XML is for dinosaurs, right? Everybody uses JSON these days. So you do, don’t you? But what about things like XSD, XSLT, JAXB, XPath, etc – is it all evil? In this article, I’d like to introduce the StAXON project (APL2) which tries to give you the best from both worlds: JSON outside, but XML inside. One benefit from this is that you can integrate JSON with powerful XML-related technologies for free. StAXON lets you read and write JSON using the Java Streaming API for XML (javax.xml.stream), also known as StAX. More specifically, StAXON provides implementations of the StAX Cursor API (XMLStreamReader and XMLStreamWriter) StAX Event API (XMLEventReader and XMLEventWriter) StAX Factory API (XMLInputFactory and XMLOutputFactory) for JSON. You may know the Jettison project, which also has XMLStreamReader and XMLStreamWriter implementations. However, StAXON aims to provide a more comprehensive and consistent solution and tries to avoid some of the issues users are having with Jettison. Anyway, let’s get started and see what this “anti-aging substance” for XML can do. Setup Add the following dependency to your Maven POM file: de.odysseus.staxon staxon 1.0 or get the latest StAXON JAR from the Downloads page and add it to your classpath. Mapping Convention The purpose of StAXON’s mapping convention is to generate a more compact JSON. It borrows the "$" syntax for text elements from the Badgerfish convention but attempts to avoid needless text-only JSON objects: Element names become object properties: <–> {"alice":null} Attributes go in properties whose name begin with "@": <–> {"alice":{"@charlie":"david"} Text-only elements go to a simple key/value property: bob <–> {"alice":"bob"} Otherwise, text content is mapped to the "$" property: bob <–> {"alice":{"@charlie":"david","$":"bob"} Nested elements go to nested properties: charlie <–> {"alice":{"bob":"charlie"} A default namespace declaration goes in the element’s "@xmlns" property: <–> {"alice":{"@xmlns":"http://foo.com"} A prefixed namespace declaration goes in the element’s "@xmlns:" property: John Doe555-1111 However, with our JSON-based writer, the output is {"customer":{"name":"John Doe","phone":"555-1111"} Reading JSON Create a JSON-based reader: String json = "{\"customer\":{\"name\":\"John Doe\",\"phone\":\"555-1111\"}"; XMLInputFactory factory = new JsonXMLInputFactory(); XMLStreamReader reader = factory.createXMLStreamReader(new StringReader(json)); Read your document: assert reader.getEventType() == XMLStreamConstants.START_DOCUMENT; reader.nextTag(); assert reader.isStartElement() && "customer".equals(reader.getLocalName()); reader.next(); assert reader.isStartElement() && "name".equals(reader.getLocalName()); reader.next(); assert reader.hasText() && "John Doe".equals(reader.getText()); reader.nextTag(); assert reader.isEndElement(); reader.next(); assert reader.isStartElement() && "phone".equals(reader.getLocalName()); reader.next(); assert reader.hasText() && "555-111".equals(reader.getText()); reader.nextTag(); assert reader.isEndElement(); reader.next(); assert reader.isEndElement(); reader.next(); assert reader.getEventType() == XMLStreamConstants.END_DOCUMENT; reader.close(); Factory Configuration The JsonXMLInputFactory and JsonXMLOutputFactory classes can be configured via the standard setProperty(String, Object) API. The factory classes define several constants for properties they support. However, the JsonXMLConfig interface provides a convenient way to hold the configuration of both - input and output - factories: JsonXMLConfig config = new JsonXMLConfigBuilder(). virtualRoot("customer"). prettyPrint(true). build(); XMLInputFactory inputFactory = new JsonXMLInputFactory(config); ... XMLOutputFactory outputFactory = new JsonXMLOutputFactory(config); ... Virtual Roots Set the virtualRoot configuration property to strip the root element from the JSON representation, e.g. { "name" : "John Doe", "phone" : "555-1111" } As XML requires a single root element, but JSON documents often don’t have one, this is an important feature required to read and write existing JSON formats. Mastering Arrays What about JSON arrays? Unfortunately, there’s nothing like this in XML. And to be honest, this causes most of the trouble when writing JSON via an XML API like StAX. Simply omitting the array boundaries would lead to non-unique JSON properties, which is usually not desired. StAXON provides several ways to deal with JSON arrays. At the core is the idea to leverage XML processing instructions to tell the writer about to start an array: the processing instruction maps a sequence of XML elements with the same name to a JSON array. The processing instruction optionally takes the array element tag name (with prefix) as data. There’s no end array hint as StAXON detects the end of an array sequence and closes it automatically. Consider the following JSON document: { "alice" : { "bob" : [ "edgar", "charlie" ], "peter" : null } } In order to get a "bob" array instead of two separate "bob" properties, we need to provide XML events corresponding to edgar charlie I.e., with the cursor API, you would just insert writer.writeProcessingInstruction(JsonXMLStreamConstants.MULTIPLE_PI_TARGET); // to start an array. Initiating Arrays with Element Paths Sometimes it is not desired or even impossible to generate processing instruction to control arrays. This may be the case if the actual writing isn’t done by your code, but some other framework like JAXB or similar, and you only provide a stream writer. Addressing such a scenario, wouldn’t it be nice being able to tell the writer beforehand, which elements should trigger a JSON array? This is where the XMLMultipleStreamWriter and XMLMultipleEventWriter wrappers step in. E.g., to specify a sequence of bob elements below root element alice as a multiple path: writer = new XMLMultipleStreamWriter(writer, true, "/alice/bob"); The boolean parameter specifies whether our paths include the root node (alice) from the paths. That is, we could also use writer = new XMLMultipleStreamWriter(writer, false, "/bob"); To wrap all bob fields into arrays (not just alice children), we can use a relative path, without a leading slash: writer = new XMLMultipleStreamWriter(writer, false, "bob"); Now we (or some legacy code, framework, …) may write our document, and the writer will take care to trigger the bob array for us. Triggering Arrays automatically Finally, if nothing else works for you, you may also let StAXON fully automatically determine array boundaries. Use this only if you cannot provide processing instructions and cannot provide the paths of the elements that should be wrapped into JSON arrays. However, using this method has several drawbacks: The writer basically needs to cache the entire document in memory, eating both space and time. The writer will not be able to produce empty arrays or arrays with a single element. To enable this feature, set the JsonXMLOutputFactory.PROP_AUTO_ARRAY property to true. Triggering Document Arrays StAXON’s writer implementation allows you to wrap a sequence of documents into a JSON array. To do this, write the PI before writing anything else: writer.writeProcessingInstruction(JsonXMLStreamConstants.MULTIPLE_PI_TARGET); writer.writeStartDocument(); // first array component ... writer.writeEndDocument(); writer.writeStartDocument(); // second array component ... writer.writeEndDocument(); ... writer.close(); The writer.close() call is crucial here, as it will close the JSON array. Using JAXB Consider a JAXB-annotated Customer class: @JsonXML(virtualRoot = true, prettyPrint = true, multiplePaths = "phone") @XmlRootElement public class Customer { public String name; public List phone; } The @JsonXML annotation is used to configure the mapping details. In the above example, the customer root element is stripped from the JSON representation, phone elements are wrapped into an array and JSON output is nicely formatted, e.g. { "name" : "John Doe", "phone" : [ "555-1111" ] } Now, the JsonXMLMapper class enables for dead-simple mapping to and from JSON: /* * Create mapper instance. */ JsonXMLMapper mapper = new JsonXMLMapper(Customer.class); /* * Read customer. */ InputStream input = getClass().getResourceAsStream("input.json"); Customer customer = mapper.readObject(input); input.close(); /* * Write back to console */ mapper.writeObject(System.out, customer); Using JAX-RS StAXON provides the staxon-jaxrs module, which enables your RESTful services to serialize/deserialize JAXB-annotated classes to/from JSON. It includes the following JAX-RS @Provider classes: de.odysseus.staxon.json.jaxrs.jaxb.JsonXMLObjectProvider is used to read and write JSON objects de.odysseus.staxon.json.jaxrs.jaxb.JsonXMLArrayProvider is used to read and write JSON arrays In order to select the StAXON message body readers/writers for your resource, a @JsonXML annotation is required. When used with JAX-RS, the @JsonXML annotation can be placed on a model type (@XmlRootElement or @XmlType) to configure its serialization and deserialization a JAX-RS resource method to configure serialization of the result type a parameter of a JAX-RS resource method to configure deserialization of the parameter type If a @JsonXML annotation is present at a model type and a resource method or parameter, the latter will override the model type annotation. If neither is present, StAXON will not handle the resource. You can find a sample project using Jersey with StAXON here. Using XPath XPath is another standard that can be easily adopted for use with JSON. The Java XPath API (javax.xml.xpath) doesn’t let us provide an XMLStreamReader or similar as a source, but requires a Document Object Model (DOM). Therefore, we need to read our JSON into a DOM first to apply expressions against that DOM. This could be done by performing an XSLT identity transformation to a DOMResult. However, StAXON provides the DOMEventConsumer class to translate XML events to DOM nodes, which should be faster and simpler than leveraging XSLT. Once we have a DOM, there’s nothing special with applying XPath expressions. StringReader json = new StringReader("{\"edgar\":\"david\",\"bob\":\"charlie\"}"); /* * Our sample JSON has no root element, so specify "alice" as virtual root */ JsonXMLConfig config = new JsonXMLConfigBuilder().virtualRoot("alice").build(); /* * create event reader */ XMLEventReader reader = new JsonXMLInputFactory(config).createXMLEventReader(json); /* * parse JSON into Document Object Model (DOM) */ Document document = DOMEventConsumer.consume(reader); /* * evaluate an XPath expression */ XPath xpath = XPathFactory.newInstance().newXPath(); System.out.println(xpath.evaluate("//alice/bob", document)); Running the above sample will print charlie to the console. What else? In the end, using an XML API to read and write JSON may still look like a compromise, but it may turn out to be a good choice. The availability of a StAX implementation for JSON acts as a door opener to powerful XML related technologies and easily enables for dual-format (XML and JSON) services. There’s more we can do with StAXON: XSD, XSLT, XQuery, XML-JSON/JSON-XML conversions, to name a few. Please check the Wiki for some of those.

