If you go to Google and search for "measuring software developer productivity" you will find a whole lot of nothing. Seriously -- nothing. Nick Hodges, Measuring Developer Productivity By now we should all know that we don’t know how to measure programmer productivity. There is no clear cut way to measure which programmers are doing a better or faster job, or to compare productivity across teams. We “know” who the stars on a team are, who we can depend on to deliver, and who is struggling. And we know if a team is kicking ass – or dragging their asses. But how do we prove it? How can we quantify it? All sorts of stupid and evil things can happen when you try to measure programmer productivity. But let’s do it anyways. We’re Writing More Code, So We Must Be More Productive Developers are paid to write code. So why not measure how much code they write – how many lines of code get delivered? Because we've known since the 1980s that this is a lousy way to measure productivity. Lines of code can’t be compared across languages (of course), or even between programmers using the same language working in different frameworks or following different styles. Which is why Function Points were invented – an attempt to standardize and compare the size of work in different environments. Sounds good, but Function Points haven’t made it into the mainstream, and probably never will – very few people know how Function Points work, how to calculate them and how they should be used. The more fundamental problem is that measuring productivity by lines (or Function Points or other derivatives) typed doesn’t make any sense. A lot of important work in software development, the most important work, involves thinking and learning – not typing. The best programmers spend a lot of time understanding and solving hard problems, or helping other people understand and solve hard problems, instead of typing. They find ways to simplify code and eliminate duplication. And a lot of the code that they do write won’t count anyways, as they iterate through experiments and build prototypes and throw all of it away in order to get to an optimal solution. The flaws in these measures are obvious if we consider the ideal outcomes: the fewest lines of code possible in order to solve a problem, and the creation of simplified, common processes and customer interactions that reduce complexity in IT systems. Our most productive people are those that find ingenious ways to avoid writing any code at all. Jez Humble, The Lean Enterprise This is clearly one of those cases where size doesn’t matter. We’re Making (or Saving) More Money, so We Must Be Working Better We could try to measure productivity at a high level using profitability or financial return on what each team is delivering, or some other business measure such as how many customers are using the system – if developers are making more money for the business (or saving more money), they must be doing something right. Using financial measures seems like a good idea at the executive level, especially now that “every company is a software company”. These are organizational measures that developers should share in. But they are not effective – or fair – measures of developer productivity. There are too many business factors are outside of the development team’s control. Some products or services succeed even if the people delivering them are doing a lousy job, or fail even if the team did a great job. Focusing on cost savings in particular leads many managers to cut people and try “to do more with less” instead of investing in real productivity improvements. And as Martin Fowler points out there is a time lag, especially in large organizations – it can sometimes take months or years to see real financial results from an IT project, or from productivity improvements. We need to look somewhere else to find meaningful productivity metrics. We’re Going Faster, so We Must Be Getting More Productive Measuring speed of development – velocity in Agile – looks like another way to measure productivity at the team level. After all, the point of software development is to deliver working software. The faster that a team delivers, the better. But velocity (how much work, measured in story points or feature points or ideal days, that the team delivers in a period of time) is really a measure of predictability, not productivity. Velocity is intended to be used by a team to measure how much work they can take on, to calibrate their estimates and plan their work forward. Once a team’s velocity has stabilized, you can measure changes in velocity within the team as a relative measure of productivity. If the team’s velocity is decelerating, it could be an indicator of problems in the team or the project or the system. Or you can use velocity to measure the impact of process improvements, to see if training or new tools or new practices actually make the team’s work measurably faster. But you will have to account for changes in the team, as people join or leave. And you will have to remember that velocity is a measure that only makes sense within a team – that you can’t compare velocity between teams. Although this doesn't stop people from trying. Some shops use the idea of a well-known reference story that all teams in a program understand and use to base their story points estimates on. As long as teams aren't given much freedom on how they come up with estimates, and as long as the teams are working in the same project or program with the same constraints and assumptions, you might be able to do rough comparison of velocity between teams. But Mike Cohn warns that If teams feel the slightest indication that velocities will be compared between teams there will be gradual but consistent “point inflation.” ThoughtWorks explains that velocity <> productivity in their latest Technology Radar: We continue to see teams and organizations equating velocity with productivity. When properly used, velocity allows the incorporation of “yesterday's weather” into a team’s internal iteration planning process. The key here is that velocity is an internal measure for a team, it is just a capacity estimate for that given team at that given time. Organizations and managers who equate internal velocity with external productivity start to set targets for velocity, forgetting that what actually matters is working software in production. Treating velocity as productivity leads to unproductive team behaviors that optimize this metric at the expense of actual working software. Next: Just Stay Busy, Measure Outcomes, not Output; and more... Just Stay Busy One manager I know says that instead of trying to measure productivity “We just stay busy. If we’re busy working away like maniacs, we can look out for problems and bottlenecks and fix them and keep going”. In this case you would measure – and optimize for – cycle time, like in Lean manufacturing. Cycle time – turnaround time or change lead time, from when the business asks for something to when they get it in their hands and see it working – is something that the business cares about, and something that everyone can see and measure. And once you start looking closely, waste and delays will show up as you measure waiting/idle time, value-add vs. non-value-add work, and process cycle efficiency (total value-add time / total cycle time). “It’s not important to define productivity, or to measure it. It’s much more important to identify non-productive activities and drive them down to zero.” Erik Simmons, Intel Teams can use Kanban to monitor – and limit – work in progress and identify delays and bottlenecks. And Value Stream Mapping to understand the steps, queues, delays and information flows which need to be optimized. To be effective, you have to look at the end-to-end process from when requests are first made to when they are delivered and running, and optimize all along the path, not just the work in development. This may mean changing how the business prioritizes, how decisions are made and who makes the decisions. In almost every case we have seen, making one process block more efficient will have a minimal effect on the overall value stream. Since rework and wait times are some of the biggest contributors to overall delivery time, adopting “agile” processes within a single function (such as development) generally has little impact on the overall value stream, and hence on customer outcomes. Jezz Humble, The Lean Enterprise The down side of equating delivery speed with productivity? Optimizing for cycle time/speed of delivery by itself could lead to problems over the long term, because this incents people to think short term, and to cut corners and take on technical debt. We’re Writing Better Software, so We Must Be More Productive “The paradox is that when managers focus on productivity, long-term improvements are rarely made. On the other hand, when managers focus on quality, productivity improves continuously.” John Seddon, quoted in The Lean Enterprise We know that fixing bugs later costs more. Whether it’s 10x or 100+x, it doesn't really matter. And that projects with fewer bugs are delivered faster – at least up to a point of diminishing returns for safety-critical and life-critical systems. And we know that the costs of bugs and mistakes in software to the business can be significant. Not just development rework costs and maintenance and support costs. But direct costs to the business. Downtime. Security breaches. Lost IP. Lost customers. Fines. Lawsuits. Business failure. It’s easy to measure that you are writing good – or bad – software. Defect density. Defect escape rates (especially defects – including security vulnerabilities – that escape to production). Static analysis metrics on the code base, using tools like SonarQube. And we know how to write good software - or we should know by now. But is software quality enough to define productivity? Devops – Measuring and Improving IT Performance Devops teams who build/maintain and operate/support systems extend productivity from dev into ops. They measure productivity across two dimensions that we have already looked at: speed of delivery, and quality. But devops isn't limited to just building and delivering code – instead it looks at performance metrics for end-to-end IT service delivery: Delivery Throughput: deployment frequency and lead time, maximizing the flow of work into production Service Quality: change failure rate and MTTR It’s not a matter of just delivering software faster or better. It’s dev and ops working together to deliver services better and faster, striking a balance between moving too fast or trying to do too much at a time, and excessive bureaucracy and over-caution resulting in waste and delays. Dev and ops need to share responsibility and accountability for the outcome, and for measuring and improving productivity and quality. As I pointed out in an earlier post this makes operational metrics more important than developer metrics. According to recent studies, success in achieving these goals lead to improvements in business success: not just productivity, but market share and profitability. Measure Outcomes, not Output In The Lean Enterprise (which you can tell I just finished reading), Jez Jumble talks about the importance of measuring productivity by outcome – measuring things that matter to the organization – not output. “It doesn't matter how many stories we complete if we don’t achieve the business outcomes we set out to achieve in the form of program-level target conditions”. Stop trying to measure individual developer productivity. It’s a waste of time. Everyone knows who the top performers are. Point them in the right direction, and keep them happy. Everyone knows the people who are struggling. Get them the help that they need to succeed. Everyone knows who doesn't fit in. Move them out. Measuring and improving productivity at the team or (better) organization level will give you much more meaningful returns. When it comes to productivity: Measure things that matter – things that will make a difference to the team or to the organization. Measures that are clear, important, and that aren't easy to game. Use metrics for good, not for evil – to drive learning and improvement, not to compare output between teams or to rank people. I can see why measuring productivity is so seductive. If we could do it we could assess software much more easily and objectively than we can now. But false measures only make things worse. Martin Fowler, CannotMeasureProductivity

We love Git Flow. It’s awesome to have a standard release process where everybody is using the same terminology and tooling. It’s also great to have out-of-the-box answers to the same questions that get asked at the start of every project. For example: “How are we going to develop features in isolation?” “How are we going to separate release candidates from ongoing development?” “How are we going to deal with hotfixes?” Now it’s enough to just say ‘We use Git Flow’, and everybody’s on the same page. Well, mostly. Whilst Git Flow is terrific for managing features and separating release candidates from ongoing development, things get a little hazier when it comes time to actually release to production. This is because of a mismatch between the way that Git Flow works and another practice that is common in large development projects: immutable build artifacts. Immutable what? On most enterprise projects I work on these days, it’s considered a pretty good idea to progress exactly the same build artifact through testing, pre-production and into production. It doesn’t matter whether it’s a JAR file, WAR file, tar.gz file, or something more exotic – the key point is that you build it once, then deploy the same thing to each downstream environment. If you find a bug during this journey, you fix the bug, build a whole new artifact, and start the process again. In the absence of any established terminology, let’s just call these things immutable build artifacts. (Note that you’ll still need a separate, external file for those things that have to be different between environments, but by keeping the amount of stuff in that file to an absolute minimum, you’ll minimise your potential exposure to variances between environments.) Without immutable build artifacts, many development managers will start to sweat nervously. This is usually because at some stage in their careers they’ve been up at 2am in the morning prising apart build artifacts and trying to understand what changed between the pre-prod build (which worked just fine) and the current prod build (which is inexplicably failing). A bunch of things can cause this sort of problem. For example, it could be that somebody managed to sneak some change in between the two builds, or that some downstream build dependency changed between the two builds, or even that somebody tweaked the build process between the two builds. ‘That’ll never happen to me’, I hear you say, ‘if everybody follows our development methodology correctly’. And therein lies the problem: it’s difficult to absolutely guarantee that a developer won’t at the last minute do something stupid, like slip something into the wrong branch, upload an incorrectly-versioned downstream dependency, or mess with your buildbox configuration. My point is this: why open yourself up to the risk at all, when having a single artifact will eliminate a whole class of potential defects? Now for the actual problem A while back, I was working on a project using both Git Flow and immutable builds. A junior developer came to me looking confused. He was trying to understand when it would be OK for him to finish the current Git Flow release. The testers had just signed off on the current build. But if he finished the release, Git Flow was going to merge the release branch into master – and strictly speaking, he should create a new build from that. But if he created a new build, the testers were going to want to test it. If they found a problem, the fix was going to have to happen in a new release branch. But then when he closed that release, he was going to have to do a new build from master, which the testers would want to test again, right? And then, if they found a bug in that… I admired his highly conscientious approach to his work, but worried that his mind was going to disintegrate as it spun around this build-management paradox. I also had to acknowledge that he had stumbled head first into something that I had been wilfully ignoring in the hope that it would resolve itself; namely, the fundamental mismatch between Git Flow and the concept of immutable builds. Put simply, Git Flow works on the premise that production builds will only be done from the master branch. In contrast, immutable builds work on the premise that production builds will be done from either a release branch or a hotfix branch. There is no perfect way to work around this mismatch. The pragmatic solution Put bluntly, if you want truly immutable builds, then you should do them from the release or hotfix branch rather than master. However, because this runs contrary to how Git Flow works, there are a couple of important consequences to keep in mind. 1. Concurrent hotfixes and releases require special handling If you start and then finish a hotfix whilst a release branch is in process, then that hotfix’s changes won’t automatically be brought into the release branch by Git Flow. This means that a subsequent build from the release branch which goes into production won’t include the hotfix changes. Here’s a diagram illustrating the problem: Note that the inverse problem would apply if you tried to start a release whilst a hotfix was in progress. Thankfully, Git Flow will not let you have two release branches in progress at the same time, so we don’t have to worry about that particular possibility. (If you’re wondering how Git Flow avoids these scenarios in its regular usage, remember that it always merges back into master when a release or hotfix is finished, and that you’re supposed to always build from master. Consequently, if you’re building from master post-release or post-hotfix, you’ll always be getting the latest changes into the build.) The problem of concurrent hotfixes and releases can be solved by merging the hotfix branch into the release branch just before the hotfix branch gets finished (or vice-versa if you started a release whilst a hotfix was in progress). Here’s what it looks like: However, you will need to remember to do this merge manually because Git Flow won’t do it for you. 2. Version tags will be incorrect by default When you finish a release or hotfix, Git Flow merges the corresponding branch back into master, and then tags the resultant merge commit on master with the version number. However, because your immutable artifact will have been built from the release/hotfix branch, the commit SHA for the version tag in Git will be different from the SHA that the artifact was actually built from. Continuing on from our previous example: You may or may not care about this, for a number of reasons. Firstly, from the perspective of Git Flow, the merge commit on master should never have any changes in it. The only scenario that might lead to it having changes is if you have run concurrent hotfix and release branches (as described in the previous section) and forgotten to merge them prior to finishing. And you’llnever forget to do that now will you? :) Secondly, in the likely event that you are using some sort of continuous integration server to produce your builds, that server can probably associate its own number with each build, and stamp the resultant artifact with that number. The CI server will probably also have recorded the SHA that each build was done from. So from the artifact you could probably work backwards to the SHA that was used to produce it. If you’re nevertheless wary of the confusion that this backtracking process might introduce when trying to debug a production issue at 2am in the morning, you might still insist on having correct version tags. In that case the best thing I can think of is to manually create the tag on the release/hotfix branch yourself before finishing it and then, when finishing the release, run git flow [release/hotfix] finish with the -n option to stop it from trying to create the tag again (which would fail because the tag now already exists). I’m on a roll with my diagrams, so what the heck, let’s do one more: Wrapping Up On balance, I think the benefits of having immutable builds outweigh the costs of deviating from the Git Flow way of doing things. However, you do have to be aware of a couple of problematic scenarios. We’ll be experimenting in coming months with using Git Flow with our own immutable builds, and will let you know if anything else weird pops up. Who knows, perhaps we’ll even end up with our own version of Git Flow. Either way, I’d be interested in hearing from anybody else who has had the same problem.

Today I am going to discuss about creating a Grid in Android having image and associated checkbox. The idea is to have Grid with clickable images and checkbox. When an image is clicked the corresponding checkbox state is toggled. It is relatively easy to add custom items to the Grid. But its bit tricky to add clickable images and check/uncheck checkbox on click of the image. If you want to make the images clickable and check/uncheck the checkbox on image click, that is not that straightforward. In this article, I will take you through the creation of the Grid with clickable images and checkboxes. Creating a new project Open Eclipse and create a new android project. Choose a blank activity for the project. Create main Grid layout Open the layout file for the main activity and add a GridView component to it. Create Custom layout for grid items The next step is to create a custom layout that will be used to represent each item of the grid. Here we will define a custom layout using an ImageView and CheckBox android components. Create a new layout file named griditem.xml and add ImageView and CheckBox components to it as shown below: Adding Images to project For this sample project I am adding images to the project itself for use in the grid. But you can source those from database or any other content provider supported by android. In Android project there are few drawable-* folders under res folder. These are used for storing various resources used by the project. We can put images in any of these folders and Android SDK will copy them to other folders. If you have different images for different resolutions you can copy them to respective folders and correct image would be picked up based on the device resolution. Another option is to create a drawable folder under res and add images there. These will be copied to all drawable-* folders. We will use this approach here. Create custom adapter The next important step is to create a custom adapter which uses custom layout that we defined earlier to add items to the grid. The custom adapter should extend the BaseAdapter. The getView()method of the adapter is invoked for each item of the grid. In this method we assign values to the ImageView and checkbox. The listeners on the custom grid items are added here only. The code for getView() looks like the following: @Override public View getView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) { ViewHolder holder; if (convertView == null) { holder = new ViewHolder(); convertView = mInflater.inflate( R.layout.griditems, null); holder.imageview = (ImageView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.grid_item_image); holder.checkbox = (CheckBox) convertView.findViewById(R.id.grid_item_checkbox); convertView.setTag(holder); } else { holder = (ViewHolder) convertView.getTag(); } holder.checkbox.setId(position); holder.imageview.setId(position); holder.checkbox.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { public void onClick(View v) { CheckBox cb = (CheckBox) v; int id = cb.getId(); if (thumbnailsselection[id]){ //cb.setChecked(false); thumbnailsselection[id] = false; } else { //cb.setChecked(true); thumbnailsselection[id] = true; } } }); holder.imageview.setOnClickListener(new ImageClickListener(context, holder,thumbnailsselection)); holder.imageview.setImageResource(thumbnails[position]); holder.checkbox.setChecked(thumbnailsselection[position]); holder.id = position; return convertView; } Here we are saving the state of checkboxes in an array, thumbnailsselection. Since checkboxes are being added dynamically and there is no unique identifier for them, this will help in identifying the current state of checkbox whose state has to be toggled when an image is clicked. For the same reason we need to create a separate ImageClickListener. As we cannot identify the checkbox on click of corresponding image, we have to create the separate listener which holds the reference to holder class. Using this holder instance we can check/uncheck the checkbox when a corresponding image is clicked. Sometimes when you click on the image, the ImageClickListener is not invoked. The reason for this is that the checkbox overrides the focus event of container grid. Hence checkbox takes the focus when any item of the grid is clicked. To solve this issue you need to add the following properties to the checkbox. android:focusable=“false” android:focusableInTouchMode=“false” References Image icons source: http://www.iconarchive.com http://developer.android.com/

Recently I had a dispute with my colleagues regarding performance penalty of lazy vals in Scala. It resulted in a set of microbenchmarks which compare lazy and non-lazy vals performance. All the sources can be found at http://git.io/g3WMzA. But before going to the benchmark results let's try to understand what can cause the performance penalty. For my JMH benchmark I created a very simple Scala class with lazy val in it: @State(Scope.Benchmark) class LazyValCounterProvider { lazy val counter = SlowInitializer.createCounter() } Now let's take a look at what is hidden under the hood of lazy keyword. At first, we need to compile given code with scalac, and then it can be decompiled to correspondent Java code. For this sake I used JD decompiler. It produced the following code: @State(Scope.Benchmark) @ScalaSignature(bytes="...") public class LazyValCounterProvider { private SlowInitializer.Counter counter; private volatile boolean bitmap$0; private SlowInitializer.Counter counter$lzycompute() { synchronized (this) { if (!this.bitmap$0) { this.counter = SlowInitializer.createCounter(); this.bitmap$0 = true; } return this.counter; } } public SlowInitializer.Counter counter() { return this.bitmap$0 ? this.counter : counter$lzycompute(); } } As it's seen, the lazy keyword is translated to a classical double-checked locking idiom for delayed initialization. Thus, most of the time the only performance penalty may come from a single volatile read per lazy val read (except for the time it takes to initialize lazy val instance since its very first usage). Let's finally measure its impact in numbers. My JMH-based microbenchmark is as simple as: public class LazyValsBenchmarks { @Benchmark public long baseline(ValCounterProvider eagerProvider) { return eagerProvider.counter().incrementAndGet(); } @Benchmark public long lazyValCounter(LazyValCounterProvider provider) { return provider.counter().incrementAndGet(); } } A baseline method access a final counter object and increments an integer value by 1 by calling incrementAndGet . And as we've just found out, the main benchmark method - lazyValCounter - in addition to what baseline method does also does one volatile read. Note: all measurements are performed on MBA with Core i5 1.7GHz CPU. All results were obtained by running JMH in a throughput mode. Both score and score error columns show operations/second. Each JMH run made 10 iterations and took 50 seconds. I performed 6 measurements with the different JVM and JMH options: client VM, 1 thread Benchmark Score Score error baseline 412277751.619 8116731.382 lazyValCounter 352209296.485 6695318.185 client VM, 2 threads Benchmark Score Score error baseline 542605885.932 15340285.497 lazyValCounter 383013643.710 53639006.105 client VM, 4 threads Benchmark Score Score error baseline 551105008.767 5085834.663 lazyValCounter 394175424.898 3890422.327 server VM, 1 thread Benchmark Score Score error baseline 407010942.139 9004641.910 lazyValCounter 341478430.115 18183144.277 server VM, 2 threads Benchmark Score Score error baseline 531472448.578 22779859.685 lazyValCounter 428898429.124 24720626.198 server VM, 4 threads Benchmark Score Score error baseline 549568334.970 12690164.639 lazyValCounter 374460712.017 17742852.788 The numbers show that lazy vals performance penalty is quite small and can be ignored in practice. For further reading about the subject I would recommend SIP 20 - Improved Lazy Vals Initialization, which contains very interesting in-depth analysis of existing issues with lazy initialization implementation in Scala.

