Machine Learning Patterns and Anti-Patterns

Section 1

Introduction

By using patterns, machine learning (ML) practitioners can save time and resources by leveraging tried and true techniques that have been shown to work well. Anti-patterns, on the other hand, refer to common mistakes or pitfalls that can hinder the performance of ML models. This Refcard, comprising patterns and anti-patterns in ML, provides a set of guidelines that can help practitioners design and develop more effective models by leveraging successful techniques and avoiding common mistakes.

Section 2

Overview of Machine Learning

Machine learning and predictive analytics are two closely related fields that involve using data and statistical algorithms to make predictions or decisions. Machine learning algorithms learn patterns in data and use those patterns to make predictions or decisions. There are several types of ML algorithms, including supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning:

Supervised learning – The algorithm is trained on labeled data to learn a function that maps input to output.
Unsupervised learning – The algorithm tries to find patterns in unlabeled data without any predefined output variable.
Reinforcement learning – The algorithm learns by trial and error in an environment to maximize a reward function.

Common ML algorithms include linear regression, logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and neural networks.

Predictive analytics can be used in a wide range of industries and use cases, including tasks such as forecasting sales, predicting customer behavior, detecting fraud, and identifying at-risk patients. Both machine learning and predictive analytics rely heavily on data and statistical techniques to make predictions or decisions. While there is some overlap between the two fields, ML is focused on developing algorithms that can be learned from data, while predictive analytics is focused on using data to make predictions about future events or behaviors.

When developing ML models, key challenges include data quality, reproducibility, data scalability, and catering to multiple objectives.

Data quality is a measure of data's accuracy, completeness, consistency, and timeliness:

Data accuracy can be mitigated by understanding the source of the data and the potential errors in the data collection process.
Data completeness can be achieved by ensuring that the training data contains a varied representation of each label.
Data consistency can be achieved when the bias of each data collector can be eliminated.
Timeliness can be ascertained by keeping a timestamp about when the event occurs and when it is added to the database.

Reproducibility is a common challenge in machine learning, as the ML model weights are initialized with random values during training. Thus, the same model code with the same training data may produce slightly different results across each iteration. Since the models run in a dynamic business environment, it's critical to keep the ML models relevant by constantly updating the variables and to prevent any data drift.

The challenge of data scalability needs to be addressed during data collection and preprocessing, training, and serving. First, data engineers need to build data pipelines that can scale to handle big data, and then ML engineers need to ensure the right infrastructures like processors for seamless training. Data scientists need to be served with the right infrastructure support for continued scoring of the models.

Lastly, multiple teams in an organization might have different objectives and expectations from a model, despite using the same one.

Section 3

Patterns in Machine Learning

Design patterns provide a set of proven solutions to common problems that arise during the design and implementation of ML systems. They provide a systematic approach to designing and building ML systems, which can lead to more robust and scalable systems that are easier to maintain and update. An ML pattern is a technique, process, or design that has been observed to work well for a given problem or task. ML patterns can help guide the development of new models, as well as provide a framework for understanding how existing models work. In this section, we'll cover patterns for data representation, problem representation, model training, resilient serving, and reproducibility.

Data Representation

Data representation design patterns refer to common techniques and strategies for representing data in a way that is suitable for learning algorithms to process. The design patterns help transform raw input data into a form that can be more easily analyzed and understood by ML models.

Table 1

Patterns
Feature scaling	Scales input features to a common range, such as between 0 and 1, to avoid large discrepancies in feature magnitudes. Helps to improve the convergence rate and accuracy of learning algorithms.
One-hot encoding	Represents categorical variables in a numerical format. Involves representing each category as a binary vector, where only one element is "on," and the rest are "off."
Text representation	Represents in various formats like bag-of-words, which represents each document as a frequency vector of individual words. Other techniques: term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and word embeddings.
Time series representation	Represents using techniques like sliding window to divide the time series into overlapping windows and represents each window as a feature vector.
Image representation	Represents in various formats, such as pixel values, color histograms, or convolutional neural network (CNN) features.