Execute the slow integration tests separately from unit tests and show as much information about them as possible in Sonar.

The logging in Jersey, the reference JAX-RS implementation, is little sub-optimal. For example if it cannot find a method producing the expected MIME type then it will return “Unsupported mime type” to the client but won’t log anything (which mime type was requested, which mime types are actually available, …). Debugging it isn’t exactly easy either, so what to do? Well, I don’t know the ultimate solution but want to share few tips. Enable Tracing of Request Matching Jersey since version 1.1.5 supports request matching tracing, provided somehow detailed information about the matching process in the response headers. To enable it for the Jersey Test framework you’d do something like this in your test class: public class MyJerseyTest extends JerseyTest { public MyJerseyTest() { super(new WebAppDescriptor .Builder("my.package.with.jaxrs.resources") .contextPath("myCtxPath") .servletPath("/myServletPath") .initParam("com.sun.jersey.config.feature.Trace", "true") .build()); } // Your test methods here ...; you can get the trace headers via ClientResponse#getHeaders() } To enable it for the server itself (though might be not such a good idea to enable this in production), you would set it in web.xml: Jersey REST Service for value codes com.sun.jersey.spi.container.servlet.ServletContainer ... com.sun.jersey.config.feature.Trace true ... The headers, which you can obtain via e.g. curl -i or via ClientResponse#getHeaders(), might look like this: {X-Jersey-Trace-008=[mapped exception to response: javax.ws.rs.WebApplicationException@56f9659d -> 415 (Unsupported Media Type)], X-Jersey-Trace-002=[accept right hand path java.util.regex.Matcher[pattern=/myResource/([-0-9a-zA-Z_]+)(/.*)? region=0,17 lastmatch=/myResource/23/mySubresources]: "/myResource/23/mySubresources" -> "/myResource/23" : "/mySubresources"], X-Jersey-Trace-003=[accept resource: "myResource/23" -> @Path("/myResource/{item: [-0-9a-zA-Z_]+}") com.example.MyExampleResource@41babddb], X-Jersey-Trace-000=[accept root resource classes: "/myResource/23/mySubresources"], X-Jersey-Trace-001=[match path "/myResource/23/mySubresources" -> "/application\.wadl(/.*)?", "/myResource/([-0-9a-zA-Z_]+)(/.*)?", "/myResource(/.*)?", "/mySubresources/([-0-9a-zA-Z_]+)(/.*)?"], X-Jersey-Trace-006=[accept sub-resource methods: "myResource/23" : "/mySubresources", GET -> com.example.MyExampleResource@41babddb], X-Jersey-Trace-007=[accept termination (matching failure): "/mySubresources"], X-Jersey-Trace-004=[match path "/mySubresources" -> "/mySubresources(/)?", ""], X-Jersey-Trace-005=[accept right hand path java.util.regex.Matcher[pattern=/mySubresources(/)? region=0,6 lastmatch=/mySubresources]: "/mySubresources" -> "/mySubresources" : ""] , Transfer-Encoding=[chunked], Date=[Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:48:26 GMT], server=[grizzly/2.1.2], Content-Type=[text/html; charset=iso-8859-1]} provided that you have the class com.example.MyExampleResource annotated with @Path("/myResource/{item: [-0-9a-zA-Z_]+}") and a method annotated with @GET @Path("mySubresources") (and the class field @PathParam("item") Long item). As you can see, there is still no info regarding accepted/supported MIME types. Get Detailed Logging Into a File Jersey uses Java logging, which is know for being difficult to configure. Here is a dirty trick to get detailed Jersey logs into a file: public class MyJerseyTest extends JerseyTest { @BeforeClass public static void setupJerseyLog() throws Exception { Handler fh = new FileHandler("/tmp/jersey_test.log"); Logger.getLogger("").addHandler(fh); Logger.getLogger("com.sun.jersey").setLevel(Level.FINEST); } // Your test methods here ... } Notice that even thoug the log level is ALL, the logs still might be quite useless to troubleshoot some problems (such s the unsupported MIME type). Configure Request/Response Logging Filters Jersey provides a LoggingFilter that can be used to log request/response entities and it can be installed both into the server and the client. The com.sun.jersey.api.container.filter.LoggingFilter may be installed into the server via init-params, the com.sun.jersey.api.client.filter.LoggingFilter may be installed into the client via client.addFilter. JerseyTest automatically installs the LoggingFilter into the client it uses if the system property “enableLogging” is set (to whatever). From http://theholyjava.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/troubleshooting-jersey-rest-server-and-client/

WADL (Web Application Description Language) is to REST what WSDL is to SOAP. The mere existence of this language causes a lot of controversy (see: Do we need WADL? and To WADL or not to WADL). I can think of few legitimate use cases for using WADL, but if you are here already, you are probably not seeking for yet another discussion. So let us move forward to the WADL itself. In principle WADL is similar to WSDL, but the structure of the language is much different. Whilst WSDL defines a flat list of messages and operations either consuming or producing some of them, WADL emphasizes the hierarchical nature of RESTful web services. In REST, the primary artifact is the resource. Each resource (noun) is represented as an URI. Every resource can define both CRUD operations (verbs, implemented as HTTP methods) and nested resources. The nested resource has a strong relationship with a parent resource, typically representing an ownership. A simple example would be http://example.com/api/books resource representing a list of books. You can (HTTP) GET this resource, meaning to retrieve the whole list. You can also GET the http://example.com/api/books/7 resource, fetching the details of 7th book inside books resource. Or you can even PUT new version or DELETE the resource altogether using the same URI. You are not limited to a single level of nesting: GETting http://example.com/api/books/7/reviews?page=2&size=10 will retrieve the second page (up to 10 items) of reviews of 7th book. Obviously you can also place other resources next to books, like http://example.com/api/readers The requirement arose to formally and precisely describe every available resource, method, request and response, just like WSDL guys were able to do. WADL is one of the options to describe “available URIs", although some believe that well-written REST service should be self-descriptive (see HATEOAS). Nevertheless here is a simple, empty WADL document: Nothing fancy here. Note that the tag defines base API address. All named resources, which we are just about to add, are relative to this address. Also you can define several tags to describe more than one APIs. So, let's add a simple resource: This defines resource under http://example.com/api/books with two methods possible: GET to retrieve the whole list and POST to create (add) new item. Depending on your requirements you might want to allow DELETE method as well (to delete all items), and it is the responsibility of WADL to document what is allowed. Remember our example at the beginning: /books/7? Obviously 7 is just an example and we won't declare every possible book id in WADL. Instead there is a handy placeholder syntax:There are two important aspects you should note: first, The {bookId} place-holder was used in place of nested resource. Secondly, to make it clear, we are documenting this place-holder using tag. We will see soon how it can be used in combination with methods. Just to make sure you are still with me, the document above describes GET /books and GET /books/some_id resources. The web service is getting complex, however it describes quite a lot of operations. First of all GET /books/42/reviews is a valid operation. But the interesting part is the nested tag. As you can see we can describe parameters of each method independently. In our case optional query parameters (as opposed to template parameters used previously for URI place-holders) were defined. This gives the client additional knowledge about acceptable page and size query parameters. This means that /books/7/reviews?page=2&size=10 is a valid resource identifier. And did I mention that every resource, method and parameter can have documentation attached as per the WADL specification? We will stop here and only mention about remaining pieces of WADL. First of all, as you have probably guessed so far, there is also a child tag possible for each . Both request and response can define exact grammar (e.g. in XML Schema) that either the request or the response must follow. The response can also document possible HTTP response codes. But since we will be using the knowledge you have gained so far in a code-first application, I intentionally left the definition. WADL is agile and it allows you to define as little (or as much) information as you need. So we know the basics of WADL, now we would like to use it, maybe as a consumer or as a producer in a Java-based application. Fortunately there is a wadl.xsd XML Schema description of the language itself, which we can use to generate JAXB-annotated POJOs to work with (using xjc tool in the JDK): $ wget http://www.w3.org/Submission/wadl/wadl.xsd $ xjc wadl.xsd And there it... hangs! The life of a software developer is full of challenges and non-trivial problems. And sometimes it is just an annoying network filter that makes suspicious packets (together with half hour of your life) disappear. It is not hard to spot the problem, once you recall that article written around 2008: W3C’s Excessive DTD Traffic: Accessing xml.xsd from the browser returns an HTML page instantly, but xjc tool waits forever. Downloading this file locally and correcting the schemaLocation attribute in wadl.xsd helped. It's always the little things... $ xjc wadl.xsd parsing a schema... compiling a schema... net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Application.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Doc.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Grammars.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/HTTPMethods.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Include.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Link.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Method.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/ObjectFactory.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Option.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Param.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/ParamStyle.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Representation.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Request.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Resource.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/ResourceType.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Resources.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/Response.java net/java/dev/wadl/_2009/_02/package-info.java Since we'll be using these classes in a maven based project (and I hate committing generated classes to source repository), let's move xjc execution to maven lifecycle: org.codehaus.mojo jaxb2-maven-plugin 1.3 net.java.dev.jaxb2-commons jaxb-fluent-api 2.0.1 com.sun.xml jaxb-xjc xjc -Xfluent-api bindings.xjb net.java.dev.wadl Well, pom.xml isn't the most concise format ever... Never mind, this will generate WADL XML classes during every build, before the source code is compiled. I also love the fluent-api plugin that adds with*() methods along with ordinary setters, returning this to allow chaining. Pretty convenient. Finally we define more pleasant package name for generated artifacts (if you find net.java.dev.wadl._2009._02 package name pleasant enough, you can skip this step) and add Wadl prefix to all generated classes bindings.xjb file: We are now ready to produce and consume WADL in XML format using JAXB and POJO classes. Equipped with that knowledge and the foundation we are ready to develop some interesting library – which will be the subject of the next article. From http://nurkiewicz.blogspot.com/2012/01/gentle-introduction-to-wadl-in-java.html