In this article I will attempt to run the Mule ESB community edition in Docker in order to see whether it is feasible without any greater inconvenience. My goal is to be able to use Docker both when testing as well as in a production environment in order to gain better control over the environment and to separate different types of environments. I imagine that most of the Docker-related information can be applied to other applications – I have used Mule since it is what I usually work with. The conclusion I have made after having completed my experiments is that it is possible to run Mule ESB in Docker without any inconvenience. In addition, Docker will indeed allow me to have better control over the different environments and also allow me to separate them as I find appropriate. Finally, I just want to mention that I have used Docker in an Ubuntu environment. I have not attempted any of the exercises in Docker running on Windows or Mac OS X. Docker Briefly In short, Docker allows for creating of images that serve as blueprints for containers. A Docker container is an instance of a Docker image in the same way a Java object is an instance of a Java class. FROM codingtony/java MAINTAINER tony(dot)bussieres(at)ticksmith(dot)com RUN wget https://repository.mulesoft.org/nexus/content/repositories/releases/org/mule/distributions/mule-standalone/3.5.0/mule-standalone-3.5.0.tar.gz RUN cd /opt && tar xvzf ~/mule-standalone-3.5.0.tar.gz RUN echo "4a94356f7401ac8be30a992a414ca9b9 /mule-standalone-3.5.0.tar.gz" | md5sum -c RUN rm ~/mule-standalone-3.5.0.tar.gz RUN ln -s /opt/mule-standalone-3.5.0 /opt/mule CMD [ "/opt/mule/bin/mule" ] The resource isolation features of Linux are used to create Docker containers, which are more lightweight than virtual machines and are separated from the environment in which Docker runs, the host. Using Docker an image can be created that, every time it is started has a known state. In order to remove any doubts about whether the environment has been altered in any way, the container can be stopped and a new container started. I can even run multiple Docker containers on one and the same computer to simulate a multi-server production environment. Applications can also be run in their own Docker containers, as shown in this figure. Three Docker containers, each containing a specific application, running in one host. A more detailed introduction to Docker is available here. The main entry point to the Docker documentation can be found here. Motivation Some of the motivations I have for using Docker in both testing and production environments are: The environment in which I test my application should be as similar as the final deployment environment as possible, if not identical. Making the deployment environment easy to scale up and down. If it is easy to start a new processing node when need arise and stop it if it is no longer used, I will be able to adapt to changes rather quickly and thus reduce errors caused by, for instance, load peaks. Maintain an increased number of nodes to which applications can be deployed. Instead of running one instance of some kind of application server, Mule ESB in my case, on a computer, I want multiple instances that are partitioned, for instance, according to importance. High-priority applications run on one separate instance, which have higher priority both as far as resources (CPU, memory, disk etc) are concerned but also as far as support is concerned. Applications which are less critical run on another instance. Enable quick replacement of instances in the deployment environment. Reasons for having to replace instances may be hardware failure etc. Better control over the contents of the different environments. The concept of an environment that, at any time, may be disposed (and restarted) discourages hacks in the environment, which are usually poorly documented and sometimes difficult to trace. Using Docker, I need to change the appropriate Docker image if I want to make changes to some application environment. The Docker image file, commonly known as Dockerfile, can be checked into any ordinary revision control system, such as Git, Subversion etc, making changes reversible and traceable. Automate the creation of a testing environment. An example could be a nightly job that runs on my build server which creates a test environment, deploys one or more applications to it and then performs tests, such as load-testing. Prerequisites To get the best possible experience when running Docker, I run it under Ubuntu. According to the current documentation, Docker is supported under the following versions of Ubuntu: 12.04 LTS (64-bit) 13.04 (64-bit) 13.10 (64-bit) 14.04 (64-bit) Against my usual conservative self, I chose Ubuntu 14.10, which at the time of writing this article is the latest version. While I haven’t run into any issues, I cannot promise anything regarding compatibility with Docker as far as this version of Ubuntu is concerned. Installing Docker Before we install anything, those who have the Docker version from the Ubuntu repository should remove this version before installing a newer version of Docker, since the Ubuntu repository does not contain the most recent version and the package does not have the same name as the Docker package we will install: sudo apt-get remove docker.io The simplest way to install Docker is to use an installation script made available at the Docker website: curl -sSL https://get.docker.com/ubuntu/ | sudo sh If you are not running Ubuntu or if you do not want to use the above way of installing Docker, please refer to this page containing instructions on how to install Docker on various platforms. To verify the Docker installation, open a terminal window and enter: sudo docker version Output similar to the following should appear: Client version: 1.4.1 Client API version: 1.16 Go version (client): go1.3.3 Git commit (client): 5bc2ff8 OS/Arch (client): linux/amd64 Server version: 1.4.1 Server API version: 1.16 Go version (server): go1.3.3 Git commit (server): 5bc2ff8 We are now ready to start a Mule instance in Docker. Running Mule in Docker One of the advantages with Docker is that there is a large repository of Docker images that are ready to be used, and even extended if one so wishes. ThisDocker image is the one that I will use in this article. It is well documented, there is a source repository and it contains a recent version of the Mule ESB Community Edition. Some additional details on the Docker image: Ubuntu 14.04. Oracle JavaSE 1.7.0_65. This version will change as the PPA containing the package is updated. Mule ESB CE 3.5.0 Note that the image may change at any time and the specifications above may have changed. If you intend to use Docker in your organization, I would suspect that the best alternative is to create your own Docker images that are totally under your control. The Docker image repository is an excellent source of inspiration and aid even in this case. Starting a Docker Container To start a Docker container using this image, open a terminal window and write: sudo docker run codingtony/mule The first time an image is used it needs to be downloaded and created. This usually takes quite some time, so I suggest a short break here – perhaps for a cup of coffee or tea. If you just want to download an image without starting it, exchange the Docker command “run” with “pull”. Once the container is started, you will see some output to the console. If you are familiar with Mule, you will recognize the log output: MULE_HOME is set to /opt/mule-standalone-3.5.0 Running in console (foreground) mode by default, use Ctrl-C to exit... MULE_HOME is set to /opt/mule-standalone-3.5.0 Running Mule... --> Wrapper Started as Console Launching a JVM... Starting the Mule Container... Wrapper (Version 3.2.3) http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org Copyright 1999-2006 Tanuki Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved. INFO 2015-01-05 04:41:42,302 [WrapperListener_start_runner] org.mule.module.launcher.MuleContainer: ********************************************************************** * Mule ESB and Integration Platform * * Version: 3.5.0 Build: ff1df1f3 * * MuleSoft, Inc. * * For more information go to http://www.mulesoft.org * * * * Server started: 1/5/15 4:41 AM * * JDK: 1.7.0_65 (mixed mode) * * OS: Linux (3.16.0-28-generic, amd64) * * Host: f95698cfb796 (172.17.0.2) * ********************************************************************** Note that: In the text-box containing information about the Mule ESB and Integration Platform, there is a row which starts with “Host:”. The hexadecimal digit that follows is the Docker container id and the IP-address is the external IP-address of the Docker container in which Mule is running. Before we do anything with the Mule instance running in Docker, let’s take a look at Docker containers. Docker Containers We can verify that there is a Docker container running by opening another terminal window, or a tab in the first terminal window, and running the command: sudo docker ps As a result, you will see output similar to the following (I have edited the output in order for the columns to be aligned with the column titles): CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES f95698cfb796 codingtony/mule:latest "/opt/mule/bin/mule" 7 min ago Up 7 min jolly_hopper From this output we can see that: The ID of the container is f95698cfb796. This ID can be used when performing operations on the container, such as stopping it, restarting it etc. The name of the image used to created the container. The command that is currently executing. If we look at the Dockerfile for the image, we can see that the last line in this file is: CMD [ “/opt/mule/bin/mule” ] This is the command that is executed whenever an instance of the Docker image is launched and it matches what we see in the COMMAND column for the Docker container. The CREATED column shows how much time has passed since the container was created. The STATUS column shows the current status of the image. When you have used Docker for a while, you can view all the containers using: sudo docker ps -a This will show you containers that are not running, in addition to the running ones. Containers that are not running can be restarted. The PORTS column shows any port mappings for the container. More about port mappings later. Finally, the NAMES column contain a more human-friendly container name. This container name can be used in the same way as the container id. Docker containers will consume disk-space and if you want to determine how much disk-space each of the containers on your computer use, issue the following command: sudo docker ps -a -s An additional column, SIZE, will be shown and in this column I see that my Mule container consumes 41,76kB. Note that this is in addition to the disk-space consumed by the Docker image. This number will grow if you use the container under a longer period of time, as the container retains any files written to disk. To completely remove a stopped Docker container, find the id or name of the container and use the command: sudo docker rm [container id or name here] Before going further, let’s stop the running container and remove it: sudo docker stop [container id or name here] sudo docker rm [container id or name here] Files and Docker Containers So far we have managed to start a Mule instance running inside a Docker container, but there were no Mule applications deployed to it and the logs that were generated were only visible in the terminal window. I want to be able to deploy my applications to the Mule instance and examine the logs in a convenient way. In this section I will show how to: Share one or more directories in the host file-system with a Docker container. Access the files in a Docker container from the host. As the first step in looking at sharing directories between the host operating system and a Docker container, we are going to look at Mule logs. As part of this exercise we also set up the directories in the host operating system that are going to be shared with the Docker container. In your home directory, create a directory named “mule-root”. In the “mule-root” directory, create three directories named “apps”, “conf” and “logs”. Download the Mule CE 3.5.0 standalone distribution from this link. From the Mule CE 3.5.0 distribution, copy the files in the “apps” directory to the “mule-root/apps” directory you just created. From the Mule CE 3.5.0 distribution, copy the files in the “conf” directory to the “mule-root/conf” directory you created. The resulting file- and directory-structure should look like this (shown using the tree command): ~/mule-root/ ├── apps │ └── default │ └── mule-config.xml ├── conf │ ├── log4j.properties │ ├── tls-default.conf │ ├── tls-fips140-2.conf │ ├── wrapper-additional.conf │ └── wrapper.conf └── logs Edit the log4j.properties file in the “mule-root/conf” directory and set the log-level on the last line in the file to “DEBUG”. This modification has nothing to do with sharing directories, but is in order for us to be able to see some more output from Mule when we run it later. The last two lines should now look like this: # Mule classes log4j.logger.org.mule=DEBUG Binding Volumes We are now ready to launch a new Docker container and when we do, we will tell Docker to map three directories in the Docker container to three directories in the host operating system. Three directories in a Docker container bound to three directories in the host. Launch the Docker container with the command below. The -v option tells Docker that we want to make the contents of a directory in the host available at a certain path in the Docker container file-system. The -d option runs the container in the background and the terminal prompt will be available as soon as the id of the newly launched Docker container has been printed. sudo docker run -d -v ~/mule-root/apps:/opt/mule/apps -v ~/mule-root/conf:/opt/mule/conf -v ~/mule-root/logs:/opt/mule/logs codingtony/mule Examine the “mule-root” directory and its subdirectories in the host, which should now look like below. The files on the highlighted rows have been created by Mule. mule-root/ ├── apps │ ├── default │ │ └── mule-config.xml │ └── default-anchor.txt ├── conf │ ├── log4j.properties │ ├── tls-default.conf │ ├── tls-fips140-2.conf │ ├── wrapper-additional.conf │ └── wrapper.conf └── logs ├── mule-app-default.log ├── mule-domain-default.log └── mule.log Examine the “mule.log” file using the command “tail -f ~/mule-root/logs/mule.log”. There should be periodic output written to the log file similar to the following: DEBUG 2015-01-05 12:05:37,216 [Mule.app.deployer.monitor.1.thread.1] org.mule.module.launcher.DeploymentDirectoryWatcher: Checking for changes... DEBUG 2015-01-05 12:05:37,216 [Mule.app.deployer.monitor.1.thread.1] org.mule.module.launcher.DeploymentDirectoryWatcher: Current anchors: default-anchor.txt DEBUG 2015-01-05 12:05:37,216 [Mule.app.deployer.monitor.1.thread.1] org.mule.module.launcher.DeploymentDirectoryWatcher: Deleted anchors: Stop and remove the container: sudo docker stop [container id or name here] sudo docker rm [container id or name here] Direct Access to Docker Container Files When running Docker under the Ubuntu OS it is also possible to access the file-system of a Docker container from the host file-system. It may be possible to do this under other operating systems too, but I haven’t had the opportunity to test this. This technique may come in handy during development or testing with Docker containers for which you haven’t bound any volumes. Note! If given the choice to use either volume binding, as seen above, or direct access to container files as we will look at in this section for something more than a temporary file access, I would chose to use volume binding. Direct access to Docker container files relies on implementation details that I suspect may change in future versions of Docker if the developers find it suitable. With all that said, lets get the action started: Start a new Docker container: sudo docker run -d codingtony/mule Find the id of the newly launched Docker container: sudo docker ps Examine low-level information about the newly launched Docker container: sudo docker inspect [container id or name here] Output similar to this will be printed to the console (portions removed to conserve space): [{ "AppArmorProfile": "", "Args": [], "Config": { ... }, "Created": "2015-01-12T07:58:47.913905369Z", "Driver": "aufs", "ExecDriver": "native-0.2", "HostConfig": { ... }, "HostnamePath": "/var/lib/docker/containers/68b40def7ad6a7f819bd654d5627ad1c3a0f40c84e0fb0f875760f1bd6790eef/hostname", "HostsPath": "/var/lib/docker/containers/68b40def7ad6a7f819bd654d5627ad1c3a0f40c84e0fb0f875760f1bd6790eef/hosts", "Id": "68b40def7ad6a7f819bd654d5627ad1c3a0f40c84e0fb0f875760f1bd6790eef", "Image": "bcd0f37d48d4501ad64bae941d95446b157a6f15e31251e26918dbac542d731f", "MountLabel": "", "Name": "/thirsty_darwin", "NetworkSettings": { ... }, "Path": "/opt/mule/bin/mule", "ProcessLabel": "", "ResolvConfPath": "/var/lib/docker/containers/68b40def7ad6a7f819bd654d5627ad1c3a0f40c84e0fb0f875760f1bd6790eef/resolv.conf", "State": { ... }, "Volumes": {}, "VolumesRW": {} }] Locate the “Driver” node (highlighted in the above output) and ensure that its value is “aufs”. If it is not, you may need to modify the directory paths below replacing “aufs” with the value of this node. Personally I have only seen the “aufs” value at this node so anything else is uncharted territory to me. Copy the long hexadecimal value that can be found at the “Id” node (also highlighted in the above output). This is the long id of the Docker container. In a terminal window, issue the following command, inserting the long id of your container where noted: sudo ls -al /var/lib/docker/aufs/mnt/[long container id here] You are now looking at the root of the volume used by the Docker container you just launched. In the same terminal window, issue the following command: sudo ls -al /var/lib/docker/aufs/mnt/[long container id here]/opt The output from this command should look like this: total 12 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 jan 12 15:58 . drwxr-xr-x 75 root root 4096 jan 12 15:58 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 aug 10 04:19 mule -> /opt/mule-standalone-3.5.0 drwxr-xr-x 17 409 409 4096 jan 12 15:58 mule-standalone-3.5.0 Examine this line in the Dockerfile:RUN ln -s /opt/mule-standalone-3.5.0 /opt/muleWe see that a symbolic link is created and that the directory name and the name of the symbolic link matches the output we saw earlier. This matches the directory output in the previous step. To examine the Mule log file that we looked at when binding volumes earlier, use the following command: sudo cat /var/lib/docker/aufs/mnt/[long container id here]/opt/mule-standalone-3.5.0/logs/mule.log Next we create a new file in the Docker container using vi: sudo vi /var/lib/docker/aufs/mnt/[long container id here]/opt/mule-standalone-3.5.0/test.txt Enter some text into the new file by first pressing i and the type the text. When you are finished entering the text, press the Escape key and write the file to disk by typing the characters “:wq” without quotes. This writes the new contents of the file to disk and quits the editor. Leave the Docker container running after you are finished. In the next section, we are going to look at the file we just created from inside the Docker container. We have seen that we can examine the file system of a Docker container without binding volumes. It is also possible to copy or move files from the host file-system to the container’s file system using the regular commands. Root privileges are required both when examining and writing to the Docker container’s file system. Entering a Docker Container In order to verify that the file we just created in the host was indeed written to the Docker container, we are going to start a bash shell in the running Docker container and examine the location where the new file is expected to be located and the contents of the file. In the process we will see how we can execute commands in a Docker container from the host. Issue the command below in a terminal window. The exec Docker command is used to run a command, bash in this case, in a running Docker container. The -i flags tell Docker to keep the input stream open while the command is being executed. In this example, it allows us to enter commands into the bash shell running inside the Docker container. The -t flag cause Docker to allocate a text terminal to which the output from the command execution is printed. sudo docker exec -i -t [container id or name here] bash Note the prompt, which should change to [user]@[Docker container id]. In my case it looks like this: root@3ea374a280da:/# Go to the Mule installation directory using this command: cd /opt/mule-standalone-3.5.0/ Examine the contents of the directory: ls -al Among the other files, you should see the “test.txt” file: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 53 Jan 14 03:19 test.txt Examine the contents of the “text.txt” file. The contents of the file should match what you entered earlier. cat text.txt Exit to the host OS: exit Stop and remove the container: sudo docker stop [container id or name here] sudo docker rm [container id or name here] We have seen that we can execute commands in a running Docker container. In this particular example, we used it to execute the bash shell and examine a file. I draw the conclusion that I should be able to set up a Docker image that contains a very controlled environment for some type of test and then create a container from that image and start the test from the host. Deploying a Mule Application In this section we will look at deploying a Mule application to an instance of the Mule ESB running in a Docker container. We will use volume binding, that we looked at in the section on files and Docker containers, to share directories in the host with the Docker container in order to make it easy to deploy applications, modify running applications, examine logs etc. Preparations Before deploying the application, we need to make some preparations: First of all, we restore the original log-level that we changed earlier. In this example, there will be log output when the applications we will deploy is run and we can limit the log generated by Mule. Edit the log4j.properties file in the “mule-root/conf” directory in the host and set the log-level on the last line in the file back to “INFO” and add one line, as in the listing below. The last three lines should now look like this: # Mule classes log4j.logger.org.mule=INFO log4j.logger.org.mule.tck.functional=DEBUG Next, we create the Mule application which we will deploy to the Mule ESB running in Docker: In some directory, create a file named “mule-deploy.properties” with the following contents: redeployment.enabled=true encoding=UTF-8 domain=default config.resources=HelloWorld.xml In the same directory create a file named “HelloWorld.xml”. This file contains the Mule configuration for our example application: Create a zip-archive named “mule-hello.zip” containing the two files created above: zip mule-hello.zip mule-deploy.properties HelloWorld.xml Deploy the Mule Application Before you start the Docker container in which the Mule EBS will run, make sure that you have created and prepared the directories in the host as described in the section Files and Docker Containers above. Start a new Mule Docker container using the command that we used when binding volumes: sudo docker run -d -v ~/mule-root/apps:/opt/mule/apps -v ~/mule-root/conf:/opt/mule/conf -v ~/mule-root/logs:/opt/mule/logs codingtony/mule As before, the -v option tells Docker to bind three directories in the host to three locations in the Docker container’s file system. Find the IP-address of the Docker container: sudo docker inspect [container id or name here] | grep IPAddress In my case, I see the following line which reveals the IP-address of the Docker container: “IPAddress”: “172.0.17.2”, Open a terminal window or tab and examine the Mule log. Leave this window or tab open during the exercise, in order to be able to verify the output from Mule. tail -f ~/mule-root/logs/mule.log Copy the zip-archive “mule-hello.zip” created earlier to the host directory ~/mule-root/apps/. Verify that the application has been deployed without errors in the Mule log: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Started app 'mule-hello' + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Leave the Docker container running after you are finished. In the next section we will look at how to access endpoints exposed by applications running in Docker containers. By binding directories in the host thus making them available in the Docker container, it becomes very simple to deploy Mule applications to an instance of Mule ESB running in a Docker container. I am considering this setup for a production environment as well, since it will enable me to perform backups of the directories containing Mule applications and configuration without having to access the Docker container’s file system. It is also in accord with the idea that a Docker container should be able to be quickly and easily restarted, which I feel it would not be if I had to deploy a number of Mule applications to it in order to recreate its previous state. Accessing Endpoints We now know that we can run the Mule ESB in a Docker container, we can deploy applications and examine the logs quite easily but one final, very important question remains to be answered; how to access endpoints exposed by applications running in a Docker container. This section assumes that the Mule application we deployed to Mule in the previous section is still running. In the host, open a web-browser and issue a request to the Docker container’s IP-address at port 8181. In my case, the URL is http://172.17.0.2:8181 Alternatively use the curl command in a terminal window. In my case I would write: curl 172.17.0.2:8181 The result should be a greeting in the following format: Hello World! It is now: 2015-01-14T07:39:03.942Z In addition, you should be able to see that a message was received in the Mule log. Now try the URL http://localhost:8181 You will get a message saying that the connection was refused, provided that you do not already have a service listening at that port. If you have another computer available that is connected to the same network as the host computer running Ubuntu, do the following: – Find the IP-address of the Ubuntu host computer using the ifconfigcommand. – In a web-browser on the other computer, try accessing port 8181 at the IP-address of the Ubuntu host computer. Again you will get a message saying that the connection was refused. Stop and remove the container: sudo docker stop [container id or name here] sudo docker rm [container id or name here] Without any particular measures taken, we see that we can access a service exposed in a Docker container from the Docker host but we did not succeed in accessing the service from another computer. To make a service exposed in a Docker container reachable from outside of the host, we need to tell Docker to publish a port from the Docker container to a port in the host using the -p flag: Launch a new Docker container using the following command: sudo docker run -d -p 8181:8181 -v ~/mule-root/apps:/opt/mule/apps -v ~/mule-root/conf:/opt/mule/conf -v ~/mule-root/logs:/opt/mule/logs codingtony/mule The added flag -p 8181:8181 makes the service exposed at port 8181 in the Docker container available at port 8181 in the host. Try accessing the URL http://localhost:8181 from a web-browser on the host computer.The result should be a greeting of the form we have seen earlier. Try accessing port 8181 at the IP-address of the Ubuntu host computer from another computer.This should also result in a greeting message. Stop and remove the container: sudo docker stop [container id or name here] sudo docker rm [container id or name here] Using the -p flag, we have seen that we can expose a service in a Docker container so that it becomes accessible from outside of the host computer. However, we also see that this information need to be supplied at the time of launching the Docker container. The conclusions that I draw from this is that: I can test and develop against a Mule ESB instance running in a Docker container without having to publish any ports, provided that my development computer is the Docker host computer. In a production environment or any other environment that need to expose services running in a Docker container to “the outside world” and where services will be added over time, I would consider deploying an Apache HTTP Server or NGINX on the Docker host computer and use it to proxy the services that are to be exposed. This way I can avoid re-launching the Docker container each time a new service is added and I can even (temporarily) redirect the proxy to some other computer if I need to perform some maintenance. Is There More? Of course! This article should only be considered an introduction and I am just a beginner with Docker. I hope I will have the time and inspiration to write more about Docker as I learn more.