These data representation design patterns are used to transform raw data into a form that is suitable for learning algorithms. The choice of which data representation technique to use depends on the type of data being used and the specific requirements of the learning algorithm being applied.

Problem Representation

These patterns are common strategies and techniques used to represent a problem effectively in a way that can be solved by a machine learning model.

Table 2

Patterns
Feature engineering	Selects and transforms raw data into features that can be used by an ML model.
Dimensionality reduction	Reduces the number of features in the dataset.
Resampling	Balances the class distribution in the dataset. Helps improve the performance of the model when there is an imbalance in the class distribution.

The choice of problem representation design pattern depends on the specific requirements of the problem, such as the type of data, the size of the dataset, and the available computing resources.

Model Training

Model training patterns are common strategies and techniques used to design and train machine learning models effectively. These design patterns are intended to improve the performance, scalability, and interpretability of machine learning models, as well as to reduce the risk of overfitting or underfitting.

Table 3

Patterns
Cross-validation	Assesses the performance of an ML model by partitioning the data into training and validation sets. Reduces overfitting and ensures that the model can generalize to new data.
Regularization	Reduces overfitting by adding a penalty term to the loss function of the ML model. Ensures that the model does not memorize the training data and can generalize to new data.
Ensemble methods	Combine multiple ML models to improve their performance. Reduce variance and improve the accuracy of the model.
Transfer learning	Uses pre-trained models to improve the performance of a new ML model. Reduces the amount of data required to train a new model and improve its performance.
Deep learning architectures	Use multiple layers to learn hierarchical representations of the data. Improve the performance and interpretability of the model by learning more complex features of the data.

Resilient Serving

These patterns are common strategies and techniques for deploying machine learning models in production and ensuring that they are reliable, scalable, and resilient to failures. Resilient serving is essential for building production-grade ML systems that can handle large volumes of traffic and provide accurate predictions in real time.

Table 4

Patterns
Model serving architecture	Overall design of the system that serves the ML model. Common architectures include microservices, serverless, and containerized deployments. Choice of architecture often depends on the specific requirements of the system, such as scalability, reliability, and cost.
Load balancing	Distributes incoming requests across multiple instances of the ML model. Improves the performance and reliability of the system by distributing the workload evenly and avoiding overloading any single instance.
Caching	Stores frequently accessed data in memory or disk to reduce the response time of the system. Improves performance and scalability of the system by reducing the number of requests that need to be processed by the ML model.
Monitoring and logging	Essential for identifying and diagnosing problems in the system. Common monitoring techniques include health checks, metrics collection, and log aggregation. Improve the reliability and resilience of the system by providing real-time feedback on the system's performance and health.
Failover and redundancy	Ensure that the system remains available in the event of failure. Common techniques include standby instances, automatic failover, and data replication. Improve the resilience and reliability of the system by ensuring that the system can continue to serve requests, even in the event of a failure.

The choice of design pattern often depends on the specific requirements of the system, such as performance, reliability, scalability, and cost.

Reproducibility

Reproducibility design patterns are a set of practices and techniques used to ensure that the results of a machine learning experiment can be reproduced by others. Reproducibility is essential for building trust in ML research and ensuring that the results can be used in practice.

Table 5

Patterns
Version control	Tracks changes to code, data, and experiment configurations over time. Ensures that the results can be reproduced by others by providing a history of changes and allowing others to track the same versions of code and data used in the original experiment.
Containerization	Packages an experiment and its dependencies into a self-contained environment that can be run on any machine. Ensures that the results can be reproduced by others by providing a consistent environment for running the experiment.
Documentation	Essential for ensuring that the experiment can be understood and reproduced by others. Common practices include documenting the experiment's purpose, methodology, data sources, and analysis techniques.
Hyperparameter tuning	The process of searching for the best set of hyperparameters for a machine learning model. Ensures that the results can be reproduced by others by providing a systematic and repeatable process for finding the best hyperparameters.
Code readability	Essential for ensuring that the code used in the experiment can be understood and modified by others. Common practices include using descriptive variable names, adding comments and documentation, and following coding standards.