The dependency:tree goal of the Maven plugin dependency supports various graphical outputs from the version 2.4 up. This is how you would create a diagram showing all dependencies in the com.example group in the dot format: mvn dependency:tree -Dincludes=com.example-DappendOutput=true -DoutputType=dot -DappendOutput=true -DoutputFile=/path/to/output.dot To actually produce an image from .dot you can use one of .dot renderers, f.ex. this online dot renderer (paste into the right text box, press enter). You could also generate the output f.ex. in the graphml format & visualize it in Eclipse. From http://theholyjava.wordpress.com/2012/01/13/visualize-maven-project-dependencies-with-dependencytree-and-dot-diagram-output/

Data exchanges between companies are increasing a lot. The number of applications that must be integrated is increasing, too. The interfaces use different technologies, protocols and data formats. Nevertheless, the integration of these applications must be modeled in a standardized way, realized efficiently and supported by automatic tests. Three integration frameworks are available in the JVM environment, which fulfil these requirements: Spring Integration, Mule ESB and Apache Camel. They implement the well-known Enteprise Integration Patterns (EIP, http://www.eaipatterns.com) and therefore offer a standardized, domain-specific language to integrate applications. These integration frameworks can be used in almost every integration project within the JVM environment – no matter which technologies, transport protocols or data formats are used. All integration projects can be realized in a consistent way without redundant boilerplate code. This article compares all three alternatives and discusses their pros and cons. If you want to know, when to use a more powerful Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) instead of one of these lightweight integration frameworks, then you should read this blog post: http://www.kai-waehner.de/blog/2011/06/02/when-to-use-apache-camel/ (it explains when to use Apache Camel, but the title could also be „When to use a lightweight integration framework“). Comparison Criteria Several criteria can be used to compare these three integration frameworks: Open source Basic concepts / architecture Testability Deployment Popularity Commercial support IDE-Support Errorhandling Monitoring Enterprise readiness Domain specific language (DSL) Number of components for interfaces, technologies and protocols Expandability Similarities All three frameworks have many similarities. Therefore, many of the above comparison criteria are even! All implement the EIPs and offer a consistent model and messaging architecture to integrate several technologies. No matter which technologies you have to use, you always do it the same way, i.e. same syntax, same API, same automatic tests. The only difference is the the configuration of each endpoint (e.g. JMS needs a queue name while JDBC needs a database connection url). IMO, this is the most significant feature. Each framework uses different names, but the idea is the same. For instance, „Camel routes“ are equivalent to „Mule flows“, „Camel components“ are called „adapters“ in Spring Integration. Besides, several other similarities exists, which differ from heavyweight ESBs. You just have to add some libraries to your classpath. Therefore, you can use each framework everywhere in the JVM environment. No matter if your project is a Java SE standalone application, or if you want to deploy it to a web container (e.g. Tomcat), JEE application server (e.g. Glassfish), OSGi container or even to the cloud. Just add the libraries, do some simple configuration, and you are done. Then you can start implementing your integration stuff (routing, transformation, and so on). All three frameworks are open source and offer familiar, public features such as source code, forums, mailing lists, issue tracking and voting for new features. Good communities write documentation, blogs and tutorials (IMO Apache Camel has the most noticeable community). Only the number of released books could be better for all three. Commercial support is available via different vendors: Spring Integration: SpringSource (http://www.springsource.com) Mule ESB: MuleSoft (http://www.mulesoft.org) Apache Camel: FuseSource (http://fusesource.com) and Talend (http://www.talend.com) IDE support is very good, even visual designers are available for all three alternatives to model integration problems (and let them generate the code). Each of the frameworks is enterprise ready, because all offer required features such as error handling, automatic testing, transactions, multithreading, scalability and monitoring. Differences If you know one of these frameworks, you can learn the others very easily due to their same concepts and many other similarities. Next, let’s discuss their differences to be able to decide when to use which one. The two most important differences are the number of supported technologies and the used DSL(s). Thus, I will concentrate especially on these two criteria in the following. I will use code snippets implementing the well-known EIP „Content-based Router“ in all examples. Judge for yourself, which one you prefer. Spring Integration Spring Integration is based on the well-known Spring project and extends the programming model with integration support. You can use Spring features such as dependency injection, transactions or security as you do in other Spring projects. Spring Integration is awesome, if you already have got a Spring project and need to add some integration stuff. It is almost no effort to learn Spring Integration if you know Spring itself. Nevertheless, Spring Integration only offers very rudimenary support for technologies – just „basic stuff“ such as File, FTP, JMS, TCP, HTTP or Web Services. Mule and Apache Camel offer many, many further components! Integrations are implemented by writing a lot of XML code (without a real DSL), as you can see in the following code snippet: You can also use Java code and annotations for some stuff, but in the end, you need a lot of XML. Honestly, I do not like too much XML declaration. It is fine for configuration (such as JMS connection factories), but not for complex integration logic. At least, it should be a DSL with better readability, but more complex Spring Integration examples are really tough to read. Besides, the visual designer for Eclipse (called integration graph) is ok, but not as good and intuitive as its competitors. Therefore, I would only use Spring Integration if I already have got an existing Spring project and must just add some integration logic requiring only „basic technologies“ such as File, FTP, JMS or JDBC. Mule ESB Mule ESB is – as the name suggests – a full ESB including several additional features instead of just an integration framework (you can compare it to Apache ServiceMix which is an ESB based on Apache Camel). Nevertheless, Mule can be use as lightweight integration framework, too – by just not adding and using any additional features besides the EIP integration stuff. As Spring Integration, Mule only offers a XML DSL. At least, it is much easier to read than Spring Integration, in my opinion. Mule Studio offers a very good and intuitive visual designer. Compare the following code snippet to the Spring integration code from above. It is more like a DSL than Spring Integration. This matters if the integration logic is more complex. The major advantage of Mule is some very interesting connectors to important proprietary interfaces such as SAP, Tibco Rendevous, Oracle Siebel CRM, Paypal or IBM’s CICS Transaction Gateway. If your integration project requires some of these connectors, then I would probably choose Mule! A disadvantage for some projects might be that Mule says no to OSGi: http://blogs.mulesoft.org/osgi-no-thanks/ Apache Camel Apache Camel is almost identical to Mule. It offers many, many components (even more than Mule) for almost every technology you could think of. If there is no component available, you can create your own component very easily starting with a Maven archetype! If you are a Spring guy: Camel has awesome Spring integration, too. As the other two, it offers a XML DSL: ${in.header.type} is ‘com.kw.DvdOrder’ ${in.header.type} is ‘com.kw.VideogameOrder’ Readability is better than Spring Integration and almost identical to Mule. Besides, a very good (but commercial) visual designer called Fuse IDE is available by FuseSource – generating XML DSL code. Nevertheless, it is a lot of XML, no matter if you use a visual designer or just your xml editor. Personally, I do not like this. Therefore, let’s show you another awesome feature: Apache Camel also offers DSLs for Java, Groovy and Scala. You do not have to write so much ugly XML. Personally, I prefer using one of these fluent DSLs instead XML for integration logic. I only do configuration stuff such as JMS connection factories or JDBC properties using XML. Here you can see the same example using a Java DSL code snippet: from(“file:incomingOrders “) .choice() .when(body().isInstanceOf(com.kw.DvdOrder.class)) .to(“file:incoming/dvdOrders”) .when(body().isInstanceOf(com.kw.VideogameOrder.class)) .to(“jms:videogameOrdersQueue “) .otherwise() .to(“mock:OtherOrders “); The fluent programming DSLs are very easy to read (even in more complex examples). Besides, these programming DSLs have better IDE support than XML (code completion, refactoring, etc.). Due to these awesome fluent DSLs, I would always use Apache Camel, if I do not need some of Mule’s excellent connectors to proprietary products. Due to its very good integration to Spring, I would even prefer Apache Camel to Spring Integration in most use cases. By the way: Talend offers a visual designer generating Java DSL code, but it generates a lot of boilerplate code and does not allow vice-versa editing (i.e. you cannot edit the generated code). This is a no-go criteria and has to be fixed soon (hopefully)! And the winner is… … all three integration frameworks, because they are all lightweight and easy to use – even for complex integration projects. It is awesome to integrate several different technologies by always using the same syntax and concepts – including very good testing support. My personal favorite is Apache Camel due to its awesome Java, Groovy and Scala DSLs, combined with many supported technologies. I would only use Mule if I need some of its unique connectors to proprietary products. I would only use Spring Integration in an existing Spring project and if I only need to integrate „basic technologies“ such as FTP or JMS. Nevertheless: No matter which of these lightweight integration frameworks you choose, you will have much fun realizing complex integration projects easily with low efforts. Remember: Often, a fat ESB has too much functionality, and therefore too much, unnecessary complexity and efforts. Use the right tool for the right job! Best regards, Kai Wähner (Twitter: @KaiWaehner) http://www.kai-waehner.de/blog/2012/01/10/spoilt-for-choice-which-integration-framework-to-use-spring-integration-mule-esb-or-apache-camel/