History I think it’s important to take a look at the evolution of Interceptors in Java EE because of the simple fact that it started as an EJB-specific item and later evolved into a separate spec which is now open for extension by other Java EE specifications. Version 1.0 Interceptors were first introduced in EJB 3.0 (part of Java EE 5). Interceptors did not have a dedicated spec but they were versioned 1.0 and bought basic AOP related features to managed beans (POJOs) via simple annotations @AroundInvoke – to annotate methods containing the interception logic for target class methods @Intercerptors – to bind the the interceptor classes with their target classes/methods Capability to configure interceptors for an entire module (EJB JAR) via the deployment descriptor @ExcludeDefaultInterceptors – to mute default interceptors defined in the deployment descriptor @ExcludeClassInterceptors – to mute a globally defined (class level) interceptor for a particular method/constructor of the class Interceptors 1.1 Along came Java EE 6 with EJB 3.1 – Interceptors 1.1 was still included in the EJB spec document @InterceptorBinding – a type safe way of specifying interceptors of a class or a method. Please note that this annotation was leveraged by CDI 1.0 (another specification introduced in Java EE 6) and its details are present in the CDI 1.0 spec doc rather than EJB 3.1 (light bulb moment … at least for me) @Interceptor – Used to explicitly declare a class containing an interception logic in a specific method (annotated with @AroundInvoke etc) as an interceptor along with an appropriate Interceptor Binding. This too was mentioned in the CDI 1.0 documentation only. @AroundTimeout – used to intercept time outs of EJB timers along with a way to obtain an instance of the Timer being intercepted (viajavax.interceptor.InvocationContext.getTimer()) Interceptors 1.2 Interceptors were split off into an individual spec in Java EE 7 and thus Interceptors 1.2came into being Interceptors 1.2 was a maintenance release on top of 1.1 and hence the JSR number still remained the same as EJB 3.1 (JSR 318) Interceptor.Priority (static class) – to provide capability to define the order (priority) in which the interceptors need to invoked. @AroundConstruct – used to intercept the construction of the target class i.e. invoke logic prior to the constructor of the target class is invoked It’s important to bear in mind that Interceptors are applicable to managed beans in general. Managed Beans themselves are simple POJOs which are privileged to basic services by the container – Interceptors are one of them along with life cycle callbacks, resource injection. Memory Aid It’s helpful to think of Interceptors as components which can interpose on beans throughout their life cycle before they are even constructed – @AroundConstruct after they are constructed – @PostConstruct during their life time (method invocation) – @AroundInvoke prior to destruction – @PreDestroy time outs of EJBs – @AroundTimeout Let’s look at some of the traits of Interceptors in more detail and try to answer questions like where are they applied and what do they intercept ? how to bind interceptors to the target (class) they are supposed to intercept ? Interceptors Types (based on the intercepted component) Method Interceptors Achieved by @AroundInvoke public class MethodInterceptor{ @AroundInvoke public Object interceptorMethod(InvocationContext ictx) throws Exception{ //logic goes here } } @Stateless public class AnEJB{ @Interceptors(MethodInterceptor.class) public void bizMethod(){ //any calls to this method will be intercepted by MethodInterceptor.interceptorMethod() } } The method containing the logic can be part of separate class as well as the target class (class to be intercepted) itself. Lifecycle Callback interceptors Decorate the method with @AroundConstruct in order to intercept the constructor invocation for a class public class ConstructorInterceptor{ @AroundConstruct public Object interceptorMethod(InvocationContext ictx) throws Exception{ //logic goes here } } public class APOJO{ @Interceptors(ConstructorInterceptor.class) public APOJO(){ //any calls to this constructor will be intercepted by ConstructorInterceptor.interceptorMethod() } } The method annotated with @AroundConstruct cannot be a part of the intercepted class. It has to be defined using a separate Interceptor class Use the @PostConstruct annotation on a method in order to intercept a call back method on a managed bean. Just to clarify again – the Interceptor spec does not define a new annotation as such. One needs to reuse the @PostConstruct (part of theCommon Annotations spec) on the interceptor method. public class PostConstructInterceptor{ @PostConstruct public void interceptorMethod(InvocationContext ictx) throws Exception{ //logic goes here } } @Interceptors(PostConstructInterceptor.class) public class APOJO{ @PostConstruct public void bizMethod(){ //any calls to this method will be intercepted by PostConstructInterceptor.interceptorMethod() } } The @PreDestroy (another call back annotation defined in Common Annotations spec) annotation is used in a similar fashion Time-out Interceptors As mentioned above – @AroundTimeout used to intercept time outs of EJB timers along with a way to obtain an instance of the Timer being intercepted (viajavax.interceptor.InvocationContext.getTimer()) Applying/Binding Interceptors Using @Interceptors As shown in above examples – just use the @Interceptors annotation to specify the interceptor classes @Interceptors can be applied on a class level (automatically applicable to all the methods of a class), to a particular method or multiple methods and constructor in case of a constructor specific interceptor using @AroundConstruct Using @IntercerptorBinding Interceptor Bindings (explained above) – Use @IntercerptorBinding annotation to define a binding annotation which is further used on the interceptor class as well as the target class (whose method, constructor etc needs to be intercepted) @InterceptorBinding @Target({TYPE, METHOD, CONSTRUCTOR}) @Retention(RUNTIME) public @interface @Auditable { } @Auditable @Interceptor public class AuditInterceptor { @AroundInvoke public Object audit(InvocationContext ictx) throws Exception{ //logic goes here } } @Stateless @Auditable public class AnEJB{ public void bizMethod(){ //any calls to this method will be intercepted by AuditInterceptor.audit() } } Deployment Descriptor One can also use deployment descriptors to bind interceptors and target classes either in an explicit fashion as well as in override mode to annotations. This was a rather quick overview of Java EE interceptors. Hopefully the right trigger for you to dig deeper :-) Cheers !

I have recently started to build a public REST API with Java for Podcastpedia.org and for the JAX-RS implementation I have chosen Jersey, as I find it “natural” and powerful – you can find out more about it by following the Tutorial – REST API design and implementation in Java with Jersey and Spring. Because Podcastpedia.org is a web application powered by Spring MVC, I wanted to integrate both frameworks in podcastpedia-web, to take advantage of the backend service functionality already present in the project. Anyway this short post will present the steps I had to take to make the integration between the two frameworks work. Framework versions Current versions used: 4.1.0.RELEASE 2.14 Project dependencies The Jersey Spring extension must be present in your project’s classpath. If you are using Maven add it to the pom.xml file of your project: org.glassfish.jersey.ext jersey-spring3 ${jersey.version} org.springframework spring-core org.springframework spring-web org.springframework spring-beans org.glassfish.jersey.media jersey-media-json-jackson ${jersey.version} com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs jackson-jaxrs-base com.fasterxml.jackson.core jackson-annotations com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs jackson-jaxrs-json-provider Note: I have explicitly excluded the Spring core and the Jackson implementation libraries as they have been already imported in the project with preferred versions. Web.xml configuration In the web.xml, in addition to the Spring MVC servlet configuration I added the jersey-servlet configuration, that will map all requests starting with/api/: Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet contextConfigLocation classpath:spring/application-context.xml 1 Spring MVC Dispatcher Servlet / jersey-serlvet org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer javax.ws.rs.Application org.podcastpedia.web.api.JaxRsApplication 2 jersey-serlvet /api/* Well, that’s pretty much it… If you have any questions drop me a line or comment in the discussion below. In the coming post I will present some of the results of this integration, by showing how to call one method of the REST public API with jQuery, to dynamically load recent episodes of a podcast, so stay tuned.

Learn all about creating a microservices architecture on Java in this great tutorial.

If you ever have a need to process messages serially with RabbitMQ with a cluster of listeners processing the messages, the best way that I have seen is to use a "exclusive consumer" flag on a listener with 1 thread on each listener processing the messages. Exclusive consumer flag ensures that only 1 consumer can read messages from the specific queue, and 1 thread on that consumer ensures that the messages are processed serially. There is a catch however, I will go over it later. Let me demonstrate this behavior with a Spring Boot and Spring Integration based RabbitMQ message consumer. First, this is the configuration for setting up a queue using Spring java configuration, note that since this is a Spring Boot application, it automatically creates a RabbitMQ connection factory when the Spring-amqp library is added to the list of dependencies: @Configuration @Configuration public class RabbitConfig { @Autowired private ConnectionFactory rabbitConnectionFactory; @Bean public Queue sampleQueue() { return new Queue("sample.queue", true, false, false); } } Given this sample queue, a listener which gets the messages from this queue and processes them looks like this, the flow is written using the excellent Spring integration Java DSL library: @Configuration public class RabbitInboundFlow { private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(RabbitInboundFlow.class); @Autowired private RabbitConfig rabbitConfig; @Autowired private ConnectionFactory connectionFactory; @Bean public SimpleMessageListenerContainer simpleMessageListenerContainer() { SimpleMessageListenerContainer listenerContainer = new SimpleMessageListenerContainer(); listenerContainer.setConnectionFactory(this.connectionFactory); listenerContainer.setQueues(this.rabbitConfig.sampleQueue()); listenerContainer.setConcurrentConsumers(1); listenerContainer.setExclusive(true); return listenerContainer; } @Bean public IntegrationFlow inboundFlow() { return IntegrationFlows.from(Amqp.inboundAdapter(simpleMessageListenerContainer())) .transform(Transformers.objectToString()) .handle((m) -> { logger.info("Processed {}", m.getPayload()); }) .get(); } } The flow is very concisely expressed in the inboundFlow method, a message payload from RabbitMQ is transformed from byte array to String and finally processed by simply logging the message to the logs The important part of the flow is the listener configuration, note the flag which sets the consumer to be an exclusive consumer and within this consumer the number of threads processing is set to 1. Given this even if multiple instances of the application is started up only 1 of the listeners will be able to connect and process messages. Now for the catch, consider a case where the processing of messages takes a while to complete and rolls back during processing of the message. If the instance of the application handling the message were to be stopped in the middle of processing such a message, then the behavior is a different instance will start handling the messages in the queue, when the stopped instance rolls back the message, the rolled back message is then delivered to the new exclusive consumer, thus getting a message out of order. If you are interested in exploring this further, here is a github project to play with this feature: https://github.com/bijukunjummen/test-rabbit-exclusive

