-to-right). ((juxt a b c) x) => [(a x) (b x) (c x)] The first time I ran into juxt I found it a bit intimidating. I couldn't tell you why, but if you feel the same way - don't feel bad. It turns out, juxt is exactly what we're looking for. The following REPL session shows how to combine juxt with filter and remove to produce the desired results. user=> ((juxt filter remove) even? [1 2 4 3 5 6]) [(2 4 6) (1 3 5)] There's one catch to using juxt in this way, the entire list is processed with filter and remove. In general this is acceptable; however, it's something worth considering when writing performance sensitive code. From http://blog.jayfields.com/2011/08/clojure-partition-by-split-with-group.html

Varnish is a tool built to be an intermediate server in the HTTP chain, not an origin one like Apache or IIS. You can outsource caching, logging, zipping and other filters to Varnish, since they are not the main feature of an HTTP server like Apache. What we'll see today is how to work with Edge Side Includes in Varnish, as a way to compose dynamic pages from independently generated and cached fragments; we won't encounter logging or other features. If you are familiar with PHP, ESI is an (almost) standard for executing include()-like statements on a front end server like Varnish; the proxy is able not only to assembly pages but also to cache them according to different policies: a certain time, for a single user, and so on. Thijs Feryn and Alessandro Nadalin introduced me to Varnish and ESI respectively, for the first time. I recommend you to consider their blogs and talks as additional sources on these topics. Installation The default version of Varnish in Ubuntu 11.04 is instead 2.1, and apparently does not support ESI very much. Installation via packages means adding a public key and a repository to your list of software sources, and install the varnish package via apt-get or an equivalent command. You can install version 3.0.0 via packages, but only in Ubuntu LTS (10.04). A way that always works in these cases is the installation from sources. The linked page will list the package dependencies and give you a sequence of 3-4 commands to seamlessly compile varnish. I used checkinstall instead of make install to get a binary package that I can reuse later: $ sudo checkinstall -D --install=no --fstrans=no [email protected] --reset-uids=yes --nodoc --pkgname=varnish --pkgversion=3.0.0 --pkgrelease=201108231000 --arch=i386 After installation with dpkg, check that varnishd is available and of the right version: [10:18:17][giorgio@Desmond:~]$ varnishd -V varnishd (varnish-3.0.0 revision 3bd5997) Copyright (c) 2006 Verdens Gang AS Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Varnish Software AS Varnish needs minimal configuration: a server to point at. For our tests you can edit /etc/varnish/default.vcl and check (or add) the following: backend default { .host = "127.0.0.1"; .port = "80"; } You can execute ps -A | grep varnishd at any time to see if varnish is already in execution. Execution [09:55:18][giorgio@Desmond:~]$ sudo varnishd -f /etc/varnish/default.vcl -s malloc,1G -T 127.0.0.1:2000 -a 0.0.0.0:8080 storage_malloc: max size 1024 MB. 1 gigabyte of memory is allocated for keeping fragments in RAM. An administrative interface will respond on port 2000, and only be accessible from localhost. http://localhost:8080/ is the exposed HTTP server, and will point to http://localhost:80 as defined in the configuration. Look at man varnishd for more switched and to man vcl for additional explanations on the configuration language. A bit of ESI ESI is a technique for leveraging HTTP cache and at the same time build dynamic pages. The problem with today's pages is that they are highly dynamic: some sections change very often or according to the current user (Welcome, John Doe or the current posts timeline); some sections do not change at all for days (the navigation bar and the layout structure); some sections change in response to external events (the list of incoming messages only when a new message arrives). It would be ideal to set different caching configurations for all the page's fragments. But implementing this strategy in the application code is error-prone and means reinventing the wheel. To use HTTP cache you will be forced to load with Ajax every single fragment of the page, even a single paragraph. With ESI, your application produces only the pieces, and lets an implementor of the Edge Side Include specification like Varnish assemble the whole thing. Example HTML page (very static): Varnish will work on this page: . PHP page (really dynamic, can change at any time): Varnish will work on this page: 2011-08-23. No sign of Varnish interventions, and totally transparent for the client. And sometimes you can also throw away Zend_Layout and similar components to assemble HTML on the PHP side.