Oracle Linux builds have a list of public yum repositories on the Oracle website, and they don't come configured with the builds, so if you're trying to install Puppet, you'll want to avoid this pitfall, along with a few others. We’ve been spending some time trying to setup our developer environment on a Oracle Linux 5.7 build and one of the first steps was to install Puppet as we’ve already created scripts which automate the installation of most things. Unfortunately Oracle Linux builds don’t come with any yum repos configured so when you run the following command… ls -alh /etc/yum.repos.d/ …you don’t see anything We eventually realised that there are a list of public yum repositories on the Oracle website, of which we needed to download the definition for Oracle Linux 5 like so: cd /etc/yum.repos.d wget http://public-yum.oracle.com/public-yum-el5.repo We then need to edit that file to enable the appropriate repository. In this case we want to enable ol5_u7_base: [ol5_u7_base] name=Oracle Linux $releasever - U7 - $basearch - base baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL5/7/base/$basearch/ gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5 gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 I made the mistake of enabling ol5_u5_base which led to us getting some really weird problems whereby yum got confused as to which version of libselinux we had installed and was therefore unable to install libselinux-ruby as its dependencies weren’t being properly satisfied. Calling ‘yum list installed’ suggested that we had libselinux 1.33.4.5-7 installed but if we ran ‘yum install libselinux’ then it suggested we already had 1.33.4.5-5 installed. Very confusing! After trying to uninstall and downgrade libselinux and pretty much destroying the installation in the process, another colleague spotted my mistake. We also found that we had to add the epel repo which gave us access to some other packages that we needed: rpm -Uvh http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/x86_64/epel-release-5-4.noarch.rpm After all that was done we were able to run the command to install puppet: yum install puppet That installs puppet 2.6.12 as that’s the latest version in that repo. The latest stable version is 2.7.9 but I think we’ll need to hook up a puppet specific repo to get that working. Source: http://www.markhneedham.com/blog/2012/01/18/installing-puppet-on-oracle-linux

One of the methods of exchanging data between processes with the multiprocessing module is directly shared memory via multiprocessing.Value. As any method that’s very general, it can sometimes be tricky to use. I’ve seen a variation of this question asked a couple of times on StackOverflow: I have some processes that do work, and I want them to increment some shared counter because [... some irrelevant reason ...] – how can this be done? The wrong way And surprisingly enough, some answers given to this question are wrong, since they use multiprocessing.Value incorrectly, as follows: import time from multiprocessing import Process, Value def func(val): for i in range(50): time.sleep(0.01) val.value += 1 if __name__ == '__main__': v = Value('i', 0) procs = [Process(target=func, args=(v,)) for i in range(10)] for p in procs: p.start() for p in procs: p.join() print v.value This code is a demonstration of the problem, distilling only the usage of the shared counter. A "pool" of 10 processes is created to run the func function. All processes share a Value and increment it 50 times. You would expect this code to eventually print 500, but in all likeness it won’t. Here’s some output taken from 10 runs of that code: > for i in {1..10}; do python sync_nolock_wrong.py; done 435 464 484 448 491 481 490 471 497 494 Why does this happen? I must admit that the documentation of multiprocessing.Value can be a bit confusing here, especially for beginners. It states that by default, a lock is created to synchronize access to the value, so one may be falsely led to believe that it would be OK to modify this value in any way imaginable from multiple processes. But it’s not. Explanation – the default locking done by Value This section is advanced and isn’t strictly required for the overall flow of the post. If you just want to understand how to synchronize the counter correctly, feel free to skip it. The locking done by multiprocessing.Value is very fine-grained. Value is a wrapper around a ctypes object, which has an underlying value attribute representing the actual object in memory. All Value does is ensure that only a single process or thread may read or write this value attribute simultaneously. This is important, since (for some types, on some architectures) writes and reads may not be atomic. I.e. to actually fill up the object’s memory, the CPU may need several instructions, and another process reading the same (shared) memory at the same time could see some intermediate, invalid state. The built-in lock of Value prevents this from happening. However, when we do this: val.value +=1 What Python actually performs is the following (disassembled bytecode with the dis module). I’ve annotated the locking done by Value in #<-- comments: 0 LOAD_FAST 0 (val) 3 DUP_TOP #<--- Value lock acquired 4 LOAD_ATTR 0 (value) #<--- Value lock released 7 LOAD_CONST 1 (1) 10 INPLACE_ADD 11 ROT_TWO #<--- Value lock acquired 12 STORE_ATTR 0 (value) #<--- Value lock released So it’s obvious that while process #1 is now at instruction 7 (LOAD_CONST), nothing prevents process #2 from also loading the (old) value attribute and be on instruction 7 too. Both processes will proceed incrementing their private copy and writing it back. The result: the actual value got incremented only once, not twice. The right way Fortunately, this problem is very easy to fix. A separate Lock is needed to guarantee the atomicity of modifications to the Value: import time from multiprocessing import Process, Value, Lock def func(val, lock): for i in range(50): time.sleep(0.01) with lock: val.value += 1 if __name__ == '__main__': v = Value('i', 0) lock = Lock() procs = [Process(target=func, args=(v, lock)) for i in range(10)] for p in procs: p.start() for p in procs: p.join() print v.value Now we get the expected result: > for i in {1..10}; do python sync_lock_right.py; done 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 A value and a lock may appear like too much baggage to carry around at all times. So, we can create a simple "synchronized shared counter" object to encapsulate this functionality: import time from multiprocessing import Process, Value, Lock class Counter(object): def __init__(self, initval=0): self.val = Value('i', initval) self.lock = Lock() def increment(self): with self.lock: self.val.value += 1 def value(self): with self.lock: return self.val.value def func(counter): for i in range(50): time.sleep(0.01) counter.increment() if __name__ == '__main__': counter = Counter(0) procs = [Process(target=func, args=(counter,)) for i in range(10)] for p in procs: p.start() for p in procs: p.join() print counter.value() Bonus: since we’ve now placed a more coarse-grained lock on the modification of the value, we may throw away Value with its fine-grained lock altogether, and just use multiprocessing.RawValue, that simply wraps a shared object without any locking. Source: http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2012/01/04/shared-counter-with-pythons-multiprocessing/