Spring Integration provides an extension of the Spring framework to support the well-known Enterprise Integration Patterns. It enables lightweight messaging within Spring-based applications and supports integration with external systems. One of the most important goals of Spring Integration is to provide a simple model for building maintainable and testable enterprise integration solutions. Main Components : Message : It is a generic wrapper for any Java object combined with metadata used by the framework while handling that object. It consists of a payload and header(s). Message payload can be any Java Object and Message header is a String/Object Map covering header name and value. MessageBuilder is used to create messages covering payload and headers as follows : import org.springframework.messaging.Message; import org.springframework.messaging.support.MessageBuilder; Message message = MessageBuilder.withPayload("Message Payload") .setHeader("Message_Header1", "Message_Header1_Value") .setHeader("Message_Header2", "Message_Header2_Value") .build(); Message Channel : A message channel is the component through which messages are moved so it can be thought as a pipe between message producer and consumer. A Producer sends the message to a channel, and a consumer receives the message from the channel. A Message Channel may follow either Point-to-Point or Publish/Subscribe semantics. With a Point-to-Point channel, at most one consumer can receive each message sent to the channel. With Publish/Subscribe channels, multiple subscribers can receive each Message sent to the channel. Spring Integration supports both of these. In this sample project, Direct channel and null-channel are used. Direct channel is the default channel type within Spring Integration and simplest point-to-point channel option. Null Channel is a dummy message channel to be used mainly for testing and debugging. It does not send the message from sender to receiver but its send method always returns true and receive method returns null value. In addition to DirectChannel and NullChannel, Spring Integration provides different Message Channel Implementations such as PublishSubscribeChannel, QueueChannel, PriorityChannel, RendezvousChannel, ExecutorChannel and ScopedChannel. Message Endpoint : A message endpoint isolates application code from the infrastructure. In other words, it is an abstraction layer between the application code and the messaging framework. Main Message Endpoints : Transformer : A Message Transformer is responsible for converting a Message’s content or structure and returning the modified Message. For example : it may be used to transform message payload from one format to another or to modify message header values. Filter : A Message Filter determines whether the message should be passed to the message channel. Router : A Message Router decides what channel(s) should receive the Message next if it is available. Splitter : A Splitter breaks an incoming message into multiple messages and send them to the appropriate channel. Aggregator : An Aggregator combines multiple messages into a single message. Service Activator : A Service Activator is a generic endpoint for connecting a service instance to the messaging system. Channel Adapter : A Channel Adapter is an endpoint that connects a Message Channel to external system. Channel Adapters may be either inbound or outbound. An inbound Channel Adapter endpoint connects a external system to a MessageChannel. An outbound Channel Adapter endpoint connects a MessageChannel to a external system. Messaging Gateway : A gateway is an entry point for the messaging system and hides the messaging API from external system. It is bidirectional by covering request and reply channels. Also Spring Integration provides various Channel Adapters and Messaging Gateways (for AMQP, File, Redis, Gemfire, Http, Jdbc, JPA, JMS, RMI, Stream etc..) to support Message-based communication with external systems. Please visit Spring Integration Reference documentation for the detailed information. The following sample Cargo messaging implementation shows basic message endpoints’ behaviours for understanding easily. Cargo messaging system listens cargo messages from external system by using a CargoGateway Interface. Received cargo messages are processed by using CargoSplitter, CargoFilter, CargoRouter, CargoTransformer MessageEndpoints. After then, processed successful domestic and international cargo messages are sent to CargoServiceActivator. Cargo Messaging System’ s Spring Integration Flow is as follows : Let us take a look sample cargo messaging implementation. Used Technologies : JDK 1.8.0_25 Spring 4.1.2 Spring Integration 4.1.0 Maven 3.2.2 Ubuntu 14.04 Project Hierarchy is as follows : STEP 1 : Dependencies Dependencies are added to Maven pom.xml. 4.1.2.RELEASE 4.1.0.RELEASE org.springframework spring-context ${spring.version} org.springframework.integration spring-integration-core ${spring.integration.version} STEP 2 : Cargo Builder CargoBuilder is created to build Cargo requests. public class Cargo { public enum ShippingType { DOMESTIC, INTERNATIONAL } private final long trackingId; private final String receiverName; private final String deliveryAddress; private final double weight; private final String description; private final ShippingType shippingType; private final int deliveryDayCommitment; private final int region; private Cargo(CargoBuilder cargoBuilder) { this.trackingId = cargoBuilder.trackingId; this.receiverName = cargoBuilder.receiverName; this.deliveryAddress = cargoBuilder.deliveryAddress; this.weight = cargoBuilder.weight; this.description = cargoBuilder.description; this.shippingType = cargoBuilder.shippingType; this.deliveryDayCommitment = cargoBuilder.deliveryDayCommitment; this.region = cargoBuilder.region; } // Getter methods... @Override public String toString() { return "Cargo [trackingId=" + trackingId + ", receiverName=" + receiverName + ", deliveryAddress=" + deliveryAddress + ", weight=" + weight + ", description=" + description + ", shippingType=" + shippingType + ", deliveryDayCommitment=" + deliveryDayCommitment + ", region=" + region + "]"; } public static class CargoBuilder { private final long trackingId; private final String receiverName; private final String deliveryAddress; private final double weight; private final ShippingType shippingType; private int deliveryDayCommitment; private int region; private String description; public CargoBuilder(long trackingId, String receiverName, String deliveryAddress, double weight, ShippingType shippingType) { this.trackingId = trackingId; this.receiverName = receiverName; this.deliveryAddress = deliveryAddress; this.weight = weight; this.shippingType = shippingType; } public CargoBuilder setDeliveryDayCommitment(int deliveryDayCommitment) { this.deliveryDayCommitment = deliveryDayCommitment; return this; } public CargoBuilder setDescription(String description) { this.description = description; return this; } public CargoBuilder setRegion(int region) { this.region = region; return this; } public Cargo build() { Cargo cargo = new Cargo(this); if ((ShippingType.DOMESTIC == cargo.getShippingType()) && (cargo.getRegion() <= 0 || cargo.getRegion() > 4)) { throw new IllegalStateException("Region is invalid! Cargo Tracking Id : " + cargo.getTrackingId()); } return cargo; } } STEP 3 : Cargo Message CargoMessage is the parent class of Domestic and International Cargo Messages. public class CargoMessage { private final Cargo cargo; public CargoMessage(Cargo cargo) { this.cargo = cargo; } public Cargo getCargo() { return cargo; } @Override public String toString() { return cargo.toString(); } } STEP 4 : Domestic Cargo Message DomesticCargoMessage Class models domestic cargo messages. public class DomesticCargoMessage extends CargoMessage { public enum Region { NORTH(1), SOUTH(2), EAST(3), WEST(4); private int value; private Region(int value) { this.value = value; } public static Region fromValue(int value) { return Arrays.stream(Region.values()) .filter(region -> region.value == value) .findFirst() .get(); } } private final Region region; public DomesticCargoMessage(Cargo cargo, Region region) { super(cargo); this.region = region; } public Region getRegion() { return region; } @Override public String toString() { return "DomesticCargoMessage [cargo=" + super.toString() + ", region=" + region + "]"; } } STEP 5 : International Cargo Message InternationalCargoMessage Class models international cargo messages. public class InternationalCargoMessage extends CargoMessage { public enum DeliveryOption { NEXT_FLIGHT, PRIORITY, ECONOMY, STANDART } private final DeliveryOption deliveryOption; public InternationalCargoMessage(Cargo cargo, DeliveryOption deliveryOption) { super(cargo); this.deliveryOption = deliveryOption; } public DeliveryOption getDeliveryOption() { return deliveryOption; } @Override public String toString() { return "InternationalCargoMessage [cargo=" + super.toString() + ", deliveryOption=" + deliveryOption + "]"; } } STEP 6 : Application Configuration AppConfiguration is configuration provider class for Spring Container. It creates Message Channels and registers to Spring BeanFactory. Also @EnableIntegration enables imported spring integration configuration and @IntegrationComponentScan scans Spring Integration specific components. Both of them came with Spring Integration 4.0. import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean; import org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScan; import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.IntegrationComponentScan; import org.springframework.integration.channel.DirectChannel; import org.springframework.integration.config.EnableIntegration; import org.springframework.messaging.MessageChannel; @Configuration @ComponentScan("com.onlinetechvision.integration") @EnableIntegration @IntegrationComponentScan("com.onlinetechvision.integration") public class AppConfiguration { /** * Creates a new cargoGWDefaultRequest Channel and registers to BeanFactory. * * @return direct channel */ @Bean public MessageChannel cargoGWDefaultRequestChannel() { return new DirectChannel(); } /** * Creates a new cargoSplitterOutput Channel and registers to BeanFactory. * * @return direct channel */ @Bean public MessageChannel cargoSplitterOutputChannel() { return new DirectChannel(); } /** * Creates a new cargoFilterOutput Channel and registers to BeanFactory. * * @return direct channel */ @Bean public MessageChannel cargoFilterOutputChannel() { return new DirectChannel(); } /** * Creates a new cargoRouterDomesticOutput Channel and registers to BeanFactory. * * @return direct channel */ @Bean public MessageChannel cargoRouterDomesticOutputChannel() { return new DirectChannel(); } /** * Creates a new cargoRouterInternationalOutput Channel and registers to BeanFactory. * * @return direct channel */ @Bean public MessageChannel cargoRouterInternationalOutputChannel() { return new DirectChannel(); } /** * Creates a new cargoTransformerOutput Channel and registers to BeanFactory. * * @return direct channel */ @Bean public MessageChannel cargoTransformerOutputChannel() { return new DirectChannel(); } } STEP 7 : Messaging Gateway CargoGateway Interface exposes domain-specific method to the application. In other words, it provides an application access to the messaging system. Also @MessagingGateway came with Spring Integration 4.0 and simplifies gateway creation in messaging system. Its default request channel is cargoGWDefaultRequestChannel. import java.util.List; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.Gateway; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.MessagingGateway; import org.springframework.messaging.Message; import com.onlinetechvision.model.Cargo; @MessagingGateway(name = "cargoGateway", defaultRequestChannel = "cargoGWDefaultRequestChannel") public interface ICargoGateway { /** * Processes Cargo Request * * @param message SI Message covering Cargo List payload and Batch Cargo Id header. * @return operation result */ @Gateway void processCargoRequest(Message> message); } STEP 8 : Messaging Splitter CargoSplitter listens cargoGWDefaultRequestChannel channel and breaks incoming Cargo List into Cargo messages. Cargo messages are sent to cargoSplitterOutputChannel. import java.util.List; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.MessageEndpoint; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.Splitter; import org.springframework.messaging.Message; import com.onlinetechvision.model.Cargo; @MessageEndpoint public class CargoSplitter { /** * Splits Cargo List to Cargo message(s) * * @param message SI Message covering Cargo List payload and Batch Cargo Id header. * @return cargo list */ @Splitter(inputChannel = "cargoGWDefaultRequestChannel", outputChannel = "cargoSplitterOutputChannel") public List splitCargoList(Message> message) { return message.getPayload(); } } STEP 9 : Messaging Filter CargoFilter determines whether the message should be passed to the message channel. It listens cargoSplitterOutputChannel channel and filters cargo messages exceeding weight limit. If Cargo message is lower than weight limit, it is sent to cargoFilterOutputChannelchannel. If Cargo message is higher than weight limit, it is sent to cargoFilterDiscardChannelchannel. import org.springframework.integration.annotation.Filter; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.MessageEndpoint; import com.onlinetechvision.model.Cargo; @MessageEndpoint public class CargoFilter { private static final long CARGO_WEIGHT_LIMIT = 1_000; /** * Checks weight of cargo and filters if it exceeds limit. * * @param Cargo message * @return check result */ @Filter(inputChannel="cargoSplitterOutputChannel", outputChannel="cargoFilterOutputChannel", discardChannel="cargoFilterDiscardChannel") public boolean filterIfCargoWeightExceedsLimit(Cargo cargo) { return cargo.getWeight() <= CARGO_WEIGHT_LIMIT; } } STEP 10 : Discarded Cargo Message Listener DiscardedCargoMessageListener listens cargoFilterDiscard Channel and handles Cargo messages discarded by CargoFilter. import org.slf4j.Logger; import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.MessageEndpoint; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.ServiceActivator; import org.springframework.messaging.handler.annotation.Header; import com.onlinetechvision.model.Cargo; @MessageEndpoint public class DiscardedCargoMessageListener { private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DiscardedCargoMessageListener.class); /** * Handles discarded domestic and international cargo request(s) and logs. * * @param cargo domestic/international cargo message * @param batchId message header shows cargo batch id */ @ServiceActivator(inputChannel = "cargoFilterDiscardChannel") public void handleDiscardedCargo(Cargo cargo, @Header("CARGO_BATCH_ID") long batchId) { logger.debug("Message in Batch[" + batchId + "] is received with Discarded payload : " + cargo); } } STEP 11 : Messaging Router CargoRouter determines what channel(s) should receive the message next if it is available. It listens cargoFilterOutputChannel channel and returns related channel name in the light of cargo shipping type. In other words, it routes incoming cargo messages to domestic(cargoRouterDomesticOutputChannel) or international(cargoRouterInternationalOutputChannel) cargo channels. Also if shipping type is not set, nullChannel is returned. nullChannel is a dummy message channel to be used mainly for testing and debugging. It does not send the message from sender to receiver but its send method always returns true and receive method returns null value. import org.springframework.integration.annotation.MessageEndpoint; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.Router; import com.onlinetechvision.model.Cargo; import com.onlinetechvision.model.Cargo.ShippingType; @MessageEndpoint public class CargoRouter { /** * Determines cargo request' s channel in the light of shipping type. * * @param Cargo message * @return channel name */ @Router(inputChannel="cargoFilterOutputChannel") public String route(Cargo cargo) { if(cargo.getShippingType() == ShippingType.DOMESTIC) { return "cargoRouterDomesticOutputChannel"; } else if(cargo.getShippingType() == ShippingType.INTERNATIONAL) { return "cargoRouterInternationalOutputChannel"; } return "nullChannel"; } } STEP 12 : Messaging Transformer CargoTransformer listens cargoRouterDomesticOutputChannel &cargoRouterInternationalOutputChannel and transforms incoming Cargo requests to Domestic and International Cargo messages. After then, it sends them tocargoTransformerOutputChannel channel. import org.springframework.integration.annotation.MessageEndpoint; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.Transformer; import com.onlinetechvision.model.Cargo; import com.onlinetechvision.model.DomesticCargoMessage; import com.onlinetechvision.model.DomesticCargoMessage.Region; import com.onlinetechvision.model.InternationalCargoMessage; import com.onlinetechvision.model.InternationalCargoMessage.DeliveryOption; @MessageEndpoint public class CargoTransformer { /** * Transforms Cargo request to Domestic Cargo obj. * * @param cargo * request * @return Domestic Cargo obj */ @Transformer(inputChannel = "cargoRouterDomesticOutputChannel", outputChannel = "cargoTransformerOutputChannel") public DomesticCargoMessage transformDomesticCargo(Cargo cargo) { return new DomesticCargoMessage(cargo, Region.fromValue(cargo.getRegion())); } /** * Transforms Cargo request to International Cargo obj. * * @param cargo * request * @return International Cargo obj */ @Transformer(inputChannel = "cargoRouterInternationalOutputChannel", outputChannel = "cargoTransformerOutputChannel") public InternationalCargoMessage transformInternationalCargo(Cargo cargo) { return new InternationalCargoMessage(cargo, getDeliveryOption(cargo.getDeliveryDayCommitment())); } /** * Get delivery option by delivery day commitment. * * @param deliveryDayCommitment delivery day commitment * @return delivery option */ private DeliveryOption getDeliveryOption(int deliveryDayCommitment) { if (deliveryDayCommitment == 1) { return DeliveryOption.NEXT_FLIGHT; } else if (deliveryDayCommitment == 2) { return DeliveryOption.PRIORITY; } else if (deliveryDayCommitment > 2 && deliveryDayCommitment < 5) { return DeliveryOption.ECONOMY; } else { return DeliveryOption.STANDART; } } } STEP 13 : Messaging Service Activator CargoServiceActivator is a generic endpoint for connecting service instance to the messaging system. It listens cargoTransformerOutputChannel channel and gets processed domestic and international cargo messages and logs. import org.slf4j.Logger; import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.MessageEndpoint; import org.springframework.integration.annotation.ServiceActivator; import org.springframework.messaging.handler.annotation.Header; import com.onlinetechvision.model.CargoMessage; @MessageEndpoint public class CargoServiceActivator { private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(CargoServiceActivator.class); /** * Gets processed domestic and international cargo request(s) and logs. * * @param cargoMessage domestic/international cargo message * @param batchId message header shows cargo batch id */ @ServiceActivator(inputChannel = "cargoTransformerOutputChannel") public void getCargo(CargoMessage cargoMessage, @Header("CARGO_BATCH_ID") long batchId) { logger.debug("Message in Batch[" + batchId + "] is received with payload : " + cargoMessage); } } STEP 14 : Application Application Class is created to run the application. It initializes application context and sends cargo requests to messaging system. import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.Collections; import java.util.HashMap; import java.util.List; import java.util.Map; import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext; import org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigApplicationContext; import org.springframework.messaging.support.MessageBuilder; import com.onlinetechvision.integration.ICargoGateway; import com.onlinetechvision.model.Cargo; import com.onlinetechvision.model.Cargo.ShippingType; public class Application { public static void main(String[] args) { ApplicationContext ctx = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(AppConfiguration.class); ICargoGateway orderGateway = ctx.getBean(ICargoGateway.class); getCargoBatchMap().forEach( (batchId, cargoList) -> orderGateway.processCargoRequest(MessageBuilder .withPayload(cargoList) .setHeader("CARGO_BATCH_ID", batchId) .build())); } /** * Creates a sample cargo batch map covering multiple batches and returns. * * @return cargo batch map */ private static Map> getCargoBatchMap() { Map> cargoBatchMap = new HashMap<>(); cargoBatchMap.put(1, Arrays.asList( new Cargo.CargoBuilder(1, "Receiver_Name1", "Address1", 0.5, ShippingType.DOMESTIC) .setRegion(1).setDescription("Radio").build(), //Second cargo is filtered due to weight limit new Cargo.CargoBuilder(2, "Receiver_Name2", "Address2", 2_000, ShippingType.INTERNATIONAL) .setDeliveryDayCommitment(3).setDescription("Furniture").build(), new Cargo.CargoBuilder(3, "Receiver_Name3", "Address3", 5, ShippingType.INTERNATIONAL) .setDeliveryDayCommitment(2).setDescription("TV").build(), //Fourth cargo is not processed due to no shipping type found new Cargo.CargoBuilder(4, "Receiver_Name4", "Address4", 8, null) .setDeliveryDayCommitment(2).setDescription("Chair").build())); cargoBatchMap.put(2, Arrays.asList( //Fifth cargo is filtered due to weight limit new Cargo.CargoBuilder(5, "Receiver_Name5", "Address5", 1_200, ShippingType.DOMESTIC) .setRegion(2).setDescription("Refrigerator").build(), new Cargo.CargoBuilder(6, "Receiver_Name6", "Address6", 20, ShippingType.DOMESTIC) .setRegion(3).setDescription("Table").build(), //Seventh cargo is not processed due to no shipping type found new Cargo.CargoBuilder(7, "Receiver_Name7", "Address7", 5, null) .setDeliveryDayCommitment(1).setDescription("TV").build())); cargoBatchMap.put(3, Arrays.asList( new Cargo.CargoBuilder(8, "Receiver_Name8", "Address8", 200, ShippingType.DOMESTIC) .setRegion(2).setDescription("Washing Machine").build(), new Cargo.CargoBuilder(9, "Receiver_Name9", "Address9", 4.75, ShippingType.INTERNATIONAL) .setDeliveryDayCommitment(1).setDescription("Document").build())); return Collections.unmodifiableMap(cargoBatchMap); } } STEP 15 : Build Project Cargo requests’ operational results are as follows : Cargo 1 : is sent to service activator successfully. Cargo 2 : is filtered due to weight limit. Cargo 3 : is sent to service activator successfully. Cargo 4 : is not processed due to no shipping type. Cargo 5 : is filtered due to weight limit. Cargo 6 : is sent to service activator successfully. Cargo 7 : is not processed due to no shipping type. Cargo 8 : is sent to service activator successfully. Cargo 9 : is sent to service activator successfully. After the project is built and run, the following console output logs will be seen : 2014-12-09 23:43:51 [main] DEBUG c.o.i.CargoServiceActivator - Message in Batch[1] is received with payload : DomesticCargoMessage [cargo=Cargo [trackingId=1, receiverName=Receiver_Name1, deliveryAddress=Address1, weight=0.5, description=Radio, shippingType=DOMESTIC, deliveryDayCommitment=0, region=1], region=NORTH] 2014-12-09 23:43:51 [main] DEBUG c.o.i.DiscardedCargoMessageListener - Message in Batch[1] is received with Discarded payload : Cargo [trackingId=2, receiverName=Receiver_Name2, deliveryAddress=Address2, weight=2000.0, description=Furniture, shippingType=INTERNATIONAL, deliveryDayCommitment=3, region=0] 2014-12-09 23:43:51 [main] DEBUG c.o.i.CargoServiceActivator - Message in Batch[1] is received with payload : InternationalCargoMessage [cargo=Cargo [trackingId=3, receiverName=Receiver_Name3, deliveryAddress=Address3, weight=5.0, description=TV, shippingType=INTERNATIONAL, deliveryDayCommitment=2, region=0], deliveryOption=PRIORITY] 2014-12-09 23:43:51 [main] DEBUG c.o.i.DiscardedCargoMessageListener - Message in Batch[2] is received with Discarded payload : Cargo [trackingId=5, receiverName=Receiver_Name5, deliveryAddress=Address5, weight=1200.0, description=Refrigerator, shippingType=DOMESTIC, deliveryDayCommitment=0, region=2] 2014-12-09 23:43:51 [main] DEBUG c.o.i.CargoServiceActivator - Message in Batch[2] is received with payload : DomesticCargoMessage [cargo=Cargo [trackingId=6, receiverName=Receiver_Name6, deliveryAddress=Address6, weight=20.0, description=Table, shippingType=DOMESTIC, deliveryDayCommitment=0, region=3], region=EAST] 2014-12-09 23:43:51 [main] DEBUG c.o.i.CargoServiceActivator - Message in Batch[3] is received with payload : DomesticCargoMessage [cargo=Cargo [trackingId=8, receiverName=Receiver_Name8, deliveryAddress=Address8, weight=200.0, description=Washing Machine, shippingType=DOMESTIC, deliveryDayCommitment=0, region=2], region=SOUTH] 2014-12-09 23:43:51 [main] DEBUG c.o.i.CargoServiceActivator - Message in Batch[3] is received with payload : InternationalCargoMessage [cargo=Cargo [trackingId=9, receiverName=Receiver_Name9, deliveryAddress=Address9, weight=4.75, description=Document, shippingType=INTERNATIONAL, deliveryDayCommitment=1, region=0], deliveryOption=NEXT_FLIGHT] Source Code Source Code is available on Github References Enterprise Integration Patterns Spring Integration Reference Manual Spring Integration 4.1.0.RELEASE API Pro Spring Integration Spring Integration 3.0.2 and 4.0 Milestone 4 Released