Avoiding MLOps Mistakes

Common mistakes and pitfalls that can occur during the design and implementation of MLOps are as follows:

Table 6

MLOps Challenges
Model drift	Occurs when the performance of an ML model deteriorates over time due to changes in the input data distribution. To avoid model drift, regularly monitor the performance of the model and retrain it as needed.
Lack of automation	Occurs when MLOps processes are not fully automated, leading to errors, inconsistencies, and delays. To avoid this, automate as much of the MLOps process as possible, including data preprocessing and model training, evaluation, and deployment.
Data bias	Occurs when the training data is biased, leading to biased or inaccurate models. To avoid data bias, carefully curate the training data to ensure that it represents the target population and that is the data has no unintentional bias.
Lack of documentation	Occurs when MLOps processes are not well-documented, leading to confusion and errors. To avoid this, document all aspects of the MLOps process, including data sources; preprocessing steps; and model training, evaluation, and deployment.
Poor model selection	Occurs when the wrong ML algorithm is selected for a given problem, leading to suboptimal performance. To avoid this, carefully evaluate different ML algorithms and select the one best suited for the given problem.
Overfitting	Occurs when the ML model is too complex and fits the training data too closely, leading to poor generalization performance on new data. To avoid overfitting, regularize the model and use techniques such as cross-validation to ensure that the model generalizes well to new data.

By avoiding these MLOps mistakes and pitfalls, machine learning engineers can build more robust, scalable, and accurate machine learning systems that deliver value to the business.

Section 4

Anti-Patterns in Machine Learning

Machine learning anti-patterns are commonly occurring solutions to problems that appear to be the right thing to do, but ultimately lead to bad outcomes or suboptimal results. They are the pitfalls or mistakes that are commonly made in the development or application of ML models. These mistakes can lead to poor performance, biases, overfitting, or other problems.

Phantom Menace

The term "Phantom Menace" comes from instances when differences between training and test data may not be immediately apparent during the development and evaluation phase, but it can become a problem when the model is deployed in the real world.

The training/serving skew occurs when the statistical properties of the training data are different from the distribution of the data that the model is exposed to during inference. This difference can result in poor performance when the model is deployed, even if it performs well during training. For example, if the training data for an image classification model consists mostly of daytime photos, but the model is later deployed to classify nighttime photos, the model may not perform well due to this mismatch in data distributions.

To mitigate training/serving skew, it is important to ensure that the training data is representative of the data that the model will encounter during inference, and to monitor the model's performance in production to detect any performance degradation caused by distributional shift. Techniques like data augmentation, transfer learning, and model calibration can also help improve the model's ability to generalize to new data.

The Sentinel

The "Sentinel" anti-pattern is a technique used to validate models or data in an online environment before deploying them to production. It is a separate model or set of rules that is used to evaluate the performance of the primary model or data in a production environment. The purpose is to act as a "safety net" and prevent any incorrect or undesirable outputs from being released into the real world. It can detect issues such as data drift, concept drift, or performance degradation and provide alerts to the development team to investigate and resolve the issue before it causes harm.

For example, in the context of an online recommendation system, a sentinel model can be used to evaluate the recommendations made by the primary model before they are shown to the user. If the sentinel model detects that the recommendations are significantly different from what is expected, it can trigger an alert for the development team to investigate and address any issues before the recommendations are shown to the user.

Figure 1: The Sentinel

The use of a sentinel can help mitigate risks associated with model or data degradation, concept drift, and other issues that can occur when deploying machine learning models in production. However, it is important to design the sentinel model carefully to ensure that it provides adequate protection without unnecessarily delaying the deployment of the primary model.

The Hulk

The "Hulk" anti-pattern is a technique where the entire model training, validation, and evaluation process is performed offline, and only the final output or prediction is published for use in a production environment. This approach is also sometimes referred to as offline precompute.

"Hulk" comes from the idea that the model is developed and tested in isolation, like the character Bruce Banner who becomes the Hulk when isolated from others.

Figure 2: The Hulk

To mitigate the risks associated with the Hulk anti-pattern, it is important to validate the model's performance in a production environment and continuously monitor the data and model performance to detect and address any issues that may arise. This can include techniques such as data logging, monitoring, and feedback mechanisms to enable the model to adapt and improve over time.