clover is a great tool for generating code coverage reports from your unit tests. it can be executed as a plugin in eclipse, maven or ant. however, not everyone knows that it can also be used to collect coverage data of integration tests. this post explains how to collect coverage data with clover at runtime. this post assumes that you already know what are unit and integration tests. this post assumes that you know what clover is, and already used it either with eclipse, ant or maven. * let me assured you that even though the directions bellow seems complicated and clumsy at first, after doing them once or twice it is really easy to repeat them. motivation the default action of clover is to gather code coverage information during build time or compile time. therefore, this information includes just the coverage data created by unit tests. if you are developing web applications, you probably use more technologies to test your applications beside unit tests. these technologies may include httpunit/ htmlunit or automation technologies (like selenium). these technologies do not work at build time, they can only work during run time, where a web server is up and running and http calls are made. as a result, the code coverage made during build time is not reflecting the actual code coverage. we should be able to test the coverage while a server is running. the idea the idea is that we will first run clover regularly during build time. we will than take the clover artifacts, put them in our server and then run the integration tests. while running the integration tests, the clover database will be updated and we would be able to generate reports from it which will reflect both unit and integration tests. step 1 – preparation make sure that you have a web/application server (tomcat/jboss/weblogic…) with your web application already deployed. execute clover on your application as you would normally do (either by compiling the code on eclipse or by building with maven or ant, it doesn’t matter). the result of this action would be: clover db files. one of the outcome of executing the clover on your code are the db files. the db files hold all the information about your code and the coverage itself. the location of those files may change depending on the way you use clover and according to the way you configured clover in your environment. this is how the files looks like the .db file holds the information regarding your code (classes, methods and so on). all the other files hold all the coverage data. it is important that you will locate those files because we are going to use them in the next step. an instrumented code. another outcome of clover is that it instruments your code. a clover call is injected into each method so it would be reported in the coverage calculation. we will need this code. we will use this instrumented code in runtime to update the coverage data. if you use eclipse than the generated classes would be instrumented. if you use maven or ant than most chances are that a jar with all the instrumented code would be generated separately. search the instrument code jar. again, i can’t tell you exactly where it is located, but usually it generates a jar with a ‘clover’ postfix. example: if your jar name is my_app.jar, than the generated instrumented code jar will probably be something like my_app-clover.jar. so you will need to do some detective work here to find the instrumented classes/jar. if you are not sure whether the classes are instrumented or not, just decompile one of them with jad and search for the word clover inside of it. a code coverage report. this is a report with the unit test coverage. we don’t really need this, but it would be good so that we would be able to compare it with the report we will generate at the end. step 2 – updating the server the next steps are very important, please make sure you do them properly. replacing the existing application jar/classes with the instrumented jar/classes. take the instrumented jar/classes that were created by the clover and add it to your server’s classpath instead of the original jar/classes. the instrumented code will cause the clover db to be updated with the runtime data. adding clover jars and license. since we will use clover on runtime we will need also the clover jars in our server’s classpath. so add the clover own jars to your server’s classpath. if you are using clover with eclipse than these jars are located in the plugin folder of eclipse. if you are using maven than they will be loacted in your repository. * make sure you are using the same version of clover in your server as you used to generate the db files and instrumented code, otherwise it will not work and you will get error messages. also add the clover license file to the same location as the jars. adding the clover java argument. add the following java arg -dclover.initstring.basedir={ location of the db files that were created by the clover } . * notice – the path you have entered above is the path of the folder which contains the db files. example: -dclover.initstring.basedir=c:/workspace/mywebapp/target/clover. this java argument is used by the clover to locate the db files and update them. step 3 – restarting the server and running the tests now that hopefully all is set properly all that you need to do now is to restart your server and than running your integration tests. the tests should trigger the instrumented code which will call the clover api’s and will update the clover db. while running the tests: look at your log/console and search for error messages from clover. look at the folder which holds the clover db files. if everything is going as it should, new files will be created in this folder while running the tests. if not everything is going well the first time, don’t discourage, just go over each of the steps again. step 4 – generating an updated report if everything went well and new files were created in the db folder than that means you just need to generate a new report. if you are using clover with eclipse than you can simply push the reload button to reload the coverage data. if you are using maven or ant you can execute just the task which generates the report. another way is to use the clover htmlreporter to generate a report easily. now compare the new report to the old report. you should see that the new report coverage is much bigger than the old one since it contains also the integration tests coverage. * notice that not all the data is updated, even though the percentages are being updated, for some reason the calls counter does not. to summarize. as mentioned; yes, these instructions seems a bit complicated but after you succeed the first time, it is very easy to repeat it. in the company i work for we even made this whole process automatic and we are able to generate a full coverage report with unit and integrated tests combined. source: http://www.aviyehuda.com/2011/12/use-clover-to-generate-code-coverage-reports-of-your-integrationautomation-tests/

1. Overview This is the second of a series of articles about Persistence with Spring. The previous article discussed setting up the persistence layer with Spring 3.1 and Hibernate, without using templates. This article will focus on simplifying the Data Access Layer by using a single, generified DAO, which will result in elegant data access, with no unnecessary clutter. Yes, in Java. The Persistence with Spring series: Part 1 – The Persistence Layer with Spring 3.1 and Hibernate Part 3 – The Persistence Layer with Spring 3.1 and JPA Part 4 – The Persistence Layer with Spring Data JPA Part 5 – Transaction configuration with JPA and Spring 3.1 2. The DAO mess Most production codebases have some kind of DAO layer. Usually the implementation ranges from a raw class with no inheritance to some kind of generified class, but one thing is consistent – there is always more then one. Most likely, there are as many DAOs as there are entities in the system. Also, depending on the level of generics involved, the actual implementations can vary from heavily duplicated code to almost empty, with the bulk of the logic grouped in an abstract class. 2.1. A Generic DAO Instead of having multiple implementations – one for each entity in the system – a single parametrized DAO can be used in such a way that it still takes full advantage of the type safety provided by generics. Two implementations of this concept are presented next, one for a Hibernate centric persistence layer and the other focusing on JPA. These implementation are by no means complete – only some data access methods are included, but they can be easily be made more thorough. 2.2. The Abstract Hibernate DAO public abstract class AbstractHibernateDAO< T extends Serializable > { private Class< T > clazz; @Autowired SessionFactory sessionFactory; public void setClazz( Class< T > clazzToSet ){ this.clazz = clazzToSet; } public T findOne( Long id ){ return (T) this.getCurrentSession().get( this.clazz, id ); } public List< T > findAll(){ return this.getCurrentSession() .createQuery( "from " + this.clazz.getName() ).list(); } public void save( T entity ){ this.getCurrentSession().persist( entity ); } public void update( T entity ){ this.getCurrentSession().merge( entity ); } public void delete( T entity ){ this.getCurrentSession().delete( entity ); } public void deleteById( Long entityId ){ T entity = this.getById( entityId ); this.delete( entity ); } protected Session getCurrentSession(){ return this.sessionFactory.getCurrentSession(); } } The DAO uses the Hibernate API directly, without relying on any Spring templates (such as HibernateTemplate). Using of templates, as well as management of the SessionFactory which is autowired in the DAO were covered in the previous post of the series. 2.3. The Abstract JPA DAO public abstract class AbstractJpaDAO< T extends Serializable > { private Class< T > clazz; @PersistenceContext EntityManager entityManager; public void setClazz( Class< T > clazzToSet ){ this.clazz = clazzToSet; } public T findOne( Long id ){ return this.entityManager.find( this.clazz, id ); } public List< T > findAll(){ return this.entityManager.createQuery( "from " + this.clazz.getName() ) .getResultList(); } public void save( T entity ){ this.entityManager.persist( entity ); } public void update( T entity ){ this.entityManager.merge( entity ); } public void delete( T entity ){ this.entityManager.remove( entity ); } public void deleteById( Long entityId ){ T entity = this.getById( entityId ); this.delete( entity ); } } Similar to the Hibernate DAO implementation, the Java Persistence API is used here directly, again not relying on the now deprecated Spring JpaTemplate. 2.4. The Generic DAO Now, the actual implementation of the generic DAO is as simple as it can be – it contains no logic. Its only purpose is to be injected by the Spring container in a service layer (or in whatever other type of client of the Data Access Layer): @Repository @Scope( BeanDefinition.SCOPE_PROTOTYPE ) public class GenericJpaDAO< T extends Serializable > extends AbstractJpaDAO< T > implements IGenericDAO< T >{ // } @Repository @Scope( BeanDefinition.SCOPE_PROTOTYPE ) public class GenericHibernateDAO< T extends Serializable > extends AbstractHibernateDAO< T > implements IGenericDAO< T >{ // } First, note that the generic implementation is itself parametrized – allowing the client to choose the correct parameter in a case by case basis. This will mean that the clients gets all the benefits of type safety without needing to create multiple artifacts for each entity. Second, notice the prototype scope of these generic DAO implementation. Using this scope means that the Spring container will create a new instance of the DAO each time it is requested (including on autowiring). That will allow a service to use multiple DAOs with different parameters for different entities, as needed. The reason this scope is so important is due to the way Spring initializes beans in the container. Leaving the generic DAO without a scope would mean using the default singleton scope, which would lead to a single instance of the DAO living in the container. That would obviously be majorly restrictive for any kind of more complex scenario. 3. The Service There is now a single DAO to be injected by Spring; also, the Class needs to be specified: @Service class FooService implements IFooService{ IGenericDAO< Foo > dao; @Autowired public void setDao( IGenericDAO< Foo > daoToSet ){ this.dao = daoToSet; this.dao.setClazz( Foo.class ); } // ... } Spring autowires the new DAO insteince using setter injection so that the implementation can be customized with the Class object. After this point, the DAO is fully parametrized and ready to be used by the service. 4. Conclusion This article discussed the simplification of the Data Access Layer by providing a single, reusable implementation of a generic DAO. This implementation was presented in both a Hibernate and a JPA based environment. The result is a streamlined persistence layer, with no unnecessary clutter. For a step by step introduction about setting up the Spring context using Java based configuration and the basic Maven pom for the project, see this article. The next article of the Persistence with Spring series will focus on setting up the DAL layer with Spring 3.1 and JPA. In the meantime, you can check out the full implementation in the github project. If you read this far, you should follow me on twitter here.