First and foremost, it is important to define what AWS Activate is and what it is used for before we can take a deeper look. Exactly one year ago, Amazon created a program specifically designed for a particular group of customers that often times is in need of as much help as they can get (AKA startups). This program supports startups in their initial phase of building their businesses. This includes providing AWS credits, taking part in startup contests, and receiving benefits from third party solutions on the AWS cloud. Activate allows AWS partners that want to create a presence within the Activate community offer perks to member startups. Some of which include discounts and extended free tiers. Some startups that have attained high levels of success with AWS include Spotify, Pinterest, and Dropbox. With the big shots maintaining their places in startup stardom, Amazon has opened its doors to the next generation of innovators. As such, Amazon offers two different Activate packages. The Self-Starter package is comprised of a limited amount of each of the offerings listed above, whereas the Portfolio package includes some added bonuses along the lines of more high-profile and technical support as well as more in-depth training. On his blog AWS’ CTO, Werner Vogel, reiterated the importance of startups, “Startups will forever be a very important customer segment of AWS. They were among our first customers and along the way some amazing businesses have been built by these startups, many of which running for 100% on AWS.” “We’re excited to be a part of this global momentum in the startup ecosystem. The challenge now is to support and assist an increasing number of startups across the world.” The fun doesn’t stop there. In April of this year, AWS expanded the Activate package to offer much more than generalupport. This entailed sponsoring solution architects to take startups through step by step consultations in the fields of security, architecture and performance. Consequently, though Amazon’s professional services teams were established for customers, it was natural to have them take part in Activate. By nurturing new startups and making them rely heavily on the AWS cloud. As we can see today, companies that started with AWS 4 years ago are now worth billions of dollars. Airbnb and Dropbox, for example, now thoroughly enjoy the flexibility Amazon offers, as well as the fact that they no longer have to maintain cumbersome IT operations. Why not from the get-go? So the question is, if Amazon essentially built AWS on startups, why hasn’t Activate been around from the get-go, 6 years ago? AWS owes a great deal of its success to scalable startups that wanted and needed servers to run their businesses, yet didn’t have the initial capital to build their own data centers. No one really knows why Amazon did not provide startups back then with the kind of support they do today. However, as the market matured, it became clear that Amazon realized that an increasing number of startups could use their help. As a result, Amazon discovered that marketing their support services through Venture Capitalists and incubators around the world would include them as partners in this program and aid in marketing the service to startups of all kinds. “AWS Activate requires a special registration that allows startup customers with a valid AWS account to apply for either a self-starter package or a portfolio package. If a startup is a member of one of the accelerators, seed funds, or startup organizations that Amazon already works with, they may apply for the more exclusive AWS Activate Portfolio Package.” Learn More Incubators and Accelerators It was a natural step for Amazon to partner with accelerators all over the world with the Activate package. In addition to supporting startups, as mentioned above, these accelerators act as channels in the startup scene.At the first AWS re:Invent, Bezos jokes to his fellow investors, saying that eventually some of the investments will return to him because of how heavily the startup scene relies on Amazon. Activate and the approximately 150 accelerators across the world, including White Accel, Techstars, Appwest, and Battery Ventures, genuinely support and understand the values of the AWS service. They are happy to be able to use the Activate platform to help their startups flourish within the AWS clouds. 3rd Party Partners Aside from the accelerators, as an Amazon partner, you can enroll special offers to Activate members. For example, members that are part of the Self-Starter package may receive a 3 month free trial for Chef, whereas Portfolio members may receive a 6 month trial. Most of the partners will provide an extended free trial or credits via Activate. For instance, Trend Micro, one of Amazon’s biggest partners in the security domain, provides $2500 credit for Activate members in the Portfolio package. While there are not many partners on the list, the ones that are mentioned are very helpful and provide nice benefits for Activate members. Reviews of the program from both the partners’ and startups’ side showed that Activate is ideal for startups that have resource constraints. While members within the Self-Starter package are able to use the AWS Free Usage Tier, Portfolio members can receive anywhere from $1,000 to $15,000 in AWS Promotional Credit. The credit is maybe the most important value for these startups. Bearing in mind that Google also has their own line of packages and credit for new companies, it makes sense for AWS to start giving more life to these companies, above the free tier. Everyone has access to the free tier, these startups simply get more of it. Seems that there is no downside to participating. There is no obligation and the worst thing that can happen is that you will find that the services are great, and simply continue using them, which may result in you being locked-in to the point where you need to eventually pay. On the other hand, seems that the last announcement in April, which is actually “meet our architects”. Meaning the knowledge that Amazon’s architects share with startups in their consultation sessions help them get a better grasp on the ecosystem, as well as understand that more resource utilization is ultimately the next logical step for growth. All in all, although Amazon didn’t offer with this program 4 years ago, the AWS cloud was still the natural choice for startups. It included all of the benefits a startup can get using and online and on-demand infinite amount of resources. As a result, it is the clear choice for web scale startups. There are many reasons why Amazon only recently decided to offer free benefits to their prized potential customers. While it could have stemmed from competition from Microsoft and Google, or Amazon may want to simply show their support for their potential customers, demonstrating their cloud’s benefits at an early stage. Aside from that, Amazon understands and is built on companies with long term goals and possibilities. Therefore Amazon sees startups as a long term investment, which starts off with little risk.

Converters are an essential building block in XAML interfaces with one simple task: converting values of one type to another. Since they have a input, usually a view model property, and an output, it would be wonderful if we could somehow chain them to create a new converter that processes all internal converters. Luckily, this is quite simple to do, but we do need to create a new converter which will hold other converters and whose implementation will iterate over nested converters. Full code can be found over at Github repository here, only interesting parts will be highlighted in this blog post. Our combining converter class is also a converter itself, but it can contain other converters inside it: [ContentProperty("Converters")] public class ChainingConverter : IValueConverter { public Collection Converters { get; set; } } Converter functions are trivially implemented and iteratively go through the converters list and apply the converter on the previous value. public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture) { foreach (var converter in Converters) { value = converter.Convert(value, targetType, parameter, culture); } return value; } ConvertBack is implemented in the same fashion. This allows us to create new converters in XAML with the following syntax: But what if we need to send parameters to some of the converters, how can we do that when the same parameter is used throughout the ChainingConverter implementation? To provide custom parameter for individual converters, we can create a wrapper converter around existing converter and specify parameter on that wrapper. Here is a skeleton for such wrapper converter, notice that the wrapper is also a converter: [ContentProperty("Converter")] public class ParameterizedConverterWrapper : DependencyObject, IValueConverter { // IValueConverter Converter dependency property // object Parameter dependency property // object DefaultReturnValue dependency property public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture) { if (Converter != null) return Converter.Convert(value, targetType, Parameter ?? parameter, culture); return DefaultReturnValue; } } Converter wrappers allow us to create complex converters such as this one: The final converter should be self explanatory even though you probably haven’t seen these converters before. You can see that unlike other converters, the wrapper is a dependency object which allows us to use bindings on the Parameter property since it is in fact a dependency property. More complex converters should be created from ordinary converters whenever possible, especially when working with primitive types such as bool, string, enums and null values. What’s next? The last example looked like a small DSL embedded in XAML. We could create converters that simulate flow control or conditionals. We could even create converters that switch depending on the property before it, essentially coding logic inside such converters. Whether that is desirable is debatable, but it can be done. The full code with sample application can be found at the following Github repository: MassivePixel/wp-common.

This blog post is the third in a series that cover Azure Active Directory Single Sign-On (SSO) authentication in native mobile applications. Authenticating iOS app users with Azure Active Directory How to Best handle AAD access tokens in native mobile apps Using Azure SSO tokens for Multiple AAD Resources From Native Mobile Apps(this post) Sharing Azure SSO access tokens across multiple native mobile apps. Brief Start In an enterprise context, it is highly likely that you would have multiple web services that your native mobile app needs to consume. I had exactly this scenario, where one of my clients had asked if they could maintain the same token in the background in the mobile app to use it for accessing multiple web services. I spent some time digging through the documentation and conducting some experiments to confirm some points. Therefore, this post is to share my findings on accessing multiple Azure AD resources from native mobile apps using ADAL. In the previous two posts, we looked at implementing Azure AD SSO login on native mobile apps, then we looked at how to best maintain these access tokens. This post discusses how to use Azure AD SSO tokens to manage access to multiple AAD resources. Let’s assume that we have 2 web services sitting in Azure (ie WebApi1, and WebApi2), both of which are set to use Azure AD authentication. Then, we have the native mobile app, which needs access to both web services (WebApi1, and WebApi2). Let’s look at what we can and cannot do. Cannot Use the Same Azure AD Access-Token for Multiple Resources The first thing that comes to mind is to use the same access token for multiple Azure AD resources, and that is what the client asked about. However, this is not allowed. Azure AD issues a token for certain resource (which is mapped to an Azure AD app). When we call AcquireToken(), we need to provide a resourceID, only ONE resourceID. The result would have a token that can only be used for the supplied resource (id). There are ways where you could use the same token (as we will see later in this post), but it is not recommended as it complicates operations logging, authentication process tracing, etc. Therefore it is better to look at the other options provided by Azure and the ADAL library. Use the Refresh-Token to Acquire Tokens for Multiple Resources The ADAL library supports acquiring multiple access-Tokens for multiple resources using a refresh token. This means once a user is authenticated, the ADAL’s authentication context, would be able to generate an access-token to multiple resources without authenticating the user again. This was mentioned briefly by the MSDN documentation here. The refresh token issued by Azure AD can be used to access multiple resources. For example, if you have a client application that has permission to call two web APIs, the refresh token can be used to get an access token to the other web API as well. (MSDN documentation) public async Task RefreshTokens() { var tokenEntry = await tokensRepository.GetTokens(); var authorizationParameters = new AuthorizationParameters (_controller); var result = "Refreshed an existing Token"; bool hasARefreshToken = true; if (tokenEntry == null) { var localAuthResult = await _authContext.AcquireTokenAsync ( resourceId1, clientId, new Uri (redirectUrl), authorizationParameters, UserIdentifier.AnyUser, null); tokenEntry = new Tokens { WebApi1AccessToken = localAuthResult.AccessToken, RefreshToken = localAuthResult.RefreshToken, Email = localAuthResult.UserInfo.DisplayableId, ExpiresOn = localAuthResult.ExpiresOn }; hasARefreshToken = false; result = "Acquired a new Token"; } var refreshAuthResult = await _authContext.AcquireTokenByRefreshTokenAsync(tokenEntry.RefreshToken, clientId, resourceId2); tokenEntry.WebApi2AccessToken = refreshAuthResult.AccessToken; tokenEntry.RefreshToken = refreshAuthResult.RefreshToken; tokenEntry.ExpiresOn = refreshAuthResult.ExpiresOn; if (hasARefreshToken) { // this will only be called when we try refreshing the tokens (not when we are acquiring new tokens. refreshAuthResult = await _authContext.AcquireTokenByRefreshTokenAsync (refreshAuthResult.RefreshToken, clientId, resourceId1); tokenEntry.WebApi1AccessToken = refreshAuthResult.AccessToken; tokenEntry.RefreshToken = refreshAuthResult.RefreshToken; tokenEntry.ExpiresOn = refreshAuthResult.ExpiresOn; } await tokensRepository.InsertOrUpdateAsync (tokenEntry); return result; } As you can see from above, we check if we have an access-token from previous runs, and if we do, we refresh the access-tokens for both web services. Notice how the _authContext.AcquireTokenByRefreshTokenAsync() provides an overloading parameter that takes a resourceId. This enables us to get multiple access tokens for multiple resources without having to re-authenticate the user. The rest of the code is similar to what we have seen in the previous two posts. ADAL Library Can Produce New Tokens For Other Resources In the previous two posts, we looked at ADAL library and how it uses TokenCache. Although ADAL does not support persistent caching of tokens yet on mobile apps, it still uses the TokenCache for in-memory caching. This enables ADAL library to generate new access-tokens if the context (AuthenticationContext) still exists from previous authentications. Remember in the previous post we said it is recommended to keep a reference to the authentication-context? Here it comes in handy, as it enables us to generate new access-tokens for accessing multiple Azure AD resources. var localAuthResult = await _authContext.AcquireTokenAsync ( resourceId2, clientId, new Uri (redirectUrl), authorizationParameters, UserIdentifier.AnyUser, null); Calling AcquireToken() (even with no refresh-token) would give us a new access-token to webApi2. This is due to ADAL great goodness where it checks if we have a refresh-token in-memory (managed by ADAL), then it uses that to generate a new access-token for webApi2. An alternative The third alternative option is the simplest, but not necessarily the best. In this option, we could use the same access token to consume multiple Azure AD resources. To do this, we need to use the same Azure AD app ID when setting the web application’s authentication. This requires some understanding of how the Azure AD authentication happens on our web apps. If you refer to Taiseer Joudeh’s tutorial, which we mentioned before, you will see that in our web app, we need to tell the authentication framework what’s our Authority and the Audience (Azure AD app Id). If we set up both of our web apps, to use the same Audience (Azure AD app Id), meaning that we link them both into the same Azure AD application, then we could use the same access-token to use both web services. // linking our web app authentication to an Azure AD application private void ConfigureAuth(IAppBuilder app) { app.UseWindowsAzureActiveDirectoryBearerAuthentication( new WindowsAzureActiveDirectoryBearerAuthenticationOptions { Audience = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Audience"], Tenant = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Tenant"] }); } As we said before, this is very simple and requires less code, but could cause complications in terms of security logging and maintenance. At the end of the day, it depends on your context and what you are trying to achieve. Therefore, I thought it would be worth mentioning and I will leave the judgement for you on which option you choose. Conclusions We looked at how we could use Azure AD SSO with ADAL to access multiple resources from native mobile apps. As we saw, there are three main options, and the choice could be made based on the context of your app. I hope you find this useful and if you have any questions or you need help with some development that you are doing, then just get in touch. This blog post is the third in a series that cover Azure Active Directory Single Sign-On (SSO) authentication in native mobile applications.

recently some pwc tech supremos wrote an article: agile coding in enterprise it: code small and local . subsections: moving away from the monolith why microservices? msa: a think-small approach for rapid development thinking the msa way: minimalism is a must where msa makes sense in msa, integration is the problem, not the solution conclusion msa is short for microservices architecture(s), in the above article. the article posits that microservices is the antidote to monoliths. it doesn’t mention cookie cutter scaling at all, which is another antidote to monoliths, with the right build infrastructure and devops. here’s a view of hypothetical architecture a company could deploy if they were doing microservices: w is web server. p and q don’t stand for anything in particular. here’s the same solution as cookie-cutter scaling, and the alternate (historical) choice of monolith to the right of it: the cookie cutter approach will often leverage components that are dependency injected into each other, and though monoliths might be the same today, pre 2004 they were probably hairballs of singletons (the design patten, not the springframework idiom). continuous delivery, agile? here’s one excerpt that confuses me: " … makes no sense to design and develop software over an 18-month process to accommodate all possible use cases when those use cases can change unexpectedly and the life span of code modules might be less than 18 months…. as i recall, the 18 month-delay problem was solved previously. agile methodologies principally, and continuous delivery/deployment in more recent times. it does not matter whether you’re compiling a monolith, a cookie-cutter solution, old soa services, or microservices, the 18-month fear isn’t real if you’re doing agile and/or cd. agile and cd were increasing the release cadence, and allowing the organization to pivot faster before microservices. it doesn’t matter whether you’ve got a monolith, something cookie-cutter scaled, or soa (micro or not), you’re going to be able to benefit from agile practices and devops setup that facilitates cd. in something like 30 thoughtworks client engagements since 2002, i have not seen the 18-month process at all. in fact i last encountered it in 1997 on an as/400 project, which was the last time i saw a waterfall process being championed. build(s) and trunk elsewhere there is a suggestion: “each microservice [has] its own build, to avoid trunk conflict”. that isn’t unique to microservices, of course. component based systems today also have a multiple build file (module) structure in a source tree. hopefully “trunk” mentioned is alluding to trunk based development, as i would recommend. build technologies this is a expansion on the above, and you can skip this paragraph if you want. hierarchical build systems like maven has allow you to have one build file per module (whether that’s a service or a simple jar destined for the classpath of a bigger thing). buck has a build grammar that allows for a build to grow/shrink/change based on what is being built (from implicitly shared source). maven is for the java ecosystem, while buck promises to be multi-language. both are doing multi-module builds for the sake of a composed or servicified deployment. both maven and buck are presently competing to draw the most reduced set of compile/test/deploy operations for the changes since last build for a hierarchy of modules. anyway, what is it we are striving for? what we want is to develop cheaply, and to deploy smoothly and often, without defect. we want the ability to deploy without large permanent or temporary headcount overseeing or participating in deployment. aside from development costs, and support/operation, deployment costs are a potentially big factor in total cost of ownership. what i like about cookie-cutter is the uniformity of the deployable things. the team size for deployment of such a thing doesn’t grow with the numbers of nodes that binary is being deployed to. at least, if you’re able to automate the deployment to those nodes, and have a strategy for handling the users connected to the stack at redeployment time somehow (sessions or stateless). the uniformity of the deployment is a cheapener, i think. when you have a number of dissimilar services, you might be able to minimize release personnel if you’re only doing one service. if more than one service is being updated in a particular deployment, you’re going to have to concentrate to make sure you don’t experience a multiplier effect for the participants. it is possible of course, to keep the headcount small, but the practice needed beforehand is bigger, which in turn allows for some calmness around the actual deployment. if we’ve stepped away from the project management office thinking that suggests three buggy releases a year (which is more usual than 18 month schedules of old), then we can employ continuous deployment to further eliminate personnel costs around going live. this is something that microservices does well at, but because the most adept proponents design forwards & backwards compatibility into the permutations most likely to co-exist in production. it is at least much quicker to redeploy and bounce one small service, n times than the the cookie-cutter uniform deployment.

