Fast Key-Value Store With PostgreSQL
Explore Key-Value store features which augments the already fantastic NoSQL tool set that PostgreSQL offers.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.Join For Free
Introduction to Key-Value Store
We have seen several features in PostgreSQL that goes beyond relational storage, such as:
This article will explore the key-value store feature, which is less popular, but still plays an integral part in PostgreSQL's NoSQL capabilities.
Setting Up PostgreSQL With Extension and Data
Unlike JSON and JSONB, the key-value store comes as a separate extension called
HStore. We can install it right away as it comes bundled with PostgreSQL installation itself.
CREATE EXTENSION HSTORE
This will enable the key-value store extension.
Note: Extension can be enabled only with superuser access. The system will throw an error otherwise.
Creating Table and HStore Columns
Let's create a simple demo table where we maintain scores of people in key-value fashion. To do that, we need to create the data type itself as
CREATE TABLE hstore_example (score hstore)
We do not need to specify the key-value structure type (i.e., whether the key is an
text, as the default type will always be
text). Proper datacasting is necessary either at the database level or application level for manipulation. This is similar to the JSON data type, where all of the data is just
Populating Test Data
Inserting data into
hstore columns is pretty straightforward.
INSERT INTO hstore_example values('"Jason" => 100'); INSERT INTO hstore_example values('"Jack" => 200'); INSERT INTO hstore_example values('"Perry" => 150');
Getting Started with Key-Value Queries
We can query for rows by searching for keys.
SELECT * FROM hstore_example WHERE score ? 'Jason';
Get a value for a particular key,
SELECT score -> 'Jason' as score FROM hstore_example WHERE score -> 'Jason' is NOT NULL
There are several powerful operators present that can help us do a variety of data manipulations without having to handle them in application logic. We should always do data manipulation at the database level rather than at the application level for a variety of reasons such as performance, security, etc.,
Indexing for Faster Queries
HStore extension supports indexes of the
GIN type. We can create these indexes as follows,
CREATE INDEX hstore_example_idx ON hstore_example USING GIN (score)
This is similar in speed and power to the
GIN index we can create for the
JSON type. It can significantly speed up queries, particularly if the keys are nested and searching is not straightforward with normal comparisons. These indexes are considerably smaller than a JSON GIN and can efficiently operate from the memory/cache for quicker lookups.
On the other hand, an index will slow down the writes, so a proper tradeoff has to be considered before we extensively use an index. Benchmarking should be done before taking an application/solution to production.
Internal Structure of HStore
HStore is internally stored as a
varlena. Similar to JSON, the whole field has to be read from the disk to do any read/modifications. As a result,
HStore is not really optimized compared to traditional key-value stores such as Redis and Memcache.
The documentation about TOAST table structure is also highly recommended on why the reads/writes can only be done as a whole field rather than partial updates, https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/storage-toast.html
For this reason, if the K/V structure is complex and nested, we are better off storing it as a proper
Potential use case scenarios can be similar but not limited to the below examples,
- Maintaining a cache.
- Fast read/update scenarios such as maintaining an API rate limiter.
- Maintaining scores/simple time-series data.
HStore is not a replacement for Key-Value stores; they are much more optimized for different use cases. But as already mentioned, these features exist in PostgreSQL because there are many situations where using a separate data store would be an overkill and a maintenance issue. We can use PostgreSQL's NoSQL capabilities as a bridge to fill that gap. If the business expands, we can migrate to a different database. Still, until then, we can comfortably use PostgreSQL, which provides ACID-compliant NoSQL features without the additional overhead of maintaining a separate database.
Published at DZone with permission of Everett Berry. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.