have been working on a fairly simple JMeter load script that I can run a series of 4 sequential pages against an Apache server, but the goal was to have the server support 2,000 concurrent requests for 5 minutes without error. Most of my issues in this exercise have been with JMeter and the client machine used to test the Apache server. To begin, I must state I was originally configuring Apache with a prefork MPM: StartServers 100 MinSpareServers 75 MaxSpareServers 100 ServerLimit 2000 MaxClients 2000 MaxRequestsPerChild 0 At approximately line 72 of Jmeter.bat, there are several entries the manage the JVM for running Jmeter. set HEAP=-Xms512m -Xmx512m set NEW=-XX:NewSize=128m -XX:MaxNewSize=128m set SURVIVOR=-XX:SurvivorRatio=8 -XX:TargetSurvivorRatio=50% set TENURING=-XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=2 set RMIGC=-Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=600000 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=600000 set PERM=-XX:PermSize=64m -XX:MaxPermSize=64m I decided to start with 1,000 concurrent requests for 5 minutes just to see how the test would fair. With the above settings I started getting OOM errors almost immediately so I decided to increase the HEAP and NEW memory to eliminate the issue and wanted to add more GC settings to increase the JVM’s ability to clean up: set HEAP=-Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -Xss128k set NEW=-XX:NewSize=256m -XX:MaxNewSize=256m set SURVIVOR=-XX:SurvivorRatio=14 -XX:TargetSurvivorRatio=50% set "TENURING=-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+CMSParallelRemarkEnabled -XX:+UseCMSCompactAtFullCollection -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:+UseCMSInitiatingOccupancyOnly -XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=70 -XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=4" set "EVACUATION=-XX:+AggressiveOpts -XX:+UseFastAccessorMethods -XX:+UseCompressedStrings -XX:+OptimizeStringConcat" set RMIGC=-Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=600000 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=600000 set PERM=-XX:PermSize=64m -XX:MaxPermSize=64m This did resolve the JMeter OOM issues, but now started getting Apache errors. During the ramp-up phase, I started getting connection refused errors: Response code: Non HTTP response code: org.apache.http.conn.HttpHostConnectException Response message: Non HTTP response message: Connection to http://pasundtastgprt2:8001 refused I started looking at the Apache server and noticed that the number of httpd threads was at 1,000 and it appeared that JMeter was running out of memory because the requests where starting to back up. This is why we load test right! So I decided to run a worker MQM and recompiled Apache to support the new MPM ServerLimit 80 StartServers 25 MaxClients 2000 MinSpareThreads 75 MaxSpareThreads 125 ThreadsPerChild 5 MaxRequestsPerChild 0 I started testing this configuration and while monitoring the server running 1,000 concurrent requests and the server looked like Apache was handling 1,000 requests just fine. I was running a simple command to output the sockets and httpd processes on the server during the load test: while true do echo -----`date '+%r'` -----: netstat -ant | awk '{print $6}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n echo httpd processes: [`ps aux | grep httpd | wc -l`] echo . sleep 30 done Then when I was monitoring the load test, I was concerned about seeing 82 httpd processes running which was the ServerLimit I had set. -----08:02:37 AM -----: 1 established) 1 Foreign 4 CLOSE_WAIT 17 LISTEN 32 FIN_WAIT2 41 ESTABLISHED 69 FIN_WAIT1 630 SYN_RECV 45386 TIME_WAIT [82] httpd processes . I now increased the load to my target of 2,000 concurrent requests and restarted the JMeter test and was able to get to around 1,800 concurrent request and started getting connection refused errors again. I suspected that my Servers where maxed out and was not able to create anymore threads for those servers where having: 80 server * 5 threads each server == 400 requests processed concurrently So I increased the number of threads to 25 80 server * 25 threads each server == 2,000 requests processed concurrently To end up with this worker setting: ServerLimit 80 StartServers 25 MaxClients 2000 MinSpareThreads 75 MaxSpareThreads 125 ThreadsPerChild 25 MaxRequestsPerChild 0 I was then able to turn the load up to 2,000 concurrent requests. -----08:53:27 AM -----: 1 established) 1 FIN_WAIT2 1 Foreign 4 CLOSE_WAIT 12 CLOSING 17 LISTEN 129 ESTABLISHED 621 FIN_WAIT1 1203 SYN_RECV 55556 TIME_WAIT [53] httpd processes At this point we are only using 53 Servers and 2,000 clients. The tests sustained zero errors for 5 minutes during the test. As a test I increased the ThreadsPerChild to 40 and run the load test against 3,000 concurrent requests. I was able to get to around 2,800 concurrent requests then I started getting connection refused errors: Error Count: 1 Response code: Non HTTP response code: org.apache.http.conn.HttpHostConnectException Response message: Non HTTP response message: Connection to http://pasundtastgprt2:8001 refused and I also started getting JMeter errors: Response code: Non HTTP response code: java.net.BindException Response message: Non HTTP response message: Address already in use: connect So in the furure I would like to see how much further I can push the server and I think I can get to 3,000 concurrent and most likely far more than that on my current installation. From http://www.baselogic.com/blog/development/adding-memory-jmeter/

SOAP uses XML to marshal data that is transported to a software application. Since SOAP’s introduction, three SOAP encoding styles have become popular and are reliably implemented across software vendors and technology providers: SOAP Remote Procedure Call (RPC) encoding, also known as Section 5 encoding, which is defined by the SOAP 1.1 specification SOAP Remote Procedure Call Literal encoding (SOAP RPC-literal), which uses RPC methods to make calls but uses an XML do-it-yourself method for marshalling the data SOAP document-style encoding, which is also known as message-style or document-literal encoding. There are other encoding styles, but software developers have not widely adopted them, mostly because their promoters disagree on a standard. For example, Microsoft is promoting Direct Internet Message Exchange (DIME) to encode binary file data, while the rest of the world is promoting SOAP with Attachments. SOAP RPC encoding, RPC-literal, and document-style SOAP encoding have emerged as the encoding styles that a software developer can count on. SOAP RPC is the encoding style that offers you the most simplicity. You make a call to a remote object, passing along any necessary parameters. The SOAP stack serializes the parameters into XML, moves the data to the destination using transports such as HTTP and SMTP, receives the response, deserializes the response back into objects, and returns the results to the calling method. Whew! SOAP RPC handles all the encoding and decoding, even for very complex data types, and binds to the remote object automatically. Now, imagine that you have some data already in XML format. SOAP RPC also allows literal encoding of the XML data as a single field that is serialized and sent to the Web service host. This is what’s referred to as RPC-literal encoding. Since there is only one parameter — the XML tree — the SOAP stack only needs to serialize one value. The SOAP stack still deals with the transport issues to get the request to the remote object. The stack binds the request to the remote object and handles the response. Lastly, in a SOAP document-style call, the SOAP stack sends an entire XML document to a server without even requiring a return value. The message can contain any sort of XML data that is appropriate to the remote service. In SOAP document-style encoding, the developer handles everything, including determining the transport (e.g., HTTP, MQ, SMTP), marshaling and unmarshaling the body of the SOAP envelope, and parsing the XML in the request and response to find the needed data. The three encoding systems are compared here: SOAP RPC encoding is easiest for the software developer; however, all that ease comes with a scalability and performance penalty. In SOAP RPC-literal encoding, you are more involved with handling XML parsing, but it requires there to be overhead for the SOAP stack to deal with. SOAP document-literal encoding is most difficult for the software developer, but consequently requires little SOAP overhead. Why is SOAP RPC easier? With this encoding style, you only need to define the public object method in your code once; the SOAP stack unmarshals the request parameters into objects and passes them directly into the method call of your object. Otherwise, you are stuck with the task of parsing through the XML tree to find the data elements you need before you get to make the call to the public method. There is an argument for parsing the XML data yourself: since you know the data in the XML tree best, your code will parse that data more efficiently than generalized SOAP stack code. You will find this when measuring scalability and performance in SOAP encoding styles. References: 1. Discover SOAP encoding’s impact on Web service performance (http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-soapenc/) From http://singztechmusings.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/different-soap-encoding-styles-rpc-rpc-literal-and-document-literal/