Originally written by Sébastien Deluze on the SpringSource blog Spring Jackson support has been improved lately to be more flexible and powerful. This blog post gives you an update about the most useful Jackson related features available in Spring Framework 4.x and Spring Boot. All the code samples are coming from this spring-jackson-demo sample application, feel free to have a look at the code. JSON Views It can sometimes be useful to filter contextually objects serialized to the HTTP response body. In order to provide such capabilities, Spring MVC now has builtin support for Jackson’s Serialization Views. The following example illustrates how to use @JsonView to filter fields depending on the context of serialization - e.g. getting a "summary" view when dealing with collections, and getting a full representation when dealing with a single resource: public class View { interface Summary {} } public class User { @JsonView(View.Summary.class) private Long id; @JsonView(View.Summary.class) private String firstname; @JsonView(View.Summary.class) private String lastname; private String email; private String address; private String postalCode; private String city; private String country; } public class Message { @JsonView(View.Summary.class) private Long id; @JsonView(View.Summary.class) private LocalDate created; @JsonView(View.Summary.class) private String title; @JsonView(View.Summary.class) private User author; private List recipients; private String body; } Thanks to Spring MVC @JsonView support, it is possible to choose, on a per handler method basis, which field should be serialized: @RestController public class MessageController { @Autowired private MessageService messageService; @JsonView(View.Summary.class) @RequestMapping("/") public List getAllMessages() { return messageService.getAll(); } @RequestMapping("/{id}") public Message getMessage(@PathVariable Long id) { return messageService.get(id); } } In this example, if all messages are retrieved, only the most important fields are serialized thanks to the getAllMessages() method annotated with@JsonView(View.Summary.class): [ { "id" : 1, "created" : "2014-11-14", "title" : "Info", "author" : { "id" : 1, "firstname" : "Brian", "lastname" : "Clozel" } }, { "id" : 2, "created" : "2014-11-14", "title" : "Warning", "author" : { "id" : 2, "firstname" : "Stéphane", "lastname" : "Nicoll" } }, { "id" : 3, "created" : "2014-11-14", "title" : "Alert", "author" : { "id" : 3, "firstname" : "Rossen", "lastname" : "Stoyanchev" } } ] In Spring MVC default configuration, MapperFeature.DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION is set tofalse. That means that when enabling a JSON View, non annotated fields or properties likebody or recipients are not serialized. When a specific Message is retrieved using the getMessage() handler method (no JSON View specified), all fields are serialized as expected: { "id" : 1, "created" : "2014-11-14", "title" : "Info", "body" : "This is an information message", "author" : { "id" : 1, "firstname" : "Brian", "lastname" : "Clozel", "email" : "[email protected]", "address" : "1 Jaures street", "postalCode" : "69003", "city" : "Lyon", "country" : "France" }, "recipients" : [ { "id" : 2, "firstname" : "Stéphane", "lastname" : "Nicoll", "email" : "[email protected]", "address" : "42 Obama street", "postalCode" : "1000", "city" : "Brussel", "country" : "Belgium" }, { "id" : 3, "firstname" : "Rossen", "lastname" : "Stoyanchev", "email" : "[email protected]", "address" : "3 Warren street", "postalCode" : "10011", "city" : "New York", "country" : "USA" } ] } Only one class or interface can be specified with the @JsonView annotation, but you can use inheritance to represent JSON View hierarchies (if a field is part of a JSON View, it will be also part of parent view). For example, this handler method will serialize fields annotated with@JsonView(View.Summary.class) and @JsonView(View.SummaryWithRecipients.class): public class View { interface Summary {} interface SummaryWithRecipients extends Summary {} } public class Message { @JsonView(View.Summary.class) private Long id; @JsonView(View.Summary.class) private LocalDate created; @JsonView(View.Summary.class) private String title; @JsonView(View.Summary.class) private User author; @JsonView(View.SummaryWithRecipients.class) private List recipients; private String body; } @RestController public class MessageController { @Autowired private MessageService messageService; @JsonView(View.SummaryWithRecipients.class) @RequestMapping("/with-recipients") public List getAllMessagesWithRecipients() { return messageService.getAll(); } } JSON Views could also be specified when using RestTemplate HTTP client orMappingJackson2JsonView by wrapping the value to serialize in a MappingJacksonValue as shown in this code sample. JSONP As described in the reference documentation, you can enable JSONP for @ResponseBody andResponseEntity methods by declaring an @ControllerAdvice bean that extendsAbstractJsonpResponseBodyAdvice as shown below: @ControllerAdvice public class JsonpAdvice extends AbstractJsonpResponseBodyAdvice { public JsonpAdvice() { super("callback"); } } With such @ControllerAdvice bean registered, it will be possible to request the JSON webservice from another domain using a In this example, the received payload would be: parseResponse({ "id" : 1, "created" : "2014-11-14", ... }); JSONP is also supported and automatically enabled when using MappingJackson2JsonViewwith a request that has a query parameter named jsonp or callback. The JSONP query parameter name(s) could be customized through the jsonpParameterNames property. XML support Since 2.0 release, Jackson provides first class support for some other data formats than JSON. Spring Framework and Spring Boot provide builtin support for Jackson based XML serialization/deserialization. As soon as you include the jackson-dataformat-xml dependency to your project, it is automatically used instead of JAXB2. Using Jackson XML extension has several advantages over JAXB2: Both Jackson and JAXB annotations are recognized JSON View are supported, allowing you to build easily REST Webservices with the same filtered output for both XML and JSON data formats No need to annotate your class with @XmlRootElement, each class serializable in JSON will serializable in XML You usually also want to make sure that the XML library in use is Woodstox since: It is faster than Stax implementation provided with the JDK It avoids some known issues like adding unnecessary namespace prefixes Some features like pretty print don't work without it In order to use it, simply add the latest woodstox-core-asl dependency available to your project. Customizing the Jackson ObjectMapper Prior to Spring Framework 4.1.1, Jackson HttpMessageConverters were usingObjectMapper default configuration. In order to provide a better and easily customizable default configuration, a new Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder has been introduced. It is the JavaConfig equivalent of the well known Jackson2ObjectMapperFactoryBean used in XML configuration. Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder provides a nice API to customize various Jackson settings while retaining Spring Framework provided default ones. It also allows to createObjectMapper and XmlMapper instances based on the same configuration. Both Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder and Jackson2ObjectMapperFactoryBean define a better Jackson default configuration. For example, theDeserializationFeature.FAIL_ON_UNKNOWN_PROPERTIES property set to false, in order to allow deserialization of JSON objects with unmapped properties. Jackson support for Java 8 Date & Time API data types is automatically registered when Java 8 is used and jackson-datatype-jsr310 is on the classpath. Joda-Time support is registered as well when jackson-datatype-joda is part of your project dependencies. These classes also allow you to register easily Jackson mixins, modules, serializers or even property naming strategy like PropertyNamingStrategy.CAMEL_CASE_TO_LOWER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES if you want to have your userName java property translated to user_name in JSON. With Spring Boot As described in the Spring Boot reference documentation, there are various ways tocustomize the Jackson ObjectMapper. You can for example enable/disable Jackson features easily by adding properties likespring.jackson.serialization.indent_output=true to application.properties. As an alternative, in the upcoming 1.2 release Spring Boot also allows to customize the Jackson configuration (JSON and XML) used by Spring MVC HttpMessageConverters by declaring a Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder @Bean: @Bean public Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder jacksonBuilder() { Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder builder = new Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder(); builder.indentOutput(true).dateFormat(new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd")); return builder; } This is useful if you want to use advanced Jackson configuration not exposed through regular configuration keys. Without Spring Boot In a plain Spring Framework application, you can also use Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder to customize the XML and JSON HttpMessageConverters as shown bellow: @Configuration @EnableWebMvc public class WebConfiguration extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter { @Override public void configureMessageConverters(List> converters) { Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder builder = new Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder(); builder.indentOutput(true).dateFormat(new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd")); converters.add(new MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter(builder.build())); converters.add(new MappingJackson2XmlHttpMessageConverter(builder.createXmlMapper(true).build())); } } More to come With the upcoming Spring Framework 4.1.3 release, thanks to the addition of a Spring context aware HandlerInstantiator (see SPR-10768 for more details), you will be able to autowire Jackson handlers (serializers, deserializers, type and type id resolvers). This will allow you to build, for example, a custom deserializer that will replace a field containing only a reference in the JSON payload by the full Entity retrieved from the database.

both high availability (ha) and disaster recovery (dr) have been essential it topics. fundamentally ha is about fault tolerance relevant to the availability of an examined subject like application, database, vms, etc. while dr roots on the ability to resume operations in the aftermath of a catastrophic event. a fundamental difference of these two is that ha expects no down time and no data loss, while dr does. they are different issues and should be addressed separately. background for many it shops, either ha or dr has been a high risk and high cost item. both are essential to business continuity, while traditionally tough technical problems to solve with very significant and long-term commitments on resources. not only they are technically challenging, but a continual cost-cutting which has become an it standard practice in the past two decades makes purchasing hardware/software and constructing either ha or dr solution on premises further distant from it’s financial and technical realties. sense of urgency too often, the technical challenges and resource commitments overwhelm it and turn ha and dr into academic discussions, or symbolic items on a project checklist. at the same time, information is rapidly exploding as internet, mobility and social-network are becoming integral in our daily lives and businesses. there are progressively more data to process and store. for many businesses, the needs for ha and dr is urgent for better managing risks. and continual availability and on-demand recoverability of it are becoming increasingly critical. this is the reality, now the good news is that the recent introduction of cloud computing has fundamentally changed how an ha or dr solution can be implemented. microsoft azure is a vivid example of ha and dr solutions with significantly reduced the required financial commitment and involved technical complexities. the traditional approach by establishing redundancy and acquiring a physical dr site with long-term resources and financial commitments is now largely replaced with consumable services which can be configured in minutes by mouse-clicking and with a manageable cost structure based on usage. ha and dr have become it solutions which are financially realistic and technically feasible for businesses in all sizes. ha, redundancy, and microsoft azure lrs ha is to eliminate a single point of failure of an examined component, an application for example. it denotes a strategy to employ redundancy such that a target application can and will continue being available without downtime while experiencing a failure of hosting hardware or software. there are various and well-developed ha solutions like a hyper-v host cluster using redundant hardware to eliminate a single point of failure of hosting os or hardware, and an application cluster for eliminating a single point of failure by running the application in multiple vm instances with a synchronous state. although ha implementations may vary, the fundamental principle nevertheless remains the same. ha expects neither downtime nor data loss while experiencing an outage of a target hardware or software. ha has become dramatically simple in microsoft azure. basically, all data written to disk in microsoft azure are kept at least in the so-called lrs, locally redundant storage. lrs replicates a transaction synchronously to three different storage nodes across fault domains and upgrade domains within the same region for durability. in layman’s terms, microsoft azure by default maintains at least three copies of user data to achieve ha. dr, replication, and microsoft azure grs dr is about having a plan and backups in place to resume operations in the aftermath of a catastrophic event. unplanned outage is assumed in a dr scenario, therefore some data loss is also expected. notice that ha and dr are different business problems and addressed differently. while both ha and dr are based on applying redundancy, i.e. a source and replicas, or multiple identical nodes of an examines component like application instance, databases, or vms, there are however differences between the two. a dr solution generally employs replicas or backups, are implemented with asynchronous processes, and expects an outage of a source and with some data loss in transit while the outage occurs. while ha requires a logical representation with a real-time integrity using synchronous processes across all participating nodes, expects neither downtime nor data loss while experiencing an outage of a participating node. for a critical workload, one approach of dr is to establish geo-replication to address an outage of an entire geographic area caused by a natural disaster, for example. the concern is that a catastrophic event may impact an entire geographic area causing a datacenter where a mission critical application is being hosted becomes unavailable for an extended period of time. in microsoft azure, geo redundant storage or grs is the default and an optional setting, as shown above, while configuring a storage account. grs will queue a transaction committed to lrs as an asynchronous replication to a secondary region, a few hundreds miles away from the primary region where a storage account is originated. at the secondary region, data is also stored in lrs, i.e. made durable by replicating it to three storage nodes. specifically, a microsoft azure storage account configured with grs essentially maintains three replicas locally for high availability, and replicates the content and maintains three replicas at a secondary datacenter a few hundreds miles away for dr. so all are six copies, three locally and three remotely. all these are configured by one, yes one mouse click from a dropdown list while creating a storage account. the above is a conceptual model illustrated a data flow of grs. grs replication has little performance impact on an application since application data are committed to lrs in real-time while replication to grs is queued, i.e. asynchronously. a write to lrs is synchronous and in real-time, once committed, the changes are expected within 15 minutes to be asynchronously replicated to the secondary site. for a ra-grs storage account, in addition to one primary endpoint for read/write operations as it is in a grs, there is also one secondary endpoint as read only becomes available as shown below. the cost implications of grs or ra-grs include the additional storage and the transmission costs for egress traffic, as applicable, of the secondary datacenter. ingress traffic is free . and microsoft azure storage sla offers 99.9% availability and a cost calculator is also available. microsoft azure recovery services so far, much is about backing up or replicating data. to successfully restore, a dr plan must be put in place and ensure its availability upon a dr scenario in progress. either placing a dr plan at a primary site where the source is or a secondary site where a replica stays has some issues and concerns. keeping a dr plan at the source site where all the resources are in place and on-the-job trainings seems logical. or does it? dr is assuming a catastrophic event over an extended geographic areas where the source site is experiencing an outage. in such case, keeping a dr plan in the source site defeats the purpose. maintaining a dr plan at the secondary site is the choice then. in a dr scenario, a recovery site is to be brought on line within a expected period of time according to a dr plan, and having the dr plan right there and then at a recovery site makes all the sense. or does it? this decision introduces a number of requirements including the physical readiness, the timeliness, and the financial implications on securing and maintaining a dr plan at a remote physical facility. for a vmm server running on system center 2012 sp1 or later, an idea, reliable and straightforward way is to use azure recovery services to maintain a dr plan as shown below. and for any backup needs, using cloud as a backup site makes backing up and restoring data an anytime anywhere operation. azure site recovery vault this service essentially acts as the director of a dr process. it orchestrates and manages the protection and failover of vms in clouds managed by virtual machine manager 2012 sp1 or later. a noticeable advantage is the ability to test a recovery configuration, exercise a proactive failover and recovery, and automate recovery in the event of a site outage. the sla of site recovery services is 99.9% availability to ensure a configured dr plan is always in place with expected updates. this is a dr solution that it can implement, simulate, verify, bring online and be absolutely confident with the readiness. azure backup vault this is a reliable, scalable and inexpensive data protection solution with zero capital investment and extremely low operational expense. like other secure communication with microsoft azure, you will first upload a public certificate to microsoft azure. then download the backup agent to register a target server with the backup vault. then select what to be backed up. both microsoft azure backup sla (99.9% availability) and cost calculator are available for better assessing the solution. closing thoughts form an application’s view, ha is an on-going event while dr is an anticipation. ha and dr are different business problems and should be addressed differently. nevertheless, microsoft azure provides a single platform to gracefully address ha with lrs, dr with grs, and dr orchestration with recovery services, and all with published sla s and a predictable cost structure . going forward, it pros can now include ha and dr as a reliable, scalable and relatively inexpensive proposition by employing microsoft azure as a solution platform. call to action register at microsoft virtual academy, http://aka.ms/mva1 , and train yourself on microsoft azure by taking the track of courses. go to http://aka.ms/azure200 and acquire a free trial subscription and assess microsoft azure for ha and dr solutions. review my recommended content at http://aka.ms/recommended .