The Lumberjack

The "Lumberjack" (also known as feature logging) anti-pattern refers to a technique where features are logged online from within an application, and the resulting logs are used to train ML models. Similar to how lumberjacks cut down trees, process them into logs, and then use the logs to build structures, in feature logging, the input data is "cut down" into individual features that are then processed and used to build a model, as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: The Lumberjack

To mitigate the risks associated with the Lumberjack anti-pattern, it is important to carefully design the feature logging process to capture relevant information and avoid biases or errors. This can include techniques such as feature selection, feature engineering, and data validation to ensure that the logged features accurately represent the underlying data. It is also important to validate the model's performance in a production environment and continuously monitor the data and model performance to detect and address any issues that may arise.

The Time Machine

The "Time Machine" anti-pattern is a technique where historical data is used to train a model, and the resulting model is then used to make predictions about future data (hence the name). This approach is also known as time-based modeling or temporal modeling.

To mitigate the risks associated with the Time Machine anti-pattern, it is important to carefully design the modeling process to capture changes in the underlying data over time and to validate the model's performance on recent data. This can include techniques such as using sliding windows, incorporating time-dependent features, and monitoring the model's performance over time.

Techniques to Detect Machine Learning Anti-Patterns

The following techniques help to identify and mitigate common mistakes and pitfalls that can arise in the development and deployment of ML models.

Table 7

Technique	Description
Cross-validation	Assess an ML model's performance by splitting the dataset into training and testing sets. Detect overfitting and underfitting, which are common anti-patterns in ML.
Bias detection	Bias is a common anti-pattern in ML that can lead to unfair or inaccurate predictions. ML techniques like fairness metrics, demographic parity, and equalized odds can be used to detect and mitigate bias in models.
Feature selection	Identify the most important features or variables in a dataset. Detect and address anti-patterns like irrelevant features and feature redundancy, which can lead to overfitting and reduced model performance.
Model interpretability	ML techniques like decision trees, random forests, and LIME can be used to provide interpretability and transparency to ML models. Detect and address anti-patterns like black-box models, which are difficult to interpret and can lead to reduced trust and performance.
Performance metrics	ML models can be evaluated using a variety of performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC-ROC. Monitoring these metrics over time can help detect changes in model performance and identify anti-patterns like model drift and overfitting.

Section 5

Conclusion

The present Refcard on ML patterns and anti-patterns took off by walking the readers through an overview of ML models, which comprises common challenges like data quality, reproducibility, data scalability, and catering to multiple objectives of the organization. Subsequently, this Refcard covers five key patterns, ways to avoid MLOps mistakes, five key anti-patterns, and techniques to detect ML anti-patterns.

Thus, the Refcard provides substantial knowledge and direction to the ML engineers and data scientists to be cognizant of the patterns and anti-patterns in machine learning and take the necessary measures to avoid mistakes.

References:

Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building (Vol. 1). New York: Oxford University Press.
Brown, W. H., Malveau, R. C., McCormick, H. W. S., & Mowbray, T. J. (1998). AntiPatterns: refactoring software, architectures, and projects in crisis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Barbez, A., Khomh, F., & Guéhéneuc, Y. G. (2020). "A machine-learning based ensemble method for anti-patterns detection." Journal of Systems and Software, 161, 110486.
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Johnson, R. E., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Pearson Deutschland GmbH.
Tuggener, L., Amirian, M., Benites, F., von Däniken, P., Gupta, P., Schilling, F. P., & Stadelmann, T. (2020). "Design patterns for resource-constrained automated deep-learning methods." AI, 1(4), 510-538.
Lakshmanan, V., Robinson, S., & Munn, M. (2020). Machine learning design patterns. O'Reilly Media.
Buschmann, F., Meunier, R., Rohnert, H., Sommerlad, P., & Stal, M. (2008). Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns, Volume 1 (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
Muralidhar, N., Muthiah, S., Butler, P., Jain, M., Yu, Y., Burne, K., ... & Ramakrishnan, N. (2021). "Using antipatterns to avoid MLOps mistakes." arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.00079.