If you're stumbling on this post looking for a way to manage dependencies with WAR overlays, please make sure you check out part one of this blog posting to get the background about how to apply and use WAR overlays in your POM file. This post picks up from the last post and it's assumed that you understand how to apply a WAR to an existing master project. Quick recap Why a quick recap? We're going to go into depth on how dependencies and libraries are applied to the master project. In order to have a WAR overlay, you must include the WAR as a dependency to the master project and must be overlayed during the war-plugin package phase. Where do the dependency libraries go? As mentioned in part one of this blog posting, files are placed in their parent's locations if it exists. What this means is that if, in your overlay WAR you have a .jsp file in /WEB-INF/welcome.jsp, the master WAR will then have a file named "welcome.jsp" in the /WEB-INF. Furthermore, if there is already a file named "welcome.jsp", that file will not be overwritten. If we extrapolate this a bit more, the libraries in the /WEB-INF/lib folder from the overlay will be placed inside the /WEB-INF/lib folder of the master project. This is great and all except when different versions of libraries exist causing runtime failures. Good news, there are ways to manage the dependencies in both the overlay WAR and the master project. How to see your main artifact's libraries? In order to determine what libraries are in which artifact, there are two simple ways. First, determine what libraries are in your master WAR. mvn clean package ls -al target/YOUR_ARTIFACT_WAR/WEB-INF/lib NOTE: adding "-DskipTests" when added to the above maven command would skip tests and would make this step a bit faster, though, it is strictly optional Secondly, add the "workDirectory" parameter to the configuration portion of your war-plugin when applying the overlay. Example: target/extract_here In your master project's POM file: ... ... org.apache.maven.plugins maven-war-plugin 2.1.1 target/overlay-war-folder com.yourcompany branded-templates ... ... This additional property will place each overlay's exploded contents into the specified folder to help debug library conflicts. How to exclude dependencies/libraries at build time? It can be a pain to manage the dependencies between each of the overlays, especially if the overlay is not under your development control. One method would be to manage the dependencies within the two POM files by utilizing the "provided" and "optional" dependencies that maven provides. However, if the overlay project can also stand as stand-alone project, this method will not work because the libraries are not considered to be provided or optional when running independently. This is common when trying to test each of the overlays independently. An additional option to control the libraries is to exclude them from the master WAR during the package phase. This is achieved by using the "excludes" parameter in each of the overlay sections. For example, to remove all of the spring libraries, you could exclude "spring*.jar" ... ... org.apache.maven.plugins maven-war-plugin 2.1.1 target/overlay-war-folder com.yourcompany branded-templates WEB-INF/lib/spring*.jar WEB-INF/lib/log4j*.jar ... ... You might start asking yourself, this is going to get complicated really quickly, and you're right, there are other options. Skinny vs Fat WAR Overlays Up until now, all of our overlays have been considered "fat" because they contain all of it's dependencies which get overlaid onto the master WAR file. There is an alternative that is more commonly known as the "skinny WAR". A skinny WAR is a combination between most of this post's tactics. NOTE: The method I am showing you is known as a "skinnier WAR" because the dependency libraries do exist in the overlay's WAR file, however, the classes will be externalized and the libraries can be removed during final packaging of the master project. Achieving the "skinny WAR" First, in the overlay project, during the package phase, tell maven to build the project's classes as an extra artifact in addition to the WAR file. This set of classes will become a jar file which will be used as a second dependency in the master project's POM. In the Overlay's POM file (add to the existing war plugin): ... ... org.apache.maven.plugins maven-war-plugin 2.1.1 true ... ... After successfully installing/deploying the overlay project, we will add the classes/jar file and the WAR dependency to the master project's POM file. In the master project's POM file: com.yourcompany branded-templates war ... ... com.yourcompany branded-templates 1.1 war com.yourcompany branded-templates 1.1 jar classes ... ... And finally, combine the excludes learned in the last example section above to exclude all .jar files from the overlay WAR. ... ... org.apache.maven.plugins maven-war-plugin 2.1.1 target/overlay-war-folder com.yourcompany branded-templates WEB-INF/lib/*.jar ... ... NOTE: Dependencies that exist in the Overlay will need to be added as dependencies to the master project because they have been removed from the overlay's /WEB-INF/lib folder. This is the main known risk of using skinny war overlays Congratulations! You now have a project with limited library conflicts and can better manager the main project and it's stability. Thank you for reading part one and this post, part two. Please feel free too leave comments or questions and I will do my best to answer them in a timely manner. From http://www.ensor.cc/2011/07/mavens-war-overlays-how-to-manage.html

In November 1995, while working as Lead software architect at Hughes Aircraft Of Canada Philippe Kruchten published a paper entitled: "Architectural Blueprints—The “4+1” View Model of Software Architecture". The intent was to come up with a mechanism to separate the different aspects of a software system into different views of the system. Why? Because different stakeholders always have different interest in a software system. Some aspects of a system are relevant to the Developers; others are relevant to System administrators. The Developers want to know about things like classes; System administrators want to know about deployment, hardware and network configurations and don't care about classes. Similar points can be made for Testers, Project Managers and Customers. Kruchten thought it made sense to decompose architecture into distinct views so stakeholders could get what they wanted. In total there were 5 views in his approach but he decided to call it 4 + 1. We'll discuss why it's called 4 + 1 later! But first, let's have a look at each of the different views. The logical view This contains information about the various parts of the system. In UML the logical view is modelled using Class, Object, State machine and Interaction diagrams (e.g Sequence diagrams). It's relevance is really to developers. The process view This describes the concurrent processes within the system. It encompasses some non-functional requirements such as performance and availability. In UML, Activity diagrams - which can be used to model concurrent behaviour - are used to model the process view. The development view The development view focusses on software modules and subsystems. In UML, Package and Component diagrams are used to model the development view. The physical view The physical view describes the physical deployment of the system. For example, how many nodes are used and what is deployed on what node. Thus, the physical view concerns some non-functional requirements such as scalability and availability. In UML, Deployment diagrams are used to model the physical view. The use case view This view describes the functionality of the system from the perspective from outside world. It contains diagrams describing what the system is supposed to do from a black box perspective. This view typically contains Use Case diagrams. All other views use this view to guide them. Why is it called the 4 + 1 instead of just 5? Well this is because of the special significance the use case view has. When all other views are finished, it's effectively redundant. However, all other views would not be possible without it. It details the high levels requirements of the system. The other views detail how those requirements are realised. 4 + 1 came before UML It's important to remember the 4 + 1 approach was put forward two years before the first the introduction of UML which did not manifest in its first guise until 1997. UML is how most enterprise architectures are modelled and the 4 + 1 approach still plays a relevance to UML today. UML 2.0 has 13 different types of diagrams - each diagram type can be categorised into one of the 4 + 1 views. UML is 4 + 1 friendly! So is it important? The 4 + 1 approach isn't just about satisfying different stakeholders. It makes modelling easier to do because it makes it easier to organise. A typical project will contain numerous diagrams of the various types. For example, a project may contain a few hundred sequence diagrams and several class diagrams. Grouping diagrams of similar types and purpose means there is an emphasis in separating concerns. Sure isn't it just the same with Java? Grouping Java classes of similar purpose and related responsibilities into packages means organisation is better. Similarly, grouping different components into different jar files means organisation is better. Modelling tools will usually support the 4 + 1 approach and this means projects will have templates for how to split the various types of diagrams. In a company when projects follow industry standard templates again it means things are better organised. The 4 + 1 approach also provides a way for architects to be able to prioritise modelling concerns. It is rare that a project will have enough time to model every single diagram possible for an architecture. Architects can prioritise different views. For example, for a business domain intensive project it would make sense to prioritise the logical view. In a project with high concurrency and complex timing it would make sense to ensure the process view gets ample time. Similarly, the 4 + 1 approach makes it possible for stakeholders to get the parts of the model that are relevant to them. References: Architectural Blueprints—The “4+1” View Model of Software Architecture Paper http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~gregor/teaching/papers/4+1view-architecture.pdf Learning UML 2.0 by Russ Miles & Kim Hamilton. O'Reilly From http://dublintech.blogspot.com/2011/05/41-view-model-of-software-architecture.html

Neo4j is a high-performance, NOSQL graph database with all the features of a mature and robust database. In this post I will explain how to deploy a neo4j instance in Amazon EC2 web service. For this tutorial to take you no more than 10 minutes you should be able to execute properly some bash commands like mv, tar, ssh and scp (secure copy). I also assume that you have an account in Amazon Web Services and you are familiar to the process of launching instances. If not, I strongly recommend you to follow this starting guide and complete it till you manage to connect to your instance with ssh. Start downloading the latest stable version of neo4j. Which you can find here. The “Community Edition” fits well for development purposes. Do not forget to select the Unix version of the server. This will download a tar.gz file which you will copy to your EC2 instance later. While you download the neo4j server open the AWS Management Console and launch a Basic 32-bit Amazon Linux AMI. If you want to launch an Ubuntu AMI please notice that it doesn’t ship with Java, which is required for running neo4j. If you are not familiar with key pairs, pem files or security groups I insist you to follow the EC2 starting guide I mentioned above. You can either create a new security group or use the default, but you will need to configure a new security rule for the neo4j server port. After launching the instance, create a TCP rule on port 7474 with source 0.0.0.0/0. Here you are opening port 7474 for anyone. If you are planning to use the neo4j REST API and remotely call it from another server, for example a Rails application hosted in Heroku, for security reasons, you may want to change the source field to the address of your Heroku server. Do not forget to open port 22 (SSH), this is typically the first rule normal people create after launching an instance. You are almost done! You should now install neo4j in your instance. Open a terminal in your localhost and navigate to the path where you downloaded neo4j. Copy the file to your Amazon instance by using the scp command: scp -i your_pem_file.pem neo4j-community-1.6.M01-unix.tar.gz ec2-user@YOUR_PUBLIC_INSTANCE_DNS:/home/ec2-user Please notice that you will need to change the path to your pem file, typically placed in ~/.ssh, the filename of the neo4j server you just downloaded and the plublic DNS of your instance. Now connect to your instance with SSH: ssh -i your_pem_file.pem ec2-user@YOUR_PUBLIC_INSTANCE_DNS Untar the neo4j server: tar xvfz neo4j-community-1.6.M01-unix.tar.gz.tar.gz Move it to /usr/local and rename the folder to neo4j: sudo mv neo4j-community-1.6.M01 /usr/local/neo4j Almost done!!! You should now open neo4j-server.properties under the conf directory and add the following line: org.neo4j.server.webserver.address=0.0.0.0 This lines allows anyone to connect remotely to your neo4j database server. Now run the start script. From the neo4j server folder. sudo ./bin/neo4j start Finally, open a browser and access the webadmin interface of your neo4j database by typing http://YOUR_PUBLIC_INSTANCE_DNS:7474. You should see the Neo4j Monitoring and Management Tool, pretty cool! If not, ask me You can now try using the REST API and the curl bash command to insert nodes and relationships. I hope this post helped you, good luck! Follow me on Twitter @negarnil Source: http://www.cloudtmp.com/java/how-to-deploy-a-neo4j-instance-in-amazon-ec2-in-10-minutes/