Originally written by Artem Bilan on the SpringSource blog. Dear Spring Community! Recently we published the Spring Integration Java DSL: Line by line tutorial, which uses Java 8 Lambdas extensively. We received some feedback that this is good introduction to the DSL, but a similar tutorial is needed for those users, who can't move to the Java 8 or aren't yet familiar with Lambdas, but wish to take advantage So, to help those Spring Integration users who want to moved from XML configuration to Java & Annotation configuration, we provide this line-by-line tutorial to demonstrate that, even without Lambdas, we gain a lot from Spring Integration Java DSL usage. Although, most will agree that the lambda syntax provides for a more succinct definition. We analyse here the same Cafe Demo sample, but using the pre Java 8 variant for configuration. Many options are the same, so we just copy/paste their description here to achieve a complete picture. Since this Spring Integration Java DSL configuration is quite different to the Java 8 lambda style, it will be useful for all users to get a knowlage how we can achieve the same result with a rich variety of options provided by the Spring Integration Java DSL. The source code for our application is placed in a single class, which is a Boot application; significant lines are annotated with a number corresponding to the comments, which follow: @SpringBootApplication // 1 @IntegrationComponentScan // 2 public class Application { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { ConfigurableApplicationContext ctx = SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args); // 3 Cafe cafe = ctx.getBean(Cafe.class); // 4 for (int i = 1; i <= 100; i++) { // 5 Order order = new Order(i); order.addItem(DrinkType.LATTE, 2, false); order.addItem(DrinkType.MOCHA, 3, true); cafe.placeOrder(order); } System.out.println("Hit 'Enter' to terminate"); // 6 System.in.read(); ctx.close(); } @MessagingGateway // 7 public interface Cafe { @Gateway(requestChannel = "orders.input") // 8 void placeOrder(Order order); // 9 } private final AtomicInteger hotDrinkCounter = new AtomicInteger(); private final AtomicInteger coldDrinkCounter = new AtomicInteger(); // 10 @Autowired private CafeAggregator cafeAggregator; // 11 @Bean(name = PollerMetadata.DEFAULT_POLLER) public PollerMetadata poller() { // 12 return Pollers.fixedDelay(1000).get(); } @Bean @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") public IntegrationFlow orders() { // 13 return IntegrationFlows.from("orders.input") // 14 .split("payload.items", (Consumer) null) // 15 .channel(MessageChannels.executor(Executors.newCachedThreadPool()))// 16 .route("payload.iced", // 17 new Consumer>() { // 18 @Override public void accept(RouterSpec spec) { spec.channelMapping("true", "iced") .channelMapping("false", "hot"); // 19 } }) .get(); // 20 } @Bean public IntegrationFlow icedFlow() { // 21 return IntegrationFlows.from(MessageChannels.queue("iced", 10)) // 22 .handle(new GenericHandler() { // 23 @Override public Object handle(OrderItem payload, Map headers) { Uninterruptibles.sleepUninterruptibly(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS); System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " prepared cold drink #" + coldDrinkCounter.incrementAndGet() + " for order #" + payload.getOrderNumber() + ": " + payload); return payload; // 24 } }) .channel("output") // 25 .get(); } @Bean public IntegrationFlow hotFlow() { // 26 return IntegrationFlows.from(MessageChannels.queue("hot", 10)) .handle(new GenericHandler() { @Override public Object handle(OrderItem payload, Map headers) { Uninterruptibles.sleepUninterruptibly(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS); // 27 System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " prepared hot drink #" + hotDrinkCounter.incrementAndGet() + " for order #" + payload.getOrderNumber() + ": " + payload); return payload; } }) .channel("output") .get(); } @Bean public IntegrationFlow resultFlow() { // 28 return IntegrationFlows.from("output") // 29 .transform(new GenericTransformer() { // 30 @Override public Drink transform(OrderItem orderItem) { return new Drink(orderItem.getOrderNumber(), orderItem.getDrinkType(), orderItem.isIced(), orderItem.getShots()); // 31 } }) .aggregate(new Consumer() { // 32 @Override public void accept(AggregatorSpec aggregatorSpec) { aggregatorSpec.processor(cafeAggregator, null); // 33 } }, null) .handle(CharacterStreamWritingMessageHandler.stdout()) // 34 .get(); } @Component public static class CafeAggregator { // 35 @Aggregator // 36 public Delivery output(List drinks) { return new Delivery(drinks); } @CorrelationStrategy // 37 public Integer correlation(Drink drink) { return drink.getOrderNumber(); } } } Examining the code line by line... 1. @SpringBootApplication This new meta-annotation from Spring Boot 1.2. Includes @Configuration and@EnableAutoConfiguration. Since we are in a Spring Integration application and Spring Boot has auto-configuration for it, the @EnableIntegration is automatically applied, to initialize the Spring Integration infrastructure including an environment for the Java DSL -DslIntegrationConfigurationInitializer, which is picked up by theIntegrationConfigurationBeanFactoryPostProcessor from /META-INF/spring.factories. 2. @IntegrationComponentScan The Spring Integration analogue of @ComponentScan to scan components based on interfaces, (the Spring Framework's @ComponentScan only looks at classes). Spring Integration supports the discovery of interfaces annotated with @MessagingGateway (see #7 below). 3. ConfigurableApplicationContext ctx = SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args); The main method of our class is designed to start the Spring Boot application using the configuration from this class and starts an ApplicationContext via Spring Boot. In addition, it delegates command line arguments to the Spring Boot. For example you can specify --debug to see logs for the boot auto-configuration report. 4. Cafe cafe = ctx.getBean(Cafe.class); Since we already have an ApplicationContext we can start to interact with application. AndCafe is that entry point - in EIP terms a gateway. Gateways are simply interfaces and the application does not interact with the Messaging API; it simply deals with the domain (see #7 below). 5. for (int i = 1; i <= 100; i++) { To demonstrate the cafe "work" we intiate 100 orders with two drinks - one hot and one iced. And send the Order to the Cafe gateway. 6. System.out.println("Hit 'Enter' to terminate"); Typically Spring Integration application are asynchronous, hence to avoid early exit from themain Thread we block the main method until some end-user interaction through the command line. Non daemon threads will keep the application open but System.read()provides us with a mechanism to close the application cleanly. 7. @MessagingGateway The annotation to mark a business interface to indicate it is a gateway between the end-application and integration layer. It is an analogue of component from Spring Integration XML configuration. Spring Integration creates a Proxy for this interface and populates it as a bean in the application context. The purpose of this Proxy is to wrap parameters in a Message object and send it to the MessageChannel according to the provided options. 8. @Gateway(requestChannel = "orders.input") The method level annotation to distinct business logic by methods as well as by the target integration flows. In this sample we use a requestChannel reference of orders.input, which is a MessageChannel bean name of our IntegrationFlow input channel (see below #14). 9. void placeOrder(Order order); The interface method is a central point to interact from end-application with the integration layer. This method has a void return type. It means that our integration flow is one-wayand we just send messages to the integration flow, but don't wait for a reply. 10. private AtomicInteger hotDrinkCounter = new AtomicInteger(); private AtomicInteger coldDrinkCounter = new AtomicInteger(); Two counters to gather the information how our cafe works with drinks. 11. @Autowired private CafeAggregator cafeAggregator; The POJO for the Aggregator logic (see #33 and #35 below). Since it is a Spring bean, we can simply inject it even to the current @Configuration and use in any place below, e.g. from the .aggregate() EIP-method. 12. @Bean(name = PollerMetadata.DEFAULT_POLLER) public PollerMetadata poller() { The default poller bean. It is a analogue of component from Spring Integration XML configuration. Required for endpoints where the inputChannelis a PollableChannel. In this case, it is necessary for the two Cafe queues - hot and iced (see below #18). Here we use the Pollers factory from the DSL project and use its method-chain fluent API to build the poller metadata. Note that Pollers can be used directly from an IntegrationFlow definition, if a specific poller (rather than the default poller) is needed for an endpoint. 13. @Bean public IntegrationFlow orders() { The IntegrationFlow bean definition. It is the central component of the Spring Integration Java DSL, although it does not play any role at runtime, just during the bean registration phase. All other code below registers Spring Integration components (MessageChannel,MessageHandler, EventDrivenConsumer, MessageProducer, MessageSource etc.) in theIntegrationFlow object, which is parsed by the IntegrationFlowBeanPostProcessor to process those components and register them as beans in the application context as necessary (some elements, such as channels may already exist). 14. return IntegrationFlows.from("orders.input") The IntegrationFlows is the main factory class to start the IntegrationFlow. It provides a number of overloaded .from() methods to allow starting a flow from aSourcePollingChannelAdapter for a MessageSource implementations, e.g.JdbcPollingChannelAdapter; from a MessageProducer, e.g.WebSocketInboundChannelAdapter; or simply a MessageChannel. All ".from()" options have several convenient variants to configure the appropriate component for the start of theIntegrationFlow. Here we use just a channel name, which is converted to aDirectChannel bean definition during the bean definition phase while parsing theIntegrationFlow. In the Java 8 variant, we used here a Lambda definition - and thisMessageChannel has been implicitly created with the bean name based on theIntegrationFlow bean name. 15. .split("payload.items", (Consumer) null) Since our integration flow accepts messages through the orders.input channel, we are ready to consume and process them. The first EIP-method in our scenario is .split(). We know that the message payload from orders.input channel is an Order domain object, so we can simply use here a Spring (SpEL) Expression to return Collection. So, this performs the split EI pattern, and we send each collection entry as a separate message to the next channel. In the background, the .split() method registers aExpressionEvaluatingSplitter MessageHandler implementation and anEventDrivenConsumer for that MessageHandler, wiring in the orders.input channel as the inputChannel. The second argument for the .split() EIP-method is for an endpointConfigurer to customize options like autoStartup, requiresReply, adviceChain etc. We use herenull to show that we rely on the default options for the endpoint. Many of EIP-methods provide overloaded versions with and without endpointConfigurer. Currently.split(String expression) EIP-method without the endpointConfigurer argument is not available; this will be addressed in a future release. 16. .channel(MessageChannels.executor(Executors.newCachedThreadPool())) The .channel() EIP-method allows the specification of concrete MessageChannels between endpoints, as it is done via output-channel/input-channel attributes pair with Spring Integration XML configuration. By default, endpoints in the DSL integration flow definition are wired with DirectChannels, which get bean names based on theIntegrationFlow bean name and index in the flow chain. In this case we select a specificMessageChannel implementation from the Channels factory class; the selected channel here is an ExecutorChannel, to allow distribution of messages from the splitter to separate Threads, to process them in parallel in the downstream flow. 17. .route("payload.iced", The next EIP-method in our scenario is .route(), to send hot/iced order items to different Cafe kitchens. We again use here a SpEL expression to get the routingKey from the incoming message. In the Java 8 variant, we used a method-reference Lambda expression, but for pre Java 8 style we must use SpEL or an inline interface implementation. Many anonymous classes in a flow can make the flow difficult to read so we prefer SpEL in most cases. 18. new Consumer>() { The second argument of .route() EIP-method is a functional interface Consumer to specify ExpressionEvaluatingRouter options using a RouterSpec Builder. Since we don't have any choice with pre Java 8, we just provide here an inline implementation for this interface. 19. spec.channelMapping("true", "iced") .channelMapping("false", "hot"); With the Consumer>#accept()implementation we can provide desired AbstractMappingMessageRouter options. One of them is channelMappings, when we specify the routing logic by the result of router expresion and the target MessageChannel for the apropriate result. In this case iced andhot are MessageChannel names for IntegrationFlows below. 20. .get(); This finalizes the flow. Any IntegrationFlows.from() method returns anIntegrationFlowBuilder instance and this get() method extracts an IntegrationFlowobject from the IntegrationFlowBuilder configuration. Everything starting from the.from() and up to the method before the .get() is an IntegrationFlow definition. All defined components are stored in the IntegrationFlow and processed by theIntegrationFlowBeanPostProcessor during the bean creation phase. 21. @Bean public IntegrationFlow icedFlow() { This is the second IntegrationFlow bean definition - for iced drinks. Here we demonstrate that several IntegrationFlows can be wired together to create a single complex application. Note: it isn't recommended to inject one IntegrationFlow to another; it might cause unexpected behaviour. Since they provide Integration components for the bean registration and MessageChannels one of them, the best way to wire and inject is viaMessageChannel or @MessagingGateway interfaces. 22. return IntegrationFlows.from(MessageChannels.queue("iced", 10)) The iced IntegrationFlow starts from a QueueChannel that has a capacity of 10messages; it is registered as a bean with the name iced. As you remember we use this name as one of the route mappings (see above #19). In our sample, we use here a restricted QueueChannel to reflect the Cafe kitchen busy state from real life. And here is a place where we need that global poller for the next endpoint which is listening on this channel. 23. .handle(new GenericHandler() { The .handle() EIP-method of the iced flow demonstrates the concrete Cafe kitchen work. Since we can't minimize the code with something like Java 8 Lambda expression, we provide here an inline implementation for the GenericHandler functional interface with the expected payload type as the generic argument. With the Java 8 example, we distribute this.handle() between several subscriber subflows for a PublishSubscribeChannel. However in this case, the logic is all implemented in the one method. 24. Uninterruptibles.sleepUninterruptibly(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS); System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " prepared cold drink #" + coldDrinkCounter.incrementAndGet() + " for order #" + payload.getOrderNumber() + ": " + payload); return payload; The business logic implementation for the current .handle() EIP-component. WithUninterruptibles.sleepUninterruptibly(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS); we just block the current Thread for some timeout to demonstrate how quickly the Cafe kitchen prepares a drink. After that we just report to STDOUT that the drink is ready and return the currentOrderItem from the GenericHandler for the next endpoint in our IntegrationFlow. In the background, the DSL framework registers a ServiceActivatingHandler for theMethodInvokingMessageProcessor to invoke the GenericHandler#handle at runtime. In addition, the framework registers a PollingConsumer endpoint for the QueueChannelabove. This endpoint relies on the default poller to poll messages from the queue. Of course, we always can use a specific poller for any concrete endpoint. In that case, we would have to provide a second endpointConfigurer argument to the .handle() EIP-method. 25. .channel("output") Since it is not the end of our Cafe scenario, we send the result of the current flow to theoutput channel using the convenient EIP-method .channel() and the name of theMessageChannel bean (see below #29). This is the logical end of the current iced drink subflow, so we use the .get() method to return the IntegrationFlow. Flows that end with a reply-producing handler that don't have a final .channel() will return the reply to the message replyChannel header. 26. @Bean public IntegrationFlow hotFlow() { The IntegrationFlow definition for hot drinks. It is similar to the previous iced drinks flow, but with specific hot business logic. It starts from the hot QueueChannel which is mapped from the router above. 27. Uninterruptibles.sleepUninterruptibly(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS); The sleepUninterruptibly for hot drinks. Right, we need more time to boil the water! 28. @Bean public IntegrationFlow resultFlow() { One more IntegrationFlow bean definition to prepare the Delivery for the Cafe client based on the Drinks. 29. return IntegrationFlows.from("output") The resultFlow starts from the DirectChannel, which is created during the bean definition phase with this provided name. You should remember that we use the outputchannel name from the Cafe kitchens flows in the last .channel() in those definitions. 30. .transform(new GenericTransformer() { The .transform() EIP-method is for the appropriate pattern implementation and expects some object to convert one payload to another. In our sample we use an inline implementation of the GenericTransformer functional interface to convert OrderItem to Drink and we specify that using generic arguments. In the background, the DSL framework registers aMessageTransformingHandler and an EventDrivenConsumer endpoint with default options to consume messages from the output MessageChannel. 31. public Drink transform(OrderItem orderItem) { return new Drink(orderItem.getOrderNumber(), orderItem.getDrinkType(), orderItem.isIced(), orderItem.getShots()); } The business-specific GenericTransformer#transform() implementation to demonstrate how we benefit from Java Generics to transform one payload to another. Note: Spring Integration uses ConversionService before any method invocation and if you provide some specific Converter implementation, some domain payload can be converted to another automatically, when the framework has an appropriate registered Converter. 32. .aggregate(new Consumer() { The .aggregate() EIP-method provides options to configure anAggregatingMessageHandler and its endpoint, similar to what we can do with the component when using Spring Integration XML configuration. Of course, with the Java DSL we have more power to configure the aggregator in place, without any other extra beans. However we demonstrate here an aggregator configuration with annotations (see below #35). From the Cafe business logic perspective we compose the Delivery for the initial Order, since we .split() the original order to the OrderItems near the beginning. 33. public void accept(AggregatorSpec aggregatorSpec) { aggregatorSpec.processor(cafeAggregator, null); } An inline implementation of the Consumer for the AggregatorSpec. Using theaggregatorSpec Builder we can provide desired options for the aggregator component, which will be registered as an AggregatingMessageHandler bean. Here we just provide theprocessor as a reference to the autowired (see #11 above) CafeAggregator component (see #35 below). The second argument of the .processor() option is methodName. Since we are relying on the aggregator annotation configuration for the POJO, we don't need to provide the method here and the framework will determine the correct POJO methods in the background. 34. .handle(CharacterStreamWritingMessageHandler.stdout()) It is the end of our flow - the Delivery is delivered to the client! We just print here the message payload to STDOUT using out-of-the-boxCharacterStreamWritingMessageHandler from Spring Integration Core. This is a case to show how existing components from Spring Integration Core (and its modules) can be used from the Java DSL. 35. @Component public static class CafeAggregator { The bean to specify the business logic for the aggregator above. This bean is picked up by the @ComponentScan, which is a part of the @SpringBootApplication meta-annotation (see above #1). So, this component becomes a bean and we can automatically wire (@Autowired) it to other components in the application context (see #11 above). 36. @Aggregator public Delivery output(List drinks) { return new Delivery(drinks); } The POJO-specific MessageGroupProcessor to build the output payload based on the payloads from aggregated messages. Since we mark this method with the @Aggregatorannotation, the target AggregatingMessageHandler can extract this method for theMethodInvokingMessageGroupProcessor. 37. @CorrelationStrategy public Integer correlation(Drink drink) { return drink.getOrderNumber(); } The POJO-specific CorrelationStrategy to extract the custom correlationKey from each inbound aggregator message. Since we mark this method with @CorrelationStrategyannotation the target AggregatingMessageHandler can extract this method for theMethodInvokingCorrelationStrategy. There is a similar self-explained@ReleaseStrategy annotation, but we rely in our Cafe sample just on the defaultSequenceSizeReleaseStrategy, which is based on the sequenceDetails message header populated by the splitter from the beginning of our integration flow. Well, we have finished describing the Cafe Demo sample based on the Spring Integration Java DSL when Java Lambda support is not available. Compare it with XML sample and also seeLambda support tutorial to get more information regarding Spring Integration. As you can see, using the DSL without lambdas is a little more verbose because you need to provide boilerplate code for inline anonymous implementations of functional interfaces. However, we believe it is important to support the use of the DSL for users who can't yet move to Java 8. Many of the DSL benefits (fluent API, compile-time validation etc) are available for all users. The use of lambdas continues the Spring Framework tradition of reducing or eliminating boilerplate code, so we encourage users to try Java 8 and lambdas and to encourage their organizations to consider allowing the use of Java 8 for Spring Integration applications. In addition see the Reference Manual for more information. As always, we look forward to your comments and feedback (StackOverflow (spring-integration tag), Spring JIRA, GitHub) and we very much welcome contributions! Thank you for your time and patience to read this!

When I needed to do prototyping, proof of concept or play with some new technology in free time, starting new project was always a little annoying barrier with Maven. Have to say that setting up Maven project is not hard and you can use Maven Archetypes. But Archetypes are often out of date. Who wants to play with old technologies? So I always end up wiring in dependencies I wanted to play with. Not very productive spent time. But than Spring Boot came to my way. I fell in love. In last few months I created at least 50 small playground projects, prototypes with Spring Boot. Also incorporated it at work. It’s just perfect for prototyping, learning, microservices, web, batch, enterprise, message flow or command line applications. You have to be dinosaur or be blind not to evaluate Spring Boot for your next Spring project. And when you finish evaluate it, you will go for it. I promise. I feel a need to highlight how easy is Black Box Testing of Spring Boot microservice. Black Box Testing refers to testing without any poking with application artifact. Such testing can be called also integration testing. You can also perform performance or stress testing way I am going to demonstrate. Spring Boot Microservice is usually web application with embedded Tomcat. So it is executed as JAR from command line. There is possibility to convert Spring Boot project into WAR artifact, that can be hosted on shared Servlet container. But we don’t want that now. It’s better when microservice has its own little embedded container. I used existing Spring’s REST service guide as testing target. Focus is mostly on testing project, so it is handy to use this “Hello World” REST application as example. I expect these two common tools are set up and installed on your machine: Maven 3 Git So we’ll need to download source code and install JAR artifact into our local repository. I am going to use command line to download and install the microservice. Let’s go to some directory where we download source code. Use these commands: git clone [email protected]:spring-guides/gs-rest-service.git cd gs-rest-service/complete mvn clean install If everything went OK, Spring Boot microservice JAR artifact is now installed in our local Maven repository. In serious Java development, it would be rather installed into shared repository (e.g. Artifactory, Nexus,… ). When our microservice is installed, we can focus on testing project. It is also Maven and Spring Boot based. Black box testing will be achieved by downloading the artifact from Maven repository (doesn’t matter if it is local or remote). Maven-dependency-plugin can help us this way: org.apache.maven.plugins maven-dependency-plugin copy-dependencies compile copy-dependencies gs-rest-service true It downloads microservice artifact into target/dependency directory by default. As you can see, it’s hooked to compile phase of Maven lifecycle, so that downloaded artifact is available during test phase. Artifact version is stripped from version information. We use latest version. It makes usage of JAR artifact easier during testing. Readers skilled with Maven may notice missing plugin version. Spring Boot driven project is inherited from parent Maven project called spring-boot-starter-parent. It contains versions of main Maven plugins. This is one of the Spring Boot’s opinionated aspects. I like it, because it provides stable dependencies matrix. You can change the version if you need. When we have artifact in our file system, we can start testing. We need to be able to execute JAR file from command line. I used standard JavaProcessBuilder this way: public class ProcessExecutor { public Process execute(String jarName) throws IOException { Process p = null; ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder("java", "-jar", jarName); pb.directory(new File("target/dependency")); File log = new File("log"); pb.redirectErrorStream(true); pb.redirectOutput(Redirect.appendTo(log)); p = pb.start(); return p; } } This class executes given process JAR based on given file name. Location is hard-coded to target/dependency directory, where maven-dependency-plugin located our artifact. Standard and error outputs are redirected to file. Next class needed for testing is DTO (Data transfer object). It is simple POJO that will be used for deserialization from JSON. I use Lombok project to reduce boilerplate code needed for getters, setters, hashCode and equals. @Data @AllArgsConstructor @NoArgsConstructor public class Greeting { private long id; private String content; } Test itself looks like this: public class BlackBoxTest { private static final String RESOURCE_URL = "http://localhost:8080/greeting"; @Test public void contextLoads() throws InterruptedException, IOException { Process process = null; Greeting actualGreeting = null; try { process = new ProcessExecutor().execute("gs-rest-service.jar"); RestTemplate restTemplate = new RestTemplate(); waitForStart(restTemplate); actualGreeting = restTemplate.getForObject(RESOURCE_URL, Greeting.class); } finally { process.destroyForcibly(); } Assert.assertEquals(new Greeting(2L, "Hello, World!"), actualGreeting); } private void waitForStart(RestTemplate restTemplate) { while (true) { try { Thread.sleep(500); restTemplate.getForObject(RESOURCE_URL, String.class); return; } catch (Throwable throwable) { // ignoring errors } } } } It executes Spring Boot microservice process first and wait unit it starts. To verify if microservice is started, it sends HTTP request to URL where it’s expected. The service is ready for testing after first successful response. Microservice should send simple greeting JSON response for HTTP GET request. Deserialization from JSON into our Greeting DTO is verified at the end of the test. Source code is shared on Github.

[This article was written by Yaron Parasol.] Docker containers were created to help enable the fast, and reliable deployment of application components or tiers, by creating a container that holds a self-contained ready to deploy parts of applications, with the middleware and the app business logic needed to run them successfully. For example, a Spring application within a Tomcat container. By design, Docker is purposely an isolated self-contained part of the application, typically one tier or even one node in a tier. However, an application is typically multi-tier in its architecture and that means you have tiers with dependencies between them, where the nature of the dependencies can be anything from network connections and remote API invocations, to exchange of messages between application tiers. And hence an app is a set of different containers with specific configurations. This is why you need a way to glue the pieces of your app together. While, Docker has a basic solution for connecting containers using a Docker bridge, this solution is not always the preferred one, especially when deploying the container across different hosts and you need to take care of real network settings. Docker orchestration with TOSCA + Cloudify. Check it out. Go So, what role does the orchestrator play? The orchestrator will take care of two things: The timing of container creation - as containers need to be created by order of dependencies and Container configuration in order to allow containers to communicate with one another - and for that the orchestrator needs to pass runtime properties between containers. As a side note here: With Docker you need a special tweak here, as you typically don’t touch config files inside a container, you keep the container intact, so there is an interesting workaround for cases that this is required. One method to do this is by using a YAML-based orchestration plan to orchestrate the deployment of apps and post-deployment automation processes, which is the approach Cloudify employs. Based on TOSCA (topology and orchestration standard of cloud apps), this orchestration plan describes the components and their lifecycle, and the relationships between components, especially when it comes to complex topologies. This includes, what’s connected to what, what’s hosted on what, and other such considerations. TOSCA is able to describe the infrastructure, as well as, the middleware tier, and app layers on top of these. Cloudify basically takes this TOSCA orchestration plan (dubbed blueprints in Cloudify speak) and materializes these using workflows that traverse the graph of components, or this plan of components and issues commands to agents. These then create the app components and glue them together. The agents use extensions called plugins that are adaptors between the Cloudify configuration and the various infrastructure as a service (IaaS) and automation tools’ APIs. In our case, we created a plugin to interface with the Docker API. Introducing the Docker Cloudify Plugin The Cloudify-Docker plugin is quite straightforward, it installs the Docker API endpoint/server on the machine and then uses the Docker-Py binding to create, configure, and remove containers. TOSCA lifecycle events are: Create - installation of the app components Configure - configuration of the component Start - startup/running the component There is also stop & delete - for shutdown and removal We started by using the create - to create the container, we did not implement configure at the beginning, and start to run the application. But then we realized that for containers with dependencies we need to have runtime properties, such as IP import of the counterpart container in order to create the container for example. When we create an app server container, we need the port and IP of the database container. So, we pushed the creation of the container to the configure event, and used a TOSCA relationship pre-configure hook, to get the dependent container’s info at runtime. The way to expose the runtime info to the container with the dependencies is by setting them as environment variables. 01.interfaces: 02. cloudify.interfaces.lifecycle: 03. configure: 04. implementation: docker.docker_plugin.tasks.configure 05. inputs: 06. container_config: 07. command: mongod--rest--httpinterface --smallfiles 08. image: dockerfile/mongodb 09. start: 10. implementation: docker.docker_plugin.tasks.run 11. inputs: 12. container_start: 13. port_bindings: 14. 27017: 27017 15. 28017: 28017 Nodecellar Example I’d like to explain how this works by using our Nodecellar app as an example. The Nodecellar app is composed of two hosts that, in this case, Cloudify didn’t create but just SSHed into and then installed agents on. On one we have the MongoD container, with a MongoD process. On the other we have the Nodecellar container with NodeJS and the Nodecellar app within it. The Nodecellar container needs a connection to the MongoD container to run the app queries when the app starts. Ultimately, an orchestrator should not be limited to software deployment, the whole idea behind Docker Is to allow for agility, so we’d also like to use Docker in situations of auto-scale out and auto-heal, CD. In our next post we’ll show exactly that - how Cloudify can be used with Docker for post-deployment scenarios.