One of the rules of simple design is the necessity to minimize the number of moving parts, like classes and methods, as long as the tests are satisfied and we are not accepting duplication or feeling the lack of an explicit concept. Thus, a rule that aids simple design is to use primitive types unless a field has already some behavior attached: we don't create a class for the user's name or the user's password; we just use some strings. As we make progress, however, we must be able to revise our decisions via refactoring: if a field gains some logic, this behavior shouldn't be modelled by methods in the containing class, but by a new object. The code in this new class can be reused, while the containing object will change from case to case and you will end up duplicating the same methods. Transforming a scalar value into an object is the essence of the Replace Data Value with Object refactoring. In most of the cases, a Value Object or a Parameter Object come out as a result: while DDD pursue Value Objects as concepts in the domain layer, this refactoring is more general and can be applied anywhere. For instance, in a project we started introducing Data Transfer Objects to model the data sent by the controller to a Service Layer. Data values in PHP In PHP, all scalar values are by nature data values as they cannot host methods: string, integers, and booleans are proper scalar. arrays are not scalar in the Perl or mathematical sense, but they are still a primitive type. On the borderline, we find some simple objects used as data containers in PHP: ArrayObjects. SplHeap and other SPL data structures. The classes on the borderline may host methods, but the original class is out of reach for modification, and an indirection has to be introduced."Local Extension" Steps Create the new class: it should contain as a private field just the value you want to substitute. The methods you immediately need have to be chosen between a constructor, getters, and setters (where needed). Change the field in the containing class. Update the constructor to also create the new object and populate the field, or accept injection (a rarer case). Update the original getter to delegate to the new one. Update the original setter to delegate to the new one (where present) or to create a new object. Run tests at the functional level; the changes should be propagated to the construction phases, while the external usage should not change very much. Example In the initial state, magic arrays are passed around. It's very easy to build an array where a key is missing or is called incorrectly. newPassword(array( 'userId' => 42, 'oldPassword' => 'gismo', 'newPassword' => 'supersecret', 'repeatNewPassword' => 'supersecret' )); $this->markTestIncomplete('This refactoring is about the introduction of an object; it suffices that the test does not explode.'); } } class UserService { public function newPassword($changePasswordData) { /* it's not interesting to do something here */ } } After the introduction of an ArrayObject extension, a little type safety is ensure and we gained a place to put methods at a little cost. newPassword(new ChangePasswordCommand(array( 'userId' => 42, 'oldPassword' => 'gismo', 'newPassword' => 'supersecret', 'repeatNewPassword' => 'supersecret' ))); $this->markTestIncomplete('This refactoring is about the introduction of an object; it suffices that the test does not explode.'); } } class UserService { public function newPassword(ChangePasswordCommand $changePasswordData) { /* it's not interesting to do something here */ } } class ChangePasswordCommand extends ArrayObject { } We add methods to implement logic on this object; in this case, validation logic; in general cases, any kind of code that should not be duplicated by the different clients. For a stricter implementation, wrap an array or another data structure (scalars, SPL objects) instead of extending ArrayObject as you gain immutability and encapsulation (but this kind of objects need little encapsulation.) class ChangePasswordCommand extends ArrayObject { public function __construct($data) { if (!isset($data['userId'])) { throw new Exception('User id is missing.'); } parent::__construct($data); } public function getPassword() { if ($this['newPassword'] != $this['repeatNewPassword']) { throw new Exception('Password do not match.'); } return $this['newPassword']; } } Being this a refactoring however, this is the less invasive kind of introduction of objects you can make as the client code can still use the ArrayAccess interface and treat the object as a scalar array.

About one year ago I wrote a blog post about JavaScriptSerializer and the Serialize and Deserialize methods it supports. Note: This blog post has been in draft for sometime now, so I decided to complete it and publish it. There might be situation when you want to serialize to JSON string only specific properties of a given class. You can do that using JavaScriptSerializer in combination with LINQ. Let’s say we have the following class definition public class Customer { public string Name { get; set; } public string Surname { get; set; } public string Email { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } public bool Drinker { get; set; } public bool Smoker { get; set; } public bool Single { get; set; } } Next, lets create method that will create sample data for our demo private List GetListOfCustomers() { List customers = new List(); customers.Add(new Customer() { Name = "Hajan", Surname = "Selmani", Age = 25, Drinker = false, Smoker = false, Single = false, Email = "[email protected]" }); customers.Add(new Customer() { Name = "John", Surname = "Doe", Age = 29, Drinker = false, Smoker = true, Single = false, Email = "[email protected]" }); customers.Add(new Customer() { Name = "Mark", Surname = "Moris", Age = 34, Drinker = true, Smoker = true, Single = true, Email = "[email protected]" }); return customers; } So, we have three customers with some property values for each of them. Now, lets serialize some of their properties using JavaScriptSerializer. First, you must put the following directive: using System.Web.Script.Serialization; Next, we create list of customers that will get the returned value from GetListOfCustomers method and we create instance of JavaScriptSerializer class List customers = GetListOfCustomers(); JavaScriptSerializer serializer = new JavaScriptSerializer(); Now, lets say we want to serialize as JSON string and retrieve only the Age property data… We do that with only one simple line of code: //this will serialize only the 'Age' property string jsonString = serializer.Serialize(customers.Select(x => x.Age)); The result will be: Nice! Now, what if we want to serialize multiple properties at once, but not all class properties? string jsonStringMultiple = serializer.Serialize(customers.Select(x => new { x.Name, x.Surname, x.Age })); The result will be: You see, the result is an array of objects with the four properties and their corresponding values we have selected using the LINQ query above. You can see that integer and boolean values are without quotes, which is correct way of serialization. Now, you probably saw a difference somewhere? Namely, in the first example where we have selected only one property, there are only the values of the property (no property name), while in the second example we have the property name and it’s corresponding value… Why is it like that? It’s because in the second query, we use new { … } to specify multiple properties in the select statement. Therefore, the anonymous new { … } creates an object of each found item. So, if you are interested to make some more tests, run the following two lines of code: var customers1 = customers.Select(x => x.Name).ToList(); var customers2 = customers.Select(x=> new { x.Name } ).ToList(); and you will obviously see the difference. If we use the new { } way for single property selection, like in the following example string jsonString2 = serializer.Serialize(customers.Select(x => new { x.Age })); the result will be: The complete demo code used for this blog post: List customers = GetListOfCustomers(); JavaScriptSerializer serializer = new JavaScriptSerializer(); //this will serialize only the 'Age' property string jsonString = serializer.Serialize(customers.Select(x => x.Age )); string jsonStringMultiple = serializer.Serialize(customers.Select(x => new { x.Name, x.Surname, x.Age, x.Drinker })); var customers1 = customers.Select(x => x.Name).ToList(); var customers2 = customers.Select(x=> new { x.Name } ).ToList(); string jsonString2 = serializer.Serialize(customers.Select(x => new { x.Age })); You can download the demo project here.