So you're still interested in unit testing JavaScript (good). This post is an extension of my much more indepth first posting on how to unit test JavaScript using JS Test Driver. Please check it out here. Recap Last Posting In the last posting we successfully unit tested JavaScript using Maven and JsTest Driver. This allowes us to test JavaScript when on an environment that has a modern browser installed and can be run. Problem with typical CI environments So what happens when the test are passing on your local box, but you go to check in your code and the Continuous Integration (CI) server pukes on the new tests becasue there is no "screen" to run chrome or firefox? As of this posting, none of the top-tier browsers have a "headless" or an in-memory only browser window. There are alternatives to running JavaScript in a browser, such as rhino.js, env.js or HtmlUnit, however, these are just ports of browsers and the JavaScript and DOM representation are not 100% accurate which can lead to problems with your code when rendered in a client's browser. Approach What we need to do is to run JSTestDriver's browser in a Virtual X Framebuffer (Xvfb) which is possible on nearly all Linux based systems. The example below uses a Solaris version of Linux, however, Debian and RedHat linux distrubutions come with the simplified bash script to easily run an appliation in a virtual framebuffer. This solution was derived from one posted solution on the JS Test Driver wiki. The given example is also a full working example that is in use at my current client. Here is the quick list of what we will accomplish. Note, several of these steps are discussed in depth in the previous post and are not covered in depth here. Create a profile to run Js Unit-Tests Copy JsTestDriver library to a known location for Maven to use Copy JavaScript main and test files to known locations Use ANT to start JsTestDriver and pipe the screen into xvfb Here is a sample profile to use. You will need to adjust the properties at the top of the profile to match your system. ci-jstests /opt/swf/bin/firefox 1.3.2 /opt/X11R6/xvfb-run org.apache.maven.plugins maven-dependency-plugin 2.1 copy generate-resources copy com.google.jstestdriver jstestdriver ${js-test-driver.version} jar true jsTestDriver.jar ${project.build.directory}/jstestdriver false true maven-resources-plugin 2.4.3 copy-main-files generate-test-resources copy-resources ${project.build.directory}/test-classes/main-js src/main/webapp/scripts false copy-test-files generate-test-resources copy-resources ${project.build.directory}/test-classes/test-js src/test/webapp/scripts false org.apache.maven.plugins maven-antrun-plugin 1.6 test run Possible problems Although I cannot predict or fix all problems, I can share the one major problem I ran into with Solaris and the script used to fix that. In Solaris (and could happen to other distros) the xvfb-run script was not available and several of the other libraries did not exist. I first had to download the latest X libraries and place them in their appropriate locations on the CI server. Next, I had to re-engineer the xvfb-run script. Here is a copy of my script (NOTE: This is the solution for my server and this may not work for you) I created a script that contains: /usr/openwin/bin/Xvfb :1 screen 0 1280x1024x8 pixdepths 8 24 fbdir /tmp/.X11-vbf & From http://www.ensor.cc/2011/08/maven-javascript-unit-test-running-in.html

This is the sixth of a series of articles about setting up a secure RESTful Web Service using Spring 3.1 and Spring Security 3.1. A previous article introduced security in the context of a RESTful service, using form-based authentication. This article will focus on configuration of Basic and Digest authentication and on configuring both protocols for the same URI mapping of the API, using Spring Security 3.1. The REST with Spring series: Part 1 – Bootstrapping a web application with Spring 3.1 and Java based Configuration Part 2 – Building a RESTful Web Service with Spring 3.1 and Java based Configuration Part 3 – Securing a RESTful Web Service with Spring Security 3.1 Part 4 – RESTful Web Service Discoverability Part 5 – REST Service Discoverability with Spring Configuration of Basic Authentication In part 3 of the series, the Spring Security configuration was done using form based authentication, which is not really ideal for a RESTful service. To start setting up basic authentication, first we remove the old custom entry point and filter from the main security element: Note how support for basic authentication has been added with a single configuration line – – which handles the creation and wiring of both the BasicAuthenticationFilter and the BasicAuthenticationEntryPoint. Satisfying the stateless constraint – getting rid of sessions One of the main constraints of the RESTful architectural style is that the client-server communication is fully stateless, as the original dissertation reads: 5.1.3 Stateless We next add a constraint to the client-server interaction: communication must be stateless in nature, as in the client-stateless-server (CSS) style of Section 3.4.3 (Figure 5-3), such that each request from client to server must contain all of the information necessary to understand the request, and cannot take advantage of any stored context on the server. Session state is therefore kept entirely on the client. The concept of Session on the server is one with a long history in Spring Security, and removing it entirely has been difficult until now, especially when configuration was done by using the namespace. However, Spring Security 3.1 augments the namespace configuration with a new stateless option for session creation, which effectively guarantees that no session will be created or used by Spring. What this new option does is completely removes all session related filters from the security filter chain, ensuring that authentication is performed for each request. Configuration of Digest Authentication Starting with the previous configuration, the filter and entry point necessary to set up digest authentication will be defined as beans. Then, the digest entry point will override the one created by behind the scenes. Finally, the custom digest filter will be introduced in the security filter chain using the after semantics of the security namespace to position it directly after the basic authentication filter. Unfortunately there is no support in the security namespace to automatically configure the digest authentication the way basic authentication can be configured with . Because of that, the necessary beans had to be defined and wired manually into the security configuration. Supporting both authentication protocols in the same RESTful service Basic or Digest authentication alone can be easily implemented in Spring Security 3.x; it is supporting both of them for the same RESTful web service, on the same URI mappings that introduces a new level of complexity into the configuration and testing of the service. Anonymous request With both basic and digest filters in the security chain, the way a anonymous request – a request containing no authentication credentials (Authorization HTTP header) – is processed by Spring Security is – the two authentication filters will find no credentials and will continue execution of the filter chain. Then, seeing how the request wasn’t authenticated, an AccessDeniedException is thrown and caught in the ExceptionTranslationFilter, which commences the digest entry point, prompting the client for credentials. The responsibilities of both the basic and digest filters are very narrow – they will continue to execute the security filter chain if they are unable to identify the type of authentication credentials in the request. It is because of this that Spring Security can have the flexibility to be configured with support for multiple authentication protocols on the same URI. When a request is made containing the correct authentication credentials – either basic or digest – that protocol will be rightly used. However, for an anonymous request, the client will get prompted only for digest authentication credentials. This is because the digest entry point is configured as the main and single entry point of the Spring Security chain; as such digest authentication can be considered the default. Request with authentication credentials A request with credentials for Basic authentication will be identified by the Authorization header starting with the prefix “Basic”. When processing such a request, the credentials will be decoded in the basic authentication filter and the request will be authorized. Similarly, a request with credentials for Digest authentication will use the prefix “Digest” for it’s Authorization header. Testing both scenarios The tests will consume the REST service by creating a new resource after authenticating with either basic or digest: @Test public void givenAuthenticatedByBasicAuth_whenAResourceIsCreated_then201IsReceived(){ // Given // When Response response = given() .auth().preemptive().basic( ADMIN_USERNAME, ADMIN_PASSWORD ) .contentType( HttpConstants.MIME_JSON ).body( new Foo( randomAlphabetic( 6 ) ) ) .post( this.paths.getFooURL() ); // Then assertThat( response.getStatusCode(), is( 201 ) ); } @Test public void givenAuthenticatedByDigestAuth_whenAResourceIsCreated_then201IsReceived(){ // Given // When Response response = given() .auth().digest( ADMIN_USERNAME, ADMIN_PASSWORD ) .contentType( HttpConstants.MIME_JSON ).body( new Foo( randomAlphabetic( 6 ) ) ) .post( this.paths.getFooURL() ); // Then assertThat( response.getStatusCode(), is( 201 ) ); } Note that the test using basic authentication adds credentials to the request preemptively, regardless if the server has challenged for authentication or not. This is to ensure that the server doesn’t need to challenge the client for credentials, because if it did, the challenge would be for Digest credentials, since that is the default. Conclusion This article covered the configuration and implementation of both Basic and Digest authentication for a RESTful service, using mostly Spring Security 3.0 namespace support as well as some new features added by Spring Security 3.1. In the next articles I will focus on OAuth authentication. In the meantime, check out the github project. From the REST with Spring series.

// A fairly generic method to store arrays and also to add them to a pool to reverse lookup their ids based on values that they contain. This method extends my own redis client but will work for the better clients out there such as predis. class storage extends redis { public function save($key, array $object, $timestamp=true){ $timestamp && $object['timestamp'] = date('Ymdhis'); $id = $this->incr('id:'.$key); foreach ($object as $k => $v) { $this->sadd(sprintf("%s:%s:%s", $key, $k, $v), $id); } $key = sprintf("%s:%s", $key, $id); $this->hmset($key, $object); } }

Develop your own API service for your PHP projects.

For most large web applications, uptime is of foremost importants. Any outage can be seen by customers as a frustration, or opportunity to move to a competitor. What's more for a site that also includes e-commerce, it can mean real lost sales. Zero Downtime describes a site without service interruption. To achieve such lofty goals, redundancy becomes a critical requirement at every level of your infrastructure. If you're using cloud hosting, are you redundant to alternate availability zones and regions? Are you using geographically distributed load balancing? Do you have multiple clustered databases on the backend, and multiple webservers load balanced. All of these requirements will increase uptime, but may not bring you close to zero downtime. For that you'll need thorough testing. The solution is to pull the trigger on sections of your infrastructure, and prove that it fails over quickly without noticeable outage. The ultimate test is the outage itself. Sean Hull on Quora: What is zero downtime and why is it important? Source: http://www.iheavy.com/2011/06/23/zero-downtime-what-is-it-and-why-is-it-important/