Originally authored by Artem Bilan on the SpringSource blog Dear Spring Community! Just after the Spring Integration Java DSL 1.0 GA release announcement I want to introduce the Spring Integration Java DSL to you as a line by line tutorial based on the classic Cafe Demo integration sample. We describe here Spring Boot support, Spring Framework Java and Annotation configuration, the IntegrationFlow feature and pay tribute to Java 8 Lambdasupport which was an inspiration for the DSL style. Of course, it is all backed by the Spring Integration Core project. But, before we launch into the description of the Cafe demonstration app here's a shorter example just to get started... @Configuration @EnableAutoConfiguration @IntegrationComponentScan public class Start { public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException { ConfigurableApplicationContext ctx = SpringApplication.run(Start.class, args); List strings = Arrays.asList("foo", "bar"); System.out.println(ctx.getBean(Upcase.class).upcase(strings)); ctx.close(); } @MessagingGateway public interface Upcase { @Gateway(requestChannel = "upcase.input") Collection upcase(Collection strings); } @Bean public IntegrationFlow upcase() { return f -> f .split() // 1 .transform(String::toUpperCase) // 2 .aggregate(); // 3 } } We will leave the description of the infrastructure (annotations etc) to the main cafe flow description. Here, we want you to concentrate on the last @Bean, the IntegrationFlow as well as the gateway method which sends messages to that flow. In the main method we send a collection of strings to the gateway and print the results to STDOUT. The flow first splits the collection into individual Strings (1); each string is then transformed to upper case (2) and finally we re-aggregate them back into a collection (3) Since that's the end of the flow, the framework returns the result of the aggregation back to the gateway and the new payload becomes the return value from the gateway method. The equivalent XML configuration might be... or... Cafe Demo The purpose of the Cafe Demo application is to demonstrate how Enterprise Integration Patterns (EIP) can be used to reflect the order-delivery scenario in a real life cafe. With this application, we handle several drink orders - hot and iced. After running the application we can see in the standard output (System.out.println) how cold drinks are prepared quicker than hot. However the delivery for the whole order is postponed until the hot drink is ready. To reflect the domain model we have several classes: Order, OrderItem, Drink andDelivery. They all are mentioned in the integration scenario, but we won't analyze them here, because they are simple enough. The source code for our application is placed only in a single class; significant lines are annotated with a number corresponding to the comments, which follow: @SpringBootApplication // 1 @IntegrationComponentScan // 2 public class Application { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { ConfigurableApplicationContext ctx = SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);// 3 Cafe cafe = ctx.getBean(Cafe.class); // 4 for (int i = 1; i <= 100; i++) { // 5 Order order = new Order(i); order.addItem(DrinkType.LATTE, 2, false); //hot order.addItem(DrinkType.MOCHA, 3, true); //iced cafe.placeOrder(order); } System.out.println("Hit 'Enter' to terminate"); // 6 System.in.read(); ctx.close(); } @MessagingGateway // 7 public interface Cafe { @Gateway(requestChannel = "orders.input") // 8 void placeOrder(Order order); // 9 } private AtomicInteger hotDrinkCounter = new AtomicInteger(); private AtomicInteger coldDrinkCounter = new AtomicInteger(); // 10 @Bean(name = PollerMetadata.DEFAULT_POLLER) public PollerMetadata poller() { // 11 return Pollers.fixedDelay(1000).get(); } @Bean public IntegrationFlow orders() { // 12 return f -> f // 13 .split(Order.class, Order::getItems) // 14 .channel(c -> c.executor(Executors.newCachedThreadPool()))// 15 .route(OrderItem::isIced, mapping -> mapping // 16 .subFlowMapping("true", sf -> sf // 17 .channel(c -> c.queue(10)) // 18 .publishSubscribeChannel(c -> c // 19 .subscribe(s -> // 20 s.handle(m -> sleepUninterruptibly(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS)))// 21 .subscribe(sub -> sub // 22 .transform(item -> Thread.currentThread().getName() + " prepared cold drink #" + this.coldDrinkCounter.incrementAndGet() + " for order #" + item.getOrderNumber() + ": " + item) // 23 .handle(m -> System.out.println(m.getPayload())))))// 24 .subFlowMapping("false", sf -> sf // 25 .channel(c -> c.queue(10)) .publishSubscribeChannel(c -> c .subscribe(s -> s.handle(m -> sleepUninterruptibly(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS)))// 26 .subscribe(sub -> sub .transform(item -> Thread.currentThread().getName() + " prepared hot drink #" + this.hotDrinkCounter.incrementAndGet() + " for order #" + item.getOrderNumber() + ": " + item) .handle(m -> System.out.println(m.getPayload())))))) .transform(orderItem -> new Drink(orderItem.getOrderNumber(), orderItem.getDrinkType(), orderItem.isIced(), orderItem.getShots())) // 27 .aggregate(aggregator -> aggregator // 28 .outputProcessor(group -> // 29 new Delivery(group.getMessages() .stream() .map(message -> (Drink) message.getPayload()) .collect(Collectors.toList()))) // 30 .correlationStrategy(m -> ((Drink) m.getPayload()).getOrderNumber()), null) // 31 .handle(CharacterStreamWritingMessageHandler.stdout()); // 32 } } Examining the code line by line... 1. @SpringBootApplication This new meta-annotation from Spring Boot 1.2. Includes @Configuration and@EnableAutoConfiguration. Since we are in a Spring Integration application and Spring Boot has auto-configuration for it, the @EnableIntegration is automatically applied, to initialize the Spring Integration infrastructure including an environment for the Java DSL -DslIntegrationConfigurationInitializer, which is picked up by theIntegrationConfigurationBeanFactoryPostProcessor from /META-INF/spring.factories. 2. @IntegrationComponentScan The Spring Integration analogue of @ComponentScan to scan components based on interfaces, (the Spring Framework's @ComponentScan only looks at classes). Spring Integration supports the discovery of interfaces annotated with @MessagingGateway (see #7 below). 3. ConfigurableApplicationContext ctx = SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args); The main method of our class is designed to start the Spring Boot application using the configuration from this class and starts an ApplicationContext via Spring Boot. In addition, it delegates command line arguments to the Spring Boot. For example you can specify --debug to see logs for the boot auto-configuration report. 4. Cafe cafe = ctx.getBean(Cafe.class); Since we already have an ApplicationContext we can start to interact with application. AndCafe is that entry point - in EIP terms a gateway. Gateways are simply interfaces and the application does not interact with the Messaging API; it simply deals with the domain (see #7 below). 5. for (int i = 1; i <= 100; i++) { To demonstrate the cafe "work" we intiate 100 orders with two drinks - one hot and one iced. And send the Order to the Cafe gateway. 6. System.out.println("Hit 'Enter' to terminate"); Typically Spring Integration application are asynchronous, hence to avoid early exit from themain Thread we block the main method until some end-user interaction through the command line. Non daemon threads will keep the application open but System.read()provides us with a mechanism to close the application cleanly. 7. @MessagingGateway The annotation to mark a business interface to indicate it is a gateway between the end-application and integration layer. It is an analogue of component from Spring Integration XML configuration. Spring Integration creates a Proxy for this interface and populates it as a bean in the application context. The purpose of this Proxy is to wrap parameters in a Message object and send it to the MessageChannel according to the provided options. 8. @Gateway(requestChannel = "orders.input") The method level annotation to distinct business logic by methods as well as by the target integration flows. In this sample we use a requestChannel reference of orders.input, which is a MessageChannel bean name of our IntegrationFlow input channel (see below #13). 9. void placeOrder(Order order); The interface method is a central point to interact from end-application with the integration layer. This method has a void return type. It means that our integration flow is one-wayand we just send messages to the integration flow, but don't wait for a reply. 10. private AtomicInteger hotDrinkCounter = new AtomicInteger(); private AtomicInteger coldDrinkCounter = new AtomicInteger(); Two counters to gather the information how our cafe works with drinks. 11. @Bean(name = PollerMetadata.DEFAULT_POLLER) public PollerMetadata poller() { The default poller bean. It is a analogue of component from Spring Integration XML configuration. Required for endpoints where the inputChannelis a PollableChannel. In this case, it is necessary for the two Cafe queues - hot and iced (see below #18). Here we use the Pollers factory from the DSL project and use its method-chain fluent API to build the poller metadata. Note that Pollers can be used directly from an IntegrationFlow definition, if a specific poller (rather than the default poller) is needed for an endpoint. 12. @Bean public IntegrationFlow orders() { The IntegrationFlow bean definition. It is the central component of the Spring Integration Java DSL, although it does not play any role at runtime, just during the bean registration phase. All other code below registers Spring Integration components (MessageChannel,MessageHandler, EventDrivenConsumer, MessageProducer, MessageSource etc.) in theIntegrationFlow object, which is parsed by the IntegrationFlowBeanPostProcessor to process those components and register them as beans in the application context as necessary (some elements, such as channels may already exist). 13. return f -> f The IntegrationFlow is a Consumer functional interface, so we can minimize our code and concentrate just only on the integration scenario requirements. Its Lambda acceptsIntegrationFlowDefinition as an argument. This class offers a comprehensive set of methods which can be composed to the chain. We call these EIP-methods, because they provide implementations for EI patterns and populate components from Spring Integration Core. During the bean registration phase, the IntegrationFlowBeanPostProcessor converts this inline (Lambda) IntegrationFlow to a StandardIntegrationFlow and processes its components. The same we can achieve using IntegrationFlows factory (e.g.IntegrationFlow.from("channelX"). ... .get()), but we find the Lambda definition more elegant. An IntegrationFlow definition using a Lambda populates DirectChannel as an inputChannel of the flow and it is registered in the application context as a bean with the name orders.input in this our sample (flow bean name + ".input"). That's why we use that name for the Cafe gateway. 14. .split(Order.class, Order::getItems) Since our integration flow accepts message through the orders.input channel, we are ready to consume and process them. The first EIP-method in our scenario is .split(). We know that the message payload from orders.input channel is an Order domain object, so we can simply use its type here and use the Java 8 method-reference feature. The first parameter is a type of message payload we expect, and the second is a method reference to the getItems() method, which returns Collection. So, this performs thesplit EI pattern, when we send each collection entry as a separate message to the next channel. In the background, the .split() method registers a MethodInvokingSplitterMessageHandler implementation and the EventDrivenConsumer for thatMessageHandler, and wiring in the orders.input channel as the inputChannel. 15. .channel(c -> c.executor(Executors.newCachedThreadPool())) The .channel() EIP-method allows the specification of concrete MessageChannels between endpoints, as it is done via output-channel/input-channel attributes pair with Spring Integration XML configuration. By default, endpoints in the DSL integration flow definition are wired with DirectChannels, which get the bean names based on theIntegrationFlow bean name and index in the flow chain. In this case we use anotherLambda expression, which selects a specific MessageChannel implementation from itsChannels factory and configures it with the fluent API. The current channel here is anExecutorChannel, to allow to distribute messages from the splitter to separateThreads, to process them in parallel in the downstream flow. 16. .route(OrderItem::isIced, mapping -> mapping The next EIP-method in our scenario is .route(), to send hot/iced order items to different Cafe kitchens. We again use here a method reference (isIced()) to get theroutingKey from the incoming message. The second Lambda parameter represents arouter mapping - something similar to sub-element for the component from Spring Integration XML configuration. However since we are using Java we can go a bit further with its Lambda support! The Spring Integration Java DSL introduced thesubflow definition for routers in addition to traditional channel mapping. Each subflow is executed depending on the routing and, if the subflow produces a result, it is passed to the next element in the flow definition after the router. 17. .subFlowMapping("true", sf -> sf Specifies the integration flow for the current router's mappingKey. We have in this samples two subflows - hot and iced. The subflow is the same IntegrationFlow functional interface, therefore we can use its Lambda exactly the same as we do on the top levelIntegrationFlow definition. The subflows don't have any runtime dependency with its parent, it's just a logical relationship. 18. .channel(c -> c.queue(10)) We already know that a Lambda definition for the IntegrationFlow starts from[FLOW_BEAN_NAME].input DirectChannel, so it may be a question "how does it work here if we specify .channel() again?". The DSL takes care of such a case and wires those two channels with a BridgeHandler and endpoint. In our sample, we use here a restrictedQueueChannel to reflect the Cafe kitchen busy state from real life. And here is a place where we need that global poller for the next endpoint which is listening on this channel. 19. .publishSubscribeChannel(c -> c The .publishSubscribeChannel() EIP-method is a variant of the .channel() for aMessageChannels.publishSubscribe(), but with the .subscribe() option when we can specify subflow as a subscriber to the channel. Right, subflow one more time! So, subflows can be specified to any depth. Independently of the presence .subscribe() subflows, the next endpoint in the parent flow is also a subscriber to this .publishSubscribeChannel(). Since we are in the .route() subflow already, the last subscriber is an implicit BridgeHandlerwhich just pops the message to the top level - to a similar implicit BridgeHandler to pop message to the next .transform() endpoint in the main flow. And one more note about this current position of our flow: the previous EIP-method is .channel(c -> c.queue(10)) and this one is for MessageChannel too. So, they are again tied with an implicit BridgeHandleras well. In a real application we could avoid this .publishSubscribeChannel() just with the single .handle() for the Cafe kitchen, but our goal here to cover DSL features as much as possible. That's why we distribute the kitchen work to several subflows for the samePublishSubscribeChannel. 20. .subscribe(s -> The .subscribe() method accepts an IntegrationFlow as parameter, which can be specified as Lambda to configure subscriber as subflow. We use here several subflow subscribers to avoid multi-line Lambdas and cover some DSL as we as Spring Integration capabilities. 21. s.handle(m -> sleepUninterruptibly(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS))) Here we use a simple .handle() EIP-method just to block the current Thread for some timeout to demonstrate how quickly the Cafe kitchen prepares a drink. Here we use Google Guava Uninterruptibles.sleepUninterruptibly, to avoid using a try...catch block within the Lambda expression, although you can do that and your Lambda will be multi-line. Or you can move that code to a separate method and use it here as method reference. Since we don't use any Executor on the .publishSubscribeChannel() all subscribers will beperformed sequentially on the same Thread; in our case it is one of TaskScheduler's Threads from poller on the previous QueueChannel. That's why this sleep blocks all downstream process and allows to demonstrate the busy state for that restricted to 10QueueChannel. 22. .subscribe(sub -> sub The next subflow subscriber which will be performed only after that sleep with 1 second foriced drink. We use here one more subflow because .handle() of previous one is one-way with the nature of the Lambda for MessageHandler. That's why, to go ahead with process of our whole flow, we have several subscribers: some of subflows finish after their work and don't return anything to the parent flow. 23. .transform(item -> Thread.currentThread().getName() + " prepared cold drink #" + this.coldDrinkCounter.incrementAndGet() + " for order #" + item.getOrderNumber() + ": " + item) The transformer in the current subscriber subflow is to convert the OrderItem to the friendly STDOUT message for the next .handle. Here we see the use of generics with the Lambda expression. This is implemented using the GenericTransformer functional interface. 24. .handle(m -> System.out.println(m.getPayload()))))) The .handle() here just to demonstrate how to use Lambda expression to print thepayload to STDOUT. It is a signal that our drink is ready. After that the final (implicit) subscriber to the PublishSubscribeChannel just sends the message with the OrderItemto the .transform() in the main flow. 25. .subFlowMapping("false", sf -> sf The .subFlowMapping() for the hot drinks. Actually it is similar to the previous iceddrinks subflow, but with specific hot business logic. 26. s.handle(m -> sleepUninterruptibly(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS))) The sleepUninterruptibly for hot drinks. Right, we need more time to boil the water! 27. .transform(orderItem -> new Drink(orderItem.getOrderNumber(), orderItem.getDrinkType(), orderItem.isIced(), orderItem.getShots())) The main OrderItem to Drink transformer, which is performed when the .route()subflow returns its result after the Cafe kitchen subscribers have finished preparing the drink. 28. .aggregate(aggregator -> aggregator The .aggregate() EIP-method provides similar options to configure anAggregatingMessageHandler and its endpoint, like we can do with the component when using Spring Integration XML configuration. Of course, with the Java DSL we have more power to configure the aggregator just in place, without any other extra beans. And Lambdas come to the rescue again! From the Cafe business logic perspective we compose theDelivery for the initial Order, since we .split() the original order to the OrderItems near the beginning. 29. .outputProcessor(group -> The .outputProcessor() of the AggregatorSpec allows us to emit a custom result after aggregator completes the group. It's an analogue of ref/method from the component or the @Aggregator annotation on a POJO method. Our goal here to compose aDelivery for all Drinks. 30. new Delivery(group.getMessages() .stream() .map(message -> (Drink) message.getPayload()) .collect(Collectors.toList()))) As you see we use here the Java 8 Stream feature for Collection. We iterate over messages from the released MessageGroup and convert (map) each of them to its Drinkpayload. The result of the Stream (.collect()) (a list of Drinks) is passed to theDelivery constructor. The Message with this new Delivery payload is sent to the next endpoint in our Cafe scenario. 31. .correlationStrategy(m -> ((Drink) m.getPayload()).getOrderNumber()), null) The .correlationStrategy() Lambda demonstrates how we can customize an aggregator behaviour. Of course, we can rely here just only on a built-in SequenceDetails from Spring Integration, which is populated by default from .split() in the beginning of our flow to each split message, but the Lambda sample for the CorrelationStrategy is included for illustration. (With XML, we could have used a correlation-expression or a customCorrelationStrategy). The second argument in this line for the .aggregate() EIP-method is for the endpointConfigurer to customize options like autoStartup,requiresReply, adviceChain etc. We use here null to show that we rely on the default options for the endpoint. Many of EIP-methods provide overloaded versions with and withoutendpointConfigurer, but .aggregate() requires an endpoint argument, to avoid an explicit cast for the AggregatorSpec Lambda argument. 32. .handle(CharacterStreamWritingMessageHandler.stdout()); It is the end of our flow - the Delivery is delivered to the client! We just print here the message payload to STDOUT using out-of-the-boxCharacterStreamWritingMessageHandler from Spring Integration Core. This is a case to show how existing components from Spring Integration Core (and its modules) can be used from the Java DSL. Well, we have finished describing the Cafe Demo sample based on the Spring Integration Java DSL. Compare it with XML sample to get more information regarding Spring Integration. This is not an overall tutorial to the DSL stuff. We don't review here theendpointConfigurer options, Transformers factory, the IntegrationComponentSpechierarchy, the NamespaceFactories, how we can specify several IntegrationFlow beans and wire them to a single application etc., see the Reference Manual for more information. At least this line-by-line tutorial should show you Spring Integration Java DSL basics and its seamless fusion between Spring Framework Java & Annotation configuration, Spring Integration foundation and Java 8 Lambda support! Also see the si4demo to see the evolution of Spring Integration including the Java DSL, as shown at the 2014 SpringOne/2GX Conference. (Video should be available soon). As always, we look forward to your comments and feedback (StackOverflow (spring-integration tag), Spring JIRA, GitHub) and we very much welcome contributions! P.S. Even if this tutorial is fully based on the Java 8 Lambda support, we don't want to miss pre Java 8 users, we are going to provide similar non-Lambda blog post. Stay